/sci/ - Science & Math

Well he wouldn't get pregnant, that's for sure.

bumping out of curiosity

Long term effects include smaller penis and loss of hair.

contraceptive pill = estrogen
estrogen + male = man-boobs

chemical castration.

Depends what kind of pill. If it's progestogen only, that's different than estrogen/progestogen. But mostly he'd start retaining fluids and have acne breakouts. (Did you know that preventing acne by regulating irregular cycles is one of the major reasons teenage girls go on birth control? Now you do!)

An antiprogestogen would probably have no effect at all, and apparently there's a drug that targets estrogen receptors, which probably wouldn't have many side effects in men either.

>>2340886
Awesome. :)

Sup

>>2340893
Progesterone

>>2340910
that has to be a troll

>>2340927
No shit Sherlock. Why should she be using a tampon during ovulation? There's no way you can get pregnant when bleeding.

>>2340954
Ovulation and bleeding do not necessarily happen at different times, there are multiple factors which can disrupt the normal cycle

>>2341311
im pretty sure you cant get pregnant while on your period.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar-based_contraceptive_methods

>>2341398
>Implying sperm cant survive in the female body for SEVERAL DAYS.
Fuck her on the last day of her bleeding and you could be a daddy 9 months later

>>2340927
A troll from August 2000.

AWWWWWW SHIT.

>>2341412
well i personally couldn't; i am female.

also, seems you are right, sperm can survive for around 3-4 days apparently... i didn't know that.

also, ive read that after an egg is released it is eitehr fertilised within 2 days, or broken down.

...so why is the fertility time on my diagram 11 days?
i dont get it,
lets say 5 days for the earliest the sperm would work, + 2 days for the latest the egg would work, = about 7 days, not 11.

hmm...

>>2341446
edit: 12 days on my diagram

>>2341446
Same reason the graph in this thread has a day marked 26-32.

>>2341455
I was not aware you knew exactly when your egg is released

>>2341461

i don't

i was just saying that when it IS released, it only survives for 2 days unless fertilised.

wait...so only about 7 days per month i could actually get pregnant?
the rest of the time i could fuck without contraception and still be fine?

>>2341470
Yes, but since you don't know when your egg is released, you can't know which 7 days to be safe on.

>>2341470
Yes ma'am but if I were you I wouldn't take that risk

>>2341472
i would presume the 7 days immediately after my period finishes would be the danger-days.
after that, i should be safe i think. this is all hypothetical... im just interested in teh science of it. im not actually going to take any risks.

>>2341475
no, im not going to take the risk, there is no need to.
also, i dont have a regular sexual partner, so i use contraception anyway.

>>2341485
>implying anyone would have sex with you

>>2341489
hah, wtf?
you don't even know who i am, or what i look like.

granted, looks matter far less than personality, intelligence etc. well they do to me anyway, and i guess you can get a feel for what kind of person i am from my posts...

w/e

>>2341492
butthurt?

>>2341497
nope :)

>>2341492
i'd fuck you

>>2341507
lol, just based on my posts and the fact i am female?

wow...full marks for placing no weight value on appearance... good for you, i guess.

im slightly more in between TBH, i like looks and personality.
but 'personality required, IDC about looks' > 'im a shallow prick, i only care about looks'
so good on ya. :)

>>2341527
i would fuck a dead man thats why

>>2341531
eww...

>>2341537
I'd fuck you sideways.

>>2341537
I'm sorry, what kind of scientist are you interested in? Or are you just here to get the trolls of /sci/ to lick your asshole then graph the results?

>>2341558
He might be the best you're going to get, EK, I'd go for it.

>>2341568
what?
who says im only interested in scientists?
scientists arnt the only people who are intelligent and have desirable personality
and some scientists may have neither of these traits.

and no, im not
also, i have no desire to try to 'hook up' with ayone over /sci/

>>2341572
he might.
i will never know...

>>2341578
>scientists arnt the only people who are intelligent

Wrong.

>also, i have no desire to try to 'hook up' with ayone over /sci/

Yet, this is a wise choice. But only because /sci/entists are not scientists.

>>2341606
i disagree.
people who can make great films, or write great books are not scientists, but clearly a lot of effort goes into these creations, and a great deal of intelligence is needed to do it.

>>2341606
>/sci/entists are not scientists.
i think the majority probably are. otherwise they would not choose this specific board.

>>2341606
>Wrong.
/sci/ never ceases to amaze me with its generalized stupidity.

EK why did you come here to get praennant, don't you know how many engineers are on this board?

>>2341636
>why did you come here to get praennant
*pregnant

also, as soon as they find a way to transport sperm over the internet, i'll have to get back to you on that.

nothing would happen.
they only work on girls, retard.

>>2341485
I believe there is a few day gap. So the middle of the month is riskier.

>>2341485
whore

fuck you.

tits or Gtfo. I don't care if this isn't /b/.

>>2341756
what, me?

hah, in your dreams, asshole.

I can see a market for a product that can detect when an egg is released and let the user know about it.

>>2341764
Why not?

You're a slut anyways, sleeping around with men without contraceptives.

That's an interesting idea. I wonder how reliable it would have to be to not cause more problems than it prevents.

>>2341771
these already exist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luteinizing_hormone#Ovulation_predictor_kit_.28LH_kit.29

>>2341784
learn to read properly, dickhead
>"also, i dont have a regular sexual partner, so i use contraception anyway."
>"so i use
>"i use"

im not an idiot.
also, i dont care if you think im a slut. i do what i like, if you have a problem with that then fuck you.

EK how much do I have to pay to sleep with you? I'm still a virgin, so please be gentle.

>>2341811
I assume that the price is in the form of years of recurring nightmares.

>>2341811
i never do it for money.
...or drinks, or buying me dinner... or any of the other 'slightly whorey' things other girls tend to do. i always enjoy it as much as whichever guy i am with, ...moreso perhaps. so i would feel i were exploiting them if i tried to get anything else out of it.

..also, i am wealthy enough to not need to whore myself out.

>>2341828
You're wealthy enough selling your body (while not wearing protection) so you don't sell your body.

wat

Slut logic.

>>2341828
>...or drinks, or buying me dinner... or any of the other 'slightly whorey' things other girls tend to do.
really?
damn

cost of whore: $50, chance of getting laid: 100%
cost of alcoholic beverage for drunk girl: <$10.
chance of getting laid: >50%

u jelly?

Ya know, back in the days before contraception. The girls had to take it up the wrong'un.

Captcha: Godel's nefeam

>>2341863
you fail at reading.
i DONT whore myself out.
i DO use protection when having normal non-whorey consensual sex.
understand yet?

>>2341870
>The girls had to take it up the wrong'un.
>had to

nope.avi

>>2341887

Obviously you don't watch 8 out of 10 cats.

>>2341893
ha, i do actually.

>>2341909
Who are you to talk, while men are speaking.

>>2341919
iunno, an equal human being?

>>2341935
somehow femanons just dont fit in here. for some weird reasons i get mad after reading your posts. might be because you have to reply to every stupid fucking troll post and even add stupid unrelated pictures. typical woman. thank the Lord you don't use emoticons

oh wait, you do

just gtfo

>>2341935
Tripfag open cumdumpsters are sub-sub-human

>>2341940
ah, how amusing
such a shame that your opinion doesn't matter as all...

God I love /sci/
Keep it real, STEM is, and always will be, a MAN's job.

>>2341954

yeah, that is so true, a penis is vital to succeed in all of those...
rolls-eyes.JPG

>>2341962
i just finished reading all this and already want to kill you.
I'm going to kill you

>>2341963
lol, which bit specifically offended you?

Once again, Tits or Gtfo.

>>2341967
"rolls-eyes.JPG"

>>2341953
>opinion doesnt matter
>reply every single post about you
haha i c wat u did thar

counter-trolling ek's faggotry with troll physics

>>2341970
being sarcastic on the internet... doesnt always comes across, seeing as you might read my words in the wrong tone.
rolls-eyes.JPG indicates the sarcasm, just in cae you didn't get it. :)

>>2341968
pic related

ek is the gayest tripfag this board has ever had

Oh, hey, I didn't know /r9k/ moved in.

>>2341975
jokes on you, i lurrrrrve mudkips/troll-physics

EK, out of curiosity, how old are you?

>oh look, yet another interesting thread on /sci/
>female is introduced as female
>halfway down, turns to facebook discussion
>not on my /sci/

>>2341985
19

Your younger than most of us here, now get back in the fucking kitchen.

>>2341991 19

Thank you for answering.

>ITT

lets cut the trolling and return to the SCIENCE!
Another side effect for a male taking those pills would be reducing the likelihood of prostate cancer!

>>2341999
thanks for actually posting a kitchen
you see, i am fucking moron, and without your picture to help me, i would have no idea what a kitchen even was. thank you so much.

>>2342004
no problem. was tempted to ignore it, but then saw that it was you who posted. so i was liek 'y not just tell him?'
so i did.

>>2342020
But do they make your breath Minty fresh?

>>2342020
well then males should take hem, right?
...unless negative effects outweigh that positive benefit...
what are the negative effects again?

>>2342024
I was going to guess either 19 or 22. Could not figure it out.

Fuck that, I don't want man-boobs. I'd like to have kids once in my life.

>>2342030
Man boobs and hairloss

how babby formed? how gril get pragnet?

I am the bone of my board.

>>2342030
men should never take them because of sterillity, etc.
they also increase the likelyhood of stroke and other vascular problems in both men and women, especially smokers

>>2342040
>either 19 or 22
>those numbers are not consecutive
erm, out of curiosity, why those 2 numbers?

>>2342045
fat guys get man boobs right...what if a skinny healthy guy began taking the contraceptive pill, but had a very low fat intake. he wouldnt be capable of growing man boobs, yes?

>>2342050
*praennant

>>2342065
shit, women as well?
...how effective are condoms on their own?

>>2342077
very effective, but far less fun

>Mfw one day /sci/ will get a mod that will clean up thes religion threads and permaban ek

HTML is my body, and TCP/IP is my blood.

>>2342091
true, but the pill on its own would only stop pregnancy.

has no effect on preventing lurgey.
probably be fine, but better to be safe than sorry etc.

>>2342099
1. this isnt a religion thread
2. i am in favour of the religion threads being cleaned up
3. i will not be permabanned just because some of you dislike me, i havent broken any of the rules, ergo, i will not be b&. problem?

>>2342068
Your writing and thoughts seem to have 2 traits. I could not tell if you were an old 19 or young 22

I have created over a thousand threads.

>>2342134

welcome to /sci/book

feel free to leave

>old low number, young high number

>>2342134
and there is no chance of me being inbetween?
how did you work that out?

>>2342164
Well, you remind me of a Swedish friend. I thought he was 19 because he talked about school. But it didn't quite fit him. Turns out he was 22 and this is his second time in higher education.

>>2342164
I want to be inbetween your legs.

Unknown to boredom.

>>2342173
>>2341558
>>2341507

samefag?
or are there just fuckloads of horny guys on /sci/?

>>2342206
Just post timestamped tits/vag/ass and you're off the hook.

>>2341438
That's actually from 2008. I laughed at it for a million seconds.

ITT: "hitting on EK"

Would you guys and EK be terribly inconvenienced if you took this to irc or /soc/?

>>2342256
'hitting on' = "i want to fuck you"?

...thats a pretty shite way of trying to hit on someone IMO

>>2342281
So you want us to fuck you?

>>2342281
hence the " "

Sorry, I forgot this was the internet and no one will understand humour unless I add a LOLOOLOOLLOOLOOLLO
or ;) after it.

>>2342308
who's 'us'?
and no, probably not

(although for all i know, i could have already met you IRL, been unaware you were a /sci/tard, already fucked you, you were unaware i was EK. etc)

>>2342340
Stop teasing us.

GangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGang
bangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbang
GangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGang
bangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbangGangbang
GangbangGangbangGangbang!

Hm, finding pascal and EK always in the same thread. Interesting.

I need more theine.

>>2342355
lol, im really curious now... i wonder what the stats are on something like this...
maybe i should have some sort of secret codeword, just to find out if they ever used /sci/ ... i suppose there would be no way to know.

... wait, no need to use a codeword. i could just say "EK" and then judge there facial expression and see if it makes any sense to them.

>>2340879
Enjoy your bitch-tits.

HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.
HIS NAME WAS ROBERT PAULSON.

>>2342362
I would wager EK has afternoon classes. And pascal gets bored at work.

>>2342367
lol, just imagined quite an amusing scene.
as they orgasm, i'm like "by the way, i am EK, does that mean anything to you?", and they are like "OH MY GOD ITS YOU!!"

>>2342367
Eek
Eck
Or ekay

>>2342377
I'm not usually the guy to ask, but post pics? I am generally curious to what a woman that browses /sci/ would look like.

>>2342377
I would cum instantly, over and over.

> /sci/

>>2342386
'ekay' is how i say it.

>>2342387
lol, that question has come up at the end of at least 5 different threads...lol.

nah, i dont want to post pics. sorry.

>>2342387
>implying woman

This thread is unbelieveable. /sci/ confirmed for being the most pathetic board on 4chan.

>>2342411
hows it pathetic... i might have accidently slightly derailed the thread, but i think the OP was already answered very early on anyway.

>>2342431
> She doesn't understand.

>>2342377
im going out on saturday. i will try this.
...if i pull a guy, it probably wont pull a /sci/tard... but i like the feeling of 'ooh, it could be!"

>>2342367
>secret codeword
Or just ask a question like this ,,Do you happen to know imageboard called /sci/ about science and math?"

>>2342506
oh yeah....fine, i could just do that.

>>2342431
because it turned into a bunch of nerds slobbing over an attention whore
and yes you are an attention whore.
The conversation turned to YOU and you kept it going.

>>ITT: the unfuckable drool over the unfuckable.

GTFO my /sci/ you attention whoring tripfag.
Do you understand now?

Your posts have nothing to do with anything but yourself. Unfortunately you have found a place (on the internet, lulz) where you can actually get male attention because in real life there has been a stark lack of quality males. Here you can pretend.

/sci/ + possible female = funny as fuck

>>2342549
lol.
>in real life there has been a stark lack of quality males.
nope. most of my friends are males (im a bit of a tomboy) and all are 'quality'

every is forgeting the nasty side effects like puking, blood clots in your brain, bone loss ect ect

>>2342387
ugh, be careful what you wish for

>>2342566
Is that... you?

>>2342566
God damnit, do you have to ruin every thread? You're so fucking annoying.

>>2342597
no. im also not will smith or this guy >>2341884
in case any of you were wondering.

>>2342599

>>2342603

>>2342616

Excerpt from a recently published study in the journal Science.
>Various studies have suggested internet users shedding the vale of anonymity, commonly referred to 'tripfags' on the popular image board 4chan.org, are attention whores of giant proportions. In this case study we provide further support for this hypothesis. We provide novel insight into the psyche of the tripfag by quantifying the attention whoring behavior of 'EK !D96TK2PSsI'. Further studies are needed in order to provide adequate solutions to this problem.

This.

ah yes, the internet
where the men are men, the women are men and the little girls are fbi agents

>>2342654
'horrible' boyfriend?
wtf?
lol, if you were 'horrible' you'd be so dumped!

dont want a boyfriend anyway.
commitment sucks.

>>2342644
Well that settles it. The data don't lie.

>>2342665
That was irony. You don't have to reply to everything that involves your person or GOTIS, you know...

>>2342665 commitment sucks

What's so bad about commitment?

Lmao, dumb bitch doesn't understand her own period and gets it explained to her by males.

Go back to \soc\ faggot

>>2342691

erm, i dunno...
i guess i felt it was needlessly restricting myself, and that there were certain ways i would probably be expected to act, and dress up and shit, and i wouldnt have a clue what i was doing.

i mean, look at it this way: you eat lots of different foods, drink lots of different things, and have lots of different friends, and everyone is cool with it. but as soon as you try to have several different lovers, everyone gets insanely butthurt and pissed off, and its all 'cheating' and 'unfaithful' and shit like that.
and im like, well pardon me if no1 explained the fucking rules!

like, if you say you'll be in a relationship and commit to it, then guys become like overprotective, and paranoid etc. and dont like you even talking to other guys. and this pisses me off
wheras if they are only friends, they have no control over you, and no right to try to make you do anything. they dont own you.
...yeh, i guess to me it kinda feels like ownership/slavery in a way
"this girl is MY girlfriend" (my property, i own her, hands off, etc etc)

also, im not religious, so to me, marriage is only a bit of paper and a ring (im not so into jewellry either)

>>2342716
you wouldn't even know you had sperm at all if it wasn't explained to you in a science textbook, so STFU.

>>2342739
/sci/ - where even the woman are aspies

>>2342758
im not an aspie!

...fine, if you think commitment and reltionships are so great. explain why.
convince me
go.

>>2342763
This is precisely why you're an aspie.

>>2342739
I would say give it a few more years. Not every guy will be as needy, and at some point you might meet someone you would like to lay claim to. Sharing is nice, but don't you want the best for yourself?

>>2342763

because dumb-asses like you disagree with them

if you followed any patterns in nature you would know it takes two to tango in everything. even down to the creation of the galaxies, you need a (+) and (-) in everything, even souls. unfortunately for women they are the (-) and that's why guys are such chill positive dudes.

bro fists all around

>>2342769
'lay claim to'?
doubt it.

what would you do if one of your friends was like "i feel i am not getting enough attention, stop being friends with everybody else, and just be friends with me, you are only allowed one friend"

you'd tell them to fuck right off, they have no right to put that kind of shit on you.
but apparently its acceptable for lovers to say pretty much the same thing.

>>2342778
YUAH BRO FIST YYYUUUUAAAAHH

>>2342769
>don't you want the best for yourself?
yes, but the best for myself is complete freedom.
to not be restricted at all.
and i wouldnt try to restrict any guys sexuality either.

>>2342763
Because of evolution. Faithful women are not using their precious womb to breed someone else's genes. Faithful men are not impregnating other women and splitting resources which would be otherwise used to ensure future for children of a single wife. It's that simple.

>>2342790
Could you fuck a guy just for the heck of it? No strings attached?

>>2342780 only 1 friend
In my experience relationship double my friends. And any relationship as limiting as the one you describe can't be healthy, nor will it last.

>>2342801
I think a lot of the guys here could do that.

>>2342799
>implying i ever want children

>>2342801
can and do. to me its just for fun, no spirituality or love or bullshit need be attached to it.

>>2342807
erm... i dont fully understand. explain please. i was just using an analogy. to simplify:
me: many friends, many lovers
everyone else: many friends, STRICTLY ONLY 1 LOVER OR GTFO

>>2342834
Your implications are irrelevant, you wanted a reason why relationships are "great" and I provided it.

>>2342855
if there is a good evolutionary reason for monogamy, why do not all species of animal do it?
actually, fuck this, this thread is too long, and we are way off topic. switching thread to a new one i will make in a moment...

>>2342865
Because we don't share the same evolutionary path? Polygyny is far more common in natural world than polyandry, so that probably wouldn´t make you happy. And then...you can have shitload of offspring in which you don't invest much after giving a birth, so you don't need to have a partner. But you don't lay millions of eggs like flies and that settles it.

>>2340896
That's why I always fucked the ugly pimple-covered bitches without a rubber. They're insecure as well so it makes it easier to take advantage of them.