[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 9 KB, 328x323, 1284167402914.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2441928 No.2441928 [Reply] [Original]

/sci/ quotes?

>> No.2441935

"OP is a colossal cock sucker"
-Anonymous

>> No.2441936

nope.avi

>> No.2441938

>>2441928

"sykolojees not saienz!!!eleven!! praise richard dawkins!"

>> No.2441939

>>2441928
Completely randomly, here are two of my favorites:

>Evolution by natural selection is the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.

>There is no such thing as perfect in this world. That may sound cliche, but it's the truth. The average person admires it and seeks to obtain it. But, what's the point of achieving perfection? There is none. Nothing. Not a single thing. I loathe perfection. If something is perfect, then there is nothing left. There is no room for imagination. No place left for a person to gain additional knowledge or abilities. Do you know what that means? For scientists such as ourselves, perfection only brings despair. It is our job to create things more wonderful than anything before them, but never to obtain perfection. A scientist must be a person who finds ecstasy while suffering from that antimony. In short, the moment that foolishness left your mouth and reached my ears, you had already lost. Of course, that's assuming you are a scientist.

>> No.2441954

OP pic made me cringe.

>> No.2441963
File: 22 KB, 261x323, 1292825145535.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2441963

>>2441939

>mfw the person who wrote that was too stupid to just include the room for growth in their definition of perfection

>> No.2441967

>>2441963
>perfection
>can change, or become better
wat

>> No.2441999

>>2441967

yeah it's just like saying the most stable systems are the most dynamic ones...

seemingly contradictory, but makes sense if you're not a retard

>> No.2442004

>>2441999
No... I think it just doesn't make sense, except with a particularly obscure and pedantic interpretation of the words.

Congrats on entirely missing the point of the quote.

>> No.2442010
File: 64 KB, 468x250, caveman6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2442010

>>2442004

okay fred

>> No.2442048
File: 136 KB, 428x510, 1282077743187.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2442048

>>2442010