[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 251 KB, 626x349, Screenshot(62).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16065945 No.16065945 [Reply] [Original]

In her latest disjointed ramble (her 2nd of the day) she's already rushed so fast as to have published three mistakes she has noticed + the one in the pic she hasn't. She ceased pulling punches against figures like Susskind (if she ever had) and is proudly displaying whatever axe it is she has to grind against these people. At this pace, by this time next month her vids may resemble a shirtless Alex Jones monologue about colloidal solver. I look forward to this development.

https://youtu.be/eRzQDyw5C3M?si=7B-iM6DD1pvM7an4

>> No.16065947

>Angry german aryan hits back at jews and their lies

>> No.16065964
File: 827 KB, 2740x2000, TIMESAND___StringTheory2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16065964

Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152
>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf
The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory, but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted, and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved with a framework for quantum cosmology time arrow eigenstates. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

>> No.16065966
File: 3.01 MB, 1x1, TIMESAND___Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf_compressed.pdf [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16065966

>>16065964
>Sixty-Six Theses:
#65

>> No.16065972

>>16065966
imagine writing a paper and citing yourself more than anyone else combined, that's J. W. Tooker for ya

>> No.16066027

Straight gossiping video. That's what women in science bring

>> No.16066405

ITT: stringcels mad

>> No.16066418

>>16065945
Sabine is based and I hope stringcucks will rope themselves because their research is utterly useless and pozzed by JewWitten

>> No.16066419

>>16065945
Go to another board to talk about youtubers

>> No.16066436

>>16065947
Based

>> No.16066445

>>16065945
Ok then you ask questions get the same results

>> No.16066820
File: 95 KB, 372x640, 9874098743.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16066820

>>16065945
I love Sabine. I lie in bed and dream of gazing into her beady eyes.

>> No.16066824
File: 83 KB, 377x211, datlook.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16066824

>>16066820

>> No.16066999
File: 18 KB, 519x250, Obi-Wan Mustafar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16066999

>>16065947
>>16066418
>>16066419
You don't understand! I loved Sabinuh.
Now she makes too many videos and flip flops all over the place. She was submitting papers for testable string theory predictions and got burned, what is to say she won't change her mind back next week?

She was supposed to destroy the gobbledygook, not join them!

>> No.16067005

>>16066999
gobbledygook = $$$ the curse of humans

>> No.16067698

>>16065964
this is what judaism does to your mind

>> No.16067836
File: 35 KB, 528x581, images - 2023-12-05T193046.879.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16067836

>>16065972
Imagine needing to rewrite Mathematics in order to have the tools needed to express the equations you see in Physics.

I have this issue, a lot. Had to rewrite Psychology because the field is retarded, rewrite Math because it wasnt 100% aligning with Physics, had to rewrite all of Theology...because my citations for that are in BioPhysics, Genetics and Cognition but since Im ahead of those fields my only non-me citable sources are the very ones Im refuting.

You should try harder at life....WAY harder.