/sci/ - Science & Math

u jelly?

>>1863120
hehe

Weierstrass function here, all other functions are gay.

>>1863120
lmao faggot good luck having inverses as functions

>>1863140
Inverse <span class="math">\Gamma[/spoiler] function. lalala

u can't find all my roots
umad?

u mad ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_curve

Quadratic master god race here.
Nostalgic.

>>1863216
Nah, y = x is where it's at.
It's like I'm actually in grade 9 again!

>>1863126

umad cuz you're differentiable nowhere?

>>1863108
>Cosine
>Sine
>Tangent graphs
>not the master race
>all flow together so well

>no mention of inverse polynomials

>>1863126
Continuous everywhere, what a loser
Dirichlet function is the shit, pic related

>>1863282
You serious?
f(x)=1 if x E R, 0 otherwise?
what a shitty function.

Non deterministic function here, everyone else is a faggot.

>>1863302
You're just mad because you can't integrate me, Bernhard

>No mention of sqrt cosine/sine/tangent graphs
>No metntion of higher term polynomial trig functions
>no mention of trig functions acting upon eachother
the cos(sin(tanx)^2 was always my favorite

>>1863318
integral is 0, that's easy.

>>1863329
You ruined my joke. I hope you're happy now.

no function is as elegant as the simple logarithm.

it grows, but it's a modest function: easy does it. not too fast or you'll burn out. not like the ugly exponential, yet still more nuanced than the linear function.

behold.

>>1863349
It's a shame it'll never cross the x-axis.

cahotic functions

x->(2*sin(3/x))+(3*cos(5/x))+(4*sin(6/x))+(1*cos(3/x))

>>1863349
Kind of bent, though, innit?

>>1863349
how do you like your domain limited to x>0?
until you get to complex, but then there is the even more elegant e^iθ

logistic functions

Lyapunov fractal

>>1863353
{1,0} would like to have a word with you

>>1863353
>it'll never cross the x-axis

How about you go ahead and graph

f(x) = log (x+2)

Keep failing bro

<span class="math">Ne^{-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}}[/spoiler]

Guassian here. All bow down to my applicability.

>>1863349

if you want it elegant, make it ln, not this log2 bullshit

>>1863402
Derp forgot pic.

x^x including complex. fucking epic. can't find a pic right now, i'll keep looking

>>1863409
lol this.

Rational inverse up in this bitch.

Dirac delta here owning everyone, don't mind me...

regular functions are just special cases of piecewise functions

>>1863450
abs

>>1863450
re

>>1863450
im

>>1863505
how about a 3D plot with x being real, and the output is complex in the other two dimensions?

>>1863518

if the input is real, the output is real, at least for positive reals and negative integers. not much fun to look at

I found it! I found it!
I haven't seen this in years, and I found it!

>>1863540
<span class="math">f(x) = ix[/spoiler]

>>1863553
i was talking about x^x, just follow the post references.

wuts good faggots

>>1863541
I don't get that graph. Anyone want to explain it?

Cosh(x)

>>1863657
Int[xSin(x)]?

>>1863778
It's a buttplug.

>>1863877
Int[xSin(x^2)]?

there, that looks better

>>1863877
>>1863893

it can't be simply int[anything] since it doesn't progress in unit steps.

looks more like x*int[sin(x^2)] or something. definitely x*(something that changes sign, and does so more frequently for larger x)

Shit was totally cosh