/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2322562
There is always someone we can dispose of.

>>2322562
>somewhat necessary
what? I can't think of a single test that would give us information that we couldn't get from a voluntary subject, an understanding of biology, studying someone who's already afflicted, and animal testing.

Unless "how long before an average girl turns into a cockhungry man pleasing object from being trapped in a room with a rape robot 24/7" counts. That's a necessary study of human behavior that requires some sacrifice.

>>2322568
Like orphans?
Or your useless, plebeian mother?
Or what about you?
You don't even have a decent college degree.

>>2322586
How could you know if I have a college degree or not?

>>2322603
Because you sound like a loser faggot still in high school.

>>2322609
Is it a general law that all loser faggots in high school speak like I did?

>>2322586
>you have a point but you suck, therefore you have no point

FTFY

>>2322586
Like mass murderers.

I see no reason for such experiments unless you plan to want to experiment in psychology or neuroscience. And you can't use ^ for obvious reasons.

IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S SOME UNIT 731 UP IN THIS BITCH

look up unit 731

>>2322609
Some of the world's greatest minds had the same moral integrity, it's no indicator of intelligence as much as we'd like to think otherwise.

Personally I'm against inhumane experiments if they don't somehow save lives or are performed on an involuntary subject. I'd like to extend that kind of morality to experiments on animals but it's not really practical.

This is too broad of a subject for any one answer, really. It just comes down to whether or not the end justifies those means. Can one life save a thousand? Can a hundred lives save a million? Or is it just an immoral experiment for the sake of knowledge?

>>2322609
give the kid some slack, we used to be like that too, at some point.
>>2322568
Kid, once you break down the barriers between black and white, they start to mix together to create a grey, which at first is scorned, but then is accepted, this holds true for a lot of the shit going on in our society. once you begin to say there is someone who deserves to die the boundries begin to shift, and slowly there are more people who "deserve" to die, as pointed out by >>2322586
btw, this one of the big reasons countries with death penalties suck, like the USA, Japan and North Korea, the others mainly being third-world.

The ends can justify the means and an experiment that causes harm can give us information valuable enough to be worth it, the problem is that people are notoriously bad at distinguishing when this is the case and so if we allow 'immoral' experiments to become commonplace we might end up doing more harm than good.