/sci/ - Science & Math

...pic very much fucking related!
FFFFFUUUUU!!

Oh, EK! Why are you such an attention whore?

>>2444484
aww come on, brah. fucking everyone has to try for a GET of such epic proportions. i wasn't the only failure (me and aether were runners up, he was slightly to early, i was slightly too late, but many failed even harder)

>>2444490
>GET of epic proportions
You really have no place posting in any board besides /b/

>>2444510
well by that logic, neither do any of the other people who tried for the GET
oh wait, that was everybody
except you apparently

fuck off, ya self righteous prick.

>>2444523

>Implying anyone tried for it

get a hobby

>>2444523
gtfo individual your contributions are always of no value.

>>2444529
yeh you are correct. no-one at all tried for it.
...OH WAIT!
>39444439
>39444440
>39444441
>39444442
>39444443
>39444446
>39444447
>38444448

...fuck me.
whatever. point made.

>>2444444

Breaking News: British zoology student is a stupid bitcb. More at 11. Fucking biologyfags.

>>2444558

You care way too much about this.

>>2444591
a bitcb?
oh no!
how dare you call me a bitcb
a bitcb is the worst thing i have ever been called!

Lol EK fail.

> wake up
> eating an egg sandwich
> visit /sci/
> EK getting called names
/sci/ general

Fucking retards, that's what all of you are.

>>2444624

you study zoology?

>>2444645
EK made you that sandwich, right?

Otherwise, you're fucking stupid for defending her.

>>2444665
that's your idea of defending someone?

>>2444657
yep

>>2444665
notice the name, asshat.

EK, can you just not respond to trolls?

>>2444683

nice, i do biology as well. focussing on biochem. and microbiology.

>>2444697
yeh, im doing it for lent this year.
still several months to go though.

EK is a tinfoil hat fuckwit. That is all.

>>2444708
nice!
what year?

>>2444711

i am in the 5th semester now! i really love to study this and plan to move on with a masters in biochem.
i am interested in astrobiology as well, but i think it is very dreamy and not so realistic to really try to go into that direction.
heh, the zoology and botanics people were the nicest characters of all biological disciplines i delt with.
chemists were the worst.

>>2444445
THIS IS WHY NO ONE LIKES YOU EK

So, I just started browsing /sci/ recently, and I find it to be quite a board of my taste.

But I don't understand this hype about EK. Who is this tripfag, and why is she pissing you all off so much?

>>2444737
i'm a bit 'sassy' and 'hipster' apparently
disregard the haters for now, and form you're own opinions in time.

>>2444727
>zoology and botanics people were the nicest characters of all biological disciplines i delt with.
chemists were the worst.
yep! :D thats how it usually works out.
also, astrobiology?
do tell...

Lol.
EK is fairly new (past few months?). She's a girl. As this board's posters are mostly male, that carries a certain interest. There are a bunch of different perspectives on that, some are annoyed by the attention she gets, others give her lavish attention. One person made a !loveEK trip.

She also subscribes to memes, and isn't afraid to troll (in the common way, not the intellectual trolls).

So she gets attention. I don't really mind, I just laugh and watch.

>>2444751
*YOUR not you're

Perhaps you should stop criticizing other people's grammar until you figure it out for yourself.

>>2444760
a girl being lavished with attention because she's the only female in a community full of nerds?

It's like I'm really studying engineering!

>>2444760
EDIT: not that new, been here many months (over a year)

also, im hated for how libertine my attitude is towards sex/drugs etc.

and yeh, the trolling, everyone hates me for that! :D
but thats kind of the point...so im doing something right :)
oh! and the smileys! everyone hates them! =p

and yeh, you have it pretty much spot on apart from that.

>>2444772
HAHAHAHAHA
JAJAJAJAJJAJJJJAJJAJAJAJAA!!1101010102010101!!

I'll just leave this here
http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/2432818

>>2444779
you're hated because you're a dumb cunt.

jk i have no fuckin idea who you are, fuck off attention whore.

>>2444751

terraforming! :D
the nasa puts some money into research of microorganisms with special abilities, like to survive in extreme enviroment or other traits. remember the women who found the arsenic loving bacteria?
that kind of stuff.
but i am not sure, and i think astrobiology is very special and probably there are only needed like 20 peopel worldwide.
just go to the nasa homepage, you can find some additional info. second thing is, they want people with 2 degrees. so i´d had to do chem or geology or so as well, but maybe since i do biochemistry i have noth subjects already.

So people hate her because she's female, type posts in a female kind of way, is young, likes to troll softly and have been here for a year?

/sci/, just at this point your logic confuse me. I see no problem with this. It'd be boring if this just were one big nerdy cockfest.

I like inputs from different persons. I'll keep in mind who you are when I see your posts in the future.

>>2444751

"Hipster" has nothing to do with why you're disliked here. It's much more closely related to your inability to comprehend the culture within which you operate.

>>2444789
Hey wat's this I'll just open the link lets see- OH MY GOD THE IMMENSE AMOUNT OF TROLLING IS HURTING MY BUTTHOLE MAKE IT STOP MAKE IT STOP

>>2444737
Shes a narc that cant spell, insults peopl with other veiwpoints, makes unfounded and often racest statments, thinks every person within a religionis a hick, claims to tell the intelegence of a person through their eyes and attractiveness (and fails to do so on two accounts), and to top it off, she posts a dubs thread on /sci/.

>>2444774
Haha. Nope. EK is the only girl who wants everyone to know she's a girl while the rest of the girls post normally because they don't have an inferiority complex about their gender. I've counted at least 3 other females who have posted here (and not just visiting from /b/ or something). Of course can't be 100% sure if they're really girls or the same person but it's reasonable to think they're not.

I've mentioned my gender maybe.. two times? And I've been here for over 3 months now. Plus 2 months lurking while I was still underage b&. Wouldn't have implied about my gender this time either if it wasn't for the sake of making a point.

I'm not particularly fond of EK, however it has nothing to do with her gender and everything to do with her stupidity.

>>2444822
Oh.

The.

IRONY.

>>2444827
this thread...

... it's full of girls

>>2444789
is that supposed to be a point against me?
i actually come out pretty well in that thread
(i leave before the end, but only because the only people left were morons, and i dont want to be bumping a thread about myself anyway, it isnt science, etc etc)

>>2444809
oh i comprehend the culture alright, i just dont give a fuck. i still post in my very unique way, haters gonna hate.
umad?

>>2444827
>>2444827
this, so much this

EK isn't a girl, he gets/got his pictures from some youtube channel.

>>2444827
And because she is completely unable to comprehend her own shortcomings, she calls everyone who rightfully criticizes her as a "hater"

>>2444848
Yes yes yes, it's impossible for you to just suck, must be everyone else right?
Go fuck yourself with a rake.

How typical.
>EK, uneducated and young semi-troll.
>Militant atheist lacking any sort of nuance in his/her views, which is nicely reflected in the choice of image for this thread.
>No science content within a four mile radius.
>Tripfags come flooding in.
>Inevitably, thread turns into a troll fest.
Stay classy /sci/

but seriously, what about the male tripfage and trolls? noone will even insult them a way they do with her when she only posts "peep".
i think it is really the guys here who have a problem with her, more then she is a problem.

>>2444822
>Shes a narc that cant spell
hahah, lol u best be trollin ni99a.
>insults peopl with other veiwpoints
nope, just people with idiotic viewpoints, or people who spam/don't post science.
>andtherest
umad, etc.

>>2444827
>the only girl who wants everyone to know she's a girl while the rest of the girls post normally
NO.
FUCKING NO!
read this. http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/2431670#p2432398

and the rest of the thread downwards.
i dont just go around stating that im a femanon, it has come up once or twice, and people tend to remember, even though it isnt relevant to the science, and i lose out for it, because most people here are sexist.

>>2444837
>i actually come out pretty well in that thread

>>2444844
have stock reaction images, some of which were originally on youtube (see the OP pic in this thread)
none of the pics i use are me, but i am still female.

>>2444848
if they criticise the post, fine. if they criticise me personally, then they must be a hater, and are basing it on past judgements, rather than the post in question.

>>2444870
what is 'peep'?

>>2444883

she is right, 4chan is about the most sexist place i ever saw. i didnt knwo there is so much hatred towards women before i came here.
if you move down this path any further you soon will have another female tripfag who trolls, just to make a point.

capcha: england eductour

>>2444883
That's one thread. Wanna guess how many I (and probably other females) have posted in? Also, if you really "lose out for it", then don't fucking tripfag. Trust me, you can get attention without it. Just say something worth replying to.

>>2444907

it means, no matter what you say (even if it is just beep), they attack you like a bunch of rabit virgin monkeys, cause thats what they are.

>>2444916
It's because women can get laid basically whenever they want, and guys can't.

>>2444916
Don't mistake our hate for EK with sexism. Yes, there are sexists out there, but fuck, just ignore them. EK is hated because she has an opinion about fucking everything, is willfully persistent about her views, and often doesn't understand the arguments presented to her. Besides this, she's a troll.

>>2444902
lol, u disagree?
link a post that trolled/owned me in any way.

>>2444916
yep. also, the pic on the archive cant be zoomed, so u cant read it, ill post it again here.

<<<this is why it sucks to let it slip that you are a femanon.

>EK thread

>>2444862
[ ] not told
[ ] told
[x] in told blood

>>2444830
Irony?

>>2444883
Not trolling, and I find it funny that you dislike people who dont post science/spam... Oh also when I said I was a pan-theist you called me a hipster and said I had no right to define god... Despite you yourself claiming to be an athiest.

>>2444940
I just have to test this. Look for it in the first page in a couple of minutes.

>>2444940
>lol, u disagree?
>link a post that trolled/owned me in any way.
You posted in the thread.

>>2444925
>missed the point entirely
did you even read what i wrote in that thread?
also, im not gonna stop tripfagging, the only difference would be that the sexist bigots dont know its me, but i dont care anyway,
if they avoid me, fine, if they insult me, ignore. easy. i can't lose
its the internet, bitches!

>>2444933
oh i see, attack me for me, rather than what i post. yeh, im used to it and i dont even mind.
fuck em.

>>2444940
>it sucks to let it slip that you are a femanon
which is part of the reason why most downplay the fact and have learned to defuse the situation so the thread doesn't devolve into a tit-seeking, attention-whoring match.

Unfortunately, you rarely express said skills.

If I was you, I'd just go anonymous fo a few weeks and then come up with a new androgynous trip. And no dropping hints who the new trip is, because it destroys the purpose.

>>2444964
>if they insult me, ignore
Yet you fail miserably on this point. You seem to respond to pretty much any fucking post that references you. The green oval thread linked to earlier is a nice example.

>>2444971

why though? she isnt the bad one with simply beeing a woman. why shoudl anyone hide this fact?
those guys should try to deal with it. thus i support her. you dont want every thread she is in turning into a trollfest? then deal with your guys, tell them to shut up.

>>2444950
yes irony, saying i am a bad speller, and then spelling atrociously throughout the rest of your post.
ah yes, the pantheist, i remember you.
"pantheism is just sexed up atheism" - dawkins.
if you use 'universe' as a synonym for 'god' then it doesn't even have the same meaning anymore, and you are just taking the piss.
yes, i am an atheist, and i use words properly along with their proper meanings.

>>2444959
posting in the thread is fine, i ddidn't even make myself look bad. OP made himself look bad. just a sexist hate filled bigot.
"All I was saying originally is that OP isn't doing too goo a job at cutting EK down and a great job at making himself look like a fucktard." - anon
"Ah, so you're the one OP has his panties in a bunch over. OP isn't doing a very good job at making you look bad, more the opposite really (i.e. OP is making himself look like an idiot). " - different anon.
any haters in the thread were already haters from before.
and nothing of value was lost.

Hey EK, Tits or gtfo.

>>2444490
I got the 2kk get without a picture in my troll science get thread. u mad?

>>2445005
Posting in a troll thread means by you are trolled by definition. And while we're quote mining:
>NO ONE LIKES YOU ON THIS BOARD. EVERYONE THINKS YOU'RE RETARDED. WE KNOW YOU'RE A MAN. FUCK OFF AND STOP POSTING.
> EK, the 19 y/o brittish girl with an inferiority complex and liberated sexual notions. Fat, no education and lives with parents. Sounds about right if you switch 19 with 25 and girl with basement dwelling neckbeard.
>Or you could just stop using the tripfag like any other normal poster. Or contribute something meaningful and stop feeding the goddamn trolls so much.
>This should level out the EK appreciation thread.
> This is the third time you've been thoroughly trolled today EK. For fucks sake, stop feeding so much. Stop bumping shit threads like this and concentrate on the actual good content. Maybe than people wouldn't hate you so much.

>>2444971
nope,
there is no need to 'diffuse the situation'
i can just ignore all haters.

>>2445004
>then deal with your guys, tell them to shut up.
lol >implying anyone can control the legion.

nah, it doesn't matter though.
those enlightened enough to realise gender is not an issue tend to like me, they are helpful and informative, and i am occassionally helpful as well. (you quickly learn which are the good tripfags, and are worthy of communication, for anons you can never tell)

>>2444964
No, I didn't even open the thread. It's one thread so I don't care what happened there.

>>2445004
No one has to hider their gender, female or not. It's not like every male goes around saying "oh btw I'm male an this has nothing to do with the topic". And anyway, EK still isn't hated because she's a female. She's just an idiot and who doesn't hate idiots?

>>2445034
>i can just ignore all haters.
-> >>2444972

>>2445004
because of this:
>>2445027

If EK is so enamored of her socializing up people, there's a new, dedicated board for that named
>>>/soc/

While I appreciate your sentiment, it's like you want to tell rats not to eat your food. EK left her basket on the floor and is now acting surprised that her picnic got swarmed.

So either EK failed to appreciate the kind of majority we have here and is terribly pig-headed, or she's doing it on purpose to get attention.

Either way, not commendable.

>>2445028
>mad
nope,
and besides, its unverifiable, that GET can be labelled to any anon .

>>2445032
>And while we're quote mining:
you don't understand what quote mining is... oh lawdy...

lets see the quotes then...
1. false + ad hominem. ignore.
2. false on almost all points.
3. do contribute meaningfully on most threads.
4. i never start the EK appreciation threads. i am not actually an attention whore despite popular belief.
5. false statement, and i wasn't trolled.

>>2445067
>false
You don't even know how an argument works. Al you do is make statements. Imma get the fuck out of this thread.

>>2444883
>i lose out for it

>>2444964
>i can't lose

Yeah.. Way to go.

>>2445035
>She's just an idiot and who doesn't hate idiots?
evidence? citation? link?
when i'm not trolling, i can actually be pretty helpful. and if you link to a troll comment, that doesnt prove i am an idiot, it just proves i troll once in a while.

>>2445080
ha, okay well played.
i actually think i dont lose out. not much ayway. i dont want replies from bigotted haters, people like that are never intelligent anyway.
there are plenty of decent people i can get proper answers from, who arn't haters. and i can just ignore all the other hater comments that pop up in the thread.

>>2445093
>this thread

Anything else I can do for you?

>>2445065

it is sad though. i get it, but it is sad.

>whole thread
>argument over a get
>check to see if i am on /sci/

well shit.

>>2445117
what, failing a GET makes me an idiot?
grow up.

>>2444958
iseewhatyoudidthere.
>2444988
amirite?

>>2444988

>>2445130
Oh dear lord why do I even bother? Hmm, right, I don't have to!

Hint: there's more to this thread than your failed GET.

>>2445138
Yes.

(Not lying though, I really do need ideas.)

>>2444958
yep, they are being less than helpful.
it became about sexuality almost instantly.
point proven, well played anon.

>>2445151
...i havent said anything foolish in the thread.
link specific post if you wish.

Why would one make such a thread?

>EK!D96TK2PSsI 2306
>search_username=EK&offset=1648
>Sun Jan 2 08:59:27 2011
from greenoval
the date is the earliest post recorded by EK
The offset is the number of posts after that one.
the number after the name is the total posts by EK
Using extrapolation, that gives an initial posting date of around Dec 2010
I can only recall seeing posts from EK as early as Nov 2010
>not that new, been here many months (over a year)
>mfw
>mfw i have no face

>>2445119
I'm sorry. I don't have to like it, but I try not to aggravate it.

data appear false.

I've been on /sci/ almost daily since ~10/2010

EK was noticeably present when I arrived.

>>2445170
lol, fine i'll post in a sec.

>>2445173
was a get attempt that got derailed into a hate thread.

>>2445191
people hate you,
deal with it.

>>2445170
wow /sci/ fucking sucks.... glad to see it isnt just me that gets abuse though.
"Blowjob.
Jesus how is this difficult."
"Baby, what are you doing on 4chan?"
"Take it in the ass"
"Not fucking hard, not fucking science, its called common sense, which you clearly lack, dumb bitch."

>>2445218

yeah, my point. why do people do this?

>>2445225
simple, anonymity.
they can be assholes and no1 can stop them. its the standard default.

>>2445005
>>2445005
My poor spelling is due to me posting this on a kindle, you cant spellcheck, the buttons are small, and its vry hard to read over your post, its not that Im a poor speller, just that my typewriter is broken, as one might say.

As for pantheism, its a definition of beleife that is not covered entierly by atheism... Infact atheism is so poorly defined you could quite possibly define most of /x/ as atheists (assuming theydont beleivein god, they can still believe in monsters under their bed.

And I believe that the universe has many parallels with a normal conventualy defined god, it has created itself (or is timeless, both possabilitys are awe inspireing), it cannot think, atleast in the way that you and I do, but it is extreamly logical, and one could even say self aware. (are we not after all, part of the universe?)

>>2445225
most users come to /sci/ from /b/, where misogeny and requests for sex reign supreme.

EK has it easier on this board than any other. Most of us don't care if she's a woman, except when she gives women a bad name by fitting all of the stereotypes that so often lead to misogeny and requests for sex.

wrong statements and attention whoring are a couple possible examples. I've only seen a couple of categorically incorrect statements come from EK, but she is a bit of an attention whore. e.g. this thread and her participation in it.

>>2445231
5/10

>>2445231
You posted a get thread on /sci/ - Science & Math.
It is so easy to be blind to your own stupidity.

>>2445236
atheism isn't badly defined. it has a definition, like all words do.
atheism - lack of a belief in any gods/deitys.
it says nothing about anything else supernatural, you can be an atheist and still believe in ghosts, unicorns and astrology.
(although most people don't...if you have the sense to be an atheist, you usually have the sense to disregard all supernatural phenomena)
some similaritys with the word 'god' does not mean that the universe literally is god.
the universe doesn't judge you, think, or answer prayers. or any of the other attributes people usually apply to a god.

presumably you don pray to the universe, or kill people in the name of the universe, or hate gays in the name of the universe.
for all intents and purposes, you are an atheist, you act exactly the same as we do, because religion doesn't guide your actions.

>>2445243

ok, but if guys would just move on as they would do on a thread like this started by a male tripfag, there would be no reason to call her an attentionwhore.
you make her one by responding. and you onyl respond cause she mentioned once that she is a female.
really, noone will respond so much someone who is male and silly.

>>2445243
like ive said before, i dont attention-whore.
and except for trolling, i am not usually incorrect. (when i am, i'm happy to admit it, and learn something new)

>>2445249
shush, if this only happens once every 100,000 posts, i dont think it is much of an inconvenience
>implying i was the only one who attempted to get the GET.

>>2445278
agreed. lets move on
/thread.

>>2445243

nearly everything here that peopel dont like will lead to misogenyst comments.
the problem isnt the females, the problem is the guys here who just wait to look for "typical female behaviour", whatever that is supposed to mean.
do i make comments about the silliness of males everytime someone acts stereotypical?
i had really a lot to respond if i did.
it is silly, childish and only reflects the strong need of those peopel for acknowledgment.

>>2445005
>>2445005
My poor spelling is due to me posting this on a kindle, you cant spellcheck, the buttons are small, and its vry hard to read over your post, its not that Im a poor speller, just that my typewriter is broken, as one might say.

As for pantheism, its a definition of beleife that is not covered entierly by atheism... Infact atheism is so poorly defined you could quite possibly define most of /x/ as atheists (assuming theydont beleivein god, they can still believe in monsters under their bed.

And I believe that the universe has many parallels with a normal conventualy defined god, it has created itself (or is timeless, both possabilitys are awe inspireing), it cannot think, atleast in the way that you and I do, but it is extreamly logical, and one could even say self aware. (are we not after all, part of the universe?)

>>2445278
nah, this thread had almost 100 posts before I stopped in, and it's certainly not the first of its kind.

I give EK the same love and abuse I give any namefag on an anonymous imageboard. Maybe a bit more of both since she begs for it.

>>2445288
>implying i was the only one who attempted to get the GET.
Did I now?

Why do you tripfag anyway? I like it when people have to consider my ideas for what they are, not because of who said them. Or what I may have said in the past.

bump for justice.

Patcondell is a fag.
Typical UKIP voting scum.

>>2445272
Many of my friends that believe in a conventinal god dont pray to him.
Many christians dont believe god will derectly intervine in their life.
At the same time, many atheists do hold supernatural and unlogical beleifes, my dad would often claim that drugs open up a supernatural gateway that is unexplainable, one of my good freinds (a briliant man BTW) is a nutjob when it come to conspirasy theorys.
At the end of the day, people are pretty much the same, regaurdless of their religion.

EK's trying to be the Aether succession or what

>>2445428
I think she's more serious than that, they aren't in the same vein.
I don't mind her on here, occasionally she contributes positively, and asks questions.
The trolling bit is a bit annoying, but you can just ignore it.

Also, she isn't hated by literally everyone. So she much be doing something right.

>>2445428
thought you and her got along?

>>2445460
still derails threads.

>>2445485
derailed her own GET thread?
so?

(I'll switch between male and female since I a) believe in no women on the internet and b) women on the internet.)

>>2445467 thought you and her got along?
We've never talked to each other, so I have to rely on what he's writing, which is only rubbish as far as I can remember.
I don't dislike her, but I can't remember any particularly useful comments; I'm pretty neutral, and I'd like to be surprised. (Get threads aren't particularly successful at that.)