/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2656100
That's just what women want you to think.

>mfw all of terran society in the future consist of goddess bodied, mentally enhanced, trans-human cyborg warriors, having constant lesbian sex with their hive minds whilst exploring the universe

I wouldn't do anything at all if women were not a motivation in life.

Let's talk about this, I think it's interesting.

If there was such a pill, would you take it?

Personally I hate having women create these involuntary emotions and physiological effects in me, it's like they own my nervous system. I feel like I have no control over it, and it's a very powerful feeling.

Anyone else want to share? I personally am not sure I'd take it, but I could see how incredibly beneficial it could be.

You could take a sexual desire suppressant or you could just go and find yourself a good woman.

I recommend physicists.

>When scientists develop a pill to suppress sexual desire without side effects
There might already be a pill that has those side effects...

>>2656143
lol why are you doing science then?

>>2656187
there are, for sure. I think they are anti-depressants (not sure)

but yeah, I'd just waste away playing video games with bros. imagine you could walk around town in your sweats and shit and not give a fuck

Schizoid personality disorder fag here (not self-diagnosed).

You seem to be jealous of me.

If you want to suppress your sexual desire, get your nuts removed, it will do the trick. On the other hand, if you want to be a complete human being, get in the game and do your best. Only an insecure loser would renounce his own sexuality because of the fear of rejection.

>>2656198
I take antidepressants
They don't kill my sex drive, it just makes it harder
Like I need to fap furiously instead of normally

>>2656202
it has less to do with rejection and more to do with the feeling of being shackled to your involuntary physiological responses to sexuality

>and will thus fade into obsolescence.
obsolete? women? For the survival of our species they are considerably more relevant than men.

Also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaguya_%28mouse%29

If anything we males might become obsolete.

>>2656222
Just get a prostitute, gheeze

I can't wait until she leaves you, OP.

>When scientists develop a pill to suppress sexual desire without side effects

</humanity>

>>2656224

No one cares about perpetuating the species.

>>2656224
>Implying that men could ever become obsolete.

No. Women have one quality that has allowed them to survive this long. ONE... they are not daring, they are not bright, they are not warriors, they are not tenacious, they lack the drive to discover, conquer, fight, and pursue. They're content with complacency, and if it were up to women, we'd still be hunched over, wiping our sloppy asses with our hands.

Women are only good for making babies. I would say they're also good for pleasing men and boosting morale, but they don't want to fucking do that. I'm even hesitant to say they're useful for reproduction, as they want to argue they shouldn't HAVE to give birth for one stupid reason ("personal choice") or another. ("not ready") Can I avoid going to work and being a productive citizen because I'm not ready or choose not too? Fuck no. So women need to shutup, make babies, fuck men when we tell them too, or we will confine them, butcher them, and weed them out of existence.

>>2656237
well, if we take reproduction out of the picture then i don't see how it would make women any more obsolete than men.

Dude, just get laid so we can stop seeing these fucking "exterminate women" threads.

people that say "get laid" are fucking faggots.

>>2656260

Agreed

>>2656253

Think I'm useless?

Give me an derivative and I'll do it, hey, I'll even prove it. Give me a complex one, even.

~ A woman

In the future there will only be one unified asexual supergender of peaceful immortal curious explorers who life in underground bases on death rocks and study other lifeforms. If there will be need for more we will simply create new one's in labs. We will follow the example of our parents.

>>2656285
>implying anyone gives a fuck about derivatives
are you a good person? do you have integrity? that's what matters.

>>2656273

Angry lonely faggot that will fap his way to sleep tonight detected.

>>2656224
We'll just make artifical zygotes and grow them in tubes.
Who needs women?

>>2656253
Couldn't we automate the process of making babies? What's keeping us from doing that? According to crackpots like Hannah Rosin, women hate being parents anyway.

>>2656305
Yes, test tube babbies are definitely a viability.

>>2656294
>Woman

what do you think?

>>2656316
I was actually talking artificial wombs. Not in a "I hate women, burn all vaginas!" sort of way, but out of genuine curiosity.

I remember reading on /r9k/ that we've had the ability to build such a thing as far back as the 60s.

>>2656285

He was implying women weren't worth more than making babies and sammiches. I'm bored and want to do math and figured I'd show there was some use by doing that.

I do agree though, that being a good person is better than being a brilliant one.

OP you should look at this video
It deals with the issues you've been talking about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HApbmtryRYk&feature=related

>>2656328
Couldn't you just lobotomize women and keep them like cattle? You just need an ice pick and some fencing.

>>2656339
it would be more humane to modify embryos to never develop higher brain functions in the first place.

>>2656358
Sounds expensive.

>>2656365
economics of scale and chinese lab assistants will solve that problem

>>2656335
http://www.backpage.com/
look at the escort section

this thread is now about your face when humans have as much free will as for example, a cow, a mosquito, a spider

Men are the sole drive of cultural progress.

Name one instance in history when a group of women risked their lives to further the species, built a huge boat and sailed across the sea, or conquered anything. (Spoiler alert: it never happened)

Men are better than women. Why? Because if you disagree with me I will just kill you. A woman would argue and debate, maybe try to make peace... but that's not what drives progress and evolution.

Evolution and progress are driven by men conquering, fucking and killing; end of story.

>>2656438
Youre argument is perfect for the 1800s and 1900s.
But today, with our technologies and sciences and medicines (not to mention a general lack of terrestrial places to physically conquer and explore), youre argument is more than invalid, its regressive and stupid.

>>2656438
Your argument is perfect for the 1800s and 1900s. But today, with our technologies and sciences and medicines (not to mention a general lack of terrestrial places to physically conquer and explore), your argument is more than invalid, its regressive and stupid.

>>2656460
>yfw I kill your family and run off with your property

>>2656438

Men are better than women?

At what? You failed to specify.

Apparently you're not very good at making a clear cut point, man.

>>2656490
He just did. He said men have always been the ones to advance the species by daring too. Fucking read.

When scientists develop robots to kill and/or fuck without side effects, men will no longer be the gatekeepers of anything, and will thus fade into obsolescence.

>>2656100

eventually, we're just going to all be robots and completely ditch our flesh bodies altogether.

>mfw

>implying men don't also want companionship
>implying a procedures to do this doesn't already exist

also if it were widespread we'd have tons of sexually frustrated women, woman-on-man raep would become a horrifying epidemic of crime

>>2656990
This! I'm ok with this!