/sci/ - Science & Math

PART II


6. On a scale of 0 (no-word-to-describe-stupid) to 10 (bright as fuck), how would you rate yourself?
7. On a scale of 0 (anti-religious) to 10 (highly religious), 5 being completely indifferent about religion, how religious would you like your partner to be?
8. On a scale of 0 (anti-religious) to 10 (highly religious), how would you rate yourself?
9. On a scale of 0 (highly insignificant) to 10 (highly significant), how significant is your partner's field of interest in studies and work to you?
10. What field of study or work would you like your partner to be a part of? Why?
11. What field of study or work are you a part of? Why?
12. On a scale of 0 (highly insignificant) to 10 (highly significant), how significant is your partner's political standing?
13. What is your political standing?
14. On a scale of 0 (no prior dating relationships) to 10 (10 or more dating relationships), how much prior dating experience would you like your partner to have?
15. On a scale of 0 (no prior dating relationships) to 10 (10 or more prior dating relationships), how much dating experience do you have?
16. If you have had prior dating relationships, what are the reasons those relationships ended?
17. On a scale of 0 (no prior sexual partners) to 10 (10 or more prior sexual partners), how many prior sexual partners would you like your partner to have?
18. On a scale of 0 (no prior sexual partners) to 10 (10 or more prior sexual partners), how many sexual partners have you had?

1.10
2. 4
3. 0
4. 1
5. 5
6. 7
why you put question 6 twice
7. 8
8. 1
9. 0
10. no field. attraction to females not based on their intellectual endeavors.
11. linguistics because it's interesting
12. 7
13. anarcho-capitalist
14. 1
15. 0
16. n/a
17. 0
18. 0

standard reply by a /sci/entologist :

1. 10, must also be a 12 year old girl. Or a trap. Engineering students will stipulate
Jon Kortajarena or an equally attractive male model.
2. 10
3. 10
4. 10
5. 10
6. 10

19. What are your preferences when it comes to the usage of alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs by your partner?
20. What is your own relationship to alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs?
21. What kind of personality would you consider ideal for your partner?
22. Do you think one gender is inferioir to the other? Which one?
23. What is your gender?
24. What is your age?

Answers are much appreciated.

Flooooood.

1) 7
2) 7
3) 6
4) 6
5) 8
6) 9
7) 2
8) 1
9) 5
10) housewife
11) chemE, i like it
12) 2
13)no idea
14) 1
15) 0
16) NaN
17) 0
18) 0

Everyone on /sci/ will answer 8-10 on question 6 because that's the humility that comes with being an undergrad at a lower-tier university.

1. 8
2. 11
3. 7
4. 6
5. 7
6. 8

7. 2
8. Very torn, don't like telling people what to believe, but simultenously see the negatives religion can bring in extreme cases. Not going to go into a massive explanation for this point though, so I'll just say '5'
9. In what way do you mean significant?
10. Whatever she enjoys and earns lots money in
11. Psychology with biology electives, looking to major in neurobiology
12. As in how big of an interest she takes in politics (3) or her standing in the political world (0, she's not a politician)?
13. N/A
14. 0
15. 3
16. They were typical high school relationships
17. 0
18. 1

19. She doesn't use
20. Tried smoking once because of peer pressure, one puff, realised I didn't like it. Drink only on very rare occasions (three times since April of last year, IIRC). Only use drugs for medicinal purposes (paracetamol, sleeping aids for my insomnia). No illicit drug use
21. A big breasted one.
22. Depends on the criteria, but yes there are many gender differences - both physical and mental (and those are of coursed generalised and not necessarily strict to any gender, there are always outliers)
23. Male
24. 19

Some of the questions were a bit ambiguous.

>>2891938
19) anything with little or no long term effects, including financially, is fine by me. (also, no smoke, i dont like smoke)
20) sometimes i have some ethanol about once a week
21) tomboy (lol, im an engineer), objective, (a little) interested in obtaining knowledge, fun loving, able to take sarcasm.
22) females are inferior. reason: see 23.
23) Male
24)21

1.10, why not.
2. 6 I guess?
3.1, if she has too many other friends, she's more likely to have dumb ideas.
4.6 I love my friends, and I have quite some, but I don't really like making new friends or meeting new people so it's kind of weird...
5.10 I love spending my time with smart people. Dumbasses not allowed.
6. 9? not a super genius, but I think I'm not that dumb.

1. 7+
2. 6
3. 5
4. 3
5. 7
6. 8
7. 0
8. 0
9. 4
10. Not too fussed as long as it isn't art or something equally useless.
11. Mechanical Engineering. I enjoyed maths and physics in grammar school and this is basically a continuation of it.
12. 2
13. I used to consider myself an anarcho-pacifist. I agree with the concepts but I don't see any practical way of implementing it in the near future so I don't really know/care these days.
14. 3
15. 0
16. N/A
17. Don't care
18. 1
19. Moderate usage is fine.
20. Moderate usage (tobacco and weed every day, drinking a lot at the weekend)
21. As long as they aren't an idiot and I can have a laugh with them.
22. No
23. Male
24. 20

1. 8
2. 8
3. 3
4. 3
5. 9
6. 8
7. 4
8. 2 or 3
9. 7 or 8
10. A hard science or engineering.
11. Law. It suits my capabilities and interest well, also good job prospects.
12. 5
13. Unclear.
14. 0 or 1
15. 0
16. -
17. 0 or 1
18. 0
19. No smoking, no illegal drugs, some alcohol
20. Don't smoke, no illegal drugs, some alcohol
21. Serious but understands humor and sarcasm, gives things much thought, keeps things in order, is open-minded, generally kind, not too talkative (but is able to have meaningful discussions)
22. ..Females seem to be more annoying, but can't say definitely
23. Female
24. 19

Sure, for you. <3

1. 7
2 6
3 8
4 9
5 9
6 9
7 3
8 2
9 6
10 Maybe something Science related? My current girlfriend does accounting. OR a lawyer (I like a good debate, i pressume a lawyer would bring that.)
11 Pharmacy, Why? Lovin' the chemistry, and wanna work in a hospital with patients, something i've always wanted to do. (inb4 too dumb to be a doctor... although that'd be pretty accurate)
12 3 I couldn't deal with someone massivley authoritarian, but, i think some polarity is good, creates good discussions. :)
13 Liberal. ( I could go into depth into what kind, but i'd rather not bore you)
14 3
15 3
16. First was a pshycotic bitch who turned me into a bitch, which, i ended up realising and got out of there..
Second wasn't too sierious, been a couple of months and we just decided it wasn't working,
Current is not finished, so N/A

17. Er, If i could give N/a i would, I really don't care. But i'd say about 5?
18. 5
19. My first girlfriend smoked, it wasn't nice, it wouldn't really put me off, But, it's a negative for smoking (unless it's like, at a party, iregularly). Alcohol I really don't mind about, as long if the girl didn't judge me for dirnking, if she didn't.. (oh, alcoholism is a bad point) As for drugs, occasional weed and lsd/ecstacy i'm cool with, Heroin, Cocaine, the heavy stuff, a MAJOR off put.
20. Tried weed a couple of times, don't smoke constantly, occasionally on a night out drinking. Not addicted to any drugs.
21 Liberal, free thinking, independant, blunt,
22. No. Although i believe some genders are better at certain things, but that's not to say people within those genders cannot be just as good. So, men are better for heavy lifting - generally, but that's a seroetype, generally, gender to me is irrelevant.
23. Male
24. 18

OP here. Thanks for the answers. Would like more though.

>>2891924
Quite obvious but lol'd anyway.

6. Conservative estimate: 14
7. -10. I like saging religion threads whenever I can to show my intelligence in dealing with such issues.
If I have a girlfriend, she'll also help me sagebomb the shit of these threads.
9.. Psychology isn't a science, and liberal arts students are all worthless.
10. Anything I deem to be of worth, such as staying in the kitchen to cook for me.
11. Engineering
12. 10. I don't want her beliefs to be in any way different from mine's.
13. Anarcho-capitalism
14.0
15.0 I could've had 10 easily, but all of the women here are bitches and whores sucking jock dicks for cash.
17.0
18. 0

>>2892082
ayn rand seems like your kind of gal

1. What I would LIKE? 10, obviously -- but I would not mind anyone 5-10 (5 being average), provided they were a pleasure to be around.
2. 6.5
3. 5.5
4. 3
5. ≥7
6. 8
7. ≤5
8. 1
9. 6.5
10. Any field I found interesting.
11. Math. It's incredibly engaging.
12. 7
13. Contrary to whatever positions the Republican Party holds.
14. No preference.
15. One year-long relationship.
16. Has not ended.
17. No preference.
18. 3

>>2892125
If she was still alive, she would surely be drawn to me, the independent wealth creator fighting against the looters leeching off the work of others. I would pin her to the ground, her resistance quickly fading away once she recognizes my worth as an individual.

Oh fuck it, my (already limited) capacity for creativity is fading fast.Brb, sleep.

1) He is probably a 5 so oh well
2) 8
3) 6
4) 5
5) 9
6) 0
7) <= 5
8) 5
9) 3
10) Something that makes a lot of money
11) Biomed
12) 1
13) Apathy
14) 3
15) 3
16) 0
17) 0

There ya go, OP.

1) He is probably a 5 so oh well
2) 8
3) 6
4) 5
5) 9
6) 0
7) <= 5
8) 5
9) 3
10) Something that makes a lot of money
11) Biomed
12) 1
13) Apathy
14) 3
15) 3
16) Incompatibility
17) 0
18) 0
19) As little as possible
20) We're not on speaking terms
21) Quiet, tortured genius
22) Not really
23) Female
24) 19

There ya go, OP.

hey man, I'm a hetero university student in science, and I'm going through some relationship right now, and i'll tell you- Intelligence matters, but being able to talk about smart shit is not nearly as important as you think.

Dated girl A for a year, and she's intelligent, but she doesn't like to discuss "intellectual" things, ethics and philosophy, etc (but we'd discuss advanced bio sometimes since that's where our majors overlapped). I thought i really wanted someone who I could do that with. Then we broke up and I dated girl B who was brilliant, but boring as fuck.

Turns out I was much happier with girl A who fucks like a champ, cooks like a champ, decorates her surroundings and body like a champ, and parties like a champ, than girl B, who can discuss and intellectual topic I please but was boring and plain as white bread.

1. 5-10
2. 6
3. 5
4. 3
5. 7
6. 7
7. 5
8. 4
9. 0
10.Physics, Mathematics, or Biology. I find all 3 fascinating
11.None having trouble deciding
12. 0
13. none
14. 0-3
15. 1
16. N/A
17. 0-1
18.1

>>2892247
19.Apathetic
20. I will use on Rare situations
21. Agressive
22. Biologically,no. Physiologically,females.?
23. Male
24. 19

1: 9+
2: 9
3: 8+
4: 8
5: 8+
6: 9.5
7: 6 or less
8: 3
9: 7.5
10: Anything serious that isn't bullshit like philosophy, art or shit like that. Science/math, engineering, law, medical, economics, etc. Shit that's actually useful later in life.
11: Automation/robotics/heuristics and management/business on the side. Taking a bit extra math as well (primarily topics within linear algebra and geometry, as this is useful for robotics). This shit pretty much guarantees me a decent job, and the management/business should help me up the ladder once I get one.
12: 4
13: My political views are: Fuck people who can't help themselves. My parents lived in fucking squalor in a shitty war-ridden country and worked their way up, and I'm continuing that tradition. I'm not going to give away my hard-earned money through taxes to give potheads incentives to stay out of work with welfare checks. Fuck 'em.
14: 3+. She should at least not be completely clueless in a relationship.
15: 5.
16: I've dumped a few girls when finding better girls. The grass is always greener I guess. I've also been dumped once for being an asshole. But then again, I've never planned for any of my prior relationships to be anything other than short-term.
17: 4-9. She should have some experience, I hate virgins. She shouldn't be a complete slut either.
18: Quite a bit more than 10. Mostly drunken hook-ups and one-night stands between relationships. Yes I am a hypocrite.

>>2892280

Remaining questions:

19: As long as it's use, not abuse, I'm cool with it.
20: I've tried a lot of things and drink once or twice a week. But I keep it moderate.
21: Engaging and independent. Fuck clingy bitches who can't come up with a single fucking sentence that keeps your attention.
22: To be honest, I'm glad I'm male. Women might not be genetically inferior, but they're certainly inferior in the sense that they still hold less power than us in today's society.
23: Male
24: 22

1. 5-9
2. 9
3. 5
4. 2
5. 8
6. 9(I'm still an arrogant undergrad that has yet to be humbled.)
7. 0
8. 0
9. 3
10. Don't care.
11. ChemE, why the fuck not?
12. 3
13. N/A (not American)
14. 2
15. 0
16. N/A
17. 0
18. 0
19. Mild usage of alcohol is fine.
20. Don't drink/smoke/use drugs etc.
21. Anything that isn't too emotional
22. Do
23. Male
24. 18

1. 8
2. 7
3. 5
4. 4
5. 7
6. 8
7. 3
8. 2
9. 1
10. Sex
11. Nothing atm
12. 6
13. Anarchist
14. 4
15. 4
16. I only have been in them for the sex.
17. 0-2
18. 7

>>2892416

19. Pot and beer is okay as not abused
20. Barely tried
21. Mine
22. Men are superior to women
23. Man
24. 20

1. 7
2. 7
3. 7
4. 5
6. 8
7. 6
8. 6
9. 7
10. despite being intelligent, household
11. linguistic because i live in a multilanguage culture and i need it as a base
12. 4
13. a bit to the right and i think the ubermench idea is valid
14. 4
15. 3
16. being too passive, not caring really
17. 1+
18. 1
19. everything is bad but some alcohol is great for getting the relationship going and some fun
20. done nothing but i drink alot due to genes preventing hangover and due to my ancestors i like the taste and feel of vodka
21. a tad passive but naughty, intelligent and well spoken. true to me and casual, not overly comforting and realistic.
22. yes men have a better capitaciy in all skills and features, but women are not that much behind.
23. male
24. 17

what do you do with all this? read for fun or will we see some summarization?

1. 10
2. 7
3. 5
4. 3
5. 7
6. 8
7. 1
8. 1
9. -
10. Science, because it's awesome.
11. See above.
12. -
13. Liberal
14. 0
15. 0
16. -
17. 0
18. 0

19. None please.
20. See above.
21. Positive, funny, unique, interesting.
22. Neither.
23. Male.
24. 9000

1. 7
2. 8
3. 7
4. 4
5. 7+
6. 8
7. 5
8. 5
9. 4
10. Medicine or Engineering
11. Medicine
12. 5
13. Centrist
14. 5
15. 0
16. -
17. 4
18. 4

>>2892472
19. Nothing Illegal
20. Experimented in the past, 100% sober now
21. No preference
22. equal
23. Male
24. 21

OP here. Thanks a lot /sci/borgs. Still hoping for more.

>>2892426
At first it was just supposed to be a couple of question for interest.. But when I was writing these questions, nothing seemed to be enough so I started thinking of doing a larger survey and summarizing it later on.

The idea for this came up when I yet again noticed what kind of attitude the most of /sci/ has toward females.

Here, have a pikachu.

1. 10 (isn’t that kind of definitively true?)
2. 7. 9 if I were 6 inches taller.
3. 7
4. 7
5. 10
6. 8? Higher, globally, but 8 feels right.
7. 3 (meaning “religion is stupid as fuck, which is why I don’t waste my time giving a shit about it”)
8. 3
9. 8
10. Any science or engineering discipline, though I’m content with a girl who were intellectually capable of doing science, whether it were her field or not.
11. Bioengineering. It’s tough to say why bioengineering, but I have an inclination to problem solving.
12. 6
13. Moderate, somewhat liberal.
14. 5?
15. 0
16.
17. 5?
18. 2
19. Marijuana good, alcohol bad.
20. Marijuana good, alcohol bad.
21. Wild but not wasteful or hateful. Very playful.
22. Men hate each other by nature. Women are superior.
23. Male
24. 23

1 10
2 6
3 4
4 2
5 8
6 10
7 6
8 6
9 0
10 do not care as long as it is not premed/law or art or philosophy
11 math also econ
12 2
13 hate everyone
14 3
15 1
16 bitch was a whore
17 4
18 1
19. must be ok with alcohol but prefer not a regular drinker, the more weed/tobacco the better, no hard drug problems but use is a plus
20. enjoy a drink every now and then, smoke weed everyday, quit cigs but would start again, willing to try every drug out there
21. what the fuck kind of question is this
22. inferior isnt the right word but we are different
23. hurp
24. 19

>>2891918

I'm a girl! OMG!

1. 6+ pretty to look at
2. 8 Arrogant I guess
3. 5ish. Too many friends leads to drama.
4. 3. I have one or two friends at a time.
5. 10+ I need a CHALLENGE
6. 10. Arrogant? Yea...
7. n/a. Religion doesn't matter so long as they are accepting
8. 0. antireligion
9. erg, depends on whether or not our fields would cause physical distance.
10. I'm looking in to journalism which would make me travel.
11. Journalism.
12. 0. I don't care about politics, just reason.
13. n/a
14. n/a. doesn't matter. I can teach em ;P
15. 4 partners total
16. incompatibility.
17. n/a. They will have to change anyway to learn my needs.
18. er, no comment.

1. 7
2. 7
3. 8
4. 5
5. 7-10
6. 8
7. 0
8. 0
9. 4
10. science or engineering. Talk with her about my/her work
11. mechanical engineering & mathematical physics. I enjoy that kinda thing.
12. 5
13. unknown
14. 4
15. 3
16. became long distance
17. 3-4
18. 2
19. weekly alcohol. occasional bit of weed. no tobacco.
20. weekly alcohol. occasional bit of weed. no tobacco.
21. intelligent and more open than i am.
22. no
23. male
24. 22

>mathfag reporting in, fyi
1. 10
2. 3
3. 0
4. 0
5. 10
6. 10
7. 0
8. 0
9. 6
10. Math. Because 300k (double income = 600k woot)
11. Math. Because 300k and it's beautiful.
12. 9
13. Liberal (not idealistic douche liberal, just liberal), anti-religion, pro-reason
14. 3
15. 0
>foreveralone.jpg
16. null
17. 0
18. 0.5 (the .5 was a blowjob under the influence of alcohol and weed)

1. 8
2. 8
3. 5
4. 3
5. 7
6. Standard rating: 8/9 - /sci/ rating: 5 to 6?
7. 4
8. 4
9. 6
10. Anything in the hard sciences/engineering. Why? Because anyone else is a bimbo/idiot 90% of the time.
11. None yet, gonna be Astrophysics and Aerospace Engineering
12. 7
13. On political compass I get in Libertarian Socialist.
14. 5
15. 4
16. Mutual dislike, EVERY SINGLE TIME
17. 5
18. 1

1, 7
2. 5
3.4
4.2
5.8
6. 7
7. 5
8. 0
9. 5
10. math cuz i do math
11. math. because
12. 5
13. ...Democrat
14. 4
15. 0
16. na
17. 3
18. 0

>2.
19/21 people of those that answered said they're above 5..

/sci/ is full of good-looking guys?

>>2895736
Actually there were a few ladies as well. Still, who would've thought?

1.7
2.6
3.6
4.8
5.10
6.8
7.5
8.0
9.7
10.Medicine, because science.
11.Medicine.
12.0
13.Neutral
14.5
15.1
16.They're bitches.
17.0
18.2

10
8
8
3
9
6

>>2895799 nigger splitting up posts

Starting at 7

3
3
6
Science because engineering
Engineering
3
2
10
7
0
10
10

1. 7+ ( beauty is in the eye of the beholder)
2. 5
3. 5-7
4. 3-7
5. 8+
6. 5
7. 0-1
8. 0-1
9. 5
10. anything in science or computer science.
11. non atm. Aspiring to be a programmer.
12. 5
13. repiblican (left) social-democratic and Pirate.
14. <span class="math"> \Tau [/spoiler]
15. N/A
16. I do not care (I can not judge there choices in life)
17. N/A

>>2895736
/sci/, like everyone else, thinks that 7 is the average on a 0-10 scale.

1. 5
2. 7
3. 4 (around 4 is perfect, I don't like over-socials)
4. 4
5. 10
6. 8
7. 5+
8. 7+
9. 7
10. Anything that could start intelligent discussions.
11. Computer sciences, but not enjoying it much anymore. Physics and philosophy are more interesting to me.
12. 4
13. As little government influence as possible
14. 0-5
15. 0
16. -
17. 0-1
18. 0

1. 6+
2. 9-10
3. 5-
4. 2-
5. 5+
6. 5
7. 4-
8. 0
9. Don't care as long as it produces happiness
10. Don't care as long as it produces happiness
11. Mechanical Engineering
12. 6+
13. Fiscal Conservatism
14. Don't care
15. 5
16. Intrinsically insane women
17. 6-
18. 10+
19. Some alcohol
20. Some alcohol, smoked pot in my adolescence
21. Aggressive
22. Women are physically inferior on average as well as being prone to emotional outbursts. Men are assholes
23. Male
24. 24

1. 10
2. 6
3. 6
4. 3
5. 9
6. 9
7.3
8. 2
9. 10
10. Medicine. Want her to be a professional but not in science or law.
11. Applied Math. It's intresting and I'm good at it.
12. 0
13. Pro-individual freedoms, strong foreign policy, flat-tax
14. 5
15.1
16. Young
17. 5
18. 0

>>2895848

19. Would rather not see smoking or drugs, and as little alcohol as possible.
20. Occasional alcohol.
21. Caring, intelligent, introverted. A stereotypical nerd personality.
22. No.
23. Male.
24. 21
22.

1) 5-7
2) 6-7
3) 4
4) 5
5) 9
6) 8-10
7) 0 (Not militant, just don't believe in unscientific crap.)
8) 0
9) 2 A
10) Science or at least something that does good for the world. Intellectually and progressively useless people need not apply.
11) Physics/Aerospace Engineering. I love planes, space and physics and I have a hardon for human progress.
12) 0 - As long as she can back it up.
13) Socially Liberal... Centrist economically
14) 2-5
15) 4
16) Various reasons... Sometimes distance sometimes whorishness and sometimes we were just sick of each other.
17) 2-6
18) 4

>>2895822
19. I do not care, as long as it does not tear on auer relationship or mental state.
20. The only drug i use on a regular basis is caffeine, as in coffee.
21. she must be able to defend herself if need be. and she must be in to science and such.
22. no, not in practise, but females do have less genetical disease then males, and be more social.
23. Male
24. 23

>>2895871
19) Fine. Just not excessively.
20. Used to drink,smoke and do a ton of drugs. I'm pretty much straightedge now.
21) Nerdy fo shizzle.
22) No. Shut the fuck up.
23)Male
24) 19

1. 8
2. 7
3. 5
4. 6
5. 7
6. 7.5
7. 2
8. 2
9. 5
10. Doesn't matter.
11. n/a
12. 6
13. Somewhat leftist leaning toward libertarianism.
14. 4
15. 4
16. Cheating bitches.
17. 1 tp 2
18. 1
19. Can't stand drugs. Moderate alcohol okay, not drunk off ass drinking though.
20. Completely clean.
21. Funny, quirky, carefree to an extent, cheery.
22. Honestly, I see men as slightly superior.
23. Male
24. 18

1. 10, like and willing to settle for are different.
2. 4-7. Varies depending on how much I care.
3. 5, likes to go out but okay staying in.
4. 3, I'm charismatic but I hate people.
5. 8
6. 8 for my age.
7. 6, hating religion is asinine. Accept it, respect it, but don't follow it.
8. 6
9. 2
10. Don't care as long as it's ethical and she's happy.
11. Joining AF as cryptolinguist. Going to be an interpreter/translator and move to NH after my term is up.
12. 7
13. Fuck ideologies. I'm a problem solver.
14. Don't care, just not 0 or 10.
15. 4
16. I was an asshole and/or they were childish.
17. 2-3
18. 4

1. 7+
2. 5
3. 6
4. 4
5. 7
6. 8 (huehuehue i smarter than gurl)
7. 5
8. 2
9. 4
10. Don't really care. As long as it's something related to actual science/technology and not some social science/humanities crap
11. Bioengineering. I want to get into the field of longevity, I like Kurzweil and Aubrey de Grey's ideas.
12. 0 (lol, politics)
13. i dunno lol, probably tending towards liberal, given that I don't really care, huehueheu
14. 2
15. 0
16.
17. 2
18. 0
19. Shouldn't do any of those, at all
20. Don't do any of those as well
21. Clumsy, funny, mildly extroverted, enjoys walks on the beach, romantic sunsets. Turn offs: racism and war huehuehu
22. not really
23. male
24. 19

>>2895957

Cont'd

19. I'm open to anything but her taste better be good. White girls, white drugs.
20. I use them all socially.
21. White, intelligent, takes care of herself, not insecure, fine taste in all arts, logical,basically has her shit together. Again this is ideal, and therefore near impossible.
22. Not objectively. Culture and economic status are far bigger factors.
23. Male
24. 21

PART 1
1. 10
2. 8
3. 4
4. 2-3
5. 7
6. 9

PART II
7. 0
8. 0
9. 5
10. Don't really care.
11. Maths and actuarial studies
12. 8
13. Right-wing anarchist
14. 3-4
15. 5
16. Moving; not wanting to go out with them unless sex was guarenteed.
17. 0-1
18. 6

PART III
19. Hate alcohol and cigarettes. Wouldn't mind if they smoked weed once a month or something.
20. Don't enjoy any of them.
21.Normal; tending towards introversion.
22. Females are inferior to males.
23. Male
24. 20.

ITT 2 rational adults amongst a sea of children

>>2896033
who are the two you refer to?

1. 9-10
2. 10
3. 9
4. 7
5. 6
6. 8
__________
7. Anywhere between 5 and 10-Just don't be preachy as fuck + have a bit of respect for other peoples choice of belief.
8. Maybe about 6? Tolerant,but I don't believe in the corruption that is the Christian/Catholic Church etc,but who knows there might be something out there.
9. 6, having a few shared interests is aite
10. Couldn't give a shit tbh. A teacher or something would be cool.
11. Law/Commerce Student, future career=typical W*A*S*P job/lifestyle
12. 5- just can't stand extreme politically correct liberals.
13. No fucking idea,except in this society-money buys freedom.
14. 7
15. 8
16. Various
17. 7-10 minimum.
18. 10
19. weed+booze are fine,cigs are a waste of money and later life.Besides,I'd never bother with a girl who hasn't even gone partying/clubbing at least once. Those socially excluded+"Innocent and pure" dorks are fuckn losers.
20. hit the piss alot,sometimes abit of weed its all g. I'll probably try everything once,because you only live once.
21. gotta have dreams and desires,open,cant be some prude conservative fuck.
22. being a hot chick with a deece body means you get alot more shit for handed to you like jobs etc. Also super feminazis are idiots because Men are biologically the hunters/leaders/protectors of the species while women are the childbearers and nurturers. You cannot claim otherwise,its a biological fact of life and present in almost every living organism on Earth,but this doesnt mean you can treat women like subhumans.
23. Male
24. 20

>>2896040

Now where would the fun be in telling you that?

I just see a lot of posts here of stupid standards and polarized views; and many self proclaimed centrists are actually just apathetic. I also see a lot people who are just in a phase, at least I hope so because a lot of things stated reflect things I used to think before I realized how retarded they were. I used to be a registered libertarian ffs.

For a board of science enthusiasts, there is a stark lack of rationalism in this thread. It feels more like r9k.

>>2896063

News Flash

>Everyone is different

>1. how attractive would you like your partner to be?
8.7+
>2. how would you rate yourself?
6/7~ish
>3 how social would you like your partner to be?
5-9?
>4. how would you rate yourself?
4/5. I've got both a social and apathetic side.
>5. how intelligent would you like your partner to be?
9+
>6. how would you rate yourself?
9+ if we're doing it by iq/overall intelligence. I have some intellectual abilities to a level that you would not see in a 9.9 (of which people have commented on), but that would be dickheaded of me to define "intelligence" as whatever i'm good at.
>7. On a scale of 0 (anti-religious) to 10 (highly religious), 5 being completely indifferent about religion, how religious would you like your partner to be?
Less than 3.
>8. how would you rate yourself?
0
>9. , how significant is your partner's field of interest in studies and work to you?
1
>10. What field of study or work would you like your partner to be a part of? Why?
not psychology (i would rage). Anything else is is fine (well obviously not homeopathy/theology etc.).
>11. What field of study or work are you a part of? Why?
financial services. Saving up money to get me started on my true calling.
>12. how significant is your partner's political standing?
7/8
>13. What is your political standing?
center-left libertarian, anti-discrimination

>>2896063

this isnt board specific just an age thing. its also why i hate everyone my age. all these faggots want to share their views on shit but they just sound really ignorant. i get the feeling idiots want to talk because theyre insecure about their views and discuss them to achieve some sense of certainty. i hate it though because i sit there the whole time thinking to myself that i already got my shit figured out and dont feel like rehashing the problems with their logic. save it for the debate class and leave me the fuck alone. fuck college students.

>>2896075

>14, how much prior dating experience would you like your partner to have?
In terms of proper serious relationships- 0. non-serious/teen relationships= less than 2. Definitely don't want a girl who has a taste for flings.
>15. how much dating experience do you have?
0
>17, how many prior sexual partners would you like your partner to have?
1/2. Don't want a girl who's slept around.
>18. how many sexual partners have you had?
0. i don't agree with casual sex on moral grounds (nor do i believe it is good for long-term happiness) I could go with 3/6s easily if i wanted. Unless you can get a girl you'd actually spend your life with, it's not an achievement.
>19. What are your preferences when it comes to the usage of alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs by your partner?
Open to drug useage/experimentation but not a very regular user. non-smoker preferably. hasn't used mdma more than 4/5 times (10 absolute max). willing to not smoke weed 2/3 months before pregnancy.
20. What is your own relationship to alcohol, tobacco and illegal drugs?
Done moderate level of experimentation. would like to do more. alcohol ~30/40 times per year. weed~15/20 times per year. can discriminate between the natural feeling of endorphins and that of dopamine. Would like my partner to be willing to learn the same.
>21. What kind of personality would you consider ideal for your partner?
Free-thinking, up for fun/immaturity and not uptight and somehow achieving this without having the same brain chemistry as me. I worry that doing so would lead to kids with adhd/schizophrenia/aspergers/other mental illnesses.
>22. Do you think one gender is inferioir to the other? Which one?
in the traits i value? not in absolute terms, and i am against discrimination.
>23. What is your gender?
male
>24. What is your age?
21

>>2896087

You sound like one of those angsty "im-so-intellectual-and-ahead-of-the curb-dont-talk-to-me,sheeple" cunts.

Stfu and stop acting like some antisocial,intolerant nerd.

>2.
>19/21 people of those that answered said they're above 5..

>/sci/ is full of good-looking guys?

Intelligence and good looks are quite correlated in males.

>>2896107
Source?

>>2896103

i apologize, that isnt my intent.

if the setting/context is fit for discussion thats fine, i just get sick of faggots that spout dumb shit like "there should be a law for abortion" or "if life is pointless why dont you kill yourself" like its a goddamn pleasant conversation piece. its more of an intolerance of loud idiocy and i frankly dont have the willpower to have these arguments over and over again. its intentionally provocative and often only for the sake of being provocative. it makes me respect educators a lot more for putting up with it with a smile.

>>2896116

1. 10, not that it's realistic in the slightest
2. 3
3. ≤ 3
4. 3
5. ≥ 7
6. 7
7. 4 - 6
8. 5
9. 0
10. Doesn't really matter
11. I'm not far enough for that.
12. 0 why she thinks it is more important than what.
13. Social Libertarian.
14. Irrelevant
15. 1
16. For reasons that can't be repeated so it doesn't really matter.
17. Irrelevant
18. 0
19. A little is fine. I don't care if someone does it all the time, but I couldn't put up with some alcoholic/junk
20. I don't drink/smoke/use any drugs and most of it is infamously legal here.