/sci/ - Science & Math

because peace is stagnation and death.

ponies taste good.

signed,
a rancher in Utah

Because conservatives are still aloud to live.

Because of religion.

i'm moving to courascant when i can hitch a ride.

>>2544708
>implying Ponies don't have religion.
>>2544704
>it's illegal to kill and consume ponies.
Reported, you little shit.

>>2544710
not illegal on a private ranch, though a permit is required.

report away, ponies are still yummy.

>>2544695
because of atheism and liberals

>>2544710
I never even watched that pony show so for all I know that's just a random name of a world and some pony picture. It should've said that the picture was related.

>>2544723
Hurr durr, this troll is retardo.
>>2544718
>implying Star Trek isn't atheist infested.
>>2544716
Private or not, it's still illegal, doofus.
I already called my authorities.

I'd prefer to live in the Culture, although it isn't quite so peaceful.

>>2544730

Why?

>>2544729
legal.

we round em up and sell em for dog food.

>>2544729
u mad?

>>2544716
So just because you own your own land means you're above the law? lolwut You can still be arrested because it's still illegal. I really doubt you don't do what you say you do, but better hope you don't get animal abuse charges.

>>2544741
In Asia?

>>2544741
I bet you slaughter cats too, aye faggot.
Nobody is above the law so it's still illegal.

>>2544744
I can drive without a driver's license in my own backyard and it'd be legal. It's basicly the same thing.

>>2544744
no seriously.

wild ponies eat grass clear to the roots and then starve to death after ruining the land for cattle and sheep.

we round them up, keep some, sell some, adopt some out, eat a few, and sell the rest for pet food and glue.

actually doesn't taste that bad, though I prefer sheep.

If I own my own property. Does this mean I am exempt from all laws?

Because you touch yourself at night.

>>2544753
Japanese?

>>2544756
american

Not science, GTFO!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_meat#United_States

It's not illegal, but that dude is probably trolling since it says the consumption of horse meat is a rare taboo in the country of the United States. So those asking if the poster is Asia has a very good chance of being correct.

>>2544769
>science fiction
>science

Get fucked by a horse, Mr. Hands.

>>2544773
it's not really taboo on the ranches in the Western US where wild ponies live. We eat anything we can shoot. I don't actually live on a ranch anymore, and I haven't eaten horse in over 20 years, but I'm sure it still happens.

>>2544777
>thinks science fiction is scientifically valid.

>science fiction
>fiction

Lrn2distinguish fantasy from reality.

>>2544800
>he doesn't realize that without science fiction they'll be no science.

Smug logical fallacy, troll.
Cry more.

>>2544817
This is what idiots actually believe.

>>2544817
lrn2scientific method, dipshit.

>>2544820
>>2544827
>>2544800
>>2544810

That is one very angry samefag.

Sage to watch him mad.

>>2544820
I know that without sci-fi they'd be no scientific imagination and without sci-imagination they're be no goals to achieve.

>>2544800
>implying you know what fiction actually is
>implying the science isn't more important.

You are a stupid lameass.

>>2544834
Hardly, in fact many scientists hate science fiction including Einstein.

"It distorts science, and gives people the illusion of understanding science."
- A. Einstein

>>2544848
>he thinks Albert Einstein was actually a scientific genius when in reality only his theories and ideas were the work of a genius. He was a complete fool otherwise.

>>2544841
Fiction is not factual narratives, that is all.
>implying science fiction always makes the effort to be scientifically valid.

Try harder, dumbass.

>>2544848
Go ahead and hide behind some hack of a scientists, brah.

>>2544855
You're the dumbass here, bro; every great work of fiction has some truth behind it.
>>2544848
He supplies a quote from a hack of a scientists who will be invulnerably wrong on all accounts.
laughingbitches.gif

>>2544862
Some truth, not necessarily. And that doesn't make it scientifically valid, in fact it makes it invalid, retard.

As for Einstein, his theories are still valid unlike your stupid pony show.

>>2544848
>A. Einstein

He chooses a hack out of all of the brilliant sciences in the world past, present, and future.

>>2544878
>>2544862
>>2544857
>>2544855
>>2544853
Go back to /b/.

>>2544874
Kiss his dead balls, kike, because there are much better scientists than he was. Also, I don't watch girl cartoons.

>>2544880
This better include yourself as well since you clearly can't science either.

Galileo > Einstein

Eat it, fags.

>>2544887
Galileo didn't waste his time with scifi, btw.

>>2544848
Einstein is in the shit tier of scientists.
Next time choose someone who's words are meaningful.

>>2544888
>implying I care.

But either way, modern scientists are better than any of the shitty ancient ones.

>>2544888
Science fiction didn't exist in Galileo's time, dumbass.

>>2544893
NO duh, Hurr Durr.

This area is in throbbing pain and I don't know why. I haven't gone on long walks in a couple of days, I haven't exercised since then either, and I haven't struck or been struck by any blunt objects.

Why might it be hurting?

>>2544898
Wrong thread, sorry.

>>2544897
Then why state such an ignorant statement?