/sci/ - Science & Math

the current rate of average global temperature increase is completely unprecedented in the geologic record.

>>16071442
>t. I have never heard of Dansgaard–Oeschger events and I have no educational background in climate science or any related field.
Even college freshmen learn about Dansgaard–Oeschger events and the currently climate is nowhere near as dramatic as a Dansgaard–Oeschger event. The weather hasn't changed substantially in the past 40 years, its the same now as it was when the global warming meme was started in the 1980s

>>16071452
Heh, looks like we got ourselves a real smoothbrain over here. Never heard of Dansgaard–Oeschger events? Color me shocked, anon. I bet you think you're some kind of intellectual heavyweight, spouting off about how "tHe cLiMaTe hAsN't cHaNgEd iN 40 yEaRs." Newsflash, genius: even a drooling college freshman who's barely passed their intro to climate science class knows about D-O events.

But here you are, confidently asserting that our current climate situation is nothing compared to those ancient events, as if you've got a PhD in paleoclimatology tucked away in your waifu body pillow. Guess what, champ? The mere fact that we're not experiencing a full-blown D-O event right now doesn't mean climate change isn't real or significant. That's like saying a broken leg is no big deal because it's not as severe as getting decapitated.

And don't even get me started on your galaxy brain take about the weather being the same as it was in the 80s. I'm sure all those record-breaking heatwaves, droughts, and superstorms we've been seeing are just a figment of our collective imagination. But hey, why trust decades of meticulous scientific research when you can just pull assertions out of your ass based on your keen observations of the weather outside your mom's basement window?

In conclusion, do us all a favor and crack open a book (or even a Wikipedia article) before you start spouting off half-baked opinions on topics you clearly know jack shit about. Until then, kindly take your smooth-brained hot takes and shove them back where they came from.

>>16071438
Nobel disease. He wasn't a climatologist.

>>16071460
also not a nobel laureate, but his was an expert in thermodynamics, which is needed to predict future climatology. (((you))) on the other hand couldn't even pass freshman thermodynamics, so why do you presume you're smarter than edward teller?

>>16071464
Fuck off.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-021-00205-7

>>16071464
>please sir I want some more
Eat it.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-00555-5

>>16071480
>>16071483
>no argument

>>16071486
>doesn’t understand the papers he too 1 minute 22 seconds to respond about

Whelp, can’t fix stupid

>>16071442
you are a moron

>>16071496
get a life you fucking loser kek

>>16071438
I agree, now that I realize jews are the real problem.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8AHkAJrpAxd4/

>>16071442

>>16071480
>>16071483
Nature is a political propaganda outlet, not a scientific journal

>>16071557
>unlike 4chan retards
lol

>>16071457
>Guess what, champ? The mere fact that we're not experiencing a full-blown D-O event right now doesn't mean climate change isn't real or significant.
You claimed
>the current rate of average global temperature increase is completely unprecedented in the geologic record.
Right?

>>16071575
>i hate 4chan and everyone who posts on 4chan
why are you here?

>>16071694
They can never answer that question

How many of the many people on this board who presume they're smarter than Edward Teller have impressive accomplishments which demonstrate their superior intelligence?

>>16071438
>Mr. Teller have you looked for evidence?
>Uhhhh....

>>16073767
none

>>16073781
why do you presume that you're smarter than Edward Teller?

I unironically dont give a fuck.
t. math phd

>>16073781
Why do you presume that you're smarter than Edward Teller? Whats the basis of that presumption?

>>16079972
having accomplished nothing with my life and having no prospects of ever doing so

>>16071442
>f
the current rate of average global temperature increase will not BE in the geological record

>>16080894
lol

>>16071452
The people who try to portray themselves as "climate experts" be repeating popsci junk they saw on CNN never have even the slightest familiarity with the topic they're always claiming to be experts in.

>another 300 posts thread about some /pol/ shit that didn't happen

>>16071442
This is a WEF infowarrior btw. Funded because jews think they are more moral than everyone.
Mazel tov.

>>16082836
>I'm an expert in climate science because I couldn't pass freshman thermodynamic and can't do calculus
Classic Dunning Krugerism

>>16073057
Because I believe enforced anonymity is the only way online forums should operate. Having a publicly traceable post history leads people to only post what is socially acceptable or popular. I also hate niggers and trannies

>>16083064
>oh no people are discussing science on the science board

>>16083064
yet another off topic post by a cancerous /pol/ expert

>>16083364
and thats why you hate 4chan

>>16083773
but they are not discussing science. They are discussing /pol/ shit in a thread that started with something that didn't happen (typical for that other board)

>>16071460
he also didn't say that. In fact he was one of the first scientists warning about global warming. You're all posting in a chud thread

>>16071442
no it isn't

There was more arctic sea ice last year than in 2012. If global warming were real then there would've been less ice last year than in 2012, but if the climate were cooling then there would have been more ice last year, which there was.
The 11 year gap is to be consistent with solar cycles

>>16086026
>if i just ignore any evidence that conflicts with my conclusions, I must be right!

>>16085573
global temperature isn't increasing at all

>>16086287
Thats good news

>>16086287
sauce?

https://www.ipcc.ch/
i suggest reading the summary for policy makers.
i think these reports are interesting because they assign confidence labels to various findings in the report.

>>16087238
>read UN propaganda
why? its all fake an gay
theres better ways to spend your time than reading falsehoods

>>16085554
go to >>>/pol/ if you're obsessed with politics, this thread is about science

>>16071438
Teller had a particular expertise in this area of science because the H bomb tests involved a lot of speculation and calculation about their possible affects on the atmosphere

>>16089144
>Teller had a particular expertise in this area of science because the H bomb tests involved a lot of speculation and calculation about their possible affects on the atmosphere
HE LITERALLY DIDN'T SAY THE STUFF OP POSTED YOU STUPID FUCKING CHUD OF A MORON
>this thread is about science
it isn't. You're talking about fake /pol/ quote

>>16089249
>my words count more because i used all caps
you are emotionally disturbed

>>16088553
>1989
>35 years ago
>still no sea level rise
why is science so retarded?