/sci/ - Science & Math

Probably because most modern innovations are financially driven.That is, they are created with the intent on making money.

So in a way, the stupidity of society rewards us intellectual types by consuming goods that are perishable (more money that way), but that really shouldn't be perishable! :D

Bumping, and Name-fagging, because I am not Anonymous.

-Edrick

So...gay dudes are like geniuses, basically?

>breeding age females that are not obsessed with social status and the so called "Alpha" males?
wtf is that
does is have a name?
where was it first discovered?
citation please

>the more intelligent you are, the less success you have with women

Correction: the more intelligent and HONEST you are, the less success you have with women

If you are adept at spinning lies and not torturing yourself about it afterwards, you can do quite well with the ladies.

>>2946239
If I have to crush your fucking soul, I will do so.

-Edrick

>>2946251
Science requires Honesty... therefore progress requires honesty... my original point still stands.

-Edrick

not really a correlation between intelligence and success with women (I would require charts to accept such a stupid notion). You are think of people who possess an extreme intelligence at the cost of social skills. Most of these people could probably be diagnosed as having some form of autism. Another point mentioning is that perhaps those of us with above average intelligence have the desire to achieve some academic success in some form or another and have had to let certain other aspects of our life fall to the wayside...by choice not by some asocial disorder

Please...talk to me. I'm so lonely.

-Edrick

Please?

-Edrick

Not even sure if i could even honestly do well with a woman, to busy being awesome.

Not to mention thinking everything she had interesting in was pathetic while her being incapable of even comprehending a single interest of mine.

>why don't people act according to my narrow-minded and over-simplified understanding of humanity

>>2946285
Regardless, the amount of time spent on gaining skills to maintain society, and thus keep anarchy from rearing it's head, is taken from maintaining relationships, as is the case with the studies that equate hard core science and math occupations (and their college curriculum's) with virginity.

Therefore, the more intelligent one is, the more one feels a need to use their talents to maintain a society that basically fucks them in the ass.

>>2946292
Look at me, I'm bored and lonley on the internet, and instead of inducing some thought proviking discussion, I am going to attempt to feel better about myself by using social manipulation to make someone else feel bad, and thus increase my anonymous social standing, as my instincts dictate, because I am a monkey who has no idea why I do what I do.... and also, I am a clique-fag.

straight out of highschool! (Pic is for you)

-Edrick

>>2946181
Who the fuck comes up with this shit?

>I'm smart!
>I can't hold a conversation with women!
>Therefore, all smart people can't hold a conversation with women!
Jesus Christ, don't shit up this place more with your 15 year old nihilism.

>>2946307
Don't start none, if you don't feel like you can finish none, asswipe.

-Edrick (captcha: analsomp setting)

tldr
you sound like some butthurt nerd faggot who is just upset he cant get laidand now compares everyone normal to animals or something LOL

good thing you wont pass on your awful genes bro

Today my friend showed me a new way to fold a paper airplane using lined paper instead of typical printer/copier paper. It was really neat.

I don't contribute to society though, I just sit around playing videogames and browsing 4chan while telling myself I'm just too intelligent for those normal people so I can sleep better at night.

>implying that people with above average intelligence don't have meaningful relationships, get laid and even get married and start families

for fucks sake, even that cripple hawking has been in romantic relationships

hey guys im a 19 old nerd virgin and i feel guilty when i fap because i cant get pussy. therefore all intelligent people cant get pussy

>>2946350

back again,

>you know you're a disgrace to humanity when you refer to women as 'females'.

hahahaha what a mess bro,clean your act up.


virgin.

>the less success you have with women
What exactly are you implying with this?
What do you consider to be success with women?
If success with women is fucking a bunch of random club bitches that I'll never see again then yes, I suppose I'm unsuccessful. However, intelligent females don't want a guy who fucks club whores, they want an intelligent and insightful male. Reevaluate what you considering to be "success".

>>2946333
Your assumptions lend credance to your low intelligence.

4chan is a popular place, and thus, being bored, you feel that your normal clique activities would entertain you....

You seem to think you have found anouther victum to your social derisions.

You are mistaken, Miss.

If it don't apply to you, then don't respond to it, you self centered Animal.

Honestly... if it don't apply to you, then it just simply don't exist, eh?

Go eat a mound of termites, asswipe, I'm trying to express something.

>>2946339
I'm terribly sorry that you cannot comprehend a perspective that is not your own, but I assure you, that it is not my fucking problem.

Pleas step the fuck away, before I have to explain to you, in detail, why you will never accomplish anything of note with your life that anyone will remember after you are dead and buried.

-Edrick

Edrick's face gets red when he gets angry!

Watch out!

Are you supposed to be on the computer this late?

>>2946368
You are becoming upset. Don't try to argue it, it is apparent in your post.
However, your anger to your ill-received post is irrelevant.
You are using two relatively undefined terms. One is assuming there is a gold standard for intelligence. The second is assuming that once you've reached this standard you are less capable of dealing with the opposite sex. To me it seems that if someone is truly intelligent, they would use their mental prowess to devise ways (through observation and common sense) to charm the opposite sex with relative ease. I speak from experience, apply your intelligence to the problem and it becomes a non-issue. It also demolishes any correlation between intelligence and unsuccessful sex life, and leaves no room for causality.

>>2946368

Of course anyone who can't figure out women would be enthralled by them.

>>2946368

Thank god you're kept away from normal people.

>>2946181
What else am I going to do, wallow in my own self pity?

>>2946386
Yes, exactly... because the absolute only use of intelligence is in having sex with women.

Your intelligence is astounding, please, by all means, regale us with your further wisdom, on this global computer network of communications that was constructed solely through skill at seducing members of the opposite sex.

Fucking moron.

-Edrick

Men have plenty success with women as intelligent as they are, problem arises when the women aren't.

>implying there are more intelligent men than women if OP is correct

>>2946404
The ultimate use of intelligense surely isn't seducing young females, but it is better to be intelligent and fuck bitches than being intelligent and forever alone

>>2946405
There are, actually... because there is more variance in intellect in men than there are in women, it is a part of biology and reproductive strategies.

Men have more intelligent, and stupid population, women are more average, because they are what keeps the population from mutating too rapidly.

Check wiki on intelligence and gender variations. I'm sure that you will be surprised.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_intelligence

-Edrick

>>2946368

Edrick,this is your father speaking.

Get off the personal computing device right this instant.

You will also be attending boarding school from tomorrow onwards.

>>2946404

You are fucking stupid and you're missing the point, and I didn't even post >>2946386

>>2946405
>implying that mean of the distribution of female IQ isn't lower than the mean of the distribution of male IQ

>and if you are here and not a troll, I'm sure that you agree
>implying you're not a troll.

>>2946424

I lol'd, hard.

>>2946404
>Implying I said that intelligence could only be used to acquire sex.
>Implying I even IMPLIED that to the slightest degree.
No. Fool. I said that intelligence COULD be applied to the problem and the problem could be remedied through this method with small amounts of effort. However, it is now strikingly apparent that the issue has nothing to do with whether or not you're intelligent. The reason you're unsuccessful is because you're a stand-offish cunt.

Considering your only argument to me was
>I didn't understand what you said.
and
>Sarcastic non-argument.
I suppose I'll accept that as your withdrawal from this discussion.

>>2946424
>>2946430
me too

>>2946424
Don''t make me kill you *AGAIN* Dad...

>>2946435
>No. Fool. I said that intelligence COULD be applied to the
>problem and the problem could be remedied through this method >with small amounts of effort.

Yeah, exactly.... because women are completely happy with a guy who tries, and will never try to always one up... or look for the better deal while in a committed relationship!

LOL, you are too funny!

>I suppose I'll accept that as your withdrawal from this discussion.

Yeah... you don't know me son...

-Edrick

Go back to fapping, Edrick. It's no wonder you fail to get laid with this kind of ideas.

I take it you are either not as smart as you think you are or you're just fucking ugly/fat to begin with, because I manage to browse /sci, study medicine and read math books while getting laid at the same time.

Hit the gym.

If intelligence was undesirable/if intelligent people didn't fuck it would die out due to natural selection

inb4 intelligence is not mostly genetic

>>2946448
>because I manage to browse /sci, study medicine and read math >books while getting laid at the same time.

What medicine do you study?

What interesting original thoughts have you had regarding medicine, etcetera?

You aren't just reading pamphlets, are you? LOL!

-Edrick (Prove it Bitch!)

Wowsers trousers.

Yesterday there was a guy who wanted people to desperately agree with him that suicide was a game-theory optimal solution to life because his life was shit.

Now there's this asshole who wants people to agree that intelligence is inversly proportionate to success this women, probably to feel better about his shit life.

>>2946441
>Yeah... you don't know me son...
Oh, so you're one of those fools that will sit there and continue to be ripped apart by a casual level of scrutiny? Hmm, it seems the internet is abound with your type.

>Yeah, exactly.... because women are completely happy with a guy who tries, and will never try to always one up... or look for the better deal while in a committed relationship!
Well, while that doesn't actually address anything I said, I suppose I'll humor you with a response to it regardless.
If you are truly a pragmatic mind then the ins and outs of the human reproductive game really aren't that difficult to get a grasp on. It isn't simply "trying" it is putting effort in the right places. Furthermore, you have yet to define what you consider "success" thus it is impossible to actually call you out on some of your nonsense.
Your statement was on the general nature of women in relationships and has absolutely nothing to do with the respective intelligence level of their partner.

>>2946462
>Oh, so you're one of those fools that will sit there and continue
>to be ripped apart by a casual level of scrutiny?

Oh, because you said it, it must be true.. LOL!

You are too fucking stupid for your own good, honestly!

XD

>Well, while that doesn't actually address anything I said,

(Like it mattered)

>I suppose I'll humor you with a response to it regardless.

(I am far from humored)

>If you are truly a pragmatic mind then the ins and outs of
>the human reproductive game really aren't that difficult to
>get a grasp on. It isn't simply "trying" it is putting effort in
>the right places.

Yes, exactly... it is about putting more effort into pleasing women than every other guy on the planet.

As opposed to learning how to keep society running... unless you think that the civilization fairies are what keep you alive?

LOL!

>Furthermore, you have yet to define what
>you consider "success"

Reproduction, and raising your children, as opposed to raising someone else's children, or siring children without getting to raise them.

>thus it is impossible to actually call
>you out on some of your nonsense.
>Your statement was on the general nature of women in >relationships and has absolutely nothing to do with the respective >intelligence level of their partner.

And that statement has absolutely no meaning in regards to this discussion, you are proving to be more ignorant than I had previously assumed.

-Edrick

>>2946476
Whoops!!!

Without in the previous post = while.

-Edrick

>>2946476
Hmm, well. While you make-believe the condescending intellectual role, I'll again point out that all your points ring completely hollow and you have yet to support yourself with even poorly formed arguments. You're far to busy criticizing the person (who happens to be anonymous, as the board intended) instead of the valid counter-arguments (which I can only assume you've been unsuccessful in actually coming up with retorts, for) so I suppose I'll leave it at that.
Perhaps find a different outlet for you quest for attention? This one grows tired of you.
Also, learn how to fucking
>green text
you tard.

If you WANT pussy and CAN'T get it, well, you are just not that smart.

Intelligence is measured in many different ways. One way, is to take all your "contributions" and add them up. Another way is to add up all sex positions you can pull off.

alpha male =/= dumb. In fact, if you are speaking relative to a new generation of babies, the alpha male are more intelligent than you.

>>2946181

isn't it funny edrick that despite your so called intellectual superiority, despite how intelligent you are and will ever be.

You will always succumb one way or another to the most primitive of all human instincts, sexual desires.

>>2946482
>Hmm, well. While you make-believe the
>condescending intellectual role, I'll again
>point out that all your points ring completely
>hollow and you have yet to support yourself
>with even poorly formed arguments.

And your counter arguments, while completely relevant to my original point (not) are totally and completely tied in to the theme of this thread by their unbelievable relevancy, as opposed to their throwaway emotional appeal.

because instead of commenting on any particular point, you are merely insulting with common logical fallacies...

Did you have a particular point of contention, or was it just "You so stupid"?

Moron.


>>2946484
>Intelligence is measured in many different ways.

Yes, and meters are measure in many different ways, so are feet, and kilometers, and the speed of light....

because measurements are completely subjective experiences, and intelligence (or the ability to quickly solve logical problems) are the exact same thing as kicking a ball... you fucking tool.

Go back to studying "Body Kinesthetic intelligence" you fucking Ape.

>>2946485
>If you WANT pussy and CAN'T get it, well, you are just not that smart.

So... you are implying that WOMEN'S Sexual DESIRES are the universal judges of who is smart, and who is not?

Seriously?

Do you have down syndrome or something?

-Edrick

>>2946486
>You will always succumb one way or another to the most
>primitive of all human instincts, sexual desires.

Then why am I not using my intellectual superiority to chase tail?

-Edrick

>>2946504
because you're ugly

>Philosophy God
/sci/ shouldn't argue anymore, he has a phd in philosophy. He's the absolute truth.

>>2946499

If u were a girl I'd say if u want dick and can't get it or whatever, you know, you better go learn more about sexuality, not only human sexuality, obviously.

I often prefer to fap than to get laid with my gf, whatever.

Pleasure is just pleasure, man. That is sex, like tasty high cuisine. Not a big deal.

>>2946506
>because you're ugly

OMG, I AM SO BURNED!!!

Did you think of that yourself, or did you have to get a team of monkeys working for you?

Seriously?

Your insult is as childish as it it irrelevant.

Oh, and by the way, you are about 16 years old, and only come here because it was popular, you sheep.

  ▲
▲ ▲

-Edrick

>>2946518
>fighting an insult with an insult
>I AM SO MUCH MORE MATURE THAN THIS KID, HE MUST BE 16

>>2946517
>Pleasure is just pleasure, man. That is sex, like tasty
>high cuisine. Not a big deal.

Well, thank you for being civil... I am just worried about the future of my species, in that intelligent people are harvested for their intelligence, and the most breeding "Rights" (as they might be called) are "rewarded" (thanks ladies) to the most animalistic idiots of us all.

Thus, since IQ and intelligence is genetic, will cause the average intelligence of the species to decline, and revert our species to a level of average intelligence that can no longer maintain the society that supports us all (keeps us alive) I am scared for my species, honestly.

-Edrick

>>2946523
>OMG HE GOT MY AGE WRONG, ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK!!!!

Moron.... are you adding to the discussion, or are you trying to pad your ego, while being anonymous?

-Edrick

>>2946523
Oh, let him be. His namefagging is contained in a single thread, so for as long as he's harmless, let's sit back and amuse ourselves with his little rants.

>>2946544
>His namefagging is contained in a single thread

Yeah... you fuckers don't know me at all, apparently.

-Edrick

Maybe if you actually treated women as people instead of sticks with tits that you can feel an unjustified condescention towards, you'll have more "success". Seriously. Mentally, they're just like you and me, only with fem- in front of their -anon.

Oh, and how would you relate all this to male homosexuals? If we're off of the oh-so-mysterious and inferior sex, then does that mean that all of our love lives are instantly successful? Or are you going to pull the ignorant "homosexuals are just women in men's bodies" argument? I mean, after all, the exclusion of women seems to solve all of your problems. I'd tell you to go gay if it were possible (contrary to popular belief, it isn't), or if any reasonable gay male would ever want to be with such a stand-offish brat.

>>2946528

You're approach and perspective are the real problem.

Define intelligence? Define consciousness?

Why does 4chan, the epitome of anti-hierarchical-structures... have cliques?

-Edrick

>>2946551
> Yeah... you fuckers don't know me at all, apparently.
Um... no? Are you supposed to be someone important?

You must a retarded 16 year old who is only on this website because its popular

EVERYONE ON 4CHAN IS "Anonymous"
Only insecure little boys who nobody likes post there name thinking its cool, The fact your name is "Philosophy God" states that your young and have a massive ego to hide that you have a small dick and everyone hates you. Nobody secure in them selves state their name as that....dont be a fag and be Anonymous

>>2946564

because the truth hurts and denial is easier than acceptance.

>>2946556
>Maybe if you actually treated women as people instead of
>sticks with tits that you can feel an unjustified
>condescention towards

Oh, I'm sorry... Mea Culpa... totally...

Go ahead and explain to everyone here how you already know who I am, how I treat people and women.

No, seriously... you seem to know me better than I know myself.

Go ahead.... explain to them who I am!

>>2946560
>You're approach and perspective are the real problem.

>Define intelligence?

http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997specialissue.pdf

>Define consciousness?

Consciousness: an alert cognitive state in which you are aware of yourself and your situation

Happy?

-Edrick

>>2946181
It's because women are stupid, mostly.
And, inb4 butthurtfag, I'm a female and I am ashamed of how some women represent it.

>>2946551
>Yeah... you fuckers don't know me at all, apparently.
You're just a cookie-cutter misanthrope who hates society simply because you're unable to fit in it.

Intelligence and getting woman have nothing to do with each other, but most ppl on /sci/ aren't intelligent, they are average at best and look like shit, ofc they don't get women.

>>2946576
> he doesn't know about Philosophy God
What a peasant. Why, he's our newest celebrity! He's like a litmus test for being cool in /sci/.

In fact, he's so cool that he always puts his name at the end of every post, just in case you forgot it from the post right before it. And the one before it. How nice of him.

>>2946603
thats a really unattractive laughinggirls.jpg

>>2946576
More important than you will ever be able to comprehend, you lepton.

>>2946579

>EVERYONE ON 4CHAN IS "Anonymous"

Your statement is clearly in error.

>Only insecure little boys who nobody likes post there
>name thinking its cool

Only Complete Cock sucking fagots say what you just said.

Happy?

>>2946588
>because the truth hurts and denial is easier than acceptance.

That is not actually an answer to my question.... and to address all the lurkers, These are your enemies, who use social hierarchies as justification to destroy your ego's.

Don't let them... they are FAR too weak to even trifle yourself over....

Please, my brothers... don't let these Fecal primates rule you... You are above this.

-Edrick

>>2946594
Oh shut up, I bet you didn't even know who Philosophy God was before this thread. That's how uncool you are.

>>2946611
All my other laughinggirls got the repeated image error :S

People like laughinggirls around these parts.

>>2946592
>It's because women are stupid, mostly.
>And, inb4 butthurtfag, I'm a female and I am ashamed of
>how some women represent it.

Thank you... don't let Rockefeller and his paid minions fuck with you.

>>2946599
>Intelligence and getting woman have nothing to do with each
>other, but most ppl on /sci/ aren't intelligent, they are average at
>best and look like shit, ofc they don't get women.

Because all women are above average in looks.... you fucking idiot.

>>2946603
>In fact, he's so cool that he always puts his name at the end of
>every post, just in case you forgot it from the post right before it.
>And the one before it. How nice of him.

You are, of course... Quite welcome... Dude pretending to be 2 ladies.

>>2946610
>In fact, he's so cool that he always puts his name at the end of
>every post, just in case you forgot it from the post right before it.
>And the one before it. How nice of him.

Dude... it's Edrick... "Philosophy God" is merely a temporary title that I take upon myself to debate the current thread... please get it right!

XD

-Edrick

>>2946556
>treated women as people instead of [asinine and presumptuous simile] you'll have more "success"

It's a nice thought and all, but that really isn't very helpful at all towards that kind of success. Counter-productive, even.

It's just the nature of the beast and wishful thinking isn't going to change that.

>>2946589
You sequester yourself from women with the way you write. Your turn of phrase and attitude imply that they are "other".

And, ironically enough, you seem to be dividing people into groups quite a bit... Intelligent vs. Non-intelligent, for one. It's almost as if you're putting those you deem "intelligent" (which, as far as anyone can tell, is just you) into a... What's the word? Oh, yeah. It's almost as if you're dividing people up into CLIQUES based on sex and intelligence. But wait! You can do that because you're so obviously special.

And LOLWUT at how you touted your superiority complex without answering my question on how this relates to homosexuals. Come on, we're DYING for you to bless us with your unbridled intellect, O Philosophy God.

I'd ask you to apply this to lesbians, but it "applies to men only, obviously".

Or can your puny teenage brain not grasp those with different sexual philosophies, O Great Philosophy God?

>>2946635
> These are your enemies, who use social hierarchies as justification to destroy your ego's.

SOCIALIZING PEOPLE ARE COMING AFTER YOU.
How evil, trying to be close friends and stuff.

>>2946636
So, you are claiming that treating women as "People" is actually counter productive in getting laid?

-Edrick

>>2946647
dude, cliques are like, socialism, trying to take you down

>>2946635

>Because all women are above average in looks.... you fucking idiot.

You're obv pretty dumb and fail at reading comprehension, now pls gtfo and stop attention whooring.

>>2946648

More specifically, showing too much respect is counter-productive.

>>2946652
The Cliques are coming!

The Cliques are coming!

Who will save us from /sci/'s evil and destroying cliques? (and what's left to destroy anyway?)
Will Philosophy God save us with his importance and popularity?

>>2946528
Actually, they've had to readjust the standards for IQ tests, making them higher, several times within the past few decades. The average adult IQ is 100. It used to be much lower. Compare it to how people are actually much healthier than they were 100 years ago because of more readily availible sources of nutrition and greater calorie intake.

So you're saying that the women of society owe it to have sex with you, just because you've read a few more books than other people? The fact that you said >Preferably with breeding age females that are not obsessed with social status and the so called "Alpha" males?
shows how out of touch you are with the society you claim is in your debt.

>>2946655
>>"2946599"
>Intelligence and getting woman have nothing to do with each
>other, but most ppl on /sci/ aren't intelligent, they are average at
>best ***and look like shit***, ofc they
>don't get women.

Because all women are above average in looks.... you fucking idiot.

>You're obv pretty dumb and fail at reading
>comprehension, now pls gtfo and stop attention
>whooring.

So, all people on /sci/ are ugly... Right? Those are you words.. Whoor. XD

>>2946662
>More specifically, showing too much respect is
>counter-productive.

Interesting perspective, and.... quite what most people have experienced, despite the feminazi trolling on here... thank you for your honesty.

>>2946665
>Will Philosophy God save us with his
>importance and popularity?

Only Trololol guy can tell for sure!

LOL!

>>2946695
>So you're saying that the women of society owe
>it to have sex with you

So, you are saying that the men of society owe it to you to keep society running?

Asshat.

-Edrick

Ok, I'm out of rum.... and tired, I'll talk to you people later!

(LOLOLOLOL!!!)

-Edrick

Edrick = Cedrick?

ITT: People who will never get laid.

>>2947028
It's amusing how people who post "ITT" stuff don't realize that, by being in this thread, their ITT comment also applies to them.

>>2947037

ITT: aspergers.

>>2947049


ITT: a nigger