[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 185 KB, 628x934, Journal2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2603723 No.2603723 [Reply] [Original]

I got published! OC, IRL!

>> No.2603729

yay! what the fuck is this!

>> No.2603732

>electronic version: 4chan.org

what the shit

>> No.2603735

In what field ?
inb4 management science.

>> No.2603748

>>2603735
Functions on Banal Spaces

>> No.2603776

>>2603732
Yeah. I thought it was pretty clever. It took a while get to the fonts to match.

>> No.2603849

Look up a certain PubMed article by dr Mary Tai and shit bricks.

>> No.2603862

>>2603748
Oh, cool! Have you read R. Hall's paper On the Efficacy of Futile Action?

>> No.2604397

>>2603849
http://fliptomato.wordpress.com/2007/03/19/medical-researcher-discovers-integration-gets-75-citation
s/

HA!

>> No.2604423

because it's either trivial or impossible, rite

>> No.2604434

>stephen smale

>> No.2604487

>>2604397
>I remember some while ago I met a former classmate in the subway who had chosen to study economics. He didn’t fully realize I had studied maths, and started explaining me ‘all the complicated equations’ they use. Like, they use (ooh-ooh) functions. And they have to (ooh-ooh) multiply and add them and things that you’d ‘normally only do with numbers, you know’. When he told me they even have functions (ooh-ooh) that depend on more than one ‘thing’ (I believe he meant variable) I totally lost it. Luckily I had to leave next stop. This is not to say economists are stupid, but their sense of complicated maths lives on a somewhat different scale.

my god

>> No.2604545

>>2604487
>use anecdotal evidence

both retards imo

>> No.2604606

>>2604545
Not same dude, but for fuck's sake have you taken a look into the so-called formulas they use? In what I like to call the "economic world view" almost everything is linear, only sometimes they might encounter something *gasp*... exponential.

tl;dr economy can't do math

That being said, I'm fully aware that economists might actually be quite skilled at math, but that won't be an achievement of their discipline.

>> No.2605916
File: 25 KB, 312x426, bertie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2605916

>>2604434

>> No.2606996

I lold

>> No.2607015
File: 9 KB, 207x336, 0285.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2607015

>>2603748
Congratulations, I got published at the end of last year as a math major as well. I am an undergraduate, are you as well?

>> No.2607064
File: 8 KB, 280x359, The_Col.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2607064

>>2604606
The best part is that none of their Nobel Laureates have ideas that survived a decade without being refuted by the real world, and most of them violently contradict one another. Stay classy, Econ.