[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 1.45 MB, 1920x1080, 1303509685754.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933072 No.2933072 [Reply] [Original]

I was ban for "religious trolling" and just wanted to say FUCK YOU!

>> No.2933076

i was ban for 'trolling'

and i concur.

>> No.2933088

its only okay when atheists do it

>> No.2933094
File: 66 KB, 429x700, for_science.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933094

Good, let this be a lesson to you both. Keep /sci/ religion-free!

>> No.2933095

>I was ban
>trolling

>> No.2933098

Science can't dis prove GOD and someone got butthurt.

>> No.2933099

I was banned one day for posting "irrelevant" things. Banned from entire 4chan. Three days.

>> No.2933100

>>2933094
fine by me.

>>2933095
just sticking in with OP's theme...(or stealthily taking the piss out of him..you choose which)

>> No.2933106

>>2933099
lol, i have had a million of those.
'posting inane trolling garbage' is the standard ban reason.

...fuck the mods.

>> No.2933118

>>2933106

Yes you're right fuck the mods, also GOD bless you.

>> No.2933125
File: 20 KB, 582x358, 13693458.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933125

>>2933118
god bless me?
fuck that.
god is imaginary.
you may as well say "may santa claus bring you many presents next christmas"

>> No.2933126

>EK
>posting inane trolling garbage

Yep, sounds about right.

>> No.2933127

Just reset your IP you fuckin noobs.

>> No.2933144
File: 34 KB, 381x329, full_retard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933144

>>2933100
>20:39: EK agrees /sci/ should be religion-free

>>2933125
>20:46: EK rants about religion

>mfw

>> No.2933148

>>2933144
Yea. It's almost like she's a troll or something.

>> No.2933149

>>2933127
of course.
why do you think i am still here??

>>2933144
eh... yeh fine w/e
i was ranting AGAINST religion.
...problem?

>> No.2933168
File: 168 KB, 600x447, I MAD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933168

>i was ranting AGAINST religion.
>....problem?

Yes. Ranting against religion is also unacceptable. This board is for science & math, I don't want to hear about religion, no matter what stance you take. Even if Richard Dawkins himself were to post about atheism here, I would report him and hope he gets banned.

>> No.2933186

U mad OP? looks like you trolled yourself

>> No.2933193

>>2933168
what? why?
how can you simpathise with relgiousfags and they're bullshit?

>> No.2933196

>>2933193
shut the fuck up you fucking whore you know damn well what hes saying no one likes you

>> No.2933200
File: 13 KB, 417x355, 12645648.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933200

>>2933196
ahhahaha!
lol, i literally laughed out loud.
yeh, u mad!
:D

>> No.2933203

This website is fucking
>Crazy

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Feminism/feminism_is_evil.htm


I dont even know what to say about it/.

>> No.2933224

>>2933203
i approve

>> No.2933260

I was banned for racism. In a thread where I argued that races are not a concept based on biology.

>> No.2933268
File: 94 KB, 1024x768, darth-vader.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933268

>>2933260
ahahhaha!
lol, the fail is strong with this one!

>> No.2933269

>>2933200

You know, for about a week I thought you were alright. Then you started going back to your old ways.

Why do you like shitting up this place?

>> No.2933272

>>2933268

How does that make any sense whatsoever?

>> No.2933276
File: 81 KB, 720x540, trollface_irl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933276

>>2933193
EK confirmed as troll.

>> No.2933278

>>2933269
my old ways?
please do highlight your dislikes and concerns, so that i might improve myself through constructive criticism.

>>2933272
my hair is a bird, your argument is invalid.

>> No.2933281

I come to 4chan everyday and have for years. I still cannot fathom how people even notice trips.

>> No.2933285

>>2933276

No shit you fucktard.

>> No.2933290

>>2933278

Your misuse of "your", "you're", "their", "they're" and "there. Your repeated trolling of this board and your arrogant nature.

>> No.2933300
File: 7 KB, 211x175, 4colourtheoremtroll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933300

>>2933290
hehehhehe...

nothing wrong with justified arrogance anyway.

>> No.2933304

>>2933300

Your wit astounds me.

>> No.2933308

>>2933300

Tell me. Why do you do it?

>> No.2933306

>>2933300

EK do you have a youtube channel? I swear I've seen one of your vids.

>> No.2933310

>>2933304
don't worry, that happens alot.
you'll get used to it eventually.

>> No.2933311

>>2933306

That isn't EK. S/he takes them from YouTube.

>> No.2933321

>>2933310

You make me mildly lol to be honest.

Sometimes I come here when I'm sad just to remember that at least I'm not pissing my life away by badly trolling an anonymous image-board 12 hours a day.

>> No.2933330

>>2933311

ah, thanks.

>> No.2933356

>>2933321

looks like you finally got her to piss off

>> No.2933371

>>2933356
>i dont post for 8 minutes and it counts as 'pissing off'
>well_deserved_reputation.jpg

>> No.2933380

>>2933371

yet you post just after i did? id guess you were monitoring this the whole time you fucking loser

>> No.2933386

>>2933371

No answer to my claim, then?

>> No.2933393

>>2933380
hehe..perhaps.
there was nothing that needed responding to.

>> No.2933396

>>2933386
what claim?

>> No.2933397

>>2933393

At least you admit your failure.

>> No.2933401

>>2933396

The one about you being a pathetic, no-life loser.

Actually, it wasn't a claim, it's a fact.

>> No.2933404

>>2933401
ad hom = claim?
huh... w/e

>> No.2933412
File: 70 KB, 720x576, 1303179695128.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2933412

>>2933300
There's no such thing as JUSTIFIED arrogance. Arrogance by definition is when you are unjustified in your high opinion of yourself. Like Obama.

>> No.2933411

>>2933404

Do you know what an ad hominem argument is?

It's discrediting an opponent's claim based on an unrelated trait. Considering we're not even having an argument, I don't see how it could have been "ad hom".

Try again, you fat fuck.

>> No.2933422

>>2933411
i thought it was attacking the opponents persona rather than the content of they're argument.

>> No.2933429

>>2933072

Don't feel bad. Scientist was given the axe last night. His absence alone should raise the collective IQ of this board by a good 20 points.

>> No.2933431

>>2933422

Even if we use your definition, we're arguing about your persona anyway, which makes it relevant. Therefore what I say about it cannot be ad hominem.

>> No.2933435

>>2933412
arrogance: "offensive display of superiority or self-importance; overbearing pride."

nothing said about it being 'unjustified'

>> No.2933449

>>2933435

I agree. However, it does not make it appropriate.

In your case, however, it is definitely unjustified.

What do you actually succeed at? Considering you take joy in mildly irritating people on an anonymous imageboard for about 5 seconds, you can't have done much in life.

>> No.2933450

>>2933431
oh.
ok

>> No.2933452

I remember a few months ago, we had an "I love EK" thread. Nowadays, any EK post turns into a shitstorm, with no one jumping in to voice support. I'm sad to see what EK has become.

>> No.2933454

>>2933449
>What do you actually succeed at?
i'm pretty good at dancing...and math

>> No.2933463

>>2933452
relax hun, its still the same old me.

>> No.2933464

>>2933454

Yet you waste your time on here?

Even the laziest arses I know who are any good at academic subjects are working by this time of year and not wasting their time on here for more than about an hour a day. You, however, are consistently on here all day, every day.

>> No.2933471

>>2933435
Oooh, 'Bamahurt detected. But you're right, he's that, too.

>> No.2933473

>>2933464
i can multitask.
responding to posts only takes a few seconds, and then i continue reading, writing, w/e.

but now i need to sleep, something i can't multitask..yet!
unfortunately...so i bid you adieu.

>> No.2933474

>>2933473

Confirmed for British.

>> No.2933477

>>2933473

Really? Almost everyone that works at a serious level can't just dip in and out every few seconds. Especially when it comes to maths.