/sci/ - Science & Math

We must be extremely lucky then
God I hate environment "scientists" more than anyone else. They're pretty much commies in disguise

>>16171092
OH NOOO SOMEONE WAS WRONG

Didn't a top climate "scientist" say that we'd all die by 2023 or sum

>>16171092
Dr. Ehrlich lmao

>>16171285
they dont call them watermelons for nothing (green on the outside, red on the inside)

>>16171303
they've been screeching those same lies since forever

>>16171291
They're always wrong

Okay, let's get this out of the way:
>no "real" scientist ever said that
>if they did, they were probably funded by oil companies to spread FUD
>the New York Times and the Guardian aren't reliable scientific sources (they just report on scientific publications, but let's leave out that part)
>everyone agrees, you're not allowed to disagree
>no, global warming/cooling/climate change cannot be falsified, stop asking

>>16171989
>>no "real" scientist ever said that
My favourite example of the "no true scotsman"

>>16171285
Early in the pandemic we were told if we did everything right and got extremely lucky, only 10% of the population would die. It's not only the environmental studies crowd who play the luck game.

>>16171092
>how come everyone didn't disappear in cloud of blue steam in 1989?
Without the rest of the article, we cannot fairly comment as to what exactly he was referring to or meant by that, but you can pay if you want to read the whole article, curious one:
https://www.nytimes.com/1969/08/10/archives/foe-of-pollution-sees-lack-of-time-asserts-environmental-ills.html

>>16171430
without that original report, we cannot verify the bullshit claims in your bullshit image.

>>16171092
soience is the modern day religious schizos shilling end of the world lies

>>16174191
Yep, even more evidence that soientism is an insane religion

>>16175029
being wrong isn't being insane, it's just being wrong

>>16175076
if you think the world is coming to an end you are insane

>>16171092
>how come everyone didn't disappear in cloud of blue steam in 1989?
They did, and then the universe was reborn all at once. Proof: I was born in 1989.

>>16172040
>Early in the pandemic we were told if we did everything right and got extremely lucky, only 10% of the population would die.
were they wrong? did more than 10% of the population die?

>>16176189
>coming to an end
What does that mean exactly?

>>16176216
ask the blue steam

Because humanity already went extinct in 1975 when the world population reached the unsustainable number of 4 heckin billion.

>>16171430
This could still become true. Things from Siberia could certainly land in Britain, and bring about some very nasty weather.

>>16171092
They did. You're obviously too young to remember.

>>16171092
cue the environmentalists claiming that no papers said this would happen so it doesn't count

>>16171092
Everyone took the blue steam vax

>>16177741
redpill me on the blue steam vax

>>16178864
its vaporware

>>16176775
>>16173065
why are scientists so terrible at predicting the future?

>>16176215
>were they wrong
yes

New astroturf thread?

>>16180400

>>16171092
Why would the steam be blue?

>>16178864
>>16179459
lol

how low iq do you have to be to fall for doomsday scenario theories? has science ever measured this?

>>16171285

>>16171980
this, scientists are astonishingly bad at predicting the future, the average tea leaves reader or horoscope expert is unironically much better

>>16185771
They wouldn't be always wrong if they weren't intentionally shilling harmful lies. If they were just running on random chance they would be correct occasionally