[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 482 KB, 833x1250, IMG_3759.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073259 No.16073259 [Reply] [Original]

IFT-3 Launch Day Edition

Previous - >>16070026

>> No.16073263
File: 179 KB, 2000x2778, superheavy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073263

MASSIVE PAYLOADS AND HUGE THRUST

>> No.16073265
File: 460 KB, 1280x1920, IMG_5877.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073265

CANCEL MSR

>> No.16073267

its time

>> No.16073269

Phew just got back on sfg after work.
I will have the launch thread up tomorrow morning, assuming no early weather scrub. Can’t wait lads

t. Launch thread anon

>> No.16073270
File: 1.26 MB, 4096x2304, 1709572123154522.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073270

Soon

>> No.16073272

>>16073263
you're the kind of person no cries for when they get run over for jaywalking

>> No.16073274

Space X? More like SCRUB X.

>> No.16073275
File: 3.69 MB, 2100x3500, 109240588_p0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073275

>>16073272
you're double gay

>> No.16073280

>Starship flight 3 maybe tomorrow
>maybe

What did Elong mean by this, he got his license

>> No.16073281

>>16073280
It's windy (scrub).

>> No.16073283
File: 2.48 MB, 1642x2489, IMG_3446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073283

>> No.16073287

>>16073283
lrn to crop

>> No.16073290
File: 950 KB, 958x1196, rocketman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073290

>>16073259
Glass the Earth, demigod war eventually

>> No.16073300
File: 732 KB, 1080x1080, 65f2546f88ea3cd0350ca21b_spacex-starship-starbase-satellite-20240311.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073300

https://twitter.com/Harry__Stranger/status/1768094802590175323
>A very high resolution satellite image of Starship on the launch pad ahead of a possible flight in less than 10 hours. The image was captured nearly 2hrs after Ship 29 performed a spin prime test on the Monday.

https://spacefromspace.com/satellite-images/spacex-starbase-launch-site-flight-3-20240311

>> No.16073320
File: 331 KB, 1280x720, srtbse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073320

might have been posted in the last thread but I didn't see it, new starbase flyover

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2zU6bjahl4

>> No.16073324
File: 46 KB, 600x499, Spin Polarized DT Fusion Vista Nuclear Spacecraft Torch Drive.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073324

Has there ever been an attempt to make a rocket engine like this, but instead of achieving fusion, it achieves fission? A sort of inertial confinement fission drive?

>> No.16073328
File: 63 KB, 1024x552, starfox_arwing_redesign_by_adamkop_dczmo1u-fullview.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073328

>>16073324
I want to achieve fursion with Krystal

>> No.16073332

>>16073259
Cock rocket will explode, seals will clap, screenshot it.

>> No.16073333

>>16073324
Fission doesn't need laser-inertial confinement, you just bang roggs together. I guess the closest would be a Nuclear Lightbulb / Closed Cycle Gas Core NTR where a gas core reactor is physically contained by a giant quartz crystal that transfers heat and UV+xrays to the LH2 on the outside.

>> No.16073335

>>16073332
Off by one.

>> No.16073343
File: 1.01 MB, 1366x768, Star Fox Arwing Spacecraft.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073343

>>16073333
Well that's my point though, by using inertial confinement. You could get an extremely powerful gas core like fission propulsion system without requiring all of the wacky batshit crazy engineering to keep them from exploding constantly. You would remove the constraints of having to worry about the walls melting or flushing out unused uranium. And unlike fusion ICF, you don't need massive fuck off lasers to do the near impossible (nuclear fusion), you can probably really easily achieve nuclear fission with some basic lasers and a basic setup fuel pellet.

So now you get an ICF fission reactor that can achieve ISP's in the 10,000's of seconds and thrust levels in the 1,000,000's of newtons all without worrying about the reactor itself exploding because there is no reactor. Just a pretty capable torch drive based on basic bitch fission.

>>16073328
Yes

>> No.16073351

>>16073343
Anon, laser confinement IS wacky crazy engineering. Nobody EVER does it when they can use solid walls.

>> No.16073360

I'm advertising /sfg/ on the /pol/ threads about this starship launch.

>> No.16073361

>>16073360
TYSM!

>> No.16073364
File: 64 KB, 540x405, 1682912684299562.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073364

>wake up an hour and a half early for a launch that will be scrubbed
>sleep in and miss something cool and historic
The time I set my alarm for determines tomorrow morning's launch events, I am as God.

>> No.16073365

>>16073360
You do this every time do you really need to tell us? Its like clockwork

>> No.16073368

>>16073364
I have already determined the outcome (scrub) because I am not sleeping tonight and will be wrecking my sleep schedule

>> No.16073369

>>16073351
they do when the solid walls melt.

>> No.16073371
File: 813 KB, 1920x1084, Furry Krystal Space X.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073371

what time is the launch?

>> No.16073372

Is there a confirmed time yet for launch?

>> No.16073374

>>16073371
Friday

>> No.16073375

>>16073372
T-336 hours

>> No.16073376

>>16073371
>>16073372
https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/7363

>> No.16073377

>>16073360
bitch why

>> No.16073383
File: 172 KB, 1179x1267, IMG_0964.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073383

>>16073259
Here from /pol/. Let’s go!

>> No.16073385

>>16073320
where is the flame trench supposed to be? or are those pieces for some sort of diverter to go under the OLM?

>> No.16073386

>>16073385
its burried for now

>> No.16073395

KABOOM

>> No.16073398

>>16073386
For the new launch mount or excavating under the first one?

>> No.16073400

>>16073398
at Masseys for ship SF

>> No.16073404
File: 707 KB, 2048x2007, IMG_0171.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073404

>>16073377
I’m from /pol/ and I love SpaceX and space. Even if it’s fake

>> No.16073414
File: 3.69 MB, 1648x1200, 00000000000008795541.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073414

Imagine what can be done when we can just drop 50 tons on mars without having to pack every possible instrument into 1 ton

>> No.16073417
File: 988 KB, 1631x2224, 1680135501414071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073417

STARSHIP IFT-3 WILL SUCSEED! ENDING NUMBERS MATCH AND PROVE IT!

>> No.16073418

>>16073371
Kys noa

>> No.16073419

>>16073417
It will fail and all the spacex shills will claim it's a success like always

>> No.16073421

>>16073417
Fail, fuck you for ruining launch.

>> No.16073422

>>16073417
pippers

>> No.16073425
File: 9 KB, 570x102, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073425

>>16073287
okay, but it's going to take some practice

>> No.16073427
File: 20 KB, 1484x676, inertial confinement fission nuclear rocket propulsion space.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073427

>>16073324
>>16073343
Here liek dis:

>> No.16073431

>>16073324
That's basically Zubrin's Nuclear Salt Water Rocket

>> No.16073435

>>16073427
To add, you can even induce a sheared flow to the propellant so that the pellet stays in the center as it heads towards the point of criticality.

>> No.16073442

please don't explode too early, it's getting boring

>> No.16073443
File: 129 KB, 951x1450, GImZC5IWwAAVVPr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073443

kino, too bad its gonna scrub tomorrow

>> No.16073444
File: 90 KB, 1080x399, Screenshot_20240314-142206-865.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073444

>>16073417
Holy shit you saved SpaceX
>ends in 17
>Posted 17 minutes ago

>> No.16073446

The everyday astronaut is live now

>> No.16073448

>>16073446
i was hoping he was dead

>> No.16073449
File: 533 KB, 1354x701, Clipboard04.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073449

g'night /sfg/
see you all early tomorrow

>> No.16073455

>boss just called and told me to come in 2 hours early/will miss the launch due to a last minute meeting
lol

>> No.16073456
File: 29 KB, 1044x810, Screenshot 2024-03-13 at 11.09.04 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073456

attached my phone to my telescope with a 3d printed mount and pointed it at the ISS just to see what would look like. I thought these were lens flares on a white dot but I think I'm looking at a basic outline of the ISS

>> No.16073457

>>16073456
bro, space is fake.

>> No.16073459
File: 29 KB, 1044x810, Screenshot 2024-03-13 at 11.11.27 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073459

>>16073456

>> No.16073461

>>16073444
Wasted trips kys

>> No.16073463

>>16073461
>>16073444
samefag

>> No.16073464
File: 98 KB, 1179x374, IMG_3761.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073464

>>16073463
Fail

>> No.16073482
File: 60 KB, 1080x356, Screenshot_20240314-154218.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073482

>>16073463

>> No.16073487
File: 458 KB, 400x400, ALL SYSTEMS FULL POWER Torchship Space.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073487

kerosene + hydrogen peroxide>liquid methane/liquid hydrogen + liquid oxygen

fite me

>> No.16073490

>>16073417
kys pipnig

>> No.16073512

>>16073417
Cute girl

>> No.16073527
File: 421 KB, 603x602, apu poopoo.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073527

if repeating digits, starship will explode.

>> No.16073535
File: 704 KB, 2732x4096, 1700437826440626.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073535

>>16073527
>not one repeating digit

>> No.16073540
File: 79 KB, 1024x1000, apu horrors scared.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073540

>>16073535
if repeating digits, starship explodes and kills people as a result

>> No.16073546

>>16073540
thank you for blessing the launch

>> No.16073549

Really looking forward to things tomorrow lads :)

>> No.16073551

>>16073263
I want her to beat and rape me half to death.

>> No.16073559

>>16073455
Lmao imagine being this much of a cuck

>> No.16073569

what's the launch time exactly? trying to do gay timezone conversions from ausfailia

>> No.16073570

>>16073527
>>16073540
stupid frogposter

>> No.16073573

>>16073569
Window opens at 12:00PM UTC

>> No.16073576

>>16073569
It's in 6 hours

>> No.16073577

>>16073283
I know starship has nearly double the thrust at liftoff but something about those big dirty F1s with the big orange kerosene flames created a spectacle.

>> No.16073579
File: 66 KB, 1024x962, Sad Apu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073579

>>16073570

>> No.16073587

>>16073576
based ill stay up then.

im in the hospital right now because I can't breathe properly so I hope I don't die before the first successful starship launch

if I do die, kill all martians, birds, beetles, ocelots, FAAfags, boingsisters, bloriginers, 5s, ESGs, earthers and nuclearfags for me bros

>> No.16073596

>>16073569
I know it'll be 10.30pm here in Adelaide, which is 11pm if you're a filthy east coaster. Or 10pm in Queensland, even though Brisbane is 1400km further east than Adelaide because daylight savings says fuck you and your logic for 6 months out of the year.

>> No.16073602

>>16073596
>Queenslanders have a stupid timezone
>SA has the stupidest timezone on earth (muh half hour)
no wonder the crown shipped you off

>> No.16073603

>>16073602
Learn to read, I wasn't criticizing the croc shaggers for their timezone, I was criticizing daylight savings (which SA has and QLD doesn't) for being retarded.

>shipped you off
SA wasn't founded as a penal colony and never took in any convicts, unlike all the others. We're the only free state.

>> No.16073608

>>16073603
you're the worst of all of us, you're basically all seventh sons of seventh sons, the flotsam of the sewage run off of the called aristocracy of Britain. Victoria should have annexed you.

>> No.16073613

what's plan b

>> No.16073616

>>16073613
fireworks

>> No.16073620
File: 441 KB, 1114x855, cloud.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073620

>Mostly cloudy, with a high near 78. Breezy, with a south southeast wind 14 to 18 mph, with gusts as high as 26 mph.
If they launch the likelihood of good ground tracking footage is pretty low.

>> No.16073623
File: 6 KB, 486x324, 20240313_235538.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073623

if only you knew how bad things really are

>> No.16073625

>>16073620
Is the WB-57 scheduled?

>> No.16073626
File: 2.34 MB, 3840x2547, Transporter 10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073626

i need more rideshare porn

>> No.16073627

Singles and the launch time will be delayed until tomorrow

>> No.16073629

Does anyone have the X stream link? It was posted few days ago here with the Starship date being the 14th.

>> No.16073631
File: 82 KB, 527x341, 5hrs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073631

~5 hrs from now

>> No.16073633

>>16073629
https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1LyxBnOvzvOxN

>> No.16073637

Pad clear

>> No.16073638

>>16073633
Nice, roughly going live in ~4 hours. Someone should make a thread when that happens.

>> No.16073641

>>16073638
I will. I've been making the spacex launch threads for like 7 years now

>> No.16073649

>>16073620
if only they had on board cameras...

>> No.16073651

Invest in cloud removing technology

>> No.16073652

>People trying for digits in a 2 posts per minute board and failing
Get the fuck off my /sci/ and /sfg/, tourists. I blame boardfag.

>> No.16073659

ok anons
I'm going to stay up
what should I do in the meantime

>> No.16073661

>>16073633
>doesn't work without account
fuck you elon bitch bastard lasagna

>> No.16073664

>>16073659
You should be edging for the launch

>> No.16073665

>>16073659
go clean your room you filthy animal

>> No.16073666

>>16073360
stop you fuck

>> No.16073668

>>16073659
then clean your kitchen

>> No.16073669

>>16073659
listen to irish folk music

>> No.16073670

>>16073360
Thank you for taking the torch from me :)

>> No.16073671

>>16073661
Not working right now, but i've watched some Starlink launches on "X" not logged in.
I think it only works once the stream has started.

>> No.16073674

>>16073668
yeah alright mom

>> No.16073679
File: 19 KB, 546x82, can't wait.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073679

I.... am ready.
I've been here since the very beginning. San Pedro, hopper, all that. It's been a journey, /sfg/. I wonder how many of you have also been hanging around sci rocket threads since ~2017?

>> No.16073681

>>16073659
ejaculate at least twice so that you achieve a high level of post nut clarity before the launch, allowing you to truly appreciate it

>> No.16073682

>>16073360
Great, a bunch of underage subhuman tourists

>> No.16073684

>>16073633
>>16073661
>>16073671
Yeah, it worked for flight 2 like that, but I think the link that worked then was a link to a post, rather than the /i/broadcasts/ garbage.

>> No.16073685

>>16073684
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1765037578343121372

>> No.16073686

ok people, let's see what this tin can can do

>> No.16073688

snacks: ready
launch thread: ready to post
sfg: fullscreen

>> No.16073691

does anybody have the launch stream link still?

>> No.16073692

>>16073691
posted it here >>16073685
orrr you watch it here :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62LcUyKITjA

I will have the usual other livestreams in the launch thread of course

>> No.16073696
File: 127 KB, 359x337, 83e9bf7a036002d9026bbb96a2afd180.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073696

>>16073368
I accidentally slept from 2pm to 8 pm so now I'm just in hell
>>16073579
stupid frogposter
>>16073679
yeah

>> No.16073709
File: 115 KB, 481x547, mars.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073709

>> No.16073710

>>16073709
Why not both?

>> No.16073711
File: 55 KB, 1500x679, SpaceX Starship Test For sfg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073711

Guys, I just got a sneak peak at the SpaceX launch of the Starship, it's not looking good.

>> No.16073713

>>16073710
BILLIONS FOR MARS
TRILLIONS FOR THE EARTH

WONT SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF EARTH

>> No.16073714

>>16073711
the sun doesn't have sunglasses? really?

>> No.16073715

>>16073713
Stop the Artemis program, we need to protect the Earth instead of doing a moon landing

>> No.16073718

>>16073713
>>16073709
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9qWYUH5x3k
MARS FOR THE RICH

>> No.16073717

>>16073715
protect it from what? ourselves? seems to be a reasonable solution to just move ourselves to mars then. no more people around to be fucking up the earth.

>> No.16073720

I like smoke and lightning

>> No.16073727
File: 214 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073727

does starship have any reaction wheels? how will they turn it in space?

>> No.16073732

Tomorrow the weather is much more positive

>> No.16073733

>>16073727
no
RCS
how? RCS controllers in real life are much smarter than the RCS controllers in KSP

>> No.16073734

>>16073727
starlink sats have reaction wheels. so they have experience with them.

>> No.16073737

Are we go for launch ?

>> No.16073740

>>16073737
we are not confirmed as not go

>> No.16073741

>>16073737
The launch is in 3 hours anon

>> No.16073742

>>16073737
biggest hurdle is weather now, isn't it? somebody pull up the aviation weather forecasts

>> No.16073745

>>16073709
good to know he's still repeating 105iq takes he picked up from the new york times editorial page like they're his original nougats of wisdom dispensed upon the yearning masses

>> No.16073746
File: 84 KB, 640x477, scottish podracing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073746

>>16073737
Kilt 4 standing by.

>> No.16073747

>>16073733
reaction wheels are also far more limited in real life

>> No.16073748

>>16073742
can we remove weather?

>> No.16073749

Isla Blanca Park parking has already a 100m waiting line

>> No.16073750

>>16073746
quit shitposting and get me the aviation weather forecast for boca chica, scott

>> No.16073752
File: 129 KB, 2048x1153, GInmk-dXEAEYaJU.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073752

>>16073749

>> No.16073754

>>16073749
just sneak in, can't be that hard to disguise yourself as a beetle

>> No.16073756

>>16073733
RCS controllers in ksp can be pretty smart if you mess around with the attitude adjustment settings in mechjeb and don't have retarded placement

>> No.16073757

SCRUBBBBBBBBBB
https://twitter.com/Robbies315/status/1768179262668845112
according to literally who

>> No.16073760

I've got 5 bucks riding on this piece of shit making orbit. Don't fail me again Elon.

>> No.16073761

>>16073757
lying about the event being cancelled is the oldest trick in crowd control

>> No.16073764

>>16073760
it's not going to make orbit tho. Not even the periapsis is above the ground.

>> No.16073765

>>16073752
I wanna be a part of it bros. I feel left out :(

>> No.16073766

>>16073761
this

>> No.16073768
File: 266 KB, 1536x2048, GImCiPUWYAALW_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073768

>>16073765
I'm waiting for first tower catch to go watch in person

>> No.16073770

>>16073764
including the deorbit burn is enough dv to put it in orbit

>> No.16073773

>>16073760
It's a suborbital flight so you're destitute either way

>> No.16073774

>>16073757
space is cancelled
everyone back to work

>> No.16073775

>>16073765
you are part of the sfg party fren

>> No.16073776

>>16073770
hmm, true.

>> No.16073780

>>16073776
giving a shit is stupid, arbitrary and pedantic so you should not give a shit

>> No.16073783

>>16073760
don't worry anon. i still haven't paid out on my bet that new shepard would make it to orbit.

>> No.16073784

>>16073760
based retard

>> No.16073788

>>16073750
He is too busy being on the NSF stream. I hope they at least pay him.

>> No.16073792

>>16073764
>>16073773
>>16073784
I know niggers but you fucking know what I mean.

>> No.16073793
File: 1.18 MB, 3410x1917, H4Cf4WhkLg5moYmHw7wZ4K.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073793

WE ARE GOING

>> No.16073794

it's a superorbital flight

>> No.16073797

it's a hop

>> No.16073798

20 knot ground speed forecast. Not great, not terrible. High/low patterns look good. Altitude winds should be good.

>> No.16073801
File: 26 KB, 960x720, GInvkVfW8AA-JJV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073801

From Mexico

>> No.16073803

>>16073801
I'm glad Mexicans are interested in cool rockets

>> No.16073804
File: 742 KB, 320x180, 2u6sll.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073804

>>16073798
So what about windshear.

>> No.16073805

> it’s a bit windy so we need to scrub episode

>> No.16073808
File: 51 KB, 523x523, 1629080236275.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073808

>>16073775
Thanks fren
We will witness history

>> No.16073810
File: 3 KB, 36x251, ws.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073810

wind shear is not that bad

>> No.16073812

What's your bets for this time
>another separation failure
>suborbital but SS doesn't make it down
>both stages reach the water

>> No.16073814

>>16073812
Sep successful, booster soft landing ok, ship makes targets but fails entry

>> No.16073815

>>16073812
Slightly further along than last time before RUD.

>> No.16073816

dedicated launch thread when?

>> No.16073817

>>16073812
complete success. remember ift2 would have worked, they just made an oopsie with their method for accounting for not having a payload.
this stack has 1000s of changes. why wouldnt it work?

>> No.16073819

>>16073812
Both stages reach the water. Unfortunately for SN28, it's the shit infested waters.

>> No.16073820

>>16073812
I'm feeling optimistic, I'm saying SS reaches the water but explodes on impact

>> No.16073821

>>16073816
I want to wait maybe one more bong before posting the launch thread, you never know about these last minute scrubs. But chances look good.

>> No.16073822

SS will not make it back, too many tiles will fall off. Integration monkeys are still fucking useless at tile attachment.

t. knower

>> No.16073823

>>16073816
There is no launch until Insprucker chimes in.

>> No.16073824
File: 6 KB, 231x250, 1710005069084906.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073824

>>16073812
I vote for RUD during reentry

>> No.16073826

>>16073812
raptors fail to light for the deorbit burn on SS and the landing burn on SH

>> No.16073829

IFT3 needs to work this time , like it should not trigger an anomaly in FAA's eyes. SpaceX cant afford to waste another 3-4 months for another launch

>> No.16073831

>>16073829
FAA said that if it fails to safely splash down, they'll count it as an anomly.

>> No.16073832

>>16073829
does FAA stop caring at a certain point in flight? would a re entry anomaly trigger another FAA license process boondoggle?

>> No.16073835
File: 397 KB, 699x551, aa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073835

>> No.16073836

>>16073812
Blows up at hot staging because they got lucky last time and there's as yet unpredicted physics involved, fire in Ship engine bay knocks out avionics and as a result altitude undershoots before AFTS fires.

>> No.16073838

>>16073816
>>16073821
at least wait until the official stream starts

>> No.16073839
File: 11 KB, 600x450, D30_41_459_0004_600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073839

vibes

>> No.16073841

>>16073812
I believe in a full success

>> No.16073843
File: 14 KB, 360x360, 1693160666787.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073843

>>16073263
why didn't you guys tell me you were hiding tomboy muscle waifus in these threads

>> No.16073847
File: 1.56 MB, 1886x1102, 1614056113226.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073847

>>16073843
yeah

>> No.16073848

>>16073843
Rocket waifus are a point of contention in these threads

>> No.16073849

ULA sniper is in position. Time for Tory to destroy Elon once and for all

>> No.16073850

>>16073848
>point of contention
We have a couple of tourists who can't stop REEE'ing, sure.

>> No.16073852
File: 490 KB, 2160x2880, 1703335270379219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073852

>>16073843
Nobody was hiding them

>> No.16073853

>>16073848
Only by seething furry pedos

>> No.16073855

>>16073849
>inb4 Houthi rocket takes out starship

>> No.16073856

>>16073848
kek is the schizo still around? I haven't been here lately

>> No.16073861

>>16073812
It will fly outside its flight path and explode through the FTS

>> No.16073866
File: 802 KB, 1198x1062, x.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073866

bong govt advertising the launch, cool

>> No.16073869

>>16073866
>UK space agency
oxymoronic
cool logo tho

>> No.16073870
File: 3.28 MB, 375x498, 1656784273701.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073870

I can't lie lads, I got a BAAAAD feeling about this flight

>> No.16073872

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZSTkunGczI

>> No.16073875

>>16073870
sn8 good
sn9 bad
sn10 good
sn11 bad
sn15 good
ift1 bad
ift2 good
ift3 ....

mmmmmmh

>> No.16073876

>>16073870
If explodes on the launchpad it’s over

>> No.16073877

>>16073870
Pretty sheepish thing to say

>> No.16073879

>>16073875
ift1 was pretty good tho

>> No.16073880

RADAR HAS DETECTED AN OCELOT IN THE RESTRICTED ZONE

>> No.16073881

THE HAND OF GOD

>> No.16073882

>>16073848
Pinup decals = heterosexual
Anthropomorphized machines = homosexual
That's all there is to it.

>> No.16073883

ok I did the dishes

>> No.16073884

THERE IS A BEETLE 150FT AWAY FROM THE PAD . SHUT SPACEX DOWN NOW !!!

>> No.16073887
File: 2.99 MB, 960x540, 1555193812551.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073887

SpaceX's Starship test 3 aims to push the boundaries of the super heavy launch vehicle in several ways. Here are the key objectives:

Successful burns of both stages: This is a core goal, ensuring both the Super Heavy booster and Starship upper stage fire their engines effectively during ascent.
Testing Starship's functionalities: This includes opening and closing the payload door, a critical function for future cargo and crew missions.
In-space propellant transfer: Demonstrating the ability to transfer fuel between tanks while in space is crucial for Starship's reusability and missions requiring long durations in orbit.
First ever Raptor engine relight in space: Relighting engines in space allows for maneuvers and course corrections, a vital capability for future missions.
Controlled reentry and splashdown: Starship needs to safely reenter the atmosphere and achieve a controlled ocean landing.
This test flight also features a new trajectory with a splashdown target in the Indian Ocean. This path allows SpaceX to attempt new maneuvers like in-space engine burns while maintaining public safety.

Overall, this mission is a significant step in developing Starship's capabilities for future space exploration, including NASA's Artemis missions.

>> No.16073888

thanks claude

>> No.16073890

i'm glad nsf has all these ecelebs ready to step in and explain basic facts to me

>> No.16073892

>NSF livestream is so soi that the estronaut is actually better
wild

>> No.16073893

>>16073890
>>16073892
>not watching everyday astronaut

>> No.16073894

What is the comfiest stream ? Labpadre?

>> No.16073896
File: 145 KB, 1872x879, GIn3BJuW0AA687W.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073896

>Starbase range security boat Defender I is outbound from Port Isabel

>> No.16073897

>>16073892
Of all the spacex fanboy channels estronaut has always been the best and I don't understand why everyone dislikes him. I wouldn't even play NSF's streams to guantanamo prisoners, that would be too inhumane

>> No.16073898

>>16073894
Virtual YouTube Clear Usui, she is my wife so be nice to her

>> No.16073900

>>16073897
because of the pickle incident, anon.

>> No.16073902

>>16073896
>armed with dual 50.cals

Elon takes his security seriously

>> No.16073904

Chopsticks look to be open.

>> No.16073905

>>16073897
Since he started streaming with that woman his streams have been unwatchable. When he streams alone is fine

>> No.16073906

Does it have cameras on it? So we can see the reentry?

>> No.16073907

>>16073896
OK BOOMERS FISHING TIME IS OVER, GET THE

FUCK

OUT OF THE WATER

>> No.16073908

>>16073897
Yeah I don't see anything offensive about him, besides the different colored eyes. Almost as bad as being left-handed

>> No.16073909
File: 90 KB, 967x1450, GImCmbcWgAEQrse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073909

>> No.16073910

>>16073892
Estronaut isn't in it just for the cash, he really enjoys sharing spaceflight with people. When your community is based on milking the cattle, you will have a community of cattle(redditors)
>>16073896
Boomer boat seeking torpedos installed
>>16073905
Is it his GF? I don't get why she has to be a host

>> No.16073911

>>16073897
the estronaut epithet almost singlehandedly killed his reputation on here. it's too perfect and too funny, even though he isn't any more onions than the nsf crowd.

>> No.16073913

>>16073906
>plasma blackout exists
No views on reentry.

>> No.16073914

>>16073897
He used to be ok apart from the immense soi energy but the random hag he streams with now is insufferable.

>> No.16073915 [DELETED] 

>>16073897
His launch live streams became so shit when that woman became his co-host.

>> No.16073916 [DELETED] 

>>16073910
It's his friend's wife.

>> No.16073917

Village evacuated
https://twitter.com/bocachicagal/status/1768219939129671689

>> No.16073918

>>16073910
>Is it his GF? I don't get why she has to be a host
No , she is the wife from someone from NSF. She just started hanging out in Tim's streams from wharever reason

>> No.16073919

>>16073913
>plasma blackout in 2019+5
This is a meme. The shuttle had connectivity all the way down. And now with Starlink it's almost certain

>> No.16073920

>>16073905
>>16073914
Is she supposed to be the clueless foil? At least she doesn't have to act.

>> No.16073921

>>16073919
>UHF comm check

>> No.16073923

>>16073921
was about to post this

>> No.16073924

>>16073916
>>16073918
I pray she won't be there today

>> No.16073927 [DELETED] 

>>16073916
>>16073918
What a cuck

>> No.16073928

>>16073909
It's so hard to tell just how big it is from images like that

>> No.16073929

>>16073919
Dragon doesn't have any connection through reentry.
Or does the size of starship help?

>> No.16073930

For me it’s Marcus houses rundown on Saturdays

>> No.16073931
File: 519 KB, 2400x2400, burrito.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073931

I'm making a burrito. need to stay awake. and I have work today too

>> No.16073932

>>16073920
If he wanted a clueless foil he should have hired one of those barely clothed mega booba bimbos from tik tok, at least it would be some eye candy

>> No.16073933

BRB
gotta wash my car

>> No.16073934

>>16073919
shuttle's gentle reentry profile meant it had less plasma interference than starship's going to have around 60km altitude

>> No.16073935
File: 298 KB, 865x367, columbia breakup.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073935

>>16073921
>plasma blackout

>> No.16073936

launch thread in 30 bings

>> No.16073937

astronaut just said they have starlink and camera capability

>> No.16073938 [DELETED] 

For me, it's Scott Manley posting passive aggressive political statements on twitter.

>> No.16073941

Wayward boat bros are you ready to fuck shit up?

>> No.16073943

>>16073941
ULA trawler captain, standing by

>> No.16073944

Lunch time!!

>> No.16073945

>>16073941
Boomer sama the machine gun boat is out there now it's not worth it bro put the fishing rod away bro

>> No.16073946

>>16073930
Oh yea easily the best.

I like Germans too so What About It and Marcus House are the only two I toss a Dollar in the dirt to on the monthly.

>> No.16073947

"i just can't see a need for an orion drive" - estronaut

>> No.16073948 [DELETED] 
File: 789 KB, 288x464, 1708275736647.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073948

It's over

>> No.16073951

>>16073931
>putting wood in a burrito

Is this an american thing? Is it like sawdust or what?

>> No.16073952

>>16073951
cellulose is good for you, europoor

>> No.16073953

>>16072814
They're getting a taste of their own medicine.

>> No.16073954

>>16073948
why he do it tho

>> No.16073956

6AM perfect time for FISHIN.
***gulp** ***gulp** ***gulp**
This white Monster taste fantastic
***BRRRAAAAAPAPAPAPAPAP*
American V8 baby , South padre beach lets go

>> No.16073957 [DELETED] 
File: 704 KB, 368x640, 1707295752394057.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073957

>> No.16073958

>>16073948
Parachutes are arcane magic that only half a dozen boomers on the planet know how to pack. This is the real reason why retrorepulsive landing is being developed.

>> No.16073959 [DELETED] 
File: 1.74 MB, 300x240, 1665061426879958.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073959

>> No.16073960

the methalox pollution's so bad you can't even see the sun. unbelievable the EPA allowed this.

>> No.16073961

please no more rekt video ... please

>> No.16073963 [DELETED] 
File: 824 KB, 388x368, 1659956741930287.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073963

Me taking remote control of Starship crashing it into SF

>> No.16073964

any non-cringe stream?
the moment I opened NSF, they're masturbating themselves again

>> No.16073966

>>16073964
any non-cringe thread? I guess this one's just goreposting now

>> No.16073967 [DELETED] 
File: 2.03 MB, 640x368, 1662829114960143.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073967

>> No.16073968

>>16073964
The best you'll get is estronaut.

>> No.16073969

>>16073966
The Jannies are around. Report and ignore.

>> No.16073970 [DELETED] 
File: 236 KB, 240x282, 1707959844746293.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073970

>>16073966
This musk worshipping thread was always cringe

>> No.16073971

At least post something new, this is shit I've already seen.

>> No.16073972 [DELETED] 
File: 773 KB, 382x488, 1707296533861329.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073972

>> No.16073974

Clean it up, jannies.

>> No.16073975

>>16073970
Are you really posting gore because you let musk live in your head rent free?

>> No.16073976 [DELETED] 
File: 2.87 MB, 448x340, 1676516999232554.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073976

>> No.16073978

>>16073975
the npc wojack “stream rocket launch to brain” flerf spammer linked this thread /pol/. I assume this is a result of that.

>> No.16073979

>>16073971
This, tbqh. Post chinese villagers being fucked up by hydrazine or smth on topic if you're going to gorepost.

>> No.16073980

>musk enrages me
>i'm too impotent and feeble to do anything about it
>so i have to rage at my class peers so they know how much i'm suffering (victimhood is a moral virtue right)

>> No.16073981

>>16073930
marcus is a moron
>>16073946
what about it is okay.

>> No.16073982

>>16073929
it's more that being able to glue starlink dishes to the side helps, plus being able to use frequencies that aren't entirely blocked by plasma

>> No.16073983

I’m stuck in work whats happening?
Is it looking for launch on time?

Streams have ruined these threads as an info stream

>> No.16073984

>>16073980
kek

>> No.16073985 [DELETED] 
File: 2.86 MB, 480x576, 1709281138869597.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073985

Average sfg kike musk worshipper

>> No.16073986

>>16073982
Why even care about a minute of no comms? I don’t think it makes a difference

>> No.16073987

Damn I didn't know Musk was so powerful that he could melt people's brains

>> No.16073989

>>16073982
Well I guess we'll hopefully see if we do get any shots. It would be sick.

>> No.16073991

>>16073975
100% a twitter tranny

>> No.16073992

>>16073983
SpaceX hasn't said a peep. Everything looks go for launch otherwise. Evacuations. Aircraft activity. Downrange policing. etc

>> No.16073993

>>16073986
because I want uninterrupted live views all the way down
also if your shit breaks up during blackout, you have no idea why

>> No.16073994

>>16073983
Looks that way!
Launch thread will be up in a bit

>> No.16073995
File: 66 KB, 176x144, Spacex Crew Dragon Explosion Lz-1 20Th April 2019 (144P 10Fps H264-96Kbit Aac).webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073995

At least post spaceflight faggot

>> No.16073996 [DELETED] 
File: 2.84 MB, 640x352, 1663248361362.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16073996

>> No.16073998

>>16073959
actual Darwin award. why on earth did he do that?

>> No.16074000

>>16073995
bro I had this thread open at work and now I’m fired, thanks a lot

>> No.16074001

>>16073978
yep

>> No.16074002

hullo says they're behind schedule for a 7 AM launch with the GSE

>> No.16074004 [DELETED] 

>>16073996
Nerve gas?

>> No.16074005

I hate gore so much ... some people from here are so sick , take a walk, take a breath of fresh air , touch grass

>> No.16074007
File: 592 KB, 950x713, ir.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074007

Coool , IR cam with spots for the coldest and hottest point

>> No.16074008

>>16073978
you can tell its from /pol/ because its the same videos always spammed there
someone should have hired the ULA sniper to kill the boardfag years ago

>> No.16074009

>>16073930
ye he's the only one that doesn't make me feel dread listening to

>> No.16074010

Great thread

>> No.16074013

Man I wish I had some ciders for this launch. Instead I'll be stuck drinking trashy basic whiskey.
>>16073577
>those big dirty F1s
This sounds unnecessarily sexual.

>> No.16074014 [DELETED] 

>>16074011
>>16074011
>>16074011
Bump limit, new thread!

>> No.16074015

OLM Vent and Tower Vent.

Polling to prop load is coming up next.

>> No.16074016

>>16074014
Go fuck yourself, tourist.

>> No.16074020

>>16073964
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxI5ip72XVc

>> No.16074022
File: 836 KB, 1920x1080, live.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074022

T-1h:05min

>> No.16074023

reminder: if this mission doesn't go PERFECTLY then starship will have more failures in 3 launches than shuttle had in 135

>> No.16074025

>>16074023
Starship is not in operational mode right now. Test failures doesnt count

>> No.16074026
File: 147 KB, 1440x738, ACA61C13-1520-4D2E-AAAB-4F26A06883EF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074026

Lets Gooo

>> No.16074027

>>16074023
And zero astronauts killed

>> No.16074028

>>16074023
Starship failures don't lose lives and put the project on hold for years so no.

>> No.16074030

>>16074025
Cope

>> No.16074031
File: 237 KB, 1277x1280, word-image-546.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074031

>>16074025
shuttle had 4 launches before it was operational. it went 4/4.
>>16074027
>>16074028
hey, nobody ever said you could achieve greatness without taking a few risks.

>> No.16074034

launch thread: >>16074033
less than 30 minutes to stream start.

>> No.16074039

>>16074031
>"The orbiter is not an operational vehicle and they need to stop treating it like one," [Former astronaut John Young] said during a visit to Georgia Tech, where he graduated in aerospace engineering in 1952. "This is still an experimental vehicle. STS-107 [Columbia's final flight] proved that pretty well."

>> No.16074040

>>16074007
Remote temperature measurement of reflective metal surfaces is generally not a good idea.

>> No.16074042

>shittle
>greatness
Lmao.

>> No.16074043

>>16074031
Counterargument : Shuttle didnt use iterative design for its test process. Nasa style involved having a "perfect" vehicle ready from day 1.

>> No.16074045

T-1h

ITS GABBENING

>> No.16074047

Fucking hell, Marcus House really let himself go. I miss when he used to make KSP tutorials

>> No.16074053

>>16074047
>Marcus House
He "indeed" has an extremely punchable face

>> No.16074055

>Weather is 70% favorable
its ogre

>> No.16074056

>>16074055
70% is an F in my book. but F stands for Favorable...

>> No.16074057

>>16074055
better than i expected

>> No.16074071

Starship full stack orbital launch starts in 10 minutes, yet /sfg/ is dead.

>> No.16074072

>>16074071
Pushed back 30 minutes, oort cloud poster.

>> No.16074073

>>16073996
what gas causes this? ether?

>> No.16074074

>>16074073
Nerve gas.

>> No.16074077

>>16073996
Spaceflight?

>> No.16074079

>>16073964
Labpadre
Official spacex
Clear

>> No.16074082
File: 711 KB, 1200x1200, 1696492640144984.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074082

>rekt spamming
>new thread at bumplimit
>anthro fags still at it
it's shizo time

>> No.16074083

>>16074023
Unless Elon takes a dozen astronauts out behind the tower and shoots them in the head, SpaceX wins on the failure metric so far.

>> No.16074084
File: 187 KB, 931x923, marinetraffic.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074084

sniff sniff

>> No.16074085

>>16074002
hullo probably isn't up to date on the pad upgrades that have shortened prep

>> No.16074092

>>16074084
What's the Indian Ocean looking like?

>> No.16074100

>>16074082
Israel will grow larger

>> No.16074106

embarassing thread

>> No.16074108

we need more space stuff in the Brownsville area, SpaceX isn't enough

>> No.16074111

Launch thread is stickied!

>> No.16074112

>>16074084
>boats fail to get out the exclusion zone
>spacex forced to postpone launch
>repeat with another chinese boat for each launch attempt
>starship permanently grounded
why aren't the ccp doing this, it'd be so easy

>> No.16074114

I woke up early for this, so it'll be scrubbed.

>> No.16074115
File: 292 KB, 563x386, io.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074115

>>16074092
Dunno. Maritetraffic is free only for ships that reach land based receivers.

>> No.16074118

>>16074112
Because they like having access to ports for their cheap shit.

>> No.16074121

There's no way the glowies are gonna send it on first go
They need to build the anticipation first

>> No.16074130

>Stream pushed back another 30 minutes
Not looking good.

>> No.16074142

doesn't look that windy based on the clouds of vented gas

>> No.16074143

>>16074118
>no i no understan, i am simpre chinese fisherman lookin for tasty feesh i go rost, wha u meen cee cee pee?
no way to prove otherwise

>> No.16074151

what's a good stream without people grifting and reading out paypiggy messages?

>> No.16074154

>>16074151
SpaceX on X

>> No.16074155

>>16074151
Unironically Clear

>> No.16074157

>>16074151
https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1LyxBnOvzvOxN

Wait for the official one.

>> No.16074165

>>16074033
>>16074033
>>16074033
>>16074033
>>16074033

Flight 3 Launch thread btw.

>> No.16074171

>>16074165
We know how to find a sticky, tourist. Now fuck off.

>> No.16074175
File: 57 KB, 1080x622, IMG_20240314_085342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074175

>>16074157
Fucking Xitter

>> No.16074180

>>16074175
not live yet

>> No.16074181

FUCKING BOATS

>> No.16074186

>>16074155
clear?

>> No.16074194

>>16074171
It’s actually the other way around lol. Used to be there was no sfg, just launch threads

>> No.16074202
File: 224 KB, 800x439, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074202

>>16074092
There are two Xiang Yang Hong-class "survey" vessels operating off of India right now, one of which was monitoring an Indian missile test a few days ago. All of the Yuan Wang rocket trackers seem to be in port or in Chinese waters

>> No.16074214

>>16073623
heh, I recognize this: it's the KAIROS payload that was successfully deployed! (explosively)
y'know, launch failures tend to come in clusters of three....

>> No.16074218

>>16074143
sink them with 20mm armor piercing fired at 6000 rpm from M61 Vulcans, no more chink.

>> No.16074220

>>16074175
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-3

>> No.16074230

>>16074186
I guess he's refering to the turbocringe "space" vtuber that mentally ill trannies ususally spam here

>> No.16074231

How come Florida rarely has the boat issue?

>> No.16074240

>>16074231
They have been doing launches for some time.

>> No.16074245

>>16074240
Couldn't they just send a Coast Guard vessel to keep boats out?

>> No.16074250

>>16074245
It's a big sea.

>> No.16074257

>>16074250
For you

>> No.16074260

>>16074231
Florida is enforced by military. Even so, during Crew Demo splashdown, there were plenty of boats roaming nearby

>> No.16074296

>>16073847
god that fucking leg literally gets me hard every time, what's wrong with me

>> No.16074307

>>16074031
Yeah, all crewed and built with an all up kind of testing philosophy inherited from Apollo you fucking midwit, of course they could not afford them to fail.

>> No.16074330

>>16074023
Operational shuttle missions lost: 2
Operational Starship missions lost: 0

>> No.16074338

I can't stand the voice of the NSF guys, they either sound like 9 year old children or gay men.

>> No.16074354

>>16074338
They got that soi cadence, Estro at least sounds like a normal human despite the moniker

>> No.16074371

One more hour

trust the plan, White Man.

>> No.16074372

What happened to NSF? Like 15 years ago they were highly respected boomer space autists, now they all have effeminate voices.

>> No.16074392

>>16074372
s o y overdose

>> No.16074398
File: 220 KB, 719x535, 1689078554162061.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074398

FUELING

>> No.16074405

>>16074372
Boomers retired/died
Autists found a job

So you're left only with the soience faggots. Apart from Daz, who seems like the only normal person there.

>> No.16074407

>7:59
>8:29
>8:37
>8:52
AHHHHH JUST START THE STREAM

>> No.16074416

I'm watching LabPadre, he seems normal and hasn't promoted any hat or tshirt yet.

>> No.16074420

just woke up. what i miss?

>> No.16074425

>>16074416
lab padre for commentary, estronaut for good cameras

>> No.16074463

>>16074425
is there even a point of nsf anymore? they're annoying and also have bad cameras, worst of both worlds

>> No.16074490

>>16074463
You can get a shout out for the low low price of a red superchat (paid in ARS)

>> No.16074495

>>16074463
You can pay them money to say your name on the internet

>> No.16074506

>>16074463
rover 1 is the only cam labPadre has that's an interesting angle NSF doesn't have. for the most part for everyday tankwatching NSF has better angles

>> No.16074507

Starship Gazer is streaming SpaceX Starship Launch Flight 3 Starbase Texas 4 MILES AWAY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnXSTqMP0ZE
lot of wind noise, no talking.

>> No.16074513

>>16074507
Those clouds are moving fast...

>> No.16074544
File: 365 KB, 498x498, peepo-rocket-3440971786.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074544

which live stream are you watching?

>> No.16074550

>>16074544
The crypto scam one

>> No.16074555
File: 288 KB, 1200x764, 1644973022918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074555

>that femoid presenter is not on estronaut's stream today
Thank fuck

>> No.16074556

SCRUBBED
C
R
U
B
B
E
D

>> No.16074564

>>16074420
another delay

>> No.16074565

>>16074556
Glad you took your decennial shower, sweaty.

>> No.16074566
File: 201 KB, 613x364, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074566

official stream UP

>> No.16074568

SpaceX stream starting

>> No.16074573

LIVE
>https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1LyxBnOvzvOxN

>> No.16074578

>>16074573
pretty fox girl

>> No.16074580
File: 264 KB, 595x333, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074580

LFG

>> No.16074587
File: 1.71 MB, 937x936, 1681672200088974.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074587

It's time

>> No.16074594
File: 202 KB, 1920x1080, 1710420844399181.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074594

Oh no you guys, it's on fire...

>> No.16074596

>it doesn't work logged out
Fuck Xitter. The only reason I don't want it to go bankrupt and fold is that it'd cost Elon money that could go into SpaceX instead.

>> No.16074597

Love me Kate
Simple as

>> No.16074602

>>16074573
does twitter not have a big screen mode that is not fullscreen

>> No.16074607

>>16074602
PiP mode is the best twix can do for now.

>> No.16074609
File: 64 KB, 149x159, 1710420876110866.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074609

>>16074597
I have a boyfriend.

>> No.16074613

>>16074602
You can pop out the video.

>> No.16074615

Also 4 streams in one: https://multistream.co/p/0sFRvbcF7j-/SpaceX_IFT-3
>>16074544
above
but I can't find the N927NA WB57

>> No.16074620

>>16074602
Install windowed floating youtube/every website extension
Might have to hit fullscreen a few times on twitter before you get the prompt to do windowed fullscreen on twitter

>> No.16074670

I can't change X stream quality on my phone

>> No.16074700

WHERE'S JOHN INSPRUCKER?

>> No.16074704

>>16074670
have a direct link
https://prod-ec-us-west-2.video.pscp.tv/Transcoding/v1/hls/gBsfBOvU8UeoyLWWRQ5LJLWU4mw5670V1iMlhQAd0Z1rxjEygWsrVEzkhce3HlPa_E9bydVTZ05_nlB72qGyPg/non_transcode/us-west-2/periscope-replay-direct-prod-us-west-2-public/master_dynamic_highlatency.m3u8?type=live

>> No.16074722

>>16074700
Who do you think is dealing with the ULA snipers?

>> No.16074726

>wind is picking up
>delays are because of boatfags

>> No.16074727

>>16074609
damn, more like kate ice

>> No.16074741

it's over

>> No.16074742

>>16074700
He doesn't wake up for scrubs.

>> No.16074745
File: 395 KB, 596x674, 1710380423926850.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074745

>>16073259
There's a hidden Starfox logo in the top right of the OP image if you turn the brightness way up

>> No.16074747

SEVENTEEN MINUTES
>>16073897
everyday estronaut is alright but he's kinda retarded and kinda soi

>> No.16074763
File: 321 KB, 599x335, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074763

Uhhh ITAR-bros?

>> No.16074770

>>16074763
Don't worry. Plumbing is covered up.

>> No.16074774

>>16074763
LEWD

>> No.16074782

>>16073951
it's smoked bacon that's been smoked specifically with smoke from apple wood

>> No.16074800
File: 3.47 MB, 1280x624, Z0pp8wqnfczk8e8g.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074800

>> No.16074836

What's your serious opinion about the chopsticks? I think it's just too absurd

>> No.16074839
File: 378 KB, 651x682, 2024-03-14 14_17_22-SpaceX_Launches_Third_Starship_Flight_Test_-_YouTu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074839

Kino

>> No.16074843

>>16074836
If it is stupid but it works it isn't stupid.

>> No.16074851

>>16074836
Seems ridiculous but I guess the flip maneuver was ridiculous too

>> No.16074853

>>16074836
If they can harden the tower for when they blow up on a botched landing, maybe they'll be ok. If one failure sets them back 8 months each time, they should have went with legs

>> No.16074857

>>16074843
the amount of precision they need not to snap the sticks or fuck up the hull

>> No.16074860

>>16074836
Landing a booster was too absurd a decade ago, so I don't question spacex now

>> No.16074880

>>16074836
It seems absurd at a glance but I think it's actually not as crazy as it sounds. They can do precise landings already with Falcon, and that's with needing to do hoverslams. Superheavy and Starship can hover and have finer control over their thrust.

>> No.16074881

>winds

>> No.16074909

2 minutes

>> No.16074920

>Clear: You don't have to follow Elon Musk on X but you should follow the SpaceX account
kek

>> No.16074925

>good chance we blow

>> No.16074930

1 minute

>> No.16074932

>>16074920
good advice

>> No.16074952
File: 15 KB, 245x300, fd53b461f65734cd896548b6c2575c63.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074952

>> No.16074955
File: 306 KB, 546x557, 2024-03-14 14_25_26-(1)_Starship's_Third_Flight_Test__X_—_Mozilla_Fire.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074955

WE ARE GOING

>> No.16074964
File: 164 KB, 1920x1080, 1710422732400890.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16074964

woosh

>> No.16074963

Chunks of concrete flying off..

>> No.16074972

WE ARE SO GAAAN

>> No.16074973

>>16074963
SHUT THE FUCK UP

>> No.16074981

>>16074963
Good, the more those spics get blasted with debris the better.

>> No.16075002

Stage separation is a success!!

>> No.16075012
File: 73 KB, 1259x625, 1710422914365664.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075012

buh bye

>> No.16075013

POGGIES

>> No.16075049
File: 800 KB, 2048x1336, LETS_GO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075049

LETS
FUCING
GO

>> No.16075073

I fucking kneel Twitterman.

>> No.16075084

THE ENGINES DIDNT LIGHT

>> No.16075088

NO RELIGHT

>> No.16075093

Engine relight problems again

>> No.16075098

that's supposed to land on chopsticks???? looks like it lost fucking control

only 2 engines relit

>> No.16075108

looks like they were losing control of the vehicle during transsonic

>> No.16075127

>>16075108
Expect redesign of the gridfins.

>> No.16075138
File: 141 KB, 1920x1080, 1710423278226757.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075138

Nominal orbital insertion baby

>> No.16075141

>>16075127
Wasn't the fins. The engines didn't light

>> No.16075144

i only saw 2 engines relit on the booster

>> No.16075147

Raptordoomers were right...

De-orbit burn not looking good...

>> No.16075157

>>16075141
It started wobbling like a motherfucker prior to engine relight. The current setup does not work as intended.

>> No.16075159

>>16075138
look at all those tiles. shuttle survived fewer

>> No.16075161

>>16075108
Was it transonic? Wasn't the velocity higher?

>> No.16075166

>expendable starship now operational
DOOOOD
SPACE MEGA TELESCOPES ARE GOING

>> No.16075167
File: 472 KB, 297x212, 1368043966123.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075167

This things is suppose to land by being grabbed by two giant chopsticks???? Musk is retarded.

>> No.16075170

>>16075108
Yeah I assume the gimballing engines were supposed to help maintaining position. the gridfins alone seem to end up overcompensating

>> No.16075174

So what's breaking on Starship right now?

>> No.16075190

>>16075161
~1200km/h, so subsonic.

>> No.16075192

>>16075157
Maybe it was the high winds

>> No.16075205

PEZ door!

>> No.16075225

good music choice
waiting warmly

>> No.16075232

>two chopsticks btw hehe

>> No.16075238

>Elevator muzac
SOVL

>> No.16075254

>>16075232
>>16075167
Jeff pls

>> No.16075259

I have a feeling it's issues with the fuel intake again. The fuel being sloshed around and pushed up when the booster is falling is causing the engines to not relight. Maybe an issue that they couldn't fix on this booster because it was already assembled

>> No.16075264

https://twitter.com/DJSnM/status/1768269068635865402

HULLO GOT A VIDEO

>> No.16075268

>>16075174
my boner
>>16075225
very tropical
on the beach on the Rio Grande, sipping a cocktail, waiting for my baby to come back (video from the ship)

>> No.16075277

Garbage fucking music

>> No.16075292

went out of control because the engines did not relit thus it was faster than usual

>> No.16075293

>>16075259
yeah they delayed the fuel slosh from boostback to landing burn, I think they need better control of their attitude once they get subsonic

>> No.16075301
File: 284 KB, 1916x1080, Bethesda interiors.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075301

>> No.16075302

>>16075264
If this was a software issue then lol.

>> No.16075318

FOD floating around in the fucking payload bay are you kidding me

>> No.16075323
File: 3.72 MB, 2553x1407, inside starship.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075323

>> No.16075324

>>16075190
I checked back--it started losing control at around 1500 km/h
Mach 1.21, so yeah, right at the start of transonic regime

>> No.16075326

>FOD floating around inside the ship
uh, aviation safety bros???

>> No.16075327

kino shot

>> No.16075331

lmao, faggots are whining about the music

>> No.16075334

>>16075301
Future's looking bright.

>> No.16075336

>>16075318
hey there's that screwdriver

>> No.16075340

>>16075264
thanks for this, they started to get wobbly around Mach 2 and blew up in the transsonic regime during engine relight

>> No.16075343
File: 1.74 MB, 2560x1440, 1709969969993875.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075343

Only 3 engines lit max then 2 shut down
slammed the ocean at 1111km/hr <1km left

>> No.16075347

>>16075326
they're injecting micro plastics into the atmosphere

>> No.16075352

OH MY GOD TANK INTERIOR WHAT THE FUCCKKKKKK WAAAWAWAAAAA UFUCAJAKK

ACTUAL HISTORICAL KINO

>> No.16075355

im so fucking pissed i was waiting for the lunch and was afraid i wouldnt get home by the time it launches, checked that one spacex yuotube stream every once in a while only to find out that it had already launched..... but im happy its done

>> No.16075360

the fuck is this elevator music

>> No.16075371

>fucking juarrez dropped a wrench inside the cargo bay again

>> No.16075370

>>16075336
Not a boing rocket.

>>16075343
No shit all engines didn't start, it was oscillating like a motherfucker most likely due to the off-axis gridfins not working as intended.

>> No.16075375

Engines definitely failed to relight, but I'm sure there was a problem with the attitude control before then. They definitely want more margin than they had there between the relight and the thing starting to fully tumble.

>> No.16075385

>>16075293
Could be guidance software. The first F9 landing attempts come to mind. Maybe they need bigger fins, or the winds might have been bad out in the gulf

>> No.16075397

its so beatiful....

>> No.16075402

>>16075343
Could be worse. It didn't disintegrate. It was mostly pointing the right way.

>> No.16075403

I'm fucking blind can someone circle the wrench for me?

>> No.16075407

>>16075264
I yeah looks like they started to lose control at around 2000km/h 5 km up a few seconds before engines start to relight

>> No.16075409

>>16075343
o7
You did your best, center engine

>> No.16075410

why is the ship SPEENing?

>> No.16075412

>>16075318
Just like in the LEM

>> No.16075416

>>16075352
That's the payload bay interior right?

>> No.16075420

wait what did they fucking lose control?

>> No.16075421

HOLY SHIT WHY IS IT SPINNING AAAAIIIEEEEEEEE

>> No.16075422
File: 90 KB, 539x529, 1695378364896273.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075422

We're all going to make it

>> No.16075430

did the door not open? I didn't hear any mention of payload being deployed (and would have expected they showed it)

>> No.16075433

>>16075352
is that tank interior? looked like the payload bay
good shit

>> No.16075436
File: 133 KB, 1920x1080, 1710423986115261.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075436

Makes me want to press L for Lobby.

>> No.16075440

>>16075421
Prop transfer simulation tests.

>> No.16075441
File: 2.81 MB, 365x200, CRS-16-spin.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075441

This is a known issue. SpaceX pls fix

>> No.16075447

Someone's playing with the controls

>>16075430
no payload, they just opened it for demo

>> No.16075448

>>16075403
people are memeing about wrench/screwdiriver, we just saw some unidentifiable thing float by in one of the interior shots

>> No.16075463

>>16075375
you can watch it start to oscillate around mach 2 (2000 km/h) and completely lose it once they start to get to the grid fin critical speed (like 1400 km/h)
skipping reentry burns really changes the forces on the system huh

>> No.16075469

>>16075447
I thought they said they had a some non-critical nasa sat to launch?

>> No.16075491

>>16075410
why wouldn't you speeeeen

>> No.16075494

PROPELLANT TRANSFER DEMO

>> No.16075498

>>16075421
artificial gravity demo

>> No.16075500

PROP TRANSFER DEMO

>> No.16075504

>>16075469
Nobody said that, it just has a propellant transfer demo

>> No.16075513

Man I woke up late and need to get coffee, reentry wen

>> No.16075514

Did anyone on the ground get a video of the booster landing burn?

>> No.16075515

is it viable to start the relight earlier at 6km or so for more control?

>> No.16075517

HEY THUNDERTRANNYF00T ARE YOU WATCHING OR DID YOU KILL YOURSELF ALREADY?

>> No.16075522

PROP TRANSFER COMPLETE KEK

>> No.16075529

>>16075469
bro they aren't even going to orbit this time, they're intentionally going to 250x50km orbit (which is suborbital) and then doing a boostback to 250x-100km or so, which is enough juice to end up in orbit if they did it in the other direction but won't leave them up there as a hazard if it doesn't work

>> No.16075541

>>16075514
landing was miles out in the exclusion zone so probably not

>> No.16075547
File: 70 KB, 1179x1364, 405739051_1788666948241676_3123991373491389896_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075547

>>16075522
It's that easy in rocketry.

>> No.16075562

Is SpaceX giving estro et al some slack? Why wouldn't the commentators explain what is happening. We only get some faint mission control loop mixed with elevator music.

>> No.16075597

>>16075562
this kinda stream is the best kind of stream, it tells you everything you need to know if you're not a flaming retard and nothing more

>> No.16075598

>>16075562
this is a kino experience that can only be made better with more reliable video from the bay.

>> No.16075608

>>16075562
>We only get some faint mission control loop mixed with elevator music.
way more kino than soi commentators talking about godzilla or whatever

>> No.16075611

ENGINE CHILL STARTED

THEY'ER GONNA DO IT

>> No.16075616
File: 1.06 MB, 4096x2732, 1685695728316705.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075616

I propose a new division in the history of human kind, we are now in the year 0 A.S.S.
(After Star Ship)

>> No.16075620

>>16075522
wtf how did they test this? what were they transfering prop to?

>> No.16075627

look at it speen
wtf is that clear in the bay?!

>> No.16075639

>>16075620
just the header tank

>> No.16075650

stop fucking spinning it's making me nervous especially with the elevator music

>> No.16075652
File: 741 KB, 1920x1080, 1710424598761368.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075652

>> No.16075654

spaceX just got payed 50 million dollars for pushing some fuel around inside their rocket

>> No.16075656

>>16075639
>we moved the propellant around the ship
>this proves depots work... just because it does okay!!!

>> No.16075657

>>16075608
They could at least tell the plebs what is happening and why and what the next thing is.

>> No.16075664

SPEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEN

>> No.16075669

>>16075360
I'm jammin

>> No.16075670

uhhhh

did they actually manage to close the door? looks like there's a problem

>> No.16075673

>>16075654
Yes because it's a simulation for fuel transfer, something it's going to need to pull off to get it to the Moon.

>> No.16075674

>>16075654
just pull yourself up by your bootstraps and you too can be a gas station attendant in LEO

>> No.16075679

STOP SPINNING, RETARD

>> No.16075683

>>16075670
the door isn't structurally important

>> No.16075689

https://twitter.com/DJSnM/status/1768275015802478995

DOOR STUCK DOOR STUCK DOOR STUCK

>> No.16075693

It's funny to watch milestones switch from impossible to trivial the second SpaceX passes them. The next astronauts to walk on the moon WILL land on HLS and I am going to laugh at all of you when it happens.

>> No.16075706

>>16075670
DOOR STUCK! DOOR STUCK! PLEASE! I BEG YOU!

>> No.16075710

>>16075683
best part is no part

>> No.16075712

Door come on please close

>> No.16075728

inb4 successful re-entry with open door

>> No.16075733

>>16075689
I fucking love that all the audio from this part of the flight will have elevator music on top of it.
I assume the culprit is ice?

>> No.16075740
File: 903 KB, 895x978, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075740

r-redeemed?!?!?!

>> No.16075742

Why even open and close the door? Why not just have a hole?
>Uh buh buh muh wind
Ever driven a convertible?

>> No.16075744

>>16075733
ice from what?
there is no water in space

>> No.16075745

is it rolling to keep the temps even?

>> No.16075747

>starship raptor performance flawless
>control surfaces nominal
>door actuation failure

>> No.16075753

LAND HO!

>> No.16075754

>>16075745
it's just rolling for fun

>> No.16075756

>>16075410
if it's planned, probably some sort of BBQ roll to balance the thermals between the heatshielded side and the stainless steel side?

>> No.16075764

>>16075742
>space
>wind

>> No.16075765

>>16075744
from when it was all frosty on the ground, retard

>> No.16075778

>>16075765
the door isnt where the chilly propellant is retard

>> No.16075782

>door issues
wtf boingbrothers.... that's our schtick...

>> No.16075783

>>16075747
>10% of tiles missing

>> No.16075784

MOMMY IS BACK

>> No.16075790

>>16075778
i thought they meant the ice flying off everywhere

>> No.16075794

Any Replay?

>> No.16075803

>>16075790
that happened AT launch

>> No.16075813

>>16075783
I only saw like 3

>> No.16075817

bets on the tiles

>> No.16075819
File: 634 KB, 1280x720, door stuck.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075819

>>16075794

>> No.16075832

oh they will relight first hmmm

i bet they will fail this

>> No.16075833

Haha, door actually closed
fuck skeptics

>> No.16075836
File: 832 KB, 640x360, 1701949116059058.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075836

>>16075819
I've seen this episode before

>> No.16075841

>>16075836
This isn't your mom's astra dildo.

>> No.16075845

NO RELIGHT PART TWO

>> No.16075847

they did not relight

>> No.16075878

meme tiles
it's our fucking turn

>> No.16075879

Wasn't that burn to prevent burning up?

>> No.16075898

Attitude control broke?

>> No.16075902

leaves?

>> No.16075905

the flapsssssssssssssssss

>> No.16075908

It's over

>> No.16075913

>>16075879
Nah the ship was lost either way it was just to see if they could. Seems to still have relight issues.

>> No.16075914

>>16075902
Ice flakes.

>> No.16075929
File: 470 KB, 470x272, starship.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075929

she's waving

>> No.16075931

OH SHIT OH FUCKK

>> No.16075934

>>16075902
black ice

>> No.16075938

cam on flaps, at least let us test the heat tiles

>> No.16075937

guys I think it might be speening

>> No.16075943
File: 167 KB, 1920x1080, 1710425470319949.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075943

Sure is tumbly.

>> No.16075952

>>16075929
wave back
WE GOT PLASMA

>> No.16075963

holy shitting christ on a chopstick

>> No.16075970

HOLY FUCK
PLASMA BTFO

>> No.16075972

ITS HEATING UP HOLY FUCK

fucking beautiful

>> No.16075975

KINOKINOKINOABSOLUTEKINO

>> No.16075976
File: 99 KB, 1022x1038, 1710425513078469.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16075976

>> No.16075987

Holy shit

>> No.16075991

THERE SHE GAANS

>> No.16075998

Jesus Christ, how powerful is Starlink

>> No.16076002

Oh shit, it's heading straight to the white house!

>> No.16076004

holy fuck the kino!

>> No.16076005

communication blackout? couldn't be me

>> No.16076009
File: 115 KB, 1920x1080, 1710425579036739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076009

Did you guys see this shit?

>> No.16076014

>>16075998
you jinxed it cunt

>> No.16076019

god I hate these faggot presenters
someone link a stream that isn't by nasa spaceflight

>> No.16076021

>they moved the cameras
lmaoooooooo stop doing that shit man

>> No.16076027

Way further into the reentry than I expected. Impressive

>> No.16076031

still got telemetry, ships still trucking

>> No.16076036

LOSS OF TELEMETRY

>> No.16076039

>>16076019
where the FUCK was Innsprucker?

>> No.16076040

>>16076019
https://youtu.be/62LcUyKITjA

>> No.16076045
File: 1.21 MB, 2560x1440, Screenshot 2024.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076045

>>16076009
our screenshots are off by 1kmh

>> No.16076052

TELEMETRY STOPPED

>> No.16076056

I've never seen reentry from within before, that's incredible.

>> No.16076059

looks like its over

>> No.16076065
File: 861 KB, 600x900, OWARI_DA.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076065

Telemetry stops and the presenters launch into a canned speech.

It's over.

>> No.16076071

I am truly shocked it got that far with tiles missing

>> No.16076076

>>16076059
Blackout was to be expected. It's not necessarily over.

>> No.16076081

blackout period?

>> No.16076088

>>16076056
Listen to the Columbia tapes for added immersion.

>> No.16076091

plasma blackout

>> No.16076098

>>16076021
the camera is mounted in the lee of one of the flaps

>> No.16076100
File: 19 KB, 474x280, OIP.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076100

Come on you bitch

>> No.16076102

it survived. you dont need tiles

>> No.16076109

>>16076065
It's the reentry blackout, no data can get in or out.
Though it could have been destroyed, it's just going way too fucking fast for that height.

>> No.16076119

>>16076056
here you go
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U88DzZcsubs&t=388s

>> No.16076122

>>16076109
itll be pretty incredible if the feed comes back on. Good show regardless though

>> No.16076125

its too aerodynamic the atmosphere's friction did not slow it down as expected

>> No.16076133

>>16076056
Space shuttle crews took some views

>> No.16076134

The aliens stole the rogget.
We're not seeing it ever again until we launch the attack on Cydonia

>> No.16076151
File: 1018 KB, 1973x1945, 1650313795125.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076151

S28, Starbase, comm check

>> No.16076159

shit shit shit I just woke up

>> No.16076165

>>16076151
starbase to stupid frogposter

>> No.16076168

>>16076133
>>16076119
A video after the fact is neat, but I meant live reentry footage, as it is happening. How the fuck didn't blackout stop us from seeing that?

>> No.16076169

it's out of blackout territory

it lost control and exploded probably

>> No.16076177

Surprised that heating started at like 100 km altitude. I would have thought it would be lower.

>> No.16076180

>>16076169
blackout territory last until like 1:01:00

>> No.16076181

>>16076159
I woke up about half an hour ago and missed launch, showed up during propellent transfer test. Once this is over I'm going back to watch the whole thing.

>> No.16076182

>>16076159
Sorry bro, but it annihilated the launch pad. Brownsville is gone.

>> No.16076194

>>16076182
boca chica was wiped off the map

>> No.16076198
File: 32 KB, 529x244, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076198

>Positive media coverage
bros.... is it time?

>> No.16076202

>>16076182
Turns out the reason Musk bought Twitter was to show gore as bits of humans were blown everywhere.

>> No.16076207

>>16076159
>>16076181
happened to me too. woke up just before reentry

>> No.16076211

>>16076180
why is it so long? dragon's blackout is much much less

>> No.16076224

>>16076182
Elon musk has been arrested and executed for treason

>> No.16076228

>>16076211
shallower angle I guess. or maybe we're stupid and wrong.

>> No.16076234

it didn't survive reentry did it

>> No.16076240

WHERE IS THE PLASMA WEBM BROS???

>> No.16076245
File: 29 KB, 300x161, 1520134417644.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076245

>>16076198
They took notice that it keeps improving with each flight.

>> No.16076249
File: 278 KB, 340x354, 1710425785484165.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076249

>>16076234
No! But look at my pretty face!

>> No.16076253

>>16076234
Imo no fucking way it takes 10 mins...

>> No.16076255

Could anybody below have filmed the reentry? There must have been some poo fishermen out there looking upwards.

>> No.16076275

Good launch guys, see you for the next one

>> No.16076276
File: 784 KB, 1694x878, 1710361461726397.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076276

>>16076255

>> No.16076290

See you in 2 weeks for IFT-4

>> No.16076291

>flubbed the monty python quote

>> No.16076302

>>16076198
It seems like the media's criteria for success/failure is whether the booster explodes on camera or not.

>> No.16076306
File: 1.93 MB, 400x457, 1660657724439932.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076306

>booster failed to land
>starship broke up during reentry
embarrassing.

>> No.16076305

>>16076290
I really do wonder just how long it'll take.

>> No.16076307

it's dead
good shit, I thought it was weird how much they were rolling

>> No.16076308

So when is OFT-4?

>> No.16076315

>There's a type of plasma blackout where the free electrons in the plasma block radio waves.
I think starship is experiencing the second type of plasma blackout where bits of its antennae became plasma.


hullo is coping

>> No.16076318

>>16076308
two weeks

>> No.16076324

>>16076308
FAA will cockblock them until 2027

>> No.16076329

>>16076290
Now they gotta fix the tiles

>> No.16076333

>>16076255
Very unlikely. It's in a very remote area of the Indian ocean.

>> No.16076338

Don't cry clear...

>> No.16076340

>>16076318
The FAA would never

>> No.16076354

>>16076315
I think you don't get it.

>> No.16076355
File: 231 KB, 512x512, 1689989651900736.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076355

>super heavy lost control @ transsonic
Raptors still aren't reliable. Possibly unfixable issue.
>starship disintegrated @ mach 20 / 65km
Starship's planned reentry profile doesn't work even from easy suborbital reentry. This ship is supposed to return from the moon. They need to redesign the entire vehicle to increase its drag through upper atmosphere. This is very serious.

>> No.16076356

FAA is gonna consider booster explosion an anomaly aren't they, and then delay IFT-4 for 1 month more

>> No.16076364

you guys think they're gonna stick starlinks in it next time? it got far enough it would have deployed them successfully

>> No.16076365

>>16076324
>>16076340
Just ignore them. What are they gonna do, fine you? Ignore the fines too lmao.
>reeee you can't launch! you owe us a gorillion dollars now!
>'lol no I don't'

>> No.16076371

>>16076356
Anything that doesn't go perfectly to the slight plan makes it an anomaly

>> No.16076382

>>16076364
>it got far enough
Didn't go high enough to eject jack shit.

>> No.16076386

>>16076364
it's essentially an expendable rocket now lmaooooooooooo

>> No.16076390

>>16076371
greaaat

>> No.16076395

was this the first ever live onboard video during re-entry?

>> No.16076398

>>16076364
It would make more sense to make a mass simulator in shape of Starlink V2 to test the dispenser mechanism

>> No.16076410

>>16076355
I remember reading the same about "unfixable issues" after the other two tests.

>> No.16076415
File: 504 KB, 453x569, 1710426805513574.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076415

>> No.16076418

>>16076395
that one probe last month

>> No.16076420

>hurr durr pi day
what a bunch of clowns

>> No.16076434

>>16076415
Cutie (Tice) Pie.

>> No.16076439
File: 1.42 MB, 512x288, soyuz 512_288_med.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076439

>>16076395
Live? yea

>> No.16076443

>>16076415
yeah I'm glad I already ended the stream

>> No.16076444

>>16076386
>lmaooooooooooo
If there's something I hate about these launches is how obvious it is the threads get filled with third worlders.

>> No.16076457 [DELETED] 
File: 35 KB, 723x757, 1661269422708833.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076457

>>16076415

>> No.16076463

RATE THE LAUNCH

>> No.16076467

>>16076364
I think they're going to want to do an engine relight in space before actually entering orbit just to prove that they can do a controlled deorbit, and that precludes Starlinks until then.

>> No.16076469

>>16076463
9/10.

>> No.16076471

>>16076444
I keep forgetting that the launch thread brings in tourists, so I have to keep my power level down and stop throwing around in-jokes

>> No.16076477

>>16076463
4/10

>> No.16076480

>>16076463
11/10
good feels

>> No.16076484

>>16076463
Excitement was guaranteed and I was thoroughly entertained. 8/10

>> No.16076485

>>16076463
10/10 just for the plasma
HOLY FUCK THAT WAS AMAZING

>> No.16076489

>>16076463
10/10 for presentation. 7/10 for objectives.

>> No.16076491

>>16076463
9.5/10 for kino 6/10 for milestones

>> No.16076497

>>16076463
EXCITEMENT WAS GUARANTEED
AND I WAS EXCITED
NO FAA MISHAP INVESTIGATION
WE GAAAN NEXT MONTH

>> No.16076499

it was the altitude control, not the heatshield right?

>> No.16076504

>>16076463
6/10
Back to work.

>> No.16076505

>>16076463
Made me unironically söyjack at my screen so… pretty good

>> No.16076509

>>16076463
8/10

>> No.16076512

>>16076463
10/10
I'm giggling like a fucking retard.
That plasma was a genuinely kino cinematic moment that'll be remembered forever.

>> No.16076513

>>16076499
Yup, heatshield won't help if you're reentering sideways.

>> No.16076526

>>16076356
they didn't delay Falcon 9 for landing failures

>> No.16076539
File: 625 KB, 849x849, 6bb7194237ac96bca98b2acafbe801a4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076539

>>16076457
stupid frogposter

>> No.16076542

>>16076499
it kept spinning for a while while still reentering, then it looked more stable but I assume that wasn't good enough

>> No.16076544

Flight controls chads... what happened?

>> No.16076546

Is it possible for them to launch a payload next time and release it?

>> No.16076549

>>16076410
You mean, like, raptor reliability? Yeah I'm glad they fixed that one :D

retard

>> No.16076550
File: 366 KB, 1920x1080, 1710143112730752.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076550

launchpadbros...

>> No.16076556

Time for a beer. If I was still smoking, I'd have a cig too at this point.

>> No.16076559

>>16076463
12/10 that reentry was incredible
>>16076499
yeah I'm not sure if that roll was commanded or not, there sure was a lot of back and forth and extreme inputs commanded on those flaps

>> No.16076558

I'm gonna call it, ice buildup caused RCS to fail and it tumbled into the atmosphere due to uncontrolled roll on the horizontal axis

>> No.16076564

>>16076546
berger says starlinks for next flight and I trust him

>> No.16076567

How can they even obtain the flight data if it didn't survive the blackout?

That's my biggest question right now

>> No.16076573
File: 3.62 MB, 3464x3464, 1710426303939466.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076573

>>16076550
it's over...

>> No.16076574

>>16076558
>no part is best part
build some fucking heaters you have the mass godamn spacex

>> No.16076580

>>16076463
9/10
probably best day of this half of the year... until the next launch since nothing went catastrophically wrong meaning more launches imminent.

>> No.16076583

>>16076549
>first launch
>like half the engines fail
>second launch
>couple engines fail
>third launch
>no fails
All the problems were with reignition, something that had yet to be tested.

>> No.16076587

>>16076580
FAA will still say its an anomaly and demand a 2 month investigation

>> No.16076591

>>16076583
>first launch
>like half the engines fail
Six failed.

>> No.16076596

>>16076583
Booster oscillating like a motherfucker while the off-axis gridfins were trying to compensate wildly didn't help prop slosh.

>> No.16076599

>>16076567
Blackbox

>> No.16076601

>>16076583
Booster Engines failed to reignite but it's probably not the engine's fault, it was the sharp movements caused by the grid fins.

>> No.16076604

>>16076596
That happened because the engines didn't ignite in time.

>> No.16076611

IFT-1 -> 7 months -> IFT-2 -> 4 months > IFT-3

IFT-4 in 2-3 months?

>> No.16076614

>>16076599
the chinks got it

>> No.16076615

>>16076567
Couldn't they put in some black box that could take all this shit. They certainly had the mass margins.

>> No.16076621

>>16076604
Entering chicken and egg territory here. I believe a gridfin redesign is coming up. We'll see.

>> No.16076622

>>16076611
It could genuinely be much faster, they've built the hardware already. I could see a launch in April or early May.

>> No.16076624

>>16076611
I'd say august

>> No.16076628

>>16076614
It's over...

>> No.16076630

>>16076567
Just fix the attitude control in space. Don't do a 1080 with the unethical experimental while reentering the atmosphere.

>> No.16076631

>>16076604
The control oscillation begun a few seconds before planned relight.

>> No.16076637

>>16076463
11/10 those shitty tiles fucking worked
we will live to see space colonies

>> No.16076640

>>16076596
Yeah, looked like the control loop needs some tuning

>> No.16076641
File: 14 KB, 220x275, NASA_Administrator_Bill_Nelson_Official_Portrait_(NHQ202105170001).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076641

Are we gonna hear a "well done you made it harder this time" speech again.

>> No.16076646

>>16076641
Why would Skeletor even chip in? No NASA payload was involved.

>> No.16076649

So both S29 and B11 have yet to perform a static fire. The former has done cryo and spin prime while the latter only cryo.
NET June sounds realistic

>> No.16076650

would you put your payload in the next flight?

>> No.16076651

>>16076646
Because they completed a NASA milestone?

>> No.16076653

Most advanced anti-whale weapon ever devised by man
They fucking frag grenaded the booster with the FTS just above the surface for maximum cetacean death

>> No.16076655

>>16076567
There should be significant flight data transmitted even after the video cut out because it's much lower bandwidth

>> No.16076661

>>16076655
you meant the telemetry? it stopped updating at 65km

>> No.16076663

>>16076651
Did the prop transfer even work? They said they completed the door thing but it was clearly stuck open.

>> No.16076664

>>16076653
We can throw it at chink trawlers

>> No.16076666

>>16076650
Yeah, its functional as a disposable launch system

>> No.16076670

>>16076655
They said both starlink and back up comms died at the exact same time

>> No.16076672
File: 200 KB, 379x228, 1679694642626660.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076672

>> No.16076674

>>16076646
NASA’s involved intimately, payload or not.

>> No.16076677
File: 194 KB, 584x476, 1679571919909240.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076677

And there it is!

>> No.16076678

>>16076599
Real easy to find one of those in the Indian ocean I heard.

>> No.16076679

>>16076663
If the door hadn't shut down it would have blown up the moment reentry started.

>>16076666
>if I say it 20 more times it'll be true
Just admit you don't know about rocketry.

>> No.16076681

>>16076674
Sure, but Skeletor only chips in when it's something NASA broadcasts to the masses.

>> No.16076684
File: 18 KB, 586x137, 1685825478155991.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076684

alright this is quite funny

>> No.16076687

Does SpaceX have any full assembled (or close to it) ships and boosters at the moment? I'm curious how quickly they could launch again, barring the legal stuff, of course.

>> No.16076691

>>16076596
Why are they off-axis anyway? Why reinvent the wheel?

>> No.16076692

>>16076679
Why are you so angry?

>> No.16076693

>>16076646
debunked >>16076677

>> No.16076695

Since they already have the next few ships built, how much improvement can they realistically make? they can make programming changes from the data, but hardware wise they're kind of stuck for the next few launches right?

>> No.16076697

How large is the payload door? there's no clam-shell like door, just a slit?

>> No.16076698

>>16076687
several I believe. They haven't stopped making new ones.

>> No.16076701
File: 903 B, 77x39, runes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076701

>>16076684

>> No.16076707

>>16076677
thank you professor administrator doctor senator skellington
very cool

>> No.16076708

>>16076677
Thank you skeltor's twitter intern

>> No.16076710

>>16076695
They put in baffles in the current booster from lessons learned during IFT2. It's steel, man. It's not made of unobtainium that can't be changed once assembled.

>> No.16076713

>>16076684
I suspect they didn't do the relight because the door jammed
They opted to at least see how the tiles would do in the early stages of reentry instead of fucking the ship with the door from a relight

>> No.16076719

>>16076305
the next stack is literally just waiting in line; second stage is sitting on suborbital next to OLM

>> No.16076723

>>16076684
Not sure if quality bait or genuine mental retardation.

>> No.16076725

>>16076713
The way they were talking was engine relight completely handled onboard based on parameters?

>> No.16076727

>>16076684
mean while the fuel gauges:
[#_______________________________]
[#_______________________________]

>> No.16076734

fucking hilarious how bad that was honestly. the way it waas flipping was fucked up. How you do you guys not notice this shit?

>> No.16076735

>>16076719
Well yeah, but that's never been the issue. It's always been getting through the paperwork.

>> No.16076736

>>16076701
jew knee phoon

>> No.16076737

>>16076725
Yup, my guess is the uncontrolled spin, computer didn't think it was stable enough to light

>> No.16076738

>>16076713
i think it was because they didn't have attitude control, so a relight risked pushing the trajectory out of the flight path

>> No.16076743

>>16076719
they said that last time fucking idiot. sentiment was that it wold launch on christmas. why do you not learn?

>> No.16076748

>>16076743
but today is christmas anon

>> No.16076749
File: 2.05 MB, 2560x1440, 1683584129511990.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076749

is it supposed to burn its butt on reentry

>> No.16076751

>>16076687
Ship 29 is on a test stand and had three cryo tests before, they need to static fire it as well as a booster, then stack and wet dress rehearsal. Ship 26 had a static fire but it has no flaps or heat shield so on one knows what its for, probably not a flight article.
If they went at absolute max speed I'm guessing they could do a month, realistically I'd say 2-3. It was 4 since the last flight.

>> No.16076752
File: 3.89 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.22.48-0.23.28.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076752

Beginning to process max-quality webms.

>> No.16076753

>>16076719
Sorry goyim but uncle Biden has to look through your FAA paperwork first

>> No.16076766

>>16076719
It's not, both S29 and B11 have to perform static fire tests.

>> No.16076769

>>16076752
the drone shot as its going through the clouds is kino

>> No.16076774
File: 276 KB, 1920x1080, 1710428407526955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076774

>>16076752
that cloud coverage is kino. looks so good during the booster reentry too

>> No.16076775

was so amazing to see hot plasma form

>> No.16076776
File: 188 KB, 585x789, 1704160290441002.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076776

>>16073824
I won

>> No.16076781

so what caused the roll? some gas venting out of a broken line? ice blocking the RCS nozzles?

>> No.16076782
File: 3.69 MB, 1920x1080, ss_pl.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076782

>> No.16076783

hot plasma started forming at 46min

>> No.16076784

>payload door cycling and prop transfer demo (to be confirmed!), and ship entry!
>tbc

Oh no no tipping point bros, the $50 million...

>> No.16076785

>>16076546
If they can get the door to work. From here on they are testing the really hard stuff. Payload deployment, docking and fuel transfer, and reentry will be many more test flights

>> No.16076786

Spaceguy5 has not tweeted in an hour
I repeat, Spaceguy5 has NOT tweeted

>> No.16076787
File: 73 KB, 640x476, the-nooooticer-v0-766gxlu34lw81.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076787

>>16076752
The twr looks much better

>> No.16076788

>>16076753
>>16076743
>>16076735
it'll probably get sent back anyway or replaced entirely for design tweaks based on today's flight data like the current stack went through.

>> No.16076789

What's with all the tumbling today bros?

>> No.16076791
File: 1.49 MB, 1579x888, 1687731367112594.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076791

re-entry heating started way too early, it was still doing the barbeque spins when it started to glow

here you can see it's glowing sideways

>> No.16076792

>>16076677
>together we are
You didn't do anything

>> No.16076793

It's pretty funny how itterative this has been, and how they fail at the next step.

IFT 1: S1 Failure
IFT 2: S1 success, Boostback failure and S2 ascent failure
IFT 3: Ascent success, boostback success, S1 Landing burn failure, so-so coast phase and Reentry failure.

They'll really get it to work this year.

>> No.16076795

>>16076789
Control thrusters not working properly

>> No.16076796
File: 2.16 MB, 3423x2160, starship z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076796

Wallpaper from SpaceX

>> No.16076798

>>16076776
There was like half a dozen people at least saying this same thing, enjoy your sloppy 6ths

>> No.16076802

>>16076791
wouldn't this quickly disintegrate any non-steel rocket?

>> No.16076804

>>16076795
Insufficient attitude control authority, it seems

>> No.16076803

>>16076791
yeah, the atmosphere really dropped the ball by getting so dense above 90km.

>> No.16076806

>>16076791
They didn't have enough control to orient it for reentry so they just let aerodynamics do the work from what i can tell

>> No.16076807
File: 112 KB, 1024x980, 1710349006148179.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076807

>>16074836
landing boosters was straight sci fi a little over a decade ago. As long as the spacex crew does not get sniped with regulation or financial trouble they will make it

>> No.16076809

>>16076793
>They'll really get it to work this year
>They'll really get it to work next year

Ftfy based off historical data

>> No.16076811
File: 949 KB, 1579x888, 1687702511809719.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076811

butt is getting grilled

no plasma forming on the top part, i don't think this orientation is nominal

>> No.16076813

>>16076752
Based. Do you have one for the payload bay door opening and venting into space?

>> No.16076814

Do we have any video of the booster coming down from a different perspective? Did FTS activate or did it pile drive itself into the water at mach 2? Seeing the latter would be fucking awesome.

>> No.16076816

>>16076814
that would require a boat and you fags hate boats

>> No.16076818

>>16076811
Surprisingly that orientation may be nominal. In simulations, the curvature of the nosecone generates lift in that direction, so it needs to turn down relative to the airstream to prevent the ship from skipping out of the atmosphere.

>> No.16076819

>>16076806
when you're above 70km control surfaces can be sufficient to maintain attitude when you're already stable, but they definitely can't arrest you out of a spin. source: many failed attempts at landing spaceplanes in RSS/RO.

>> No.16076822

So they basically got oldspace rocket at the moment

>> No.16076821

Videos coming in of a whale, a shark and a group of beetles getting crushed by the booster as it impacts the ocean.. It's over

>> No.16076823
File: 34 KB, 340x94, 1706879967040519.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076823

>>16076818
this orientation you mean?

>> No.16076824

>>16076802
it can and has

>> No.16076825

>>16076818
Idk I'm pretty sure grilling one part of the rocket when you have a skyscraper to work with is not nominal

>> No.16076827
File: 3.85 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.23.32-0.25.02.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076827

>>16076813
I'm just starting with rendering the splashdown, so not yet.

>> No.16076829

>>16076823
Just like that, yes. Pointing down helps keep the direction of lift towards the Earth instead of out into space.

>> No.16076831

>>16076802
no. Plasma is not necessarily scorching hot at that point.

>> No.16076832

>>16076823
still going 26.7k km/h at 82km that's so done

>> No.16076836

>>16076823
>PUT ME IN SPACE AND POINT ME AT INDIA I AM READY

>> No.16076837
File: 3.89 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.25.32-0.26.32.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076837

>> No.16076838
File: 1.87 MB, 640x480, 1708727649992301.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076838

please tell me someone actually saw and filmed the superheavy slamming into the ocean at 1k km/h

>> No.16076839

>>16076822
The biggest old space rockets ever if you like

>> No.16076840
File: 3 KB, 342x93, 1705629473354735.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076840

>>16076701
its trending

>> No.16076844

>>16076822
but bigger, cheaper, made by 1 (one) company, and flies 3 times per year already

>> No.16076845

>>16076823
>almost 27kph
>82km altitude

Jej was never going to make it

>> No.16076846

>>16076818
>>16076829
nose down is never going to be necessary to prevent skipping. a 90-degree roll will give you zero vertical lift force. faget's straight-wing shuttle had very similar reentry characteristics to starship and it never would have needed more than 80 degrees roll to prevent skipping.

>> No.16076847

>>16076845
does someone have space shuttle data? what's their reentry angle?

>> No.16076850
File: 2.51 MB, 492x283, marisa explosion.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076850

>>16076782

>> No.16076851

>>16076847
check out that real engineering video on it

>> No.16076852

>>16076845
>>16076847
that's a normal speed at 82km for reentry. you get basically no deceleration above 75km.

>> No.16076853

>>16076846
It's a 3D problem, and pointing down gives negative lift.

>> No.16076862

>>16076845
Shuttle went about 28,000 km/h when it reentered. But yeah, a graph showing its velocity at different altitudes during that would be helpful.

>> No.16076863

>>16076840
whats happening on japanese twitter

>> No.16076866

>>16076782
>the camera fuckups starting at 1:03
Zoomers shat their pants and jumped out of their seats.

>> No.16076867
File: 921 KB, 3840x2160, 1701850721905424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076867

>>16076863
VRchat

>> No.16076870
File: 3.90 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.26.40-0.27.50.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076870

>>16076752
>>16076827
>>16076837

>> No.16076873

>"Congratulations Elon" -- you managed to accomplish something that @NASA
accomplished back in 1960. Good job, ya frothing fascist right wing lying conman crook Republican white supremacist dung heap !

Tweeter is fucking hilarious right now on Congratulations Elon trend, mix of pure delight and unrelenting seething

>> No.16076875

>Crashing two rockets into the ocean in one launch
The FAA gonna tear them a new one, aren't they. I hope SS eventually launches again but this looks grim.

>> No.16076876

>>16076867

Why is japan like this?

>> No.16076877
File: 3.82 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.28.45-0.30.13.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076877

>>16076870

>> No.16076878

>>16076873
>So, SpaceX loses a whole ass rocket (for the umpteenth time) and still the boot lickers scream "congratulations elon" if only the God-Emperor would only glance their way ...

>Y'all worship some dumb shit.

lmao, clueless

>> No.16076879

We should savor these test flights while we still can. Years from now when Starship launches become at least as boring and routine as Falcon, we'll look back at this period of its development and miss the excitement.

>> No.16076881

>>16076878
reddit spacing

>> No.16076882

>>16076853
if you want negative lift for some other reason then sure, but i'm just saying that it's not necessary to prevent skipping when you're reentering from LEO.

>> No.16076884

any new video footage?
did anyone film the starship descent with some telescope?

>> No.16076885

>>16075264
It's 2024 and a bunch of engineer still can't implement a basic control algorithm

>>16075463
what's grid fin critical speed

>> No.16076888

>>16076881
twitter spacing actually

>> No.16076890

>>16076878
They are literally bots retard

>> No.16076891
File: 342 KB, 1286x372, reuters lmao.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076891

>reuters livestream
>2000 views
TOP KEK

>> No.16076894

>>16076882
It may be off nominal, since the ship never really had attitude control in flight, but the ship was dumping gas and the flight controllers operate in real time to try and control their vehicles to whatever their target destination is, so it's hard to be sure one way or another.

>> No.16076896
File: 665 KB, 888x818, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076896

Bill is happy, WE GAAAN
https://twitter.com/SenBillNelson/status/1768288689694642398

>> No.16076899
File: 304 KB, 512x512, 1691316145020221.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076899

would it be risky for them to put some starlink sats for the next launch?

looks like getting past the fucking orbit is already figured out. well it's not fully expendable yet, they need to keep fuel for testing the landings.

>> No.16076900

Is it possible FTS activated because it was reentering in wrong place?

>> No.16076903

>>16076900
No, not possible

>source: Me

>> No.16076904

>>16076900
it would have been activated well before 65km

>> No.16076906

>>16075463
>mach 2 (2000 km/h)
Retard

>> No.16076912

Why don't SpaceX streams display relevant units like m/s and mach numbers?
Annoying to mentally convert from km/h. What is this, a fucking car speedometer?

>> No.16076913
File: 3.91 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.31.20-0.32.20.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076913

>>16076877

>> No.16076915

>>16076655
Yeah I think so. But SpaceX rarely talks about that. I'm also pretty sure they have a completely separate beacon always transmitting from Starship. That way they can know if it blows up or something.

>> No.16076917

Will we see a fast turnaround? or will we have to wait months for the FAA?

>> No.16076919

>>16076885
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_control_speeds#Minimum_control_speed_when_airborne

>> No.16076924

>>16076899
Wasting Starlink on suborbital flights seem pointless and I guess that's going to be the next mission profile too, because attitude control failed and they didn't perform an in-orbit startup. Maybe they will go a bit further, to Hawaii.
I think it would be better to put a mass simulator there to test the dispenser.

>> No.16076923
File: 3.86 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.37.25-0.37.35.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076923

>>16076913

>> No.16076926

>>16076621
>I believe a gridfin redesign is coming up. We'll see.
They should copy BO's grid finns.

>> No.16076927

>>16076823
>were not aiming for the truck!

>> No.16076930
File: 199 KB, 543x587, sshot-056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076930

Whats the next goalpost for seethers?

>> No.16076933
File: 144 KB, 2048x1149, IMG_2943.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076933

>>16076894
loss on reentry seemed to be caused by the off axis flight rather than TPS issues

>> No.16076934

>>16076912
Thank you for your feedback, future streams will be displayed in feet per second as a velocity unit and altitude will be displayed in fathoms.

>> No.16076935

>>16076917
2 months

>> No.16076936

>>16076923
Just makes me wanna float in there

>> No.16076939

>>16076930
Catching booster is impossible

>> No.16076940

>>16076933
Maybe, but we don't actually know when it was lost in flight or what failed. Maybe the ship was losing altitude too fast, maybe the flaps weren't up to the job.

>> No.16076941

>>16076870
Why can't I see Starships engine plumes

>> No.16076945

>>16076923
What's the smoke

>> No.16076947

>>16076941
Stop plooming and seek God you nasty addict

>> No.16076948

>>16076941
>Plume 101km up
Hello tourist.

>> No.16076950

>>16076933
doesn't like very off axis in your picture though

>> No.16076951

>>16076945
might just be dust on the inside of the payload bay

>> No.16076953

>>16076939
It actually is impossible.

>> No.16076954

>>16076924
I guess they can do test deployals first

>> No.16076956

>>16076934
Yeah, I was thinking of joking about that but figured it was too lame. Thanks for taking on the burden.
I guess not measuring distances in body parts is a huge leap for an american company. They'll get to correct units one day.

>> No.16076957

>>16076940
It entered the atmosphere 90 degrees off axis and kept rotating through the plasma

>> No.16076958

>>16076948
but we could see some plumes during coast phase

>> No.16076960

>>16076930
Already being called a failure
https://www.seattlepi.com/business/article/spacex-s-mega-rocket-blasts-off-on-a-third-test-19012633.php
>SpaceX’s mega rocket blasted off on another test flight Thursday and made it farther than two previous attempts, but the spacecraft was lost as it descended back to Earth.

>The company said it lost contact with the spacecraft as it neared its goal, a splashdown in the Indian Ocean, about an hour after liftoff from the southern tip of Texas near the Mexican border.

>Two test flights last year both ended in explosions minutes after liftoff.

>> No.16076962
File: 90 KB, 900x1042, 1699524809712139.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076962

We are never leaving this gay earth, are we?

>> No.16076963

>>16076957
Booster 7 vibes

>> No.16076964

>>16076933
>>16076940
>>16076957
Altitude control fucked up, it entered the atmosphere while it was still bbq rolling, you see plasma start to form while it was still rolling like a dumbo

>> No.16076965

>>16076962
Not with that boomer oldspace mentality, no.

>> No.16076966

>>16076964
More or less, but they never actually seemed to attain attitude control.

>> No.16076971

>>16076962
>i want to collect rocks in a muggy space suit on mars!

Why

>> No.16076972

>>16076964
>>16076966
sure seemed like something was venting the entire time it was in space from the video

>> No.16076973

>>16076972
thats just the RCS

>> No.16076977

>>16076912
just divide by 3.6, retard

>> No.16076978

someone please screenshot and post Clear in the pie.
I'm in a meeting.

>> No.16076982

The negative news media narrative is "Ship destroyed before splashdown that SpaceX hoped for"

>> No.16076986
File: 221 KB, 1088x791, 1701690748901169.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076986

We wouldn't have these relight problems if SpaceX just went hypergolic

>> No.16076987
File: 1.59 MB, 1920x1080, 1689294927318091.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16076987

>>16076978

>> No.16076989

>>16073283
The Saturn v looks so much sexier

>> No.16076991

>>16076791
it's only like 30 degrees off right here, that should be fine if they could have gotten it back under control
>>16076814
it was at like mach 1, the speed of a pistol bullet
>>16076831
if it's glowing its very hot, but it might not be transferring much heat to the vehicle
>>16076885
grid fins work like flat plates at medium speeds and like a bunch of small wings at low speeds and very high speeds as the shockwave blocks the holes at specific speeds
I think Manley has a video on it

>> No.16076992

>>16076973
maybe, but the RCS shouldn't be firing the entire time if it's working right. either you had something venting to cause the tumble or the RCS was having serious issues from the start.

>> No.16076994

>>16076962
You aren't.

>> No.16076996

>>16076987
Max-Qute
ty

>> No.16076998

>>16076991
>grid fins work like flat plates at medium speeds and like a bunch of small wings at low speeds and very high speeds as the shockwave blocks the holes at specific speeds
>I think Manley has a video on it
So just make a normal wing then instead of grids

>> No.16076999

>>16076998
Less efficient.

>> No.16077001

>>16076934
finally some fucking sensible units

>> No.16077005
File: 639 KB, 856x597, A6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077005

https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Ariane/Flying_first_on_Ariane_6

ESA just posted this and no one even cares.

>> No.16077009

>>16076998
sorry, not sorry, will not implement marked closed

>> No.16077010
File: 3.87 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.39.12-0.41.03.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077010

>>16076923

>> No.16077013
File: 3.90 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 0.53.16-0.54.35.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077013

>>16077010

>> No.16077014
File: 153 KB, 877x522, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077014

>>16076998
https://www.nas.nasa.gov/assets/nas/pdf/papers/kless_j_analysis_grid_fins_2011.pdf
no

>> No.16077015
File: 3.91 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 1.07.35-1.09.00.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077015

>>16077013

>> No.16077016

>>16076804
Iced up thrusters.

>> No.16077017

>>16076960
But that doesn't actually call it a failure

>> No.16077020
File: 3.90 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 1.09.01-1.10.00.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077020

>>16077015

>> No.16077021

>>16077005
>Ariane 6 will launch several satellites, deployers and experiments from space agencies, companies, research institutes, universities and young professionals on its first flight.
mmm, i know it has an increased payload capacity but even so i don't think ariane 6 can put entire universities into orbit.

>> No.16077023
File: 2.03 MB, 1920x1080, (2) 【#Starship】新ミッション追加! 人類史上最大最強のロケット #スターシップ 3度目の試験飛行 #りあライブ 打上視聴会🌟 2024.3.14 #Vtuber【#宇推くりあ】 - YouTube - 2-51-47.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077023

>>16076987

>> No.16077024

>>16077005
you're damn right we don't

>> No.16077027
File: 3.79 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 1.10.01-1.11.45.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077027

>>16077020

>> No.16077028
File: 3.90 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 1.30.08-1.30.22.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077028

>>16077027

>> No.16077029

OH FUCK OFF FAA

>> No.16077031
File: 3.83 MB, 1920x1080, 2024-03-14 08-02-02 - 1.31.12-1.31.20.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077031

>>16077028

>> No.16077032

>>16077027
Doesn't this look like only front is getting buttfucked?

>> No.16077033

>>16077020
pretty obvious on rewatch that they had limited control of the vehicle in orbit

>> No.16077034

>>16077029
Mishap investigation?

>> No.16077035
File: 249 KB, 913x847, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077035

DEFUND THE FAA
https://twitter.com/FAANews/status/1768303183862927810

>> No.16077037

https://twitter.com/FAANews/status/1768303183862927810

>> No.16077038

>inb4 they figure out the chopsticks before reentry

>> No.16077040

>>16077035
Wtf, it went pretty much perfectly

>> No.16077041

>>16077027
is it supposed to look like this

>> No.16077043

>>16076782
I really hoped the flaps would have enough control authority to unfuck the ship, but I guess not at that altitude.

>> No.16077044

>>16077020
>>16077033
You can see how the roll has been nulled by ~T+47 minutes and it quickly reorients itself after that.

>> No.16077045
File: 230 KB, 1300x866, 16234440-danger-on-the-road-caus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077045

>>16077041
no

>> No.16077047

>>16077028
>All white males except one token pajeet
racism

>> No.16077049

>>16077035
fuck these annoying imbeciles

>> No.16077051

>>16077045
Perfect.

>> No.16077052

>>16075302
Pretty much, yeah. Looks like a controls issue. Either they're not sending the right commands or there's too much lag between sensor & output.

>> No.16077057

>>16077052
Could be frost in the thruster, oxygen freezing as the pressure drops

>> No.16077058

>>16077035
spacex was going to investigate what went wrong anyway. inshallah FAA just OKs whatever spacex comes back with same day

>> No.16077060

Fun fact: SLS was heavier when going at the same speed ( shortly before core MECO)

>> No.16077061

>>16076873
>>16076878
If I wanted to read that faggotry I'd be over there instead of here, fuck off with twitter garbage

>> No.16077064

>>16077044
>roll has been nulled
Look at the plasma. The roll continued.

>> No.16077065
File: 113 KB, 915x651, 1684878562222108.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077065

>>16077034
Yeah.
https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/statements

>> No.16077066

>>16077065
So the usual?

>> No.16077067

>>16076583
No engines failed during ascent on IFT2 either

>> No.16077072

>>16077035
This is expected for any launch that does not go perfectly.

>> No.16077073

>>16076695
Remember when they just added hot staging anon

>> No.16077075
File: 477 KB, 1300x866, drunk reentry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077075

>>16077045
>>16077051

>> No.16077078

>>16076713
They didn't relight because the vehicle was tumbling and the RCS couldn't stop it.

>> No.16077079

Well that was insane and I’m sure >we will allude to this flight similar to how we call back to the FH demo flight

>> No.16077080

>>16077065
>SpaceX-led mishap
Nothingberger

>> No.16077082

Looks like normie news media outlets view the launch as a success

>> No.16077083
File: 87 KB, 900x720, eternal freedom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077083

>>16076971
To be as far away from the rest of you as possible, forever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQZzwnQ5PBk&ab_channel=SongLyricsHD

>> No.16077086

>>16077065
Abolish the FAA

>> No.16077088

>>16077082
well, it failed, so they are making up shit as usual

>> No.16077089

>>16076971
Yes, I'd like to do this. I'm going to close my eyes and imagine my rogg collectio rn.

>> No.16077091

>>16076791
They weren't doing a bbq roll, they simply didn't have control authority through the coast phase dude.

>> No.16077092
File: 565 KB, 1690x872, Proton M will not go to space today.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077092

>>16077035
Wow thanks guys, if it wasn't for your technical insight we might have failed to notice how the booster went into the sea at near supersonic speed because the engiens failed to relight for the landing burn and how Starship tumbled on orbit and during re-entry.

>> No.16077096
File: 617 KB, 815x747, CNN.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077096

>>16077088
CNN posting Ws

>> No.16077097

>>16077075
>Get in kid, we're doing re-entry!
Cheers.

>> No.16077098

>>16077075
kek

>> No.16077100
File: 25 KB, 480x360, muffled eurobeat playing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077100

>>16077041
OFT-3: Orbital Doriftu

>> No.16077105

>starship did what N1 couldn't and got something into an orbital flight successfully

>> No.16077112

did anyone manage to film the booster explosion from land?

>> No.16077130

>>16077092
The fucked up thing is that if it wasn't starship, there would be no investigation as bailing in the ocean and burning up in atmosphere is expected any other time

>> No.16077132

>>16077091
they, i meant the computer

>> No.16077133

https://www.youtube.com/live/ixZpBOxMopc?si=orEzohup4UvFMVGr&t=33763
Estronaut stream captured some real aural kino from the early part of the launch before it cut out.

>> No.16077135
File: 195 KB, 1920x1080, GIpGLaPWMAARNwL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077135

>> No.16077136
File: 26 KB, 578x324, mars.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077136

does /sfg/ agree?
https://twitter.com/DrChrisCombs/status/1768292362684432840

>> No.16077138

>>16077136
Yes, Elon hypes up his own rocket too much deesu

>> No.16077139

>>16077136
Ahh yes, now show me your 120m tall, 5000 ton rocket.

>> No.16077141

>>16077136
I don't think he understands what iterative design means

>> No.16077144

>>16077105
It passed N1 on its first flight.

>> No.16077145

>>16077136
No, stop posting this retard here.

>> No.16077146

>>16077136
Do people not realize that starship doesn't even need to be fully reusable for Artemis?

>> No.16077148

What's the cope after today's failure?

>> No.16077149

>>16077146
they need reusability for orbital refueling unless you expect them to waste 8 rockets

>> No.16077150
File: 598 KB, 1170x658, retardation.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077150

>>16077136
>starships mission will be to put lots of stuff in leo
That's exactly what you need for a mars mission. Even if you use an oldspace architecture it'll just require 20 SLS launches (ie 20 years) instead of 20 starship launches (a few months once its operational)

>> No.16077151
File: 2.36 MB, 320x262, buzzpunch.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077151

>>16077136
I bet I could beat this guy up irl and he wouldn't be able to stop me.

>> No.16077152

>>16077135
Is NASA gonna allow spaceX to take drone shots like this when starship launches from the cape?

>> No.16077153

If an antenna is powerful enough, can its signal go through plasma?

>> No.16077154

>>16077149
it's free test flights for them, they were taking customer payloads on falcon 9 long before they managed to get it reliably landing

>> No.16077156

>>16077136
>does /sfg/ agree?
Nope.

>> No.16077157

>>16077153
Plasma is a great conductor, so if you have a nuclear powered antenna maybe. SpaceX said they hope starship's plasma wake will be large enough to allow starlink comms during reentry. Didn't work today as S28 was a spinny boi

>> No.16077159

>>16077154
2 years to do orbital refuel?

>> No.16077161

>>16077136
this guy is such a fag lmao

>> No.16077167

>>16077157
which means... if it wasn't spinning... video throughout reentry and splashdown?

>> No.16077177

>>16077157
What about some sort of laser communication? Is plasma opaque?

>> No.16077178

>>16077177
>Is plasma opaque?
Yes >>16076933

>> No.16077180

>>16077136
>Combs

I don't take concern trolls seriously.

>> No.16077185

Thinking back, switching to hotstaging was the smartest change they made holy shit it just fucking works

>> No.16077187

>>16077159
They will need to have 8 separate ships at the ready to launch in rapid succession even if they're reusable, early on refurbishment will take way too long. If some of them don't make it back it doesn't affect the schedule.

>> No.16077188

>>16077185
I didn't expect it to be so easy.

>> No.16077191

>>16077188
it really is this easy in rocketry

>> No.16077194

>>16077185
we still don't know what kind of damage the booster suffers during hot staging. they could need to replace the interstage every flight

>> No.16077198

>>16077185
A very good example as to why the way spacex develop rockets is the way to go.

>> No.16077199
File: 215 KB, 585x817, david.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077199

holy crap
SLS shill coming out with a rare W today
https://twitter.com/ThePrimalDino/status/1768311107943284930

>> No.16077202
File: 506 KB, 2048x1536, GIpRj_4XsAAPCPp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077202

>> No.16077204

https://twitter.com/joebarnard/status/1768273454531584053

>> No.16077207
File: 389 KB, 1280x886, Antenna_location_at_the_US_Naval_Communication_Station_Harold_E._Holt_in_Exmouth,_Western_Australia,_1972.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077207

What if we put a large antenna whose low frequency waves will be able to penetrate the plasma?

>> No.16077209

>>16077204
This guy looks like he could be Elon's son.

>> No.16077211
File: 521 KB, 2048x1536, GIpRkE1W8AI2Z5Y.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077211

More here https://twitter.com/StarshipGazer/status/1768316005715984491

>> No.16077213

>>16077198
It is retarded to waste a real vehicle and not being able to get other data than the telemetry sent while in flight.
They should put like 100s engineering caperas everywhere and have a survivable flight recorder that you can recover from the ocean.

>> No.16077214
File: 542 KB, 2048x1536, GIpRkE0WkAAjyV8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077214

>> No.16077215

>>16077211
looks fine I'm not worried about it

>> No.16077217

>>16076276
I wonder if the glowies on Diego Garcia tracked it
>you will never get to see the SR-72 chase plane footage

>> No.16077218
File: 266 KB, 1536x2048, GIpRkNaW4AA5YnU.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077218

>> No.16077221
File: 606 KB, 1976x1395, Pan_polar_antenna.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077221

>> No.16077223

>>16077177
plasma is opaque at all wavelengths, but there's a hole in the back usually

>> No.16077224

>>16077217
>SR-72 chase plane
A tictac?

>> No.16077225

>>16077185
Yeah but this Most Engines Cut Off thing looked a bit inefficient. Why shut down most of the engines only to reignite them after sep? Maybe the boostback burn could be more fuel efficient near booster apogee. But then it would suffer sloshing.

>> No.16077226

>>16077223
REEEE there's got to be a way to communicate though

>> No.16077227

>>16076308
I wouldn't be surprised to see a long interval here. We might see some major redesigns to Starship and super heavy.

>> No.16077229
File: 412 KB, 1251x645, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077229

>>16077202
>>16077211
>>16077214
During takeoff, I think I remembering seeing what looked like chunks of something fly into the air. What was it?

>> No.16077230

>>16077226
look out the back, the plasma is only in front of the vehicle bleeding up the sides, if you aim your antenna behind you and hit a Starlink sat you'll have comms the whole way down

>> No.16077232

>>16077214
What's the point of the shed for dwarves on the left there

>> No.16077235

>>16077229
probably loose shit around the pad

>> No.16077236

>>16077232
That's where the propellant lines that go up to the booster are.

>> No.16077237

>>16077229
ice

>> No.16077242

>>16077199
Wasn't this barneyfag lookalike a turbo SLSfag that hated Starship? What happened?

>> No.16077243

>>16077185
The staging regime for IFT-1 was KSP-tier nonsense, "just flip the whole thing and throw the Starship off" is so silly that I can't believe it was ever seriously considered, let alone tried.

>> No.16077246

>>16077243
I sincerely wish we had gotten footage of it in action. Was it retarded? Yes. Would it have looked awesome? Also yes.

>> No.16077247

>>16077243
Seriously thats why I wrote that post cause I think if they still wanted to do it then they would be stuck dealing with control/attitude problems and getting the right sequence down and its just unnecessary, just let the engines do all the work, its brilliant

>> No.16077250

>>16076876
Too based for whitoids.

>> No.16077253

https://twitter.com/NASA/status/1768317619998691696

Why are basically all posts made by NASA related to race or gender politics? How the fuck is this relevant to space tech?

>> No.16077254

>>16077253
this is every large institution, it's all irredeemably pozzed

>> No.16077255

>>16077253
Commie mafia wields power over organizations by being loud and visible, despite being a minority of opinion.

>> No.16077256

>>16076749
Works in KSP

>> No.16077257

>>16077253

Why are basically all posts made by /sfg/ related to offtopic seething? How the fuck is this relevant to spaceflight?

>> No.16077263

>>16077253
such bullshit I can't believe it.

>> No.16077266

>>16077225
The thrust to weight ratio of a near empty booster is extremely high compared to a full starship.
The 3 center engines already have to deeply throttle to let Ship launch off of it without knocking the booster to oblivion

To keep all 13 center engines lit at their minimum throttle means Ship couldn't separate

>> No.16077282

just watched IFT-3 since I had to be in class, what an amazing flight. it went about as i predicted with landing being fucked up and the ship breaking up in the atmosphere, it seems like spacex takes one step forward from each previous starship launch. so im assuming next time that landing may be solved, and heat shield tiles will hold up. man reentry was just amazing.

>> No.16077309

>>16077229
Beetles

>> No.16077312

>>16077225
Ever accidentally staged rocket while the lower stage was still on?
Booster would have kept pushing into Starship

>> No.16077317
File: 67 KB, 1280x720, soft splashdown.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077317

Is there a ground video of the booster bomb diving at Mach 1?

>> No.16077324

FUCK I had no idea it was today. Incredible launch

>> No.16077325

>>16077317
give it a few months and there will be a kino video from wb57

>> No.16077330

>>16076964
it was never supposed to barbeque roll in the first place

>> No.16077333

>>16077136
chris is a faggot

>> No.16077338
File: 270 KB, 600x336, booster landing.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077338

>>16077317
found it

>> No.16077341

https://twitter.com/Starlink/status/1768330178156204420
lol

>> No.16077345

>>16077194
during this launch it could clearly be seen that no hot fragments of metal were flying out of the interstage so my prediction is minimal damage easily mitigated by some water jackets and/or higher heat tolerance materials.

>> No.16077347

>>16077213
Every camera a gopro inside a crash tolerant buoyant sphere with a radar beacon that activates on contact with salt water.

>> No.16077348

>>16077185
>it just fucking works
disagree

>> No.16077353
File: 1.16 MB, 320x240, r-pjXI.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077353

Starship Loss of signal screen be like

>> No.16077355

>>16077341
Huh, this makes me think, is this the first time a reentry could be livestreamed?

>> No.16077356

Why can't stainless steel be pressed like normal steel

>> No.16077357

>>16077353
me when I'm rotating about the vertical axis

>> No.16077358
File: 14 KB, 740x138, 1689600257563333.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077358

SpaceX chuds, your response?

>> No.16077359
File: 133 KB, 800x1000, 429312040_335507396152650_4562218543835705457_n-800x1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077359

Another spacex failure...
meanwhile, someone else is quietly (and ferociously) making progress.
Tick-tock felon...

>> No.16077361

>>16077358
The secret payload was successful then

>> No.16077363

>>16077358
Of fucking course BBC is reporting on Africa

>> No.16077364
File: 451 KB, 1920x2880, BezosNewLook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077364

>>16077359
Bezos and his stylish sneakers...

>> No.16077365

>>16077358
They had internet?!

>> No.16077366

>>16077358
Africa has internet?

>> No.16077368

>>16077358
VOODOO. da white mans silver pipe has made my goats sick and my wives pregnant. dis is da devils work

>> No.16077369

>>16073626
>that one on the bottom
Who paid to put a fucking AC unit into space lmao.

>> No.16077371
File: 175 KB, 414x233, Lockheed_Martin_SR-72_concept.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077371

>>16077224
>a tic tac?
I'm sure those were following along too

>> No.16077373

>>16077358
Houthis cut undersea cables

>> No.16077375

>>16077373
Surely it wasn't Elon's ICBM crashing into a sea cable at mach 5?

>> No.16077378

>>16073717
We tried that. We still have knife crime, and now Australians exist and post on 4ch.

Shipping the problem elsewhere never works.

>> No.16077379

>>16077355
yeah usually its just recorded

>> No.16077381

Raptor ignition was confirmed to have been aborted by flight computer due to high roll rate, basically confirms some kind of loss of attitude control

>> No.16077382
File: 563 KB, 762x1926, 1679165382983341.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077382

Initial write-up is up on SpaceX's website.
https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-3

>> No.16077383

>>16077381
so the bbq anons were wrong

>> No.16077384

>>16077375
you think the ocean is as shallow as a pond? Moreso water is denser than air.

>> No.16077389

>>16077358
China, Africa, Russia, and the Arabs should never have been permitted to connect to the internet.

>> No.16077394
File: 1.62 MB, 2160x3840, GIpo5isbAAEoeM7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077394

https://twitter.com/spacex/status/1768341226187850116

>> No.16077395

>>16077382
That all seems pretty clear cut. What about this necessitates a FAA investigation?

>> No.16077396

How likely is that the booster roll oscillation was the sole cause for the landing burn failure?

>> No.16077397

>>16077384
Corrrect. For this same reason if a 3 kilometer wide iron-nickle meteorite crashes into the ocean it won't cause the cataclysm the s0i science types think would happen

>> No.16077398

>>16077382
>The booster's flight concluded at approximately 462 meters in altitude and just under seven minutes into the mission
explain why it didn't conclude at 0 meters

>> No.16077402

>>16077395
The fact that it was a space launch that blew up. They legally have to do this. Should be well known how this works by now

>> No.16077404

>>16077398
FTS I guess

>> No.16077406

>>16077394
fake. starship didn't launch at night

>> No.16077407

>>16077396
I'd say pretty likely, it looks like their PID loop needs some tuning.

>> No.16077408

>>16077394
what does off axis grid fin mean

>> No.16077413

>>16077402
Would they have launched the investigation if it crashed into the sea at a slightly slower speed? Seems like any flight experiment where the test article isn't being planned to be recoved is a mishap then.

>> No.16077421

>>16077413
I think it has more to do with the submitted flight plan vs the actual flight

>> No.16077423

>>16077413
I think the real thing is that SpaceX is legally obligated to understand and submit a remediation for the issue before they can launch again. Keep in mind that Starship is a government program.

>> No.16077426

>>16077413
The license specifies what the objectives of the flight were and what objectives not being met would constitute an anomaly.

>> No.16077429

>>16077383
It seemed like a cope to me, no reason to go to such an extreme for heat management in a short test flight. Starship will probably coast with it's shiny back towards the sun, reflecting most of the heat

>> No.16077431

>>16077382
This pretty much confirms what we talked earlier : "Starship did not attempt its planned on-orbit relight of a single Raptor engine due to vehicle roll rates during coast"

They lost all control of the vehicle from the beginning

>> No.16077432

>>16077407
Exactly, it started pretty early on, as soon as the booster hit denser atmosphere and grid fins got some control authority. Probably some super sonic aero fuckery.

>> No.16077438

>>16077431
Wasn't the roll initiated for the fuel transfer demo?
Do they need some hypergolic thrusters to keep things under control?

>> No.16077440

>>16077407
they probably lost control because they are not using good old PID but some bizarre algorithms some deranged phds came up with

>> No.16077444

>>16077407
>SpaceX engineer: 40% less D please
>It works flawlessly next flight
It really is that easy in flying skyscraper control systems

>> No.16077446
File: 262 KB, 1080x2293, translation_20240314_214001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077446

Putin ordered to build nuclear power plant in space

>> No.16077447

>>16077438
having hypergolic RCS thrusters is not part of the reusability plan. In my opinion, they need to use much bigger Cold gas thruster now in the test phase BUT transition to Hot gas thrusters using the methane and oxigen on the vehicle . I think its the only way

>> No.16077450

>>16077446
what does a meltdown in space look like? molten radioactive plasma raining down on us from the sky?

>> No.16077452
File: 1.78 MB, 350x255, vqGeMsr-2407778616.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077452

>>16077444
numbers confirm that randomly fucking with control algorithms fixes all spaceflight problems

>> No.16077453

>>16077446
Knowing Roscosmos' rate of satellite production, it will probably be ~5-10 years before this goes up, if it goes up.

>> No.16077454

>>16076276
>trying to crash it directly into Christmas Island
SANTA NOOOOOOO

>> No.16077457

>>16077450
A brief spike in roentgen, 3.6 at most. Not great, not terrible.

>> No.16077459

>>16077457
Speaking of roentgen, it was super cool to see the radiation flashes on the engineering cameras in Starship

>> No.16077464

>>16077457
Grok tells me that's the equivalent of a mild chest x-ray.

>> No.16077465

>>16077402
So they should have said they were just going to dump it in the ocean like every other launch vehicle and be fine?

>> No.16077470
File: 250 KB, 913x633, flow.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077470

People dont realize how impressive is to have your unprotected butt , full of engines , wiring , plumbing etc almost directly into the flow of plasma and survive , even if its only for 30s

>> No.16077471

Will we se footage of the booster hitting the ocean at about the speed of sound?

>> No.16077476

>>16077470
I'm impressed at seeing a reentry as it was happening from on-board, I've never seen that before, not live.

>> No.16077477

>>16077471
no, see >>16077382

>> No.16077478

>>16073259
Didn't even know this was happening. watched the replay this morning. The footage of both the booster and starship during reentry was probably the coolest thing I've seen since the perseverance landing footage. Highest order of kino.

>> No.16077480

Hot-staging fucked up the Ship's coast phase. The ship was doomed to its unrecoverable roll thanks to fires or vents.

>> No.16077483

>>16077476
we've never seen reentry from a selfie stick like that either, looking back at the vehicle is an extremely unique PoV

>> No.16077487

>>16077382
>successfully opened the payload door
I'm hoping this means the next one will have a payload

>> No.16077489

>>16077487
they didn't test relight in space, so they can't take it to orbit yet
that's my speculation

>> No.16077491

>>16076867
Dang what a comfy time. Based Nips.

>> No.16077492

>>16077446
Putin also ordered a three-day "special" operation to take over Ukraine two years ago, what's your point.

>> No.16077494

>>16077471
I hope some Australian might have recorded the starship reentry.
The expected area was near Malacca strait, so some ship has probably recorded it as well.

>> No.16077496

>>16077483
Why the fuck haven't rockets been doing that all along? We could've been swimming in amazing footage for the last several decades.

>> No.16077501

Which new objectives do we expect for IFT4?

>> No.16077503

>>16077501
dummy payload maybe

>> No.16077506

>>16077501
dummy payload so starship can be operational while theyre testing landing

>> No.16077507

Now that I think about it, it's great that we got to see the Starship rolling into its unshielded side somewhat for re-entry. The ship is a lot tougher than I first thought.

>> No.16077511

>>16077507
Re-entry plasma can't melt steel rings anon

>> No.16077517

>>16077015
>>16077020
I can't explain why, but this part of the flight reminded me of that song by Omega. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQDmyCUKHf4

>> No.16077519

>>16077501
A more robust prop transfer test
Payload of some kind
Booster landing burn.

>> No.16077520

A shame it was out of control I wonder if spacex will get any data of how well tiles performed in this test.

>> No.16077525

>>16077501
They probably have to demonstrate raptor relight before they can go orbital, so next flight is almost certainly suborbital again. That said, the obvious goals are successful soft landing of both booster and ship*. Outside of those, we'll probably see more prop transfer and door operations. I'm thinking they'll probably go for a test of their slarlink pez dispenser hardware with a few V2 mockups.
*I wouldn't be suprised to see a long interval before IFT 4 while they redesign aspects of the booster and ship

>> No.16077536
File: 739 KB, 1583x1058, GIpniXIWUAAHJPw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077536

https://x.com/Marco_Langbroek/status/1768343531163160896

>> No.16077538

>>16077525
>I wouldn't be suprised to see a long interval before IFT 4 while they redesign aspects of the booster and ship
Isn't starship getting redesign anyways? I doubt they are changing much for upcoming flights.

>> No.16077540

The worst failure today was the fucking payload door. Thankfully all ships thus far have been constructed in shitty tents/unfinished bays. Once the version 2 ships start flying the quality should go way up.

>> No.16077541

>>16077496
Upmass cost is 25k/kg, please understand

>> No.16077544
File: 3.42 MB, 1920x1080, rapidsave.com_starship_burn_spin-sttdsz3pdboc1 (2).webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077544

Reentry portion sped up

>> No.16077546

>>16077501
Probably the same, the coast phase was suboptimal, you want to demonstrate attitude control and deorbit burn before putting any kind of payload

>> No.16077548

>>16077540
they said they successfully opened and closed the payload door though

>> No.16077549

>>16077548
They did - what failed was after

>> No.16077550

>>16077492
nta but that order was based and caused an incredible amount of seething online, so I'm in favour of Putin's orders, as they have a propensity to incite seethe.

>> No.16077551

>>16077548
you can clearly see in the stream when the door shits the bed and doesn't close

>> No.16077552

>>16077540
Looks like there was some residual pressure inside the cargo bay that wasn't vented. Sus.

>> No.16077553

>>16077544
So pretty much zero control other than maybe a tiny amount from aero surfaces...

>> No.16077554

>>16077551
>>16077552
Here :
>>16075819

>> No.16077555

>>16077538
I think we might see some changes to the flaps, grids and RCS thruster system. The unmet objectives of this past test in both the booster and ship were due to failures in attitude control

>> No.16077556

Starship is an actual scam lol. Insprucker left because of this. Think about it. It got to near orbit with virtually no propellant left despite having no payload. something doesnt add up.

>> No.16077559
File: 308 KB, 635x635, yeah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077559

>>16077556
yeah

>> No.16077560

>>16077536
Personally, I think ot blew up because the propellant left in the tanks got superheated

>> No.16077562

>>16077556
Ship was underfueled purposely genius. T/W ratio was 1.5 , it reached mach 1 very fast

>> No.16077563

>>(you)
They intentionally under filled it today because they packed too much last time around. Did you notice how quick it ascended compared to last time?

>> No.16077564

Missed the Spruck today, but the comms dude they stuck in the mega bay was kinda cool

>> No.16077567

>>16077556
Insprucker left?

>> No.16077573

>>16077567
>he didn't read the whistleblower documents
lol

>> No.16077574

>>16077199
Wasn't the plan to 'lose' it in the ocean? Did it make it to where it was supposed to?

>> No.16077581

>>16077574
lost the ship 3 minutes too early and the booster 1/4 of a second too early. sorry, gotta do a mishap investigation now

>> No.16077584

>>16077573
Link?

>> No.16077585

>>16077581
6 more months

>> No.16077586

>>16077581
Oh okay, they expected better control and the engines to restart? Or was that just going to be a bonus?

>> No.16077588

>>16077548
>build a big ass rocket
>no fairings
>no shuttle-like doors
>just a Pez slot
Is this vehicle a one trick pony to deliver scamlinks and massively spy on everyone?

>> No.16077590

>>16077581
There is no it mostly went right investigation. Not according to flight plan means mishap. What it should mean is a shorter investigation.

>> No.16077591

>>16077588
the second trick will be killing everyday astronaut

>> No.16077598

>>16077591
based

>> No.16077599

>>16077559
take your reddit meme and gtfo

>> No.16077621

Anyone got the playlist of Elevator music they used?

>> No.16077655

Should add retro thrusters to fix rolling. They look cool too.

>> No.16077662

the launch site looks so empty now. nothing on the OLM, nothing on the suborbital pad

>> No.16077663

>>16077136
Everybody knows that Starship's purpose is BRILLIANT PEBBLES, but few will admit it.

>> No.16077679

>>16076497
>NO FAA MISHAP INVESTIGATION
spoke too soon: they've officially called this a mishap

>> No.16077683

https://twitter.com/Lezzyl_/status/1768333324773114138

KEK

>> No.16077684

>>16077683
expect rockets, furries, and urban design. I dont agree with everything the people i follow believe.

>> No.16077688

>>16077446
>ordered to
by who? the bogdanoffs?

>> No.16077691

>>16077503
>>16077506
One of my rules would be never a dummy payload. If the stated goal is get up and down, put your assets or your ass where your mouth is

>> No.16077694
File: 99 KB, 288x270, 1696378954340250.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077694

burns up its so joever

>> No.16077695

>>16077010
Totally didn't realise that was the leftover atmosphere in the payload bay going out of the open pez dispenser when I was watching it live.
I wonder if that's what caused the spin we see during the coasting phase and then the rcs couldn't fix it for whatever reason?

>> No.16077697

so fucking weird to see the wing start to get red with the plasma forming

like it's fucking cgi

>> No.16077701

>>16077253
Look everyone!!! Niggers can be just as smart as white people!!!!! AMAZING WHAT MONKEYS CAN DO
t. average lib

>> No.16077702

>>16077697
That's what they said about falcon 9 landings. Cybertruck. Starlink. Starship. All of it.

It IS sci-fi because he's keeps making it real

>> No.16077704
File: 485 KB, 705x536, 1701263041462905.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077704

>>16077697
when I saw this reddish hue live earlier I could not believe what i was seeing, then a few seconds later it becomes apparent

>> No.16077706
File: 2.61 MB, 720x812, like father like son.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077706

>>16077683

>> No.16077707

>>16077683
>>16077684
genuine question: whats wrong with twitter people? somehow every single on of them is some sort of freak. I've never even seen one of these fags in real life, why are they all like this?

>> No.16077708

>>16077707
whats so freakish about that tweet

>> No.16077713

>>16077243
I reckon IFT-1 only happened because they had a bunch of old stuff lying around and decided to launch it rather than scrap it.

>> No.16077721

>>16077359
>Not for Flight

>> No.16077726

>>16077243
was it planning on doing a flip, or was it losing control?

>> No.16077731

>>16077707
you've never seen someone with a nose piercing or colored hair irl?

>> No.16077736

>>16077726
It was planning to do a flip, but it lost control first.

>> No.16077737
File: 2 KB, 254x48, 1706076161995427.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077737

wiki war is happening

>> No.16077739

>>16077737
lol classic. Bet the talk page will be a fun read in a couple of days

>> No.16077740

why don't they do hops first and gradually fly further

Isn't reuse the point

>> No.16077743

>>16077740
what the fuck do you think the mission profile of today’s test was RETARD

>> No.16077744

>>16077737
once it starts flying real missions are these going to get stuck in some footnote about the test campaign so they stop polluting the metrics? I sure hope so, you don't see the full launch history of starhopper there

>> No.16077746
File: 244 KB, 628x431, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077746

>>16077708
its the account thats freakish

>> No.16077749

>>16077744
It should be/will eventually be tallied the same way they do F9 reuse attempts including the 2015 hop campaign. Until then it’s going to be autistic infighting for a couple of days

>> No.16077750

they just dumped their rockets in the ocean like every other old space launches so i think it's successful

>> No.16077753

>>16077035
Hopefully not months of delay.

>> No.16077755

>>16077746
Putting some stupid comical little fake location on your account should be illegal and punishable by death
>inb4 some stupid QUIT HAVING FUN meme response

>> No.16077756
File: 9 KB, 911x53, 1693718542038758.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077756

>>16077737

>> No.16077764
File: 4 KB, 107x144, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077764

>>16077755

>> No.16077765

>>16077750
Unironically SS could have easily gone orbital here with a conventional (expendable) flight profile so yeah I’m gonna call it a success

Also this goes to show how hard reuse is, even when you know what you’re doing. I will be left speechless if New Glenn manages a perfect landing first time.

>> No.16077770
File: 6 KB, 373x104, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077770

>>16077737
faggots the lot of them

>> No.16077771
File: 104 KB, 1259x385, 1684942096426783.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077771

>>16077770
there's an edit war going on oh my fucking god

>> No.16077772

>>16077770
We all saw this coming though, kek

>> No.16077776

>>16077737
Wiki is pozzed and has been for a while. Its controlled by troons and commies

>> No.16077777
File: 1.49 MB, 498x264, whatever-angry.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077777

>>16077706
Gridfins giving me these vibes

>> No.16077785
File: 5 KB, 376x75, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077785

>>16077770
Reverted back to success lole

>> No.16077787

>>16077243
Worked with starlink for ages, no reason yeeting starship can't work as well

>> No.16077788

So did starship reenter steel-side first into the plasma at one point???
I take back everything I’ve ever said—and I kneel. I thought losing one tile alone would be enough to kill her. Turns out you fags were right about it her being a hardy breed!

>> No.16077794

>>16077788
It didn't get to the hottest part of reentry, but yes it went in the wrong way initially. You can see the plasma going down over the bottom and probably up into the engines

>> No.16077795
File: 99 KB, 944x712, where do you think we are.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077795

>>16077755
>being against online anonymity

>> No.16077797

>>16077737
lol the anti-Musk cult is seething so hard they're trying to rewrite history

>> No.16077811

>>16077771
Why are spacex fanboys so cringe?

>> No.16077831

>>16077408
>>16077408
Super Heavy needs a lot more pitch control than the other direction, so it clusters them closer together to generate more lift in that axis. I think Elon said the final design might only have 3 fins.

>> No.16077836

>>16077777
Wasted quints

>> No.16077837

>>16077788
Ass-backwards even.
It seems it's not aerodynamically stable at all and relies completely on active control, so if one fin motor dies for example then it's fucked during reentry. I wonder if the new version with offset nose flaps will be better in this regard.

>> No.16077838

>>16077837
prolly had too much fuel and weight in the ass end

>> No.16077843

>>16077756
>this experimental vehicle's entirely untested flight plan was a failure comparable to the columbia disaster
lol
lmao

>> No.16077845

>>16077838
>prolly
kill yourself

>> No.16077848

>>16077413
The law assumes that what a company plans a rocket will do is the same as what the expect it to do. Bureaucracy lacks a high tolerance for nuance.

>> No.16077859

>>16077737
Success and failure is nonbinary in R&D
It's all cold hard data
The only real failure is if you fail in exactly the same way twice and so failed to learn from the first mistake

>> No.16077863
File: 153 KB, 1280x720, EVyFz8-U8AEO5N2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077863

Looks like blunderfoot hasn't posted for 2 weeks. CSS is giga-coping though.

>> No.16077898

>>16077863
>blunderfoot
>https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxDK5_lg6nsI0S4OqPBYfnPtYhOf-XT0F_
The comments are mentally ill and not really worth engaging with (also he censors opposing views when they aren't poorly articulated).

>> No.16077928

>>16077898
Even on a Starship day, SpaceX doesn't rest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fRfJerFqqo
Starlink 6-44 launches in T-48:00

>> No.16077955

>>16077770
>>16077785
What even is a "Partial failure" anyway? Why not call it a "Partial success" like they usually do and find the middle ground?

>> No.16077958

>>16077785
>>16077770
if they're going to add a new category why not just add a fucking "test flight" category

>> No.16077962
File: 30 KB, 287x328, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16077962

uhh /sfg bros, how do we explain to wikipedia editors that starship wasn't on an orbital trajectory?

>> No.16077963

>>16077359
That someone is expecting to land boosters the first time they try.

>> No.16077997

>>16077553
Yeah the thrusters seem to have failed in one way or another.

>> No.16078007

Space is easy
Landing is hard

>> No.16078023

>>16078007
landing is the easiest part...

>> No.16078024

Would be ironic if this F9 booster decided to die as well kek

>> No.16078033 [DELETED] 

its up
>>16078030
>>16078030
>>16078030
>>16078030
>>16078030

>> No.16078034

>>16078007
I genuinely wonder how they are going to make the fuel and oxidizer settle next time so the booster landing engines actually work. I thought that was the whole point of header tanks but apparently they do jack shit

>> No.16078036

>>16078034
Bruh the booster is decelerating at mutliple gees.
It's as settled as it gets.

>> No.16078038

>>16078036
Only two engines lit

>> No.16078044

>>16078038
Atmospheric deceleration. Very much so. Look at the velocity indicator.
The fuel is settled and the engines probably failed to relight for another reason.

>> No.16078099
File: 1 KB, 177x38, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078099

>>16078033
real

>> No.16078109

>>16076867
>all the good weather ghosts
cute

>> No.16078112
File: 61 KB, 850x561, Size-Comparison-of-Baseline-Vehicle-Concepts-with-Other-Aerospace-Vehicles.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078112

>largest flying object ever built
Yeah um, no.

>> No.16078113

>>16078099
>>16078033
its gone

>> No.16078116

wtf happened to the other tread ?

>> No.16078117

Somebody do a non-gay thread.

>> No.16078118

>>16078112
I think they mean heaviest.
Janny seething or retard OP?

>> No.16078120

>>16078116
mods don't like Trump apparently

>> No.16078121

drunk jannie, there wasn't even a thread war

>> No.16078122

Make the same thread, exactly as it was. Fuck the mods.

>> No.16078123

>>16078044
Okay then why?

>> No.16078125

>>16078116
launch thread and this one is still up so i guess they don't want any more than that

>> No.16078126
File: 31 KB, 640x360, 4c91f5c199c87823a1053a3f1403a5e2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078126

>>16078122
I recommend a catastrophic reentry failure theme

>> No.16078127

Fucking tranny jannies kill yourselves

>> No.16078128

Tipping point clause completed

>> No.16078133

>>16078129
>>16078129
>>16078129
>>16078129
New thread

>> No.16078135

>>16077737
Why do people obsess so much over whether Starship test flights can be categorized as "success" or "failure"? What does that even mean in this context? They are development test flights. Imo "success" and "failure" are only meaningful terms for certification test flights or operational flights.

>> No.16078139

I knew leaking the LOX because of no payload was going to fuck Starship up again. I called it

Just put weights in it, jesus

>> No.16078142

>>16078135
>Why do people
These are wikipedos, anon, not people.

>> No.16078149

>>16078135
It's for commie rent free Elon seethers to point at and say LOOK HE FAILED SEE IT SAYS IT ON WIKIPEDIA

>> No.16078151

>>16078139
Yeah it might have. Valve froze open. Lose all ullage gas.
RCS doesn't work any more.

>> No.16078166

>>16078139
yeah but they need a way to get rid of that weight for reentry

>> No.16078255

>>16076838
I doubt it made it to the ocean in one piece

>> No.16078267
File: 669 KB, 2308x3264, Uncle Sam (Chinese propaganda).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078267

>>16073259
Well done, USA. SpaceX is making history and reinvigorating interest in space. At this point, they should just cancel SLS.

>> No.16078269

>>16077005
esa is just a jobs program

>> No.16078303

>>16078269
more like esl kek

>> No.16078347
File: 218 KB, 1024x768, no_gay_retards.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078347

>>16077136

>> No.16078354

>>16077136
He has a followup tweet.
It's entirely delusional kek.

>> No.16078474
File: 779 KB, 1488x420, 5cientist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16078474

>>16077777