[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 27 KB, 335x400, aleister-crowley.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612917 No.1612917 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRSPE5uLvUk&playnext=1&videos=e6kgWIgrMVo&feature=recentl
ik

Right Brain > Left brain in mathematics.

U mad analyticalfags?

>> No.1612946

what is this from

>> No.1612980

>>1612946
A documentary

>> No.1612990

doesn't matter, I'm left-handed!

>> No.1613015

>>1612917
Brain type doesn't count for shit when you will never do anything 'special'

>> No.1613023

left - solutions "out of nowhere" (inventions)
right - step by step thinking (engineering)

>> No.1613042
File: 78 KB, 300x375, derr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613042

>>1613023

>> No.1613051

That documentary didn't really say much about anything. There was no definition of what the researcher considered "later mathematics", and it never qualified what "doing well" was. There are different skills to consider within mathematics itself, and people will be better at some than others depending on their natural skill at problem solving or abstracting (for example). It especially didn't say right brain > left brain in mathematics, and OP jumping to that conclusion merely demonstrates that OP is, indeed, a stupid faggot (I had a feeling judging from the faggy tripcode).

>> No.1613062

There's no fucking such thing as being left or right -brained.

>Introduction to Psychology

>> No.1613071

is that point counting program uploaded anywhere? I wanna test myself too

>> No.1613089

>>1613051
true.

>> No.1613090

>>1613071
https://www.testmybrain.org/consent_all.php?exp=61

Go nuts.

>> No.1613093

>>1613051
The description box linked to some actual studies.

>> No.1613152

>>1613090
96% with .77 second response average

C'MON /SCI/, LET'S COMPARE OUR BRAIN-PENISES.

>> No.1613153

>>1613090
I got 92% correct :D

>> No.1613203

>>1613090
>get 88

bitch, I demand a redo

>> No.1613209
File: 19 KB, 502x404, brainpenis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613209

93% with 0.45 response time.

>> No.1613221

93% and 0.4 seconds respond time :D

>> No.1613239
File: 49 KB, 551x418, better.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613239

>>1613203

>> No.1613249

0.48
93%

i blame lapses in attention.

>> No.1613298

94%
avg 0.51 seconds

Probably would have done better if I hadn't kept mistaking "y" and "b".

>> No.1613300
File: 35 KB, 568x393, ANS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613300

Yup.

>> No.1613326
File: 49 KB, 608x471, Picture 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613326

That was fun.

>> No.1613329

94%
.44

>> No.1613335
File: 37 KB, 579x429, numbars.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613335

close to everyone else

>> No.1613345

>>1613300
wow your smart

>> No.1613348

96% with 0.44 average response time.

I'm majoring in math too, so however that affects this.

>> No.1613349

Anyone else feel like 5b 6y is harder than like 13y 12b?

>> No.1613350

100%
-0.2 response time
300k starting

>> No.1613361

>>1613051
>OP is, indeed, a stupid faggot (I had a feeling judging from the faggy tripcode)

Intuition is vindicated.

>> No.1613394

92%
.35 master race reporting in

>> No.1613404

>>1613348
Ha! I got 96% with .43 response time! And I too have a mathematics degree!

>> No.1613451
File: 221 KB, 700x1051, badassteacher.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613451

95 , .35sec

master race

>> No.1613471

>>1613152
You had a score of 92% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 60, meaning you scored higher than 60% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.63 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

>> No.1613472
File: 29 KB, 525x380, meanwhile1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613472

>>1613451

waiting for someone to beat my score

>> No.1613546

>>1613451
rep.
94, .3s

My errors were due to saying "right hand" but pushing left hand.

>> No.1613566

>>1613404

Seems pretty consistent. Perhaps we're the model profile for a student of mathematics, or something.

>> No.1613577

dammit, I got 90%, 50th percentile, .48 seconds.

But fuck that, I'm awesome at math.

>> No.1613582

>>1613566
Im very curious now as to how /lit/ would fare at this test.

>> No.1613592

Now do the other tests faggots:
https://www.testmybrain.org/index.html

>> No.1613616

92% with .5 reaction times. Not too bad, but I don't really see how it'd correlate to your mathematical ability.

>> No.1613627

90%
.51

>> No.1613632

>>1613616
Its supposed to have something to do with your ability to "feel" numbers and the way they work.

>> No.1613633

92%, 60th percentile, .55 seconds

misentered a few though...

>> No.1613651
File: 47 KB, 644x402, e-penis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613651

>>1613348
>>1613404
same as >>1613152
I'm planning to major in math or physics myself (I haven't decided yet)

>> No.1613661
File: 68 KB, 570x615, sshot-24.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613661

>>1613592
I'm a face retard.
Typical aspie I guess.

>> No.1613668

>>1613616
I think it's just if you really suck at it you won't do well at math. Not visual enough maybe.

>> No.1613674

>>1613632
>>1613616
I'm excellent at math, and I can tell you for a fact that I use my intuition a lot of the time, not only in math, but life in general. In fact, it's actually difficult for me to explain how I know something or how to do something to someone, because I use my intuition.

>> No.1613680
File: 63 KB, 630x415, Screen shot 2010-08-17 at 7.56.35 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613680

For those of you psychologically illiterate, you used your visual sensory store profusely during this test.

I think that my speed led to some accuracy problems, but I'm still rather happy.

>> No.1613700

>>1613680
Same psychfag as quoted.

I don't really think that this test makes any valid predictions about one's ability to do mathematics in general, and especially not within the context of the study if they're defining mathematical ability as SAT math performance.

I could be wrong, though. I guess I use similar intuition when I do cognitive calculation. Still, I'm skeptical.

>> No.1613755

96%, .32 response time

and I looked away for 3 of them and hit the wrong button on 3 of them ;_;

>> No.1613759
File: 101 KB, 584x1154, sshot-25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613759

>>1613592
how'd you do on this one, /sci/?

The shapes to numbers things was stupid. Everyone should get 50/50, but I got spastic for 2 of them.

>> No.1613781

94%, .61, lapsed math major here under the influence of alcohol. Also I'm not so hot at reflex tests/newer video games in the first place.

>> No.1613800

92%
.38

>> No.1613803
File: 28 KB, 564x252, sshot-26.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613803

same anon as
>>1613661

I really do suck at faces. Is the rest of /sci/ as aspie as me?
https://www.testmybrain.org/consent_all.php?exp=5

>> No.1613859

I get a mysql error from the site when I try to take the test. But it seemed easy.

>> No.1613860
File: 34 KB, 597x603, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613860

Feels meh.

>> No.1613868

You had a score of 89% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 48, meaning you scored higher than 48% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.34 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

>> No.1613885

Bourne guy was hard to recognize? Really?

Also, feels meh, man.

>> No.1613890
File: 28 KB, 578x473, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613890

>>1613885

forgot pic

>> No.1613896

I was fast at .29, but I scored 90% lol. I got caught up making rhythmic sequences for about nine of my mistakes.

>> No.1613902

>>1613090
well, I'm an idiot after all

>> No.1613938
File: 46 KB, 523x445, face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613938

did badly on the yb one but this was easy.

>> No.1613957

92% .44 sec. i kept hitting b for a bit until i lifted my hand off of the desk. :P

>> No.1614008
File: 77 KB, 591x418, fail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614008

you kids are too slow.

>> No.1614185
File: 11 KB, 558x282, top1%.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614185

The other ones were pretty damn good but I was proud of this one. I didnt realise it actually told you when you got one incorrect and it startled me when I saw the red writing.

>> No.1614197

>>1613759

Shapes and number's was piss

As long as you see the pattern that each number has then you should be fine

1 = Straight lines

2 = Curved lines

3 = Semi or full circles

>> No.1614225

>You had a score of 97% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

>Your percentile score on this test was 82, meaning you scored higher than 82% of people who took this test

Forgot to look at the response time. What is this supposed to mean again.

>> No.1614313
File: 59 KB, 1042x695, sdsa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614313

note that its 4:30 in the morning and i think i could do way better, i am sleepy and have a headache... not bad :)

>> No.1614394
File: 134 KB, 799x463, 1277490843319.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614394

93% correct on this test
0.52s

you're all a buncha faggets

>> No.1614505
File: 234 KB, 1600x900, Stevlol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614505

LOL I AM DA BEST 96% right. I am only 16 lol!

>> No.1614590
File: 56 KB, 571x435, Picture 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614590

I like my score. :)

>> No.1614618

>>1614505
>>1614590
Just goes to show this test ain't prove shit.
I'm the poster of >>1614590
I know how dumb I am in real life.

>> No.1614644

>>1614618
I don't think so buddy. this test s about right. I am pretty dam good at math. You probably are lazy and are not being taught the right math steps, because you could be doing good at math if the test is right. Or your just butt hurt.

>> No.1614662

>>1614644
If you watch the video, they say a high score doesn't mean shit. It's just that a low score means you probably won't do well in grade-school math.

>> No.1614665

93% at .33 seconds

>> No.1614896
File: 112 KB, 1024x649, sfdsfsdfs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614896

I'm a shit in math.

>> No.1615014

>>1613651

Pick math, we have all the awesome nerdy girls. Women physics majors tend to be a lot more focused on their academics than woman math majors. Every attractive female math major I've met has been a nympho. Fucking awesome.

>> No.1615518

92%
0.47 sec

>> No.1615525

>>1615014
fuck year nymphos!

>> No.1615651

MIDDLE BRAIN BITCHES

>> No.1615654

ENTP represent!

>> No.1615662

>>1613023
Left sounds like alcohol to me

>> No.1615694

The right side of my body is genetically weaker than my left side yet I excel at mathematics and suck at language.

>> No.1615768

Goddamn, I'm fucking pathetic.

85%
0.25 seconds

Shit, below average.

>> No.1615793

>>1615014

Where the fuck do you go? Every girl I've ever met who's into math has been a prude cunt.

>> No.1615851

>>1612917
OP whos this guy?

>> No.1615854

>>1615851
ANOTHERFAG-ATTACK: IT'S ALEISTER CROWLEY!!!!!!!!!!!
AND AWAYYYYYYYYYYYYY

ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!

>> No.1615918
File: 21 KB, 612x441, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1615918

Hows it feel to lose to a black, colorblind, 16 year old?

>> No.1615937

94. Shitsux, I know, but it's fucking 5AM so whatever

>> No.1616004

>>1615918
Feelsgoodman.jpg
Because I'm happy that you have the potiential to make something of yourself instead of stealing fucking bikes like the other 98% of you people.

>> No.1616046
File: 20 KB, 524x404, BRAINDERP.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1616046

FRIGGIN DOTS

>> No.1616094

>>1615768

>0.25 seconds

areyouawizard.jpg

>> No.1616125

91%
.5 ms

>> No.1616127

>>1616125
>ms

i mean second -_-;

>> No.1616152

it keeps not showing dots, that should push my result right up. I have to respond slower or it doesn't load them

>> No.1616170

>>1616152
yep, 80% ,.69 seconds. They've made an anomaly machine

>> No.1616191

>>1616170
i did it faster and had no problem what browser are you using?

>> No.1616251

90%
.30 seconds

>> No.1616266
File: 20 KB, 540x408, numbsese.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1616266

>> No.1617122
File: 18 KB, 646x339, feelsgoodman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617122

herp derp

>> No.1617257

You had a score of 96% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 80, meaning you scored higher than 80% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.44 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

>> No.1617260

>>1614225

Nothing yet. The site gave an explanation that they havent tested enough people to have a conclusion yet.

>> No.1617281

ITT: autistic savants.

>> No.1617290

>>1617281

I've been called one.

>> No.1617298
File: 158 KB, 1600x1272, AS-New Blue_beveled logo.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617298

>> No.1617378
File: 161 KB, 1680x1050, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617378

YOU ARE NOW AVERAGE!!!!!!!!1111

>> No.1617384
File: 37 KB, 587x418, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617384

Failure at math reporting in.

>> No.1617409

The scale is based on the average person taking the test... not the average person on Earth.

You're all doing fine. Don't be such faggoids.

>> No.1617421 [DELETED] 
File: 89 KB, 686x1416, wat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617421

Genuis reporting in.

>> No.1617428
File: 89 KB, 686x1416, wat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617428

Genius reporting in.

>> No.1617431
File: 2.13 MB, 400x225, 1272596548367.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617431

>>1617428
>genius
>only 8 digits

>> No.1617432

>>1617428

>implying I don't have a 10-12 digit span memory depending on my mood.

>> No.1617438

>>1617432

>I could do it if I wanted to, I just don't feel like it right now
>elementary-level whining confirmed

never change, /sci/

>> No.1617440

>>1617438

>implying psychological state is irrelevant towards cognitive performance

Care to argue, faggot?

>> No.1617441

>>1617432

Prove it.

>> No.1617457

>>1617441

>implying my score is incredible.

Clumping techniques, nigga, hurdofem?

>> No.1617463

You had a score of 93% correct on this test. Based on the results we have so far, the average person who takes this test scores 90% correct.

Your percentile score on this test was 65, meaning you scored higher than 65% of people who took this test

It took you an average of 0.35 seconds to respond to each item. The average person who takes this test takes an average of 1 seconds to respond to each item. This means you respond to each item a little faster than the average person who takes this test.

>> No.1617468

>>1617457
lolwat