[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 5 KB, 225x225, images..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2387818 No.2387818 [Reply] [Original]

Alright, so we've determined that invisibility inherently causes blindness, and that super-speed inherently slows down the person into bullet time so much so that running anywhere would seem like days to the person, which obviously is atrocious to think about or attempt (even if the person somehow doesn't get tired).

What about personal flight? I see no reason for it to be ruined by science (intrinsically). Thoughts?

>> No.2387825

How do you fly faster?

>> No.2387827

You would be shot down as an unidentified flying object instead. Or have to spend tens thousands on radio communication equipment to be allowed to fly within a nation's airspace.

>> No.2387831

also, requesting higher res of that animu superwoman

>> No.2387838
File: 91 KB, 887x598, 1286604691187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2387838

>>2387818
problem?

>> No.2387845

>>2387825
i assume you just do.
>>2387827
>legally
dohoho. anyways, what if you had the money for it? and it was small enough? I'd be fine with donning my flight headset anytime i flew.

>> No.2387846

>>2387838
you'd need super compressed helium to get enough helium in there to overcome your weight!

>> No.2387855

>>2387818
>super-speed inherently slows down the person into bullet time so much so that running anywhere would seem like days to the person
I hope you're not talking about relativity, because it would be the opposite.

>> No.2387863

>>2387855
it's not relativity. to process the inputs of the world around you and direct your footfalls correctly, you would have to speed up reaction time that much.

>> No.2387871

>>2387863
That's why teleportation is so much more practical.

>> No.2387879

If flying too high gets you caught up on the radar then fly a bit lower, jeez. Also OP, at which speeds are you thinking of flying?

>> No.2387887

>>2387846
Ugh. Good one.

>> No.2387892

>>2387818
personal flight? As in with a jet pack or without?

>> No.2387900
File: 20 KB, 363x360, 1295119798428.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2387900

>>2387846

>> No.2389149

>>2387879
meh, car speeds, nothing too much greater. up to 100mph?
>>2387892
either.