[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 73 KB, 701x598, scidowner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079469 No.3079469 [Reply] [Original]

._.

>> No.3079504
File: 211 KB, 4877x4500, sigh2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079504

>mfw I'm exactly like this

>> No.3079513
File: 75 KB, 700x581, SCI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079513

>> No.3079521

>>3079513
ok, THERE we go. much more accurate.

>> No.3079533

>>3079513
Trust EK to reduce everything to a God debate. You're so boring

>> No.3079536
File: 57 KB, 701x598, dandowner3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079536

http://www.explosm.net/comics/2402/

>> No.3079537

>>3079533
Whoops meant to post with this name

>> No.3079541

>>3079533
i was taking the piss...
/sci/ - religion and trolling.

>> No.3079547

>>3079541
God, even your piss taking is the same as your regular conversation. You're so boring.

>> No.3079549

>>3079536
ah, i thought the one with /sci/ was the original..

>> No.3079551
File: 5 KB, 251x188, o_o (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079551

>mfw EK's version is actually better

Now if only you'd stop making such STUPID comments, you might actually become tolerable...

>> No.3079553
File: 3 KB, 203x210, 1267796775529.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079553

>>3079547
well my sincere opologies, i must endeavour to be more entertaining in the future...

>> No.3079552

fucking tripfags

>> No.3079557

>>3079553
better yet, stop posting

>> No.3079562
File: 19 KB, 400x400, sigh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079562

>>3079553
make sure that you do

>> No.3079565
File: 44 KB, 252x159, 1279499978932.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079565

>mfw I already strongly related with this comic before it was altered.

>> No.3079570
File: 23 KB, 429x410, 1273937366953.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079570

>>3079562
[insert witty retort here]

>> No.3079630

>>3079570
I don't get it

>> No.3079642

>>3079630
then insert a retort that is only slightly witty, so that you can still understand it. =p

>> No.3079643

>OH LOOK AT US WE'RE SO TRAGICALLY INTELLIGENT, OH THE CURSE OF BEING FAMILIAR WITH SCIENCE AND THEREFORE SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER PEOPLE

ITT: 4CHAN OMEGA MALES ATTEMPT TO BOLSTER THEIR SELF WORTH BY PLAYING THE TRAGIC GENIUS

ENJOY UR WORTHLESS BACHELOR DEGREE IN SCIENCE AND NEVER ACTUALLY GETTING ANY RESEARCH PUBLISHED

>> No.3079646

>>3079643
and omega females =p

>> No.3079657

>>3079646
Omega eunoch here

>> No.3079661

>>3079646
>>3079646
nobody thinks you're a girl. you can stop now, the joke's over.

>> No.3079664

>>3079646
>Implying you're female

Tits or STFU.

>> No.3079665

>>3079643
How do you figure? Nothing about this suggests that anyone believes themselves to be more intelligent than anyone else. However, those are scientifically inclined are likely to have a better grasp on the problems the twentieth century is facing. If I spend 6+ hours a day worrying about things like this, and I see a comic such as this one, I'll chuckle and relate to it. It has nothing to do with self-importance.

>> No.3079668

>>3079657
eunochs are still male.

>> No.3079673

>>3079668

As are you. Tits or GTFO.

>> No.3079678
File: 92 KB, 1024x1220, iwontdowhatusay.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079678

>> No.3079679
File: 20 KB, 429x420, george-costanza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3079679

>>3079673
>Tits or GTFO.

>thinks this is /b/

>> No.3079699

>>3079679
even on /b/ femanons usually don't obey mysogynistic cunt randomers that are ordering them to expose themselves.

>> No.3079695

>>3079679
>whiteknighting an imaginary female
>tripfag

Opinion disregarded.

>> No.3079703

>>3079695
it isn't whiteknighting. you think just coz i'm female it counts as whiteknighting?
whereas if i was male it would just be one person agreeing with another?
...deluded.

>> No.3079709

>>3079699
>>3079703

You were the one who chose to make a big deal about your supposed sex. Now prove it or STFU, this is a science board after all.

>> No.3079712

>>3079703
That is pretty much the defining trait of white knighting. I'm not who you're responding to, just sayin'.

>> No.3079717

>>3079695
What's wrong with whiteknighting? I love EK and she loves me and one day we will get married and have lots of children.

>3079699

True but the notion is permitted

>> No.3079733

>>3079699

Actually, you'd be surprised how often it works.

You don't go to /b/ for advice if you're looking for an answer that respects your feelings.

>>3079712

I thought the definition of whiteknighting was that the person didn't really agree and was only doing it for perceived future benefits?

Otherwise it would be impossible to agree with a femanon ever. And EK is sometimes right.

>> No.3079742

>>3079709

actually i wasn't referring to myself anyway. i meant femanons in general, because the poster had specifically only said 'males' when there are females here.
OP who had an arranged marriage in that other thread is also female...

>> No.3079769

>>3079742
Why can't you just conform to a stereotype like a good /sci/drone.

>> No.3079780

>>3079742
>Implying this is the first thread you have ever posted in
>Implying you don't consistently derail threads with your e-gina

It's boring, you're boring. Either STFU and never bring it up again, or provide timestamped tits.

>> No.3079936

>>3079780
i'm not going to post photo's of myself.
so be it, i won't bring it up again.