/sci/ - Science & Math

Looks legit.

>>2021377
>Gottfried Leibniz in Low Tier
>Newton in God Tier
Still assmad about the calculus, Isaac?

Also
>Feynman not in God Tier
Inexcusable.

I now realized that Mengele looks like Dr. Whily

>Kant
>David Attenborough
>scientists

nope.rar

Oh, who's that guy under Franklin? Isn't he the guy with the crazy Pyramids theory? That they were some sort of alien gas-station, or someshit?

>>2021377
...Hawking, on the same level as Descartes? You've got be joking. What are we measuring here?

inb4 200 replies of worthless opinions

>>2021401

Either you mean Gene Ray (time cub) or Ken Ham (creation museum)

>>2021392
chart isn't labeled

Carl Sagan and Neil deGrasse Tyson in low tier.

Why would you do that?

wait, is that guy second from the top, third from the right a real person?!

So is this a chart about greatest humans or a chart about greatest scientists?

>>2021415
Oh, Ken Ham, that's who it is. I recognized him as some sort of nutjob.

Nikola Tesla in God-tier? Come on. He was an inventor and engineer, THAT'S IT. Cool guy but not God tier.

Glad to see you put Freud in shit tier. But honestly? Ben Franklin > Richard Dawkins.

Well, thank you for adding Maxwell, but Mid-Tier? I don't think so, Tim. Do you realize that Maxwell's equations have held up through relativity and QM, and are still central to the work we do everyday?

Also, WHO THE FUCK IS THAT NEGRO, HE'S SCARING THE FUCK OUT OF ME

Kako, one of the most important inventors of string theory, is shit tier, while Dawkins, professional troll, is not? GTFO

>>2021457

spidermaninbed.tiff

>>2021457
>Michio Kaku
>important

facepalm.jpg

>string theory
>science

Stop trolling, son.

Opinions everywhere, but none of you are as impressive as any of those people. Go do yourself a favor and kill yourselves. You're doing yourself a disfavor by not doing so.

kaku may be trollish but unlike most troll/shit/low tier
he actually contributed to string theory.
He is mid tier.

>>2021463
i find it odd that of all the attempts at quantum gravity, only string theory gets shit. so far it's the only one that approximates to GR at large scale and doesn't need the EFEs added manually

a model that throws up no logical inconsistencies and reproduces known results at low energies and large scales, but cannot make testable claims within the current scope of technology shouldn't be labelled "not science"

personally i don't think it is quite the correct approach to quantum gravity, but it's thrown up so neat ideas and work so far.

>Franklin in shit tier

>Hubble in low tier

shitniggerwhatareyoudoing.jpg

>>2021485

Wow, I didn't even catch Leibniz there.

FFFFFFFFFFF

>>2021485

Franklin is so overrated.

>>2021377 <- shit tier

And who the hell is that nigger?

>>2021498

I'd put him in mid tier, maybe low. Certainly not shit-tier.

Where is Paul Dirac?

Feynman not in god tier? wat

oh.... yous trolling. 4/10

Who cares what company makes what?

Are you people so blind that you only look at the image a company has instead of just buying the hardware and software you like?

ATTENTION:

NEIL DEGRASSE IS PURE MEDIA WHORE.

HE HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING, A COMPLETE USELESS ASSHOLE THAT CRAVES FOR CAMERAS AND SHOWS.

JUST TO MINIMIZE "BLACKS ARE STUPID" SO THEY DONT FEEL BAD ABOUT THEMSELVES.

>>2021549
I think NG is pretty cool gui. He talks on the TV and doesnt afraid of anything.

>>2021578
I think O'reilly is cool, he talks and he isn't afraid of anything.
He must be mid tier scientist.
Oh wait michael moore "isn't afraid of anything" lets put him in mid tier too.

>>2021515
Is that not Dirac 3rd from the right in God Tier?

>>2021596
Michael moore is afraid of weight-loss.

>cheap fat-guy chokes, oh god I'm so clever

Put darwin down 1 or 2 tiers, and where the hell is Boltzmann?

>>2021377

>>2021644
>>2021644
I think OP is bottom row, third from the left.

> tesla god tier
> maxwell mid tier

angry-face jpg
>mfw

>>2021644

Tesla belongs in shit tier, Hawking in low tier.

>>2021713
>>2021644
Good God, wtf?

Euclid up.

Sagan, Dawkins and Hawkins should be on the top tier nuff said.

>>2021875
only sagan.

>>2021717

You mad
<<

>>2021875

nope

>>2021875
some biologist who thinks he knows philosophy
and some handicapped retard who thinks gravity can create?
no, they will always be retarded, no matter how many books they sell

>>2021884
>>2021875
>Sagan <33333 omg weed lol
Yeah, you probably don't even know who he is or what he did, you just read some funny things about him on the internet.

Kill yourself.

can anyone actually name all of them?

>>2021958
I can only name coolface and muhammed, who didn't even have a mustache
other ones still searching with tineye

>>2021958
Let's see for the first row:

Einstein, Darwin, Newton, Tesla, Bohr, Aristotle, Gauss, Dirac, Fermi and Voltaire (why is he there?).

Can't be bothered for the rest but I recognize most except some in the lower tiers.

>>2021937

Saw this and thought of you.

>Copernicus in shit tier
You just mad, cause he's a catholic priest. And a physician. And a lawyer. And an economist. And a strategist. And a mathematician.

Also Hawking is too high.

AND SAGAN AND FEYNMAN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE IN FUCK IM HIGH TIER WE DISCUSSED THIS ALREADY.
Enjoy your heliocentrism, faggot.

>>2021629

>Da vinci not in top tier, at least!
>Copernicus in shit tier
>feynman not god-tier

No. Just.. no.

>>2022010
You, sir, have improved my day significantly.

>looks at troll teir
>OP obvious evolutionist
>OP not fit to judge the merit of scientists

Pic related: its OP but for science

>>2021386
Britfag here.
This.
Newton was a dick.

>>2022042
>>2022042
>Implying there are scientist who arent evolutionist

LMAO

>Hubble in low teir

...the fuck.

At absolute least, mid teir.

>>2022064

swish..

>>2022064
everyone's a scientist
deal with it.jpg