/sci/ - Science & Math

I see magenta.

>>16155123
i do

i see crayon

>>16155123
white is more red than blue is red

>>16155123
Zoom out, more red. Zoom in, less red.

>>16155123
I don't see red at all.

The red is actually black
The white is actually cyan

>>16155123
>Do you see red?
Yes
>Explain this.
No

>>16155123
It's called memory consolidation. Your mind wants to see red because you explicitly know what a coke can looks like, so you see red.

>>16155206
This. It's red because it's a coke can, and you see a coke can because it's red.

This exact shit was on Facebook yesterday and today

>>16155123
white from your monitor is made with RGB pixels. that means that in that photo there literal red photons hitting your eye. thus, your red cones are stimulated. the rest is some brain trickery. but your red cones are physically being stimulated by red photons emitted by the coke can in your picture

>>16155123
There is no red in the pic but 4chans thumbnail renderer is fucking up and creating an incorrect thumnmail with red in it

>>16155327
>There is no red in the pic
there absolutely is you braindead chimp

>>16155328
Zoom in retard

>>16155356
AND WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU SEE WHEN YOU ZOOM IN YOU MONSTER FAGGOT

>>16155369 me
and before you answer "white" check picrel for what white is on your fucking screen

>>16155369
da letter cyan and white and black n shieet

>>16155374
I don't use an rgb monitor. My monitor has the actual colors hardcoded in

>>16155377
and what is your monitor's white hard coded as lmao

>>16155374
Just because rgb monitor requires red green and blue subpixels to produce white doesn't mean that there is red in it. You could print the image and there would be no red pigment in it.

>>16155390
You are a fucking idiot.

>>16155390

>>16155123
I see that canned black sewage shit that imbeciles like you love to drink.

>>16155374
and green + blue is cyan which is the dominant color so brain might be taking that out from white which results in drumrolls please ... fucking red

>>16155135
It’s red all the way down for me . My reality is a lie

>>16155327
there's a bit of this as well but don't think it's fucking up, it's just how it works out for small size photo to keep some of the details.

>>16155381
Pure white. Sorry if that offends you. Actually no, on second thought i am not sorry. I wont apologize for being superior. Chances are your rods and cones are primitive and can only perceive RGB combinations. At best you can maybe see magenta. Maybe. A true superior and evolved specimen as myself is able to see the entire spectrum, imcluding ultraviolet and infrared.

That's because i did a bunch of dmt and advanced to the next stage of evolution. You are merely a crab, vibrating on a lower energy frequency in a proverbial bucket. Using your rancid (metaphorical) claws to grasp out and pull others down into the filthy and unclean material world. Me? I'm a shooting star, a hypergalactic cosmic eagle soaring through the cyber world. Flying with my (literal )wings through space, time, and aether. I can see colors you can't even imagine. And my computer monitor renders and displays magnificent hues beyond your wildest dreams.

I can see, hear, smell, and even taste pure platonic forms. I can enter and exit the realm of idealized existence at any moment.

If you humle yourself, I may be willing to teach you. First you must rid yourself of negative vibes and also do a bunch of psychedelics. Only then will you be prepared to see. See the true colors of the coke cans of the multi-universe

>>16155448
But the colors you see on your monitor are an illusion, much like your drug trips. True genetic lottery winners can easily pick out the sub-pixel chromas and only mix them when it is necessary to communicate with the lesser breeds.

>>16155123
chromatic adaptation

>>16155390
No you couldnt

>>16155545
>>16155435

>>16155123
>Do you see red?
Only in the shrunken down image. Not in the expanded image.

And a good old dropper test shows some of those pixels are actually a slightly reddish grey.

>>16155597
the effect is the same for large image. I put it on laptop display and walked few feet back and I perceive it as I do the thumbnail while sitting close. even if the thumbnail is fucked

>>16155123
it's teal, black and white for me.

>>16155135
>>16155151
>>16155206
>>16155311
It's red because its a fucking jpg

Why do I see a merchant?

>>16155597
Image > Mode > Indexed... > Use custom palette > Blues and it's still happening
this is the best theory >>16155399

>>16155123
From far I see red. If I look at it closely I see white.

If you screenshot the red part, it's actually white.

>>16155448
chatgpt-text-generatorGOD

Explain this image.

>>16156674
No, I hack your brain instead.

>>16155123
In the thumbnail it's because of blending. In the real pic it looks white, unless you defocus your eyes just right, in which case it looks slightly red, probably because of the contrast with the left side (where the cyan is equally strong but the white is not). This effect disappears when you cover the left side of the can with your hand.

>>16155206
shut up nerd, im color blind

>>16155123
CGA is best protocol

>>16155123
What happens if you do it with a can of sprite instead? Is it just because our brains "know" that coca cola should be red?

>>16157702
How did you achieve the effect?

>>16156613
>muh eyes
>also, this is qualia

>>16155123
pls i didnt even understand the dress

>>16157702
You would see green I assume.

reality is purely phenomenal, there is no relation to any underlying materialism

>>16159275
>no relation
if someone steals your car do you still have your car in your garage?

>>16155123
If you imagine diet cola with a blue coca cola logo you can make the can turn white.
The power of imagination and belief this is a fragment of how religion works.

>>16155123
>Explain
Contrast color, works with every b/w pattern. No need of an overpricced sugarwater can.

>>16155206
No, I see red because my brain knows what red things look like under a blue tint, and the illusion is meant to purposely "match" those colors. Whether or not it was a coke can is irrelevant.

>>16155123
Not when I stare at it intently.

Only in a casual glance do I see red and that is just my brain filling in the gaps.

WOAH LE SPOOKY HOW DOES IT WORK!?!?

>>16155128
+ pure white/black is hardly a thing in painting, it's more often than not blue or yellow based and will affect your colour mixing
i dont see why an optical illusion couldn't be made out of it

>>16156617
Oh sweet Animal Collective hell yeah bra

>>16155123
>Do you see red? Explain this.

Color perception is subjective

>>16155123
the precision of the neuron is less than reality

>>16155123

>>16155123
red is a societal construct made by patriarchy

>>16155390
Holy shit this is incredibly stupid.
I don’t think this level of stupidity is normal.
Can we get this anon some help?

>>16160360
I'm amble to make her neck and torso rotate in opposite ways lole

>>16160360
booba!

>>16155123
Yes, but it's not red. Optical illusions are quite funny.

>>16155123

>>16159378
Wrong.

>>16155123

>>16157436
It made me almost not see the vertical lines, but that was it. I googled what the McCullough effect is and I guess I see a yellow or very light colored green in the vertical lines (which is wrong color anyway), but no color in the horizontal.

>>16161542
your brain is hacked for months now retard

>>16161194
What the FUCK did you do

>>16160360
blink at about 4hz to make it go left to right to ledt

>>16161194
I see orange now.

>>16155374
On my monitor the white subpixel is between red and green. Pic related, dumbass.

How can I use sensory illusions to make my dick feel bigger?

>>16162592
bro you really must be retarded if you can't understand what the fuck white light is made out of I swear

>>16163418
It's made of white light, that's why it has its own subpixel. Duh.

>>16163431
>white light is made out of white light

>>16163436
https://www.coolblue.nl/en/advice/pixel-structure-televisions.html
>An OLED screen has its own pixel structure, which is called WRGB.
>These pixels can produce colored and white light individually.
>each pixel consists of red, green, blue, and white subpixels that are stacked.
>can produce ... white light individually
>white subpixels

>>16163449
>a car is made out of car

>>16163462
If white light didn't exist we couldn't create singular LEDs that produce white light.

>>16163471
you don't understand much do you

>>16163474
All the evidence is in my favor, all you can do is hurl insults.

>>16163477
do you understand there are red photons present in any white light?

>>16163479
>red photons
No such thing, photons don't have color. The color spectrum is based on wavelengths of light, not particles of light.

>>16163496
do you understand that in "white light" there are photons stimulating your red cones?

>>16163498
Light is a wave, not a particle. Waves interfere with each other. Again, if white light didn't exist we couldn't create a singular LED that produces white light. I'm not convinced the "RGB cones" model of color perception is entirely accurate.

>>16163516
so we don't see color with our rgb cones?

>>16163530
I don't think it's that simple, it just doesn't add up.

>>16163573
what doesn't add up? what do you think you'd see if you'd split the white pixel's white light through a prism?

>>16155123
>Do you see red?
Yes.
>Explain this.
Colour is relative.

>>16163622
>you can use a prism to alter the wavelength of white light and make it come out as different colors
>that means photons exist and white light is made up of different colors of photons
That's like talking through a fan and saying the output means my voice "actually" sounds like a robot and the fan simply reveals it instead of understanding that the fan simply interferes with the sound of my voice and alters it.

>>16160360
>>16160573
The illusion doesn't work if you stare at the boobs.

>>16155123
Holy shit that's crazy.
This is probably a trick of the brain. The eye's are picking up just blue, black, and white of course since that's all that's there.
But the brain is seeing patterns, the coke can and the background. And makes colors that we would expect to see.

There are several other weird visual glitches you can pull on yourself.
Our brain is an interesting organ for sure.

>>16164424
It doesn't work at all unless you have awful spatial reasoning abilities. The way the dots look relative to one another when she's facing the camera is completely different from how they look when she's facing away. She is unmistakably, objectively turning to her left (your right). It's trying to be pic related but it fails.

>>16164424
Works for me. I can see boobs rotating either direction.

>>16163862
No I was just trying to make you understand that when you see the red coke can, that red is not imaginary, it's real information coming from your red cones, because they are stimulated by the "red" (wavelength) photons hitting your eyes. Photons which are emitted by your "white light pixels".
There is some trickery from your brain, as it removes blue + green (wavelengths) photons from the white, but there physically are red wavelength photons hitting your eyes from your monitor when you look at OP's photo.

>>16164570
>She is unmistakably, objectively turning to her left (your right).
I can rotate her titties any way I want.

>>16164603
That's because you have woman-tier spatial reasoning abilities.

>>16164570
Imagine thinking anything is rotating. Those are just pixels on a screen dumbass.

>>16164667
Midwit pseud.

>>16155222
>>16155206
It's red even if I just scroll up enough to cover the logo. Something else is clearly at play, probably with the way computer monitors work.

>>16164678
The mountains are also brown and the hand is flesh colored. But only in the thumbnail. When I expand the image I only see cyan, white, and black.

Scientists HATE this color because it DEFY the natural order about colors!
...Or maybe your understanding of colors is just plain wrong, admit it.

>>16164711
No, the model of how we perceive color is wrong.

>>16164711
to add on to this, yellow and cyan share the same mechanism that magenta have (they are both colors that are triggered when two cones are activated), which means they have no difference with how magenta is perceived, they are fake colors

And that proves my argument that Red, Green, Blue are the real primary colors, everything else is a combination of these, nothing more, nothing less

>>16164723
even if we add extra cyan/yellow cones we'd still see "fake" colors in the spectrum between two cones, even if smaller spectrum. "fake" colors are unavoidable for how our eyes work.

>>16164723
>>16164778
u guys are tellin' me that not only the color of love (magenta) is fake, but also the color of joy (yellow) and clarity (cyan) are also fake?
so i see how it is then, only anger (red), and envy (green), and sadness (blue) are real, positive emotions are fake, well done

>>16161194
Good post. Looks like the opposite color to the dominant is what is seen.

>>16155123
the thumbnail actually does have a slight hint of red in it, probably some compression artifact

but i do see red in the full image if i step back a bit, only for a few seconds though as my eyes adjust

>>16155123
i can see the infinity.

>>16155327
white pixels have red in them, the other pixels around them have no red, thus your eyes see a red hue on the can because it literally has more red than the rest of the image
>>16164711
or maybe UV and magenta are the same color and its not a conspiracy, retard

>>16165177
But UV is invisible.

>>16165185
>But UV is invisible.
believe whatever you want religious idiot

>>16165190
>>16165177
You need to go back to /x/

>>16157702
No, it's because Cyan is the color opposite of Red.

No ones posted it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuuPjKviGTI

>>16165748
And that's what I get for profitable warring against theoretically trillions of people. Further, who said this was your idea(the same syllogy as mentioned prior relates). I'd have the matter to suggest that was even a deception against your. Basedboys. Let me go then, and I won't hunt you.

UV is invisible to us isn't it though? Because owls can see it, but our colour spectrum isn't good enough or something

This is literally the message I required. Thanks for telling me.

Honestly don't get a boner I know many categories of your fort much better and still wouldn't accept even the nth principle one.

We can make great allies. I offer you support like I offer my money support. Some things you'll have to deal with first. First you gotta let me go, and I'll write what you owe off. You made me great.

>>16165775
You want this owe gone. If you owe me a life sentence and you owe more to him/her, it's in your best interests for these to be written off. And that's all

nigga the fuck is happening

>>16165781
bots are in the thread, it's fairly commonplace in this board

>>16165786
translation: I'm a stupid fag. I need to do what I was told.

>>16165786
Thanks for the crumpet. Now make me tea.

lol