/sci/ - Science & Math

Don't even think about posting in this thread

because speciation

because we didnt evolve from monkeys, what happened was aliens came here 200,000 years ago (you'd call them Angels) and they advanced monkey DNA by millions of years and created the first humans.
This is why there are still monkeys because they are millions of years behind us.

>>3001416
why didnt you sage
why

because you fuck your mother

>>3001425

sage is for faggots, if you dont like this thread DONT FUCKING READ IT.

not hard is it?

>>3001434
it's a troll thread, newfriend. get lost.

>>3001416
>judaism orginiated in iron age
>200,000 years ago
>angels

I don't think so Tim.jpg

>>3001434

stop fucking your mother. You're hurting her.

>>3001448
>implying there was no concept of angels before judaism

catfish aren't kosher, because they don't have scales

>>3001442

>implying you cant have a good laugh in a troll thread

>implying there arent stupid people in the world who make these threads

Because fish and monkeys are sinners and don't deserved the gracey of God to evolved into humuns

>>3001456
(_(_/////D suck my penis faggot gobble that shit up real good u gigantic nigger fuck you fucking faggot

>>3001397
>implying we didn't evolve from fish, in a symbolic way

"Hi 'Im George Bush and Im all the proof you need that humans are a very close relation to the chimp"

>>3001471
OH SNAP.

sure is /b/ up in here

>>3001467

>suck my penis you faggot

hmm whats wrong with this sentence? have a good think about it.

>>3001471

I can't tell if troll, or just very stupid...

>>3001397

They were successful in their respective realms, but fish also found out that there's a lot of food on the surface, so they developed lungs etc., some of them evolved into apes. Some of these apes turned into monkey, some turned into humans, some stayed more or less the way they were, everything with respect to their territory.

Why is this so hard to grasp for some people (and i'm not even rigorous here)?

>>3001484
I have actually seen this one on people's cars.

people are so paranoid on 4chan about being trolled all the time,

protip: the majority of the population really is stupid and say stupid things all the time.

>>3001507

We'd like to maintain our slightly naive but unrealistic world view here, thanks.

>>3001502
How did fish find food on the surface if they couldn't survive out of the ocean?

>>3001506

Yeah me too. Wish i had one of those.

SPECIATION IS RETARDED HOW DOES IT OCCOUR IF THEY ARE PERFECTLY FINE WITH TTHEIR CURRENT SURROUNDINGS? ANIMALS JUST DONT GO WANDERING OFF NORTH WHERE ITS COLD! THEY WOULD STAY WERE THEY WERE PUT. NATURAL SELECTION = BULLSHIT BEYOND BEEILF I CANNOT BELIEVE PEPOLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS SHIT

>>3001520

By looking over the top for a short time.

Those who were capable of staying longer above see level found more food, got an advantage through that and evolved to be able to live on the surface, first in amphibian form, later in surface-only form.

>>3001527

I think your caps-lock key is activated.

So if your fridge is empty, you just stay there waiting for your death instead of going to the supermarket buying the stuff you need?

>>3001520
check out this cool flying fish.

fish also jump out of the water to eat bugs and other morsels.

see where Im going with this?

>>3001534
OK YOU ARE SORT OF PROVING MY OTHER POINT HERE
SO NO FOOD = LEAVE
SO THEY LEAVE RIGHT? NOW THE ENTIRE SPECIES HAS LEFT TO GO NORTH
NONE LEFT TO CONTINUE THE SPECIES
YOUR LOGIC IS SERVIALY FLAWED MY GOOD MAND

>>3001534
I think you forgot to add that all of his punctuation keys seems to be broken

>>3001522
As a Christian, I must admit that a flying spaghetti monster car emblem is actually prett clever and hilarious.

>>3001534
lots of people on 4chan actually might if their mothers didn't go shopping and refill it for them.

>>3001555
IM STILL WAITING U SCARED OF MY CLEARLY SURPERIOR MIND SON?

>>3001555

Well, no. In the case of curious fish finding food above water level, this is not the case. Species only leave completely if there is no food source at all left.
Other fish ate other types of fish for example, while the ones on water level were more into vegan stuff, you know? Different fish like different food, just like humans.

>>3001575

Nono, i'm just feeling a bit down because you yell at me all the time. I can cope with that i guess, so don't worry.

>>3001575

Only the fish with successive and successful mutation which allowed increased time out of water were able to exploit their new environment.

Other succesful fish were selected for different traits which allowed improved survival chances in their aquatic environment.

>>3001473
"Hi 'Im Barack Hussein Obongo and Im all the proof you need that humans are a very close relation to the chimp"

>>3001595
OK SO THE FISH GETS AN MUTATION RIGHT?
SO ITS MUTATED NOW WHAT? SUDDENLY THE ENTIRE SPECIES RELATED TO IT GETS MUTATED AS WELL? COME ON NOW

fish breathe oxygen, they dont breathe "water" .. they could get onto the land, eat whatever attracted them, and get back in.

<--- this little guy has mastered it

0/10
Trolls like this don't work on /sci/. People know how science works, and how completely invalid your point is.

>>3001604

No it doesn't, that's the point. You said suddenly all the fish were gone, which isn't true.

So i guess you get it now?

>>3001555
>>3001575

there is nothing more retarded than watching 2 caps locked trolltards have an argument.

its like seing a bus crash of disabled kids, its horrifying and yet you have to watch.

>>3001604

There's nothing sudden about it, offspring of the initial mutant could be likely to carry the gene and increase their own survival outside of water.

It could have taken many thousands of generations
of fish, each being selected by their capacity to prosper in the new environment, in order to eventually produce very early amphibian offspring.

OK BUT HOW DOES HE PASS HIS MUTATION I DONT UNDERSTAND THIS

>>3001621
OMG I UNDERSTAND

>>3001622

Through germ cells i.e. ova/sperm.

>>3001620

Um, i believe those were the same guy.

>>3001616
You sure? This thread so far has proven otherwise.

>>3001620
HEY FAGGOT IM JUST TRYING TO LEARN HERE GIVE ME A BREAK U HOMOSEXUAL EVERYONE HAS TO START SOMEWHERE U ELITIST DONK

Only a fraction of fish branched off to evolve to monkeys and only a fraction of those monkeys branched off to evolve into humans.

boo,p

>>3001642

OK lesson #1 .. turn off the caps lock as its considered shouting and makes you look 10 years old.

>>3001650

In actuality monkeys, as we would recognise them, never evolved in humans at all.

Our common ancestor was similar to modern lemurs. We share this common ancestor with all of the great apes.

>>3001650

> monkey evolved into humans

>>3001529
See, this doesn't make sense to me.
Mutations occur during reproduction making the next generation, so how would the fish that found the land food pass that knowledge on to the chromosomes of it's offspring so it would know to start growing legs? Also wouldn't it take several generations for the full mutation to be completely present, meaning they would die off from lack of food before getting to use it?

>>3001673
*ugh, into humans

>>3001645
Damn.. You're right. I didn't read all the comments from people who actually took this seriously before posting.

>>3001676
>>3001673
But it's true, monkeys are a generic name for a bunch of different species of small primates which is a fairly accurate description of distant human ancestors, they weren't any species that are around today but they were monkeys.

>>3001679

We shouldn't be talking in terms of absolutes.

Dwindling food supplies might provide an avenue for speciation, a total lack of food would be catastrophic.

>>3001689

I concur, however its easier to utilise a model which doesn't immediately result in the question, But why are there still monkeys...?"

darwinbump

If being a CEO makes the most money why aren't we all CEOs? Why do we have janitors, interns and average workers, salary employees, mid managers and lower level executives?

This question is directly analogous to OPs and should show how absurd OPs question is.

If bald people come from people with hair, why are there still people with hair?

If broken cars come from working cars, why are there still working cars?

If old people come from young people, why are there still young people?