[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 791 KB, 2638x2078, siDiagragm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2104404 No.2104404 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.2104454
File: 53 KB, 393x318, stonerface.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2104454

>mfw

>> No.2104466

>>2104404
That's wrong, you retard.
1 ampere = 1 coulomb.second^(-1)

>> No.2104470

>>2104466
So the ampere is not a base unit.

>> No.2104475
File: 8 KB, 225x225, thatswrongretard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2104475

>>2104466
< you were missing this

>> No.2104476

>>2104466
Either the Amp or the Coulomb is a base unit. You have to pick one, NIST picked Amps.

>> No.2104477

>>2104466

are you saying 1 Ampere is (1 Coloumb)/(second)?

darwinism chirile

>> No.2104500

>implying one coulomb per second does not equal one Ampere
You fucking fucks, take Electricity I and get back to me.

>> No.2104520

>>2104500
No one is saying that.

>> No.2104525

>>2104520
see
>>2104477

>> No.2104539

>>2104525
He's complaining about the overcomplicated way the other guy wrote it.

>> No.2104577

Oh, I get it.

>>2104500 is an oldfag in S.A.

So for him, >>2104477 sounded very much like
>"So you're saying"
Which is the expression for >implying in S.A.
That's why >>2104500 got so mad, thinking that >>2104477 was implying that an ampere is not what it is.