/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15889910
One word: NIGGERS

>>15889910
expend enough energy to counteract it

>>15889910
monopoles?

>>15889910
you need negative mass for that

>>15889910
You don't

>>15889910
>>>/x/36541774

Make an object with negative mass

>>15889910
The method I employ is an anti harmonic double coil super conductor. The encasement contain a cyrogenic system. The coils are in a state where the phononic induction of the coils causes a pass through of the emf field which tends to a inertial moment bias.
It's pretty much a harmonic pendulum with an anti harmonic field effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon
The mechanism is a function of the stiffness of the material.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductivity
The control mechanism uses a dielectric filter feed forward.

Developing anti-gravity will be an application of a working theory of classical electrogravity (which I developed in 2013.) This is why "hypersonic missiles" suddenly popped up all over the place around 2015: it was due to my conceptual breakthrough.

>>15890608
This shows one of the USAF's myriad "hypersonic missile test failures" when the people who did not ignore and mock my work gained the technological high ground. This shows the believers' advanced vehicle destroying the unbelievers' primitive vehicle.

>>15890620
>>15890621
>>15890622
Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152
>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf
The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

https://vixra.org/abs/1307.0075

SCP-001

>>15890608
Interesting corollary result regarding the fundamental problem of quantum field theory: why do we have the standard model particles and not some other particles?

>>15889910
Develop anti-mass, forehead.

Prove gravitons. Either antigravitons are a thing or gravitons are their own antiparticle. Either way antigravity is established.

>>15891171
Let's say they're their own antiparticle. How do you use that for antigravity?
It's irrelevant as they're expected to be a spin-2 particle so wouldn't be their own antiparticle, but for engineering purposes let's assume they are

>>15889910
super conducting tesla coil

>>15890631
This is super interesting. Are you going to publish?

>>15891173
In that situation gravity would just be antigravity, so you just use objects to attract each other and shit.

Nobody said antigravity was going to be useful.

Was that it there?

>>15891237
I published it in 2013.

>>15890288
Came here to say this. If they exist.

>>15890615
>>15890608
>>15890583

This is some powerful schizoid posting

>>15889910
If you believe the glowies, it's with VHV oscillating at the resonant frequency of the CMB or some shit.

>>15891282
With those acknowledgments?

>>15889910
wear magnets on your feet

>>15890376
Well, negative energy (as OP's picrel suggests) would also work.

>>15890608
You look like a major faggot John

gravity is just a bend in space, right? So anti-gravity would've been bend of the exact same shape but in the opposite direction

>>15889910
First you open your fucking ears, secondly you go back to a hell, thirdly you learn i'm not serving anyone shit, and fourthly I have more shit to handle than a bunch of monkey cats depending on stage wires.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kotodama

>>15892311
But we know negative energy doesn't exist.

>>15890608
Cool, unfortunately I don't have time (yet) to read it and won't understand everything.
>a working theory of classical electrogravity (which I developed in 2013.)
for real?
>"hypersonic missiles" suddenly popped up all over the place around 2015
well, hypersonic planes existed before 2015...

>>15889910
Impossible since gravity is not a force. Only way would be to manipulate the gravitational field itself.

>>15891278
No, that's just using the properties of gravity. If the graviton were it's own antiparticle, you'd be able to have interference patterns similar to photons where certain regions don't have gravity but others have enhanced gravity.
Try harder next time

>>15892541
>>15892311
We are already talking about this exact thing here>>15883768
Miraculously, it has been up for almost 4 weeks.

>>15893990
Fucking /sci/, why can't I link a thread from the same board?
It's still up.

Presented without comment. There is more in the other thread
https://m.fark.com/comments/1386759/11882728#c11882728
https://m.fark.com/comments/1386759/11882728#c11882728
https://m.fark.com/comments/1203844/9725308
>Optical blackholes and Kerr Singularity analogues FTW (Maybe)

There is no anti-gravity, only inertial shielding

>>15890288
>>15891350
https://physicsworld.com/a/magnetic-monopoles-seen-in-the-lab/
This may sound like an absolutely retarded question, but if you can simulate something like vacuum interactions using an analogue like a BEC, why couldn't the simulated effect become a real effect? If you're creating an optical black hole, would you expect Hawking radiation?