/sci/ - Science & Math

This 38 minute video shows 763 different people dying from the vaccine.
https://files.catbox.moe/7yii3h.mp4

anti-semitic post

>it's another Daily Mail thread
do you ever read anything else?

>>16035039
>attacking the source because you can't discredit the information being presented

>>16034967
But people who got vaxxed trust doctors also in different decisions, that can also be the factor.

>>16034967
post the study gorilla nigger

>>16036586
I found the study no thanks to faggot op

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.079

>>16034980
Anyone else find this satisfying? It just gives me pleasure knowing I never took the vaxx.

>>16034967
Limited hangout.
They want to regain public trust through transparency by "acknowledging" side effects.
Then they will argue their risk-benefit recommendations were correct all along.
The problem is their data is probably an underestimate.
No way they rigorously scrutinized 100M people. Most of the heart conditions likely went unnoticed/unreported.
And the covid hospitalization data probably contains many false positives who were really vaccine injured (making covid look worse and vaccines look better).

My biggest issue with the whole ordeal was how one-size-fits-all their recommendations were.
You'd think they would find the most relevant variables for covid outcomes and vaccine side effects then just make a simple risk/benefit calculator that people could enter their info into.
All we got were broad age range buckets. No race, sex, BMI, comorbidities, urban/suburban/rural, athletic activity, etc.

I remember doing nigger-math to calculate my risk of severe covid outcome.
I interpolated the data they had to get the estimated risk for my age, factored in my reduced risk for my non-fatass BMI and lack of other comorbidities, then guessed at the reduced risk for my hermit lifestyle (1/5) where I leave home once a week to get groceries.
My risk was on the order of 1 / (# people my age in US).
That's when I stopped caring.

>>16037806
perverse af

>>16036623
you never would have even seen it without the thankless efforts of OP

>>16037738
>My biggest issue with the whole ordeal was how one-size-fits-all their recommendations were
mine too

>>16040679
A few countries allowed those with a documented covid infection to delay getting the injections for a few months but most considered natural immunity to be a threat and attacked it as anti-science. Medical exemptions were very difficult to get, with doctors threatened with the loss of their license if a review board disagreed with their exemption. As a result, few doctors would write them, even if the patient's life could be in danger from the injections. The risk to their livelihood was too high and their commitment to their patients too low. Everything was rounded, smoothed, and angled to get everyone into the one and only acceptable path: getting injected.
Over on Hacker News (nicknamed Orange Reddit for good reason), a popular narrative was that since the injections had zero risk, everyone should be forced to get them to make the paperwork simpler. The pandemic response cost tens of trillions, by far the most expensive government spending event in modern history, and these people were "concerned" over the cost of tracking who did and didn't have a documented natural immunity or high risk factor.
Now they all want to pretend nothing happened.
>Time to move on, no one cares about that anymore.
They're like children that threw tantrums to get an expensive toy and now have dropped it on floor out of boredom with it.

>>16037806
>money motivates people to do their job
More news at 11.

>>16034967
>>16036623
I'm not very versed in studies
is the methodology very good? seems like a lot of room for error/inaccuracy/missed data

>>16040829
>is the methodology very good?
This is pure ecological correlation with zero causally informative work. So "lol no".

This doesn't even make a pretend attempt to control for prior or concurrent covid-19 infection, for example. The fact AEFI varied so much despite vaccine "ingredient" consistency facially evidences high covid-19 concurrence. Meanwhile other paradoxical anti-trends would require you believe covid or vaccination cures things like seizures. Check fig 1 and the other time series data charts.

What you're seeing in most of them is clearly resource management altering diagnostic rates for certain conditions, such as "idiopathic" conditions in places like Taiwan, incidence increases beginning with covid-19 but prior to vaccination, and covid-19 caused conditions declining with viral severity declining. Things like that. Just facially there's every reason to conclude none of these have anything to do with vaccination from time series correlation alone.

>>16037806
horrifying

>>16037443

>>16040723
>a documented covid infection
documented by a 65 cycle PCR test

>>16034967
Nothing new in it. CDC site has been mentioning myocarditis and TTS as rare adverse events since early 2021 for mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines respectively. This study just adds some additional quantification to what's been the mainstream narrative since early 2021.
The question people want answered but none of these researchers seem to bother answering is how the risk assessment plays out given the huge number of breakthrough infections. "But COVID infection has a higher risk of myocarditis/TTS" says nothing because it assumes a highly effective vaccine without breakthrough infections, which obviously isn't the case.

>>16043204
theres no such thing as a breakthrough infection because covid-19 never existed, it was as real as the martians in "war of the worlds". only low iq people were dumb enough to fall for the hoax

I still don't understand why anyone other than an idiot would voluntarily risk their lives by taking an untested experimental medication. Seems like something only a retard would do

>>16034980
>KPop starlet appears at one point in the vid
>I feverishly google if she's actually dead
>still alive
Holy relief
Yes, attractive people get all of my sympathies and ugly ones none of it.

>>16045665
>why are all these young people suddenly dying of cancer?
>gosh its such a mystery, why can't we figure this one out?
lol

>>16034967
>With nearly 100,000,000 vaxxies looked at.
The study look at a lot of vaxxies, but the vaxxies refuse to look at the results of the study

>>16036062
Thats not against the source, thats against you presuming the source knows how ro read academic studies

>>16037806
why did the government incentivize doctors to kill people?

>>16049688
The government owes Social Security to old people and they don't want to pay so they'd rather have them be intentionally murdered by the greedy conscienceless doctors, its the most cost effective solution to the problem.

>>16037443
Look at this smug sob. Intact blood... massive penis. It's not fair. Why wasn't I this lucky?

>>16049688
Because they hate you, you are a useless eater and a burden to them, and they can make a shit ton of dough killing you people.

>>16051067
Its amazing how stingy people with a money printer can be when it comes to paying their debts to their own people. But when it comes time to give free money to Israel suddenly they become incredibly generous

>>16052610
Yeah its almost as of they're completely controlled by interests that lividly hate Americans and are only loyal to Israel or something

>>16034980
That first person is not dead. I just looked it up.

>>16044888
how about nine boosters worth?
https://rumble.com/vldefg-booster-madness.html

>>16051400
>they can make a shit ton of dough killing you people
they can make even more money when you be fruitful and multiply
seems more plausible
that's why your theory is retarded, and you are a retard

not that the vaccine isn't poison.
when retards decide they want to "save lives" you end up with poison.. imagine that