/sci/ - Science & Math

cancer is mainly caused by seed oils

>>16243200
>>16243202
cancer is caused by viruses.

seed oils and radiation wont make the exact changes necessary for cancer to start.

>>16243200
God /sci/ has become a shithole. No, non-ionizing radiation does not cause cancers. This is because it's not ionizing.

>>16243215
but there must be some negative health effects after being exposed, no?

>>16243200
Your thread gave me cancer.

>>16243215
>but muh thermally induced protein refolding

we know it doesn't break DNA, but is this *categorically* proven?

>>16243200
I used to think there was no way but given recent discoveries in how electrical pulses can regulate anatomy during growth periods (and can be reliably manipulated to induce things like frogs with five legs) it seems plausible that it might cause birth defects, if nothing else.

1800s standards of living are proven superior once again.

>>16243215
sunlight is non-ionizing and causes cancer

>>16243218
No. There are zero negative health effects.
>>16243385
Ultraviolet light is ionizing and can cause certain types of skin cancer. Visible light is non-ionizing and can't.

>>16243389
Post reproduced experimental evidence showing UV wavelengths ionizing biomolecules.

>>16243399
Ask ChatGPT. I'm not your mom.

>>16243406
All it did was apologize for being a language model and say the topic may or may not align with mainstream beliefs.

>>16243218
Yes. If you don't believe me, crawl into an oven or stare at a really bright light for a while and report back

Your threads cause cancer

>>16243200
if it doesn't have enough energy to make the electrons in your cells jump in random ways it should not cause cancer.

>>16243412
Nice larp