/sci/ - Science & Math

Don't feed.

Its full.

I actually laughed a bit
Sage tho

> implying they didn't

u faggot einstien invented gravity
newton was wrong with his apple (lol apple fan)

Gravity is bullshit
We don't even know if gravitons exist
On the other hand, everyone knows about magnetons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_magneton

magnet theory: 1
"gravity": checkmated

u mad, gravitationists?

U MAD?

if "gravity" is real, how can flying magnet machines work?

"gravitationism": 0
magnet religion: 2

you shoulda seen what his shop was like during gravitybeta testing, place was messed up. I'm totally down with g9.8, this version is the shizzle. best invention eva.

>>2322000
Sirens went off at the use of 'clip' before the whole magnet thing.

I've been spending too much time at /k/

>>2322008
The Strong Force Alignment was here you are small time magnetic religion.

>>2322024
maybe, but can you use "strong force" to generate unlimited energy? i don't think so

magnetons: 1
gravitons: 0

magnetons: 2
photons: 0

magnets are real and extremely powerful
magnons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnon
magnetons: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneton

u mad, fake religions?

>>2322017
>Sirens went off (...) before the whole magnet thing.
Wait, that pretty much implies you rage at coolface physic comics.
I hope it's just an unfortunate implication...

>implying u are not mad

>>2322348
This would actually work given the magnet was powerful enough.

>>2322402
lol no that's clearly impossible
everyone knows...
most others are possible though

>>2322465
>troll physics
>impossible
ha-ha-ha-oh-wow.bmp.tar.lzma

Fucking Maxwell's equations. How do they work?

umad, newton?

>>2322640
Omg, professor trollington, i have to try it!!!

>>2321928
Gravity isn't real. We know the theory of gravity is wrong. It doesn't correctly describe behavior on quantum scales. But it works on larger scales so we still use it and just call anyone who uses it on the wrong scale a retard. In the meantime, we're trying to figure out how it does work.
So gravity isn't invented yet. Why aren't you floating?

>>2322828
>butthurt gravityfag

fuck gravitationists

u mad, groundfags?

gravityfags are so jelly.

Gravitationalists have used millions of fake "experiments" to convince the military and Congress of the existence of this so-called "force," so that they can net hundreds of billions of dollars a year on crackpot devices such as airplanes, helicopters, and missiles, that supposedly are exempt from their "universal" law of gravity because they exert an "opposing" force.

Any moron can see straight through the gravitationalists' bizarre claims. The gravitationalists say there is a force between the earth and my computer moving it toward the center of the earth. Guess what ... the computer is STILL HERE.

continued...

But in case you want a mathematical proof, try this. The gravitationalists say that the height of an object above the ground will be <span class="math">x = h - {1 \over 2} g t^2[/spoiler], with <span class="math">weight = m_{object} * g[/spoiler], and <span class="math">weight = Gravconstant * m_{earth} * m_{object} / distance^2[/spoiler]. This means that the height <span class="math">x = h - {1 \over 2} Gravconstant * m_{earth} * t^2 / distance^2[/spoiler]. But the same equations show that the earth will be falling toward the object with height <span class="math">x = h - {1 \over 2} Gravconstant * m_{object} * t^2 / distance^2[/spoiler]. Are there two different distances between the earth and the object? Apparently the gravitationalists think so.

With such obvious mathematical proof against the gravitationalists, you might wonder why no one has spoken up yet. The fact is, that many have, but that the powerful gravitationalist forces prevent them from being heard. When an experiment that would disprove gravity is suggested, they do not allow it to be funded, or if it did have funds, they would try to stop it from being carried out anywhere, and if it is carried out they will make sure that the results are never published and certainly that the experiment is never reproduced. And so they can confidently tell the unwitting populace that "no experiment has ever disproven gravity," and after thorough literature searches no one can find anything but a few isolated experimenters, whose names the gravitationalists had dragged thoroughly through the mud a long time ago. And so people being gullible, and not taking the initiative to think or experiment for themselves, blindly accept the gravitationalist dogma as truth, and go about their day-to-day business, while the gravitationalist cabal sinks its teeth deeper and deeper into every taxpayer's pocket.

Isn't it a shame that science has sunk so low?

>>2323048
>>2323048
>>2323048
Your computer is not moving cuz it has a support underneath it that can bear the load. But otherwise it would untill it hits the center of mass of the computer-earth system.

Second, where the fuck did that formula come from. That doesnt even make sense. That formula closest resembles potential energy formula.

And if you look at newtons second law that is true. Your computer exerts a force on the earth the same magnitude, but in the opposite direction as the earth putting a force on the computer. (assuming the computer is static)

It just so happens the force needed to move the earth is much much larger then what the computer can exert.

and its not a second distance... its the same distance, defined as the distance between the center of radius of the two objects.

>>2323016
Savien Cyrano de Bergerac ORIGINAL TROLL PHYSICIST!

I just submitted all this to Conservapedia.
I got thumbs up for disproving science and challenging the field of gravitation as unscientific and unable to stand up to the theory of God Exists Bible Is True Deal With It.