[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 42 KB, 640x480, clap hands.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2230262 No.2230262 [Reply] [Original]

If you were the one responsible for the choosing of an execution method for Jesus Christ, which would you choose?
I'd choose stoning. Just to mock his "but let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!" phrase.

>> No.2230268

Throw him in a river to see if he drowns. If he doesn't, burn him, he's a fucking witch.

>> No.2230273

>If you were the one responsible for the choosing of an execution method for Jesus Christ

I would resign, because I do not support the death penalty, even for delusional cult leaders.

>> No.2230281

Alternatively, I would say "Jesus Christ? Who the heck is that? I've never heard of any Jesus the Christ. Get out of my office, Saul of Tarsus, and take your 'new way' cult with you."

>> No.2230282

old age

>> No.2230280
File: 22 KB, 350x401, 1220992139379.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2230280

I would crucify him next to some thieves, because the Romans only crucified people charged with treason, so this would contradict the entire Roman history and be rendered utterly false and nobody would ever believe this bullshit story of mine.

>> No.2230287

I dont care if its jesus or your dad. You are bad people and you should feel bad

>> No.2230293

>>2230281
Jesus I know, and Paul, but who are you?

>> No.2230298
File: 10 KB, 320x240, 1260735341082.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2230298

>>2230280

>> No.2230302

>>2230293
>You are now aware that no man named Jesus of Nazareth actually existed, but was created as an amalgamation of previous religious messiah myths and alleged prophecies in around 40 AD to act as a figurehead for a completely invented splinter cult.

>> No.2230306

>>2230302
>you are now aware that virtually all secular historians agree that there was such a person

>> No.2230310
File: 35 KB, 450x447, 1254846580423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2230310

>> No.2230311

I'd leave him alone, on the off-chance that people would figure out he was a fraud before he died

>> No.2230314

>>2230302
>i'm 14 and i just saw zeitgeist

>> No.2230313

>>2230280
Good point. I never noticed that. Really good point.

They were probably caught trying to steal from Romans, which would be close enough to treason to crucify them. I'll be sure to ask one of them.

>> No.2230320

>>2230313
No, they did not crucify thieves.
Jesus was seen as some rebel leader against the Romans and was therefore promptly crucified.

>> No.2230321

I would take my power fist and ram it up his power ass
Then the villagers would look at awe at I and my Space Marines, and Marinianity would be created.

>> No.2230322

>>2230280
[citation needed]

>> No.2230323
File: 594 KB, 1184x1264, upper-hell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2230323

WOW
OP is going to hell dude.

>> No.2230335

>fear the truth of Jesus' nonexistence
>avoid doing any actual research or reading the historical documents
>make pithy retorts to hide anxiety

>> No.2230342

>>2230335
>fear the truth of Jesus' existence
>ignore the consensus among secular historians
>get your information from shitty movies
>assume that I'm not an atheist

>> No.2230346

Guillotine.
For a rebel and an usurpator.

>> No.2230347

>>2230320
They crucified two robbers along with him.

>> No.2230348

>>2230323
OP is muslim and will be rewarded thousands of internets and virgin girls in heaven.

>> No.2230354
File: 79 KB, 400x365, 400px-Trollface_More_HD.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2230354

>>2230347
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/by_name.html

>> No.2230357

>>2230280
You don't know much about Roman history, do you. The only people who crucifixion was reserved for treason for were Roman citizens. For slaves, pirates, barbarians, and such, it was the normal and common punishment.

>> No.2230356

the method could not break any of His bones, to fulfill prophecy. crucifixion is cruel, labored and painful. 39 lashes with a cat-o-nine tails wouldn't have left Him with much life left to begin with.

so in truth, as He was already almost dead, you could have killed Him with a feather.

but only because He lay down His life, not because you were somehow powerful enough to kill God

>> No.2230364

>>2230356
Does it get really tedious capitalising those H's?

>> No.2230365

>>2230354
that such a collection of half-truths, misquotes, poetic license and translation issues it's pitiful

>> No.2230373

>>2230365
Oh I'm sure the apologetics crowd has ad hoc bullshit responses to all 457 of them. But some of them are pretty hard to explain away. Like different integers for the number of things at a place.

My favourite thing that Christians don't seem to know is that Jesus prophecised that the kingdom of heaven would do its thing before someone or other died. And everyone died. He's a failed prophet.

>> No.2230394

>>2230364
a little bit, yes :)

>> No.2230404

>>2230373
except that John, the beloved of Christ, was taken in the Spirit and whisked away to the end times to witness such things and write (some of) them down in the Book of the Revelation of John.

So John witnessed these events before he died.

Nevertheless, i can see Jesus kinda chuckling at them for never understanding that.

>> No.2230413

>>2230404
So then, I take it you're a creationist if the idea that the Bible is fallible offends you so much?

>> No.2230427

>>2230373
The kingdom of heaven did its thing when Jesus was crucified and resurrected.

>> No.2230429

>>2230413
Not him, but an infallible Bible doesn't imply creationism, unless you're retarded.

>> No.2230431
File: 170 KB, 400x400, what_the_fuck_am_i_reading_copy_142.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2230431

>>2230429
>an infallible Bible doesn't imply creationism

>> No.2230438

>>2230413
that is correct

>> No.2230443

>>2230427
the atonement for sins did its thing when Jesus was crucified and resurrected; the Kingdom of God is coming soon to a neighborhood near you

>> No.2230455

>>2230431
an infallible Bible states step by step how the universe was created, and does not imply, infer, or in any other way leave it to the reader's imagination

>> No.2230480

>>2230455
Just because the Bible is infallible doesn't mean it is always supposed to be understood literally. For example, where the Bible says "mankind" and you take that as a name and think it's talking about an individual person like a retard. (The hebrew word for "mankind" is "adam")

>> No.2230495

>>2230443
The Kingdom of Heaven is here now. Blessed are the poor in spirit, for they have it.

>> No.2230503

>>2230495
while the Kingdom of God is at hand, i do not believe we are currently living in it; i believe it will begin when Jesus takes His throne at Jerusalem and rules for 1000 years, and then for eternity.

>> No.2230508

>>2230480
Adam was a man who walked and talked with God in the Garden of Eden; Adam named all the animals; Eve was his partner; together they had babies.

i don't see how "mankind" fits into that sentence very well

>> No.2230538

>>2230508

Man + female = babby; mankind + womankind = babby for population continuing

Also, man gives names to beings of nature - means he comprehends nature to a point way beyond any animal has reached...

>> No.2230574

>>2230480
Oh what a copout! You know perfectly well that's not what the writer intended. The Jews didn't believe that, they believed what it actually said, and Jesus never corrected them.

>> No.2230666

Drown him in a puddle of dog cum. But not before torturing him and forcing him to betray the holy spirit, the unforgivable sin.

>> No.2230742

>>2230666
Triple six bitch! You must be the devil!