[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.37 MB, 480x270, 1701930909894795.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15912309 No.15912309 [Reply] [Original]

The most disturbing part of this video is that apparently they consider a 0.75% death rate from vaccinations acceptable, so to get 80% of America vaccinated they were willing to sacrifice two million people.
But how does one vaccination specialist kill 25% of their patients? How do you get to 3300% above the acceptable rate by accident?

>> No.15912318

>>15912309
Could be an error in administering the vax. Aspirating wasn’t considered a necessary part of the procedure (at least at first) and those nanolipids sure are slippery. It’s not impossible that a “”specialist”” administered a dose that escaped the deltoid, entered the bloodstream and ended up at the heart or other vital organs.

>> No.15912319

>>15912309
Yeah yeah, just drop the thinly veiled antisemitism.
I bet you think the Earth is flat too, you transphobic climate denier.

>> No.15912321

>>15912318
>oops, sorry
>honest mistake you braindead goy, don't be upset

>> No.15912340

>>15912318
Apparently they did that 60 times without anyone saying anything about it

>> No.15912661

>>15912309
What's the methodology here? I doubt it's like, 25% of the people they vaxxed keeled over two minutes later. What's the time frame? what causes of death are counted? do they just work at a hospice facility?

>> No.15912694

>>15912661
Why would anyone on hospice care and therefore by definition not taking measures to avoid death get a vaccine?

>> No.15912704
File: 60 KB, 585x500, lL8QMqiehnaF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15912704

>> No.15913278

>>15912661
They guy who released that info was thrown in jail so its pretty clear that they people who jailed him have some nasty secrets to hide

>> No.15913732
File: 75 KB, 1280x720, 1304565721190.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15913732

>>15912704

>> No.15914398

>>15913732
je me souviens

>> No.15914693

>>15912309
>they consider a 0.75% death rate from vaccinations acceptable
Thats not what it said, they said a 0.75% death rate from vaccinations is the expected death rate, which means that their maximum acceptable death rate would have to be something more than 0.75%

>> No.15915006

>>15914693
And 100% is definitely more than 0.75%, so there's no problem.

>> No.15916216

>>15915006
its only 20% so far

>> No.15917690
File: 91 KB, 1284x1268, heterosexuality.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15917690

>>15912309

>> No.15917882

>>15912309
>2 million dead mutts

based vaxxies, for once

>> No.15919092

>>15917882
its NZggers

>> No.15920416

>>15912309
>How do you get to 3300% above the acceptable rate by accident?
intentionally