/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 6 KB, 363x364, na00119_.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:14:23 2010 No.1809938 [Reply] [Original]

Do you think science will ever be able to make bigger electrons?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:17:23 2010 No.1809950 >>1809938 No, but it will make your penis bigger.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:20:23 2010 No.1809964 >>1809938 And the purpose of that would be...?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:26:23 2010 No.1809984 >>1809964 Oh, you know...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:27:23 2010 No.1809988 it's an elementary particle. unless we're completely wrong... no

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:28:23 2010 No.1809992 volume of electron = 0 infinty * volume of electron = 0 i think so

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:31:23 2010 No.1810001

The first thing to do if you want to make it bigger is to catch it.

The matter is that, if you catch it, its speed becomes 0, and then you don't know where it is anymore, because of Heisenberg.

So I guess it's impossible, because you can't technically catch an electron.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:36:23 2010 No.1810015 >>1810001 you don't "catch" electrons, you observe them

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 06:42:23 2010 No.1810028 >>1810001 gotta catch 'em all

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:02:23 2010 No.1810074

It already has. Muons and tauons are examples of 'bigger electrons' which humanity has synthesised.

Further, It remains possible that even heavier giant electron-like particles exist.

Also, if a theory of sub-lepton structure ever emerges, then since any size is greater than zero, yes, we may indeed be able to 'make bigger electrons'.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:12:23 2010 No.1810105 >>1809938 Yes, they're called anti-protons. Prove me wrong.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:25:23 2010 No.1810144 >Yes, they're called anti-protons. >Prove me wrong. Lepton number.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:40:23 2010 No.1810174 >>1810001 i thought if you knew more about its momentum you knew less about its location :S would you mind summing up Heinsenberg to a law student who learnt most their quantum physics on wikipedia?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:47:23 2010 No.1810188 >>1810174 it's a physical law which as of recently can be broken.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:53:23 2010 No.1810197 File: 9 KB, 279x267, 1276223893993i.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>1810188 WTF IS THIS BULLSHIT? Heisenbergs law still stands 0/10

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:54:23 2010 No.1810200 >>1810188 [citation needed]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:54:23 2010 No.1810201 >>1810188 o.o I doubt this seriously

Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:56:23 2010 No.1810208

>>1810197
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100727082652.htm
>A group of scientists from LMU and the ETH in Zurich, including Professor Matthias Christandl, has now shown that position and momentum can be predicted more precisely than Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle would lead one to expect

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 27 07:57:23 2010 No.1810210 >>1810208 nuuuu!

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]