/sci/ - Science & Math

Good for them

* Al-Karaji
* Jamshīd al-Kāshī
* Abū Ja'far al-Khāzin
* Al-Khazini
* Abu-Mahmud Khojandi
* Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī
* Al-Kindi
* Ali Qushji
* Muhyi al-Dīn al-Maghribī
* Al-Mahani
* Abu Nasr Mansur
* Muhammad Baqir Yazdi
* Banū Mūsā
* Yusuf al-Mu'taman ibn Hud
* Ahmad Nahavandi
* Alī ibn Ahmad al-Nasawī
* Al-Nayrizi
* Nazif ibn Yumn
* Qāḍī Zāda al-Rūmī
* Abū al-Ḥasan ibn ʿAlī al-Qalaṣādī
* Abū Sahl al-Qūhī

Yeah, and it's too their credit that they didn't get any Islam in my algebra.

* Al-Saghani
* Ibn Sahl
* Shams al-Dīn al-Samarqandī
* Ibn Yahyā al-Maghribī al-Samaw'al
* Aḥmad ibn Mūsā ibn Shākir
* Al-Ḥasan ibn Mūsā ibn Shākir
* Muḥammad ibn Mūsā ibn Shākir
* Sijzi
* Ibrahim ibn Sinan
* Sinan ibn Thabit
* 'Abd al-Hamīd ibn Turk
* Nasir al-Din al-Tusi
* Sharaf al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī
* Yaʿīsh ibn Ibrāhīm al-Umawī
* Abu'l-Hasan al-Uqlidisi
* Yaʿqūb ibn Ṭāriq
* Ibn Yunus
* Ahmed ibn Yusuf
* Abū Ishāq Ibrāhīm al-Zarqālī

...which does not mean shit.
Here we talk about the tool, not about the culture of the people that made the tool.

Yeah, and it's to their credit that they didn't get any Islam in my algebra.

these men are half a chromosome away from a chimpanzee

to bad no muslims are using advanced math today

ok bye

Argument from Authority. Just because these men contributed greatly to math, does not mean their religion is correct as well.

Newton was a Christian. Doesn't mean Christianity is correct either.

Thanks for playing, try again later.

Math is created by losers in every culture. You know, nerds.

>>2410079
>Newton was a Christian.
he was accused of being a godless athiest

>>2410092

By incredibly strict Christians.

It's like Bin Laden's type of Muslims. They only believe they are the true Muslims.

Newton was definetely a Christian, deal with it.

And your point is?

>>2410029

Unless the posters of this board are discussing Newton.

In that case, a bunch of autistic high school students can make all sorts of assumptions about his personal beliefs.

>>2410104
prove it

>>2410092

they do that to everyone who challenge their dogmas

in the past, muslims did great things for science. now all they can do is blow themselves up to kill civilians. why can't they be as awesome as they were before?

>>2410119

He was a upper middle class, educated man of the period who had personal friends in the hierarchy of Britain.

Basically, it would have been unlikely that he was anything else. Since roughly 100 percent of educated people up until about 1880 practiced religion.

Why does it offend you so much that the greatest scientist who ever lived, who died a few hundred years ago, happened to believe in something you don't?

>>2410128

You and OP are too retarded to know the difference between someone with an Arabic name and someone who is Islamic.

Protip: Islam is the actual reason the Arab world stopped producing anything.

>>2410130
>Since roughly 100 percent of educated people up until about 1880 practiced religion.

This isn't really a proof.

it doesn't bother me, i'm just curious. and you're assuming i'm an atheist because i don't think newton was a christian? nice logic there bro

>>2410136
Whatever Isaac Newton believed it is still an absolute certainty that being an atheist does not make you immune to the same self-justification and fallibility as everyone else.

Why are you so pathologically desperate to hold onto the delusion that you are superior to everyone else? Ego much?

>>2410136

>and you're assuming i'm an atheist

Because I can see you all over /sci/ fagging up threads with talk of Religion as opposed to science.

You also type like a retard. The sort of retard who discusses faith on a science board.

>This isn't really a proof.

I'm not the one who made the stupid claim that Newton wasn't a Christian you spastic. Go find some proof that he wasn't. Look at all his research into the Bible and the church. If you get brought up in an environment where all your peers, your parents and your education is built around Religion you don't suddenly have an epiphany and realise it might not be true. Especially in 17th century England.

>>2410133

well its just sad they don't realize this today. they went from being an asset to our species to a liability, because of a book written by a belligerent retard

>>2410153

You really are a fool. Arabs are not always Islamic. A Muslim is not always an Arab.

ISLAM was created by an ARAB. Who spread it to the rest of the Arabic world, about 1400 years ago.

Islam didn't replace the Arab lifestyle, it simply prevented the majority of them from doing things against their own belief.

The people on OPs list were not Islamic.

>>2410157

calm the fuck down man, i'm not saying you're wrong, in case you didn't figure it out

>>2410162

>they went from being an asset to our species to a liability

>>2410147
ror ok
>>2410150
i don't browse /sci/ often and english isn't my native language so sorry about that

>Look at all his research into the Bible and the church.
explain how that makes someone christian

>If you get brought up in an environment where all your peers, your parents and your education is built around Religion you don't suddenly have an epiphany and realise it might not be true.
we're talking about newton, not some ordinary guy. i believe he was intelligent enough to doubt religious dogma. and again what makes you think he just wasn't posing as a christian?

>I'm not the one who made the stupid claim that Newton wasn't a Christian you spastic.
my stupid claim was "maybe newton wasn't a christian" and i get called spastic for asking for proof?

The actual subject should read:

"These men were ARAB and all created the Math that you're using right now".

As already mentioned, every arab is not a muslim/islamic.

Because Mohammad was arab, he carried the arabic naming system wherever he spread his shit ( read: religion) but most of the contribution of these great men was even before the advent of Islam, when the arabs were pagans.

/thread.