/sci/ - Science & Math

Because global warming is fake af

>>15891217
The crust is probably rising there

>>15891340
/thread

>>15891345
No really, according to the coloration on the map, the crust near the northern Cali coast is sinking about 1.5mm/year

>>15891355
It's complicated: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/147439/californias-rising-and-sinking-coast
No idea where croissant city is, but if the sea level is decreasing there, there's no other explanation.

>>15891370
>there's no other explanation.
It could have something to do with global cooling.

>>15891373
No.

>>15891381
Unscientific posts like this are why /sci/ is a bad board.

>>15891388
I actually agree. That's why I'm not engaging too much with unscientific trolls.

>>15891373
Or it could be global warming evaporating more water increasing global humidity while lowering sea levels.
Lets not just make shit up.

>>15891391
True. If we starve people like >>15891381 of attention they'll go away and the board will improve.

>>15891399
No.

>>15891370
>No idea where croissant city is
and too dumb or lazy to look it up, or you don't want to know because if you did you might accidentally find out that your global warming end of the world soientism religious dogma is fake

>>15891543
Yes, I'm sure that the sea levels in one town debunk phenomena observed all around the world.
Did you look it up? What's the crust movement there? Is it going up or down?

>>15891217
cherrypicked data

>>15891543
>The graph shows changes in annual sea level at three tide gauges along the California coast. Sea level has risen by about 180 millimeters (mm) (7 inches) since the year 1900 at San Francisco and by about 150 mm (6 inches) since 1924 at La Jolla. Sea levels show year-to-year variability, but are rising overall at these and almost all other tide gauge locations in California.

>The exception occurs at Crescent City, where sea level has dropped by about 70 mm (3 inches) since 1933. In this region, the uplift of land due to geological processes is producing opposing sea level trends. Local sea levels measured at tide gauges reflect the combined effects of regional sea level change and vertical land movement. At Crescent City, uplift of land is occurring at a faster rate than regional sea level rise. The net result is a decrease in local sea level. In contrast, at North Spit in nearby Humboldt Bay (about 70 miles south of Crescent City) where land is subsiding, the highest rate of sea level rise in California has been recorded.

Oh look at that. How surprised we all are. It's exactly what >>15891340 suspected.

>>15891550
And we of course must assume that none of these locations with sea level rises are due to geological processes, which apparently only work in one direction.

>>15891399
>nasa.gov
propaganda, not real science

>>15891980
>which apparently only work in one direction.
No they don't. We have satellite data to verify which direction land moves. We also have satellite data of sea levels.

Because local factors play a bigger role than polar ice melting
Sea level is also falling in Stockholm, which is much nearer to the arctic

>>15892645
Scandinavia is one of the biggest if not the biggest example for postglacial rebound.

>>15891217
Fish are repelled by meth and shit floats, therefore more things are pushing the water down than up.

>>15891340
>The crust is probably rising there
But never sink were sea level rises.
>t. climate shill

>>15892669
Glaciers didn't reach all the way down to Cali during the last ice age, so postglacial rebound can't explain sea level falling in California

>>15892499
The fact that a nasa.gov link is pure political bullshit is somehow both sad and predictable.

>>15892940
I guess it's predictable because it's .gov
I guess it's sad because I thought it wouldn't be

>>15891217
weather machines need more water

chinese tunnels underneath the pacific ocean are collapsing

israel has a stargate underwater to siphon water to gods chosen planet

>>15891340
according to that map the crust is sinking about 1.5mm/year in the vicinity of crescent city

>>15892859
He wasn't talking about California.
There are plenty of reasons why you might have variations in subsidence in California, it's a very geologically active area.

>>15892798
>But never sink were sea level rises.
English, motherfucker, do you speak it?

>>15891217
Cali has probably been faking data to be contrarian

>>15892798
New York is sinking, which is why they observed 8 inches rise since 1950, much more than in San Francisco for example.

>>15891217
What part of global BOILING don't you understand?

>>15891217
>water rises in one part of the world
>water falls in the other part of the world
how is this hard to understand?
Now I get why Americans care so much about "global warming" they just don't want to share their salt water with the rest of the world

>>15893582
Most of New York is built on landfill, the city is a literal garbage dump.

>>15891217
California is sinking under the weight of the millions and millions of illegal immigrants who invaded and have colonized the state

>>15895562
Cut it out. They came almost 500 years ago. It's time to accept Europeans in California.

>>15893571
>>But never sink were sea level rises.
>English, motherfucker, do you speak it?
Would you give away a tool that filters out idiots from people who are interested in a discussion?

>>15897386
How about per capita? Did we break even with third-worlders yet?

>>15897583
if you love 3rd worlders so much, why don't you live with them in the 3rd world?

>>15898686
I am the savior of the lesser third world peoples, they're too stupid to fend for themselves or speak for themselves, they need me to do everything for them cause they're so dumb and worthless. Thats why I need to live in mommy's basement and spend my life screeching online about chuds and /pol/.

>>15891550
The just invoke "geological processes" processes whenever they detect sea level falling anywhere.
How come these magical "geological processes" are never responsible for sea level rising anywhere?

>>15898686
I prefer to live in a wealthy country and just falsely virtue signal my supposed concern for the 3rd world on social media

>>15891217
Remember when global warming alarmists tried to use sand bar erosion as proof of "sea level rise"?

>>15901908
Looks much more dramatic due to erosion. Global sea level rise is only a few tens of cm.

>>15891217
Every time there's an earthquake the Sierras get 1 mm taller

>>15901919
>Global sea level rise is only a few tens of cm.
Supposedly it's not even that. Literally within the margin of error. Global warming alarmists will even try to claim this is the fastest sea levels have risen in Earth's history. It's not even the fastest sea levels have risen (if they are at all, which is highly debatable) within the past 12,000 years.

>>15902012
Crescent city is nowhere near the Sierras, ignoramus

>>15891217
their workers are too lazy to measure all of it
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8AHkAJrpAxd4/

>>15902382
The average of all tide gauges is 2mm per year, which is indeed within the margin of error.

why is it that when a tide guage detects sea level falling its always because of some geological effect and not a true measure of sea level, but when one detect sea level rising its always because of global warming? what if all of the gauges measuring rising sea levels are just because of geological effects and aren't true measures of sea level?

>>15891217
Could bebtectonic uplift. California is very tectonically active and the crust there is constantly being deformed. I don't have any further information apart from the image you posted, but given the location, I'd guess it's localized effect due to the forces I described.

>>15891550
/thread indeed

>>15904031
>when one detect sea level rising its always because of global warming?
It's not. There are examples ITT where part of the rise is explained by geology and not by global warming. Fuck off.
>what if all of the gauges measuring rising sea levels are just because of geological effects
Good idea. However, they're not. Also, we don't just have tidal gauges, but also satellite data as a cross-check. Again, fuck off.

>>15904068
>reeeeeeeeee fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
you sound like a clucking chicken and just as intelligent, pure reddit

>>15904031

>>15891217
Looks like global warming was just another big lie from the scientists

>>15905128
Putin is losing in the Ukraine.

>>15891217
climate change and racism.

>>15891217
aliens are stealing Earth's water. they heard it's rising so they figured might as well

>>15907453
and sexism

>>15907453
and both of those are caused by capitalism
let me glue myself to the road in protest, that'll show them capitalist pigs

>>15891217
because global warming is fake. if sea level is rising anywhere, thats only because of geological reasons unrelated to the climate.

>>15901908

>>15891980
>I can’t understand the basic concept of global sea and local sea level change

>>15904031
Because that’s not how global sea levels are measured.

>>15910664
Oh, so it is made up like temperature is what you are saying.

>>15910609
>Imagine being this retarded

>>15910609
So that smaller rock that's clearly above water in the bottom picture is now underwater? Guess I'm sold on sea level rising now. Although it could still be a tidal effect.

>>15911277
If you count the bricks, you see that the sea level in 2020 is 2 bricks higher than in 1920. Another good visualisation, however useless considering tides.

>>15911284
>count the bricks
on a photo? can be changed by wind direction streams and many more factors. Lot of rivers and bays have higher levels now due to dyking and land reclamation. Now this first hand but they never tell you due to damage claims.

>>15892946
My son you do know has always existed as the propaganda arm of America's air and space supremacy program right

>>15912043
I counted the bricks and the level in 2020 is lower than the level in 1920. You can also compare the height of the stone at the water line to the height of the pedestal and that confirms that the water level in 2020 is lower than it was 100 years earlier

>>15912313
checks out, i tried the pedestal method. sea level is not rising

>>15911055
lol

>>15907380
lol

>>15891217
because droughts, duh

>>15914659
Its because of the reduction in offshore fishing boats due to overfishing.
Less fish = less boats = less displacement = falling sea level

>>15903397
yeah they're only like 500 miles from each other
>b-b-but they're both in california

>>15910704

>>15910701
Yes

>>15891217
Sea jews are straling the water

>>15906945
>>>/pol/

>>15920865
Right, that’s where >>15905128 should go.

>>15920871
you belong on reddit because you're a childish spaz

>>15921329
Is that where you and the other childish spazes hang out?

>>15892940
>vertical motion data is ideological
How do you go through life being this retarded?

>>15921366
Is this the first time you see a /pol/ tourist outside of his natural habitat?