/sci/ - Science & Math

It's the vaxx

>>15996100
>fat and thin people are different species

>>15996100
Yes. As per the definition of species, they can have children together, if that woman has sex with that man on the right

it's ok to be different

>>15996109
>He doesn’t know

>>15996109
Just like grizzlies and polar bears, and wolves and coyotes!
Jokes aside, I do like hard definitions, so I'd consider them the same species as well, just quite a divergent subspecies.

>>15996100
Those two are adaptations to environments. Northern Europe is cold dark place, so pale white skin helps get vitamin D more easily from such a sunlight. Whereas in Australia, everything that runs and crawls will kill you and is very hot climate so abos evolted and are selected to survive in such a harsh climatic conditions. I don't know why basic genetics 101, adaptation, natural selection and leaning how geneticists actually classify an organism into genus Homo and species sapiens is too hard for you retards. You resot to 1935 style picture nonsense. Probably your IQ is too low to understand recent science, so old propaganda is easy for your brain (no offense, of course, you can still learn and educate yourself).

>>15996130
I bet you think different species can’t reproduce and produce viable offspring according to the standard definition huh

>>15996100
These are the same species. Chuds fuck off.

>>15996100
If you look at the anatomy of how the parts fit together you'll find it's very similar

>>15996121
But that wouldn't be accurate either. If subspecies of Homo sapiens exist, then modern humans and archaic humans such as Neanderthals and Denisovans are the proposed subspecies

>>15996175
>In biological classification, subspecies (pl.: subspecies) is a rank below species, used for populations that live in different areas and vary in size, shape, or other physical characteristics (morphology), but that can successfully interbreed.
Nah, you're just a retard NPC. Taxonomy has been around long before genetic screening of any kind existed. How do you think scientists did classification back then? Keep living in your dream world where a Swede and Pygmie are identical, but preferably on reddit.

>>15996109
>definition
horse and donkey are same species?

>>15996100
this distinction is pointless
unless you want to engage in genetic experiments on humans

>>15996100
>These are the same species.

Wolves and dogs are same species, BUT VERY different in temperament and intelligence.

>>15996201
I don't know

>>15996100
I love humans
I love humans
I love humans
Yes they're both beautiful human beings

>>15996218
Dogs are not humans chud

>>15996100
we need some hard measures to stop the ones on the left from reproducing like rabbits. maybe even cap their population.
Idc about ethics. I don't want a world filled with THAT.

>>15996130
How do you explain that aboriginal Australians made almost zero technological progress in 65,000 years?

>>15996619
If you truly wanted that question answered, you would already have an honest and well-researched response. However, you don't - not only because you don't care about the topic (how human societies develop) but also because you believe you already have the answer without ever having to research about it, because you are that smart.

>>15996631
>Why does 2+2=4
>If you truly wanted that question answered, you would already have an honest and well-researched response. However, you don't - not only because you don't care about the topic (how arithmetic sums develop) but also because you believe you already have the answer without ever having to research about it, because you are that smart.

Uh, yes? Maybe he just wants to hear you say it, or is using it rhetorically?

>>15996100
>woman caked with makeup Vs woman with no makeup.
Great argument.