/sci/ - Science & Math

Why not, a fucking chain.

Chain would collapse under it's own weight.
=Space elevator problem.

>>1665386
*its

>>1665389
No.

>>1665386
you can distribute the weight with helium balloons

As long as I live no where near Termina, seems like a great, flawless plan.

>>1665415
fraid so, chap

So, the chain will curve the path of the moon around to impact with the earth? Yep... that will generate energy.

and once the kin. energy is all consumed we have mount moon somewhere in the pacific ocean?
I like it

>>1665368
>cover entire face of the moon in copper cable
>suspend magnet above moon
>allow rotation to do work for you
>beam energy down to earth
Herp derp guise, I just perpetual motion'd.

What if there is a system that makes the chain tighter and looser, depending on moons position?

First law of thermodynamics, read it

>>1665461

So, tell me that what breaks the first law of thermodynamics in OP's picture?

>>1665470
The amount of energy the turbines will have to consume

>>1665470
Nothing, but the turbines will consume an awful amount of energy.

>>1665487
Alternators motherfucker

>>1665461
First law of trolling, read it

>>1665454
You'd stop the Moon rotating. Eventually.

awesome, OP

>>1665517
Is it "Always sage when replying to a troll thread?"