/sci/ - Science & Math

and that's bad because....

>lawyer, lawyer, soldier, lawyer, tailor, lawy

wait what

>>2314037
can't lead americans if you have a small dick

>>2314075
>typical american detected

>>2314075
Are you serious?

does it really matter?

>>2314092
no explanation then?

how do you expect any improvement if you don't show us the error of our ways?

Presidents usually come about through being in the government already.

People in the government are usually former lawyers who know their shit about law.

As such, chances are a president is a lawyer. Following times of war, a Conservative former Officer is very probable in being elected (with exceptions, of course).

Not to mention most of our presidents existed in a time when lightbulbs were considered withcraft anyway.

Not sure why OP would think that a politician is qualified to science, or a scientist is qualified to politician.

Two vastly different scopes of interaction, and people rarely have time or energy to be great at a lot of things.

Fucking retard Americans, the president's job is being President, not some lawyer or military bullshit.

>>2314037
We need more wrestling pope bow hunters

>>2314100
yes.

as far as i am told here, there are only 5 presidents that could count, understand or use technology, or have a single notion what science was.

what did we vote into office? Tree stumps?

i admit things might better if we had...but seriously...what? you don't expect me to accept such an absurd idea do you?

>>2314108
>how do you expect any improvement if you don't show us the error of our ways?
Everybody in the first world has been doing that for decades now, making it so obvious a retard would laugh at those who aren't able to notice it, and yet you fucks still choose to ignore it and assume it doesn't exist and never did.

tl;dr: We do, always, but you still refuse to accept or acknowledge it.

>>2314101

Would you rather have the launch codes in the hands of a theist or a rational indivudal?

>>2314128
You're accepting absurd ideas with your post right now.

>>2314128
>implying a scientific, mathematical, or technical background is an absolute prerequisite to counting, understanding technology, or possessing a basic knowledge of science

You guys are stupid...people educated in law and politics generally go into...law and politics.

Scientists go into science, because genius in mathematics and physics for the most part doesn't go well with geneius in economics, sociology, diplomacy, law, and governing.

Scientists are good in science, having a science degree doesn't make you a master in every field

Seriously, vote Ron Paul if he comes back. The man is a legit, practising doctor and he's studies economics for over (iirc) a decade.

He actually answered questions intelligently and honestly while idiots like McCain tried to bullshit and pretending they actually understood the terms that Paul was using.

>>2314137
indeed i am.
where do i error?

Where does operations research fit in?

>>2314148
what?

run the country like a business instead of your own personal piggy bank?

That's ludicrous

>>2314131
Let's see. One says there is no point to the universe, and humanity, the other thinks they will suffer for eternity if they murder.

Thiest

>>2314129
yet we are the idiots....I see

yes. well, you are of course free to continue opening the fridge every three minutes and expecting the contents to change.
We won't mind to terrible much.

>>2314165
You're an irrational and insane person that's a danger to the intellectual side of society, and intelligent thinking generally.

>>2314165
>will suffer for eternity if they murder

Murder's okay if they're heathens.

>>2314131
>Implying that the president actually has a military >authority. The president is a fucking poster boy! >Puppet on a string, smiling at the crowds. Only >idiots glorify a politician.

Coincidentally, there was a great quote in that crappy movie - 2012: "The guy's an actor! He's reading a script!" so there's no need of the president to be technical person.

>>2314176
There's no way you wouldn't be idiots this way, and such an explanation that is your post highlights the illogicality and refusal to intellectual considerations that is the American mindset.

>>2314165
yes.
pick the one that has to be forced by personal threats to make the correct choice instead of the one who doesn't need such thing to do the same.

very good. Huzzah and all that.

>>2314165
>>2314179
>Bush
>Iraq
'nuff said.

>>2314176
You refuse to have a leader that believes in science, you prefer to choose religious oppression over balanced liberties, you choose to elect officials over similar mythological beliefs than any actual qualifiers for why they should be elected or not... Yeah, you guys are idiots.

>>2314190
You say that like you have the impression i wasn't aware of that.

Whatever gave you that backwards notion?

when in France, speak french,
... no?

>>2314177
>>2314179
>>2314194
>>2314193
Jesus christ you guys are easy to troll.

Mindless christians who have never had an IQ above 12 have manned nuclear launch facilities for decades and never had a danger of firing, except for two instances involving soviet (allegedly athiest) officers that only narrowly avoided nuclear war

>>2314037
this is starting to depress me :(

>>2314201
oh my

and your system is SO much better and flaw free I am sure.

What perfect Utopia do you hail from again?

>>2314037
this depresses me

Give me one good reason not to delete this shitty thread.

>>2314218
We use the metric system, everybody gets a fair chance at life that's actually considered "fail" by both logical and considerable notions, we actually elect and instill officials based on their experience alone and rarely anything else. Yes, our system is better than the current and laughably outdated American system (laughable as in even second world countries and some third world countries have evolved beyond it). And stiff scratches at sarcasm are one of the most common, and most unintellectual and worse, attempts at wit Americans are known for.

>>2314243
How dare you?

>>2314218
>If the system is not American, it's shit
typical logic that comes out of the US

>>2314207
>when in France, speak french,
The complete opposite of what Americans do, even in their own country.