/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15809450
His theory was eventually debunked as shit he made up but wrote in such a way that it was incredibly complex and difficult to understand.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26753-mathematicians-anger-over-his-unread-500-page-proof/

I'm not sure why, after having a career of honest maths he decided to resort to fraud for fame but whatever floats your boat

ABC conjecture is not solved by inter-universal techmuller theory

ok what happens when no one else can understand your true theory? like for real? does that imply that we are limited in the way we advance science, and does that mean that it's better to be just a bit smarter than the rest but not by much because nobody understands what the fuck you are saying?

>>15809848
science doesn't come down to "trust me bro". if you can't communicate your ideas using a language everyone understands it is irrelevant if your theory is true or not.

>>15809857
>if you can't communicate your ideas using a language
pretty sure you communicate ideas via math, at that level. not language. what if the math is so advanced that nobody fucking understands it? what then?

>>15809859
language / math / same difference.

> what if the math is so advanced that nobody fucking understands it?
that never happens.

>>15809848
It mean's you're probably a fraud and your theory belongs in the trash. It's really easy to make up any complicated bullshit you want (see the social sciences), doesn't make it true.

>>15809867
no you defaulted to your chimp mode
>oh what? someone WAY smarter than me? clearly a fraud and won't have it any other way!
I asked something and you defaulted to "but nobody can be smarter than me, and clearly not by a lot". my question was how does science deal with such a situation, when it happens? what's the protocol for that? because if there isn't one, then clearly humans are saying they'll have none of anything way smarter than them, which is primitive and retarded in itself.

>>15809872
Bootlicker, asskisser

>>15810028
well I did say you defaulted to your chimp mode.
>if you don't hate anyone smarter than you then you are a weak faggot
I think it's called frustration. what you are feeling

>>15810064
>>15810064

>>15810067
Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
>https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152
>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf
The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

>>15810064
>>15810067
>>15810069
I've missed you buddy

>>15809848
You prove it using a computerized formal proof system such as coq.

He didn't do it. No gold standard.

>>15809533
then why don't they claim the prize money

>>15809872
>someone WAY smarter than me?
Not him, but what do you mean "me"?
You're not asking about a situation where a mathematician is way smarter than a single random anon. You're asking about a situation where some 3000IQ ayylmao-tier mutant is so intelligent that he cannot even _dumb himself down_ to a level that the smartest, most highly specialized mathematicians in the world can make any sense of. There's no protocol for this situation because it doesn't exist

There are several reasons why true mathematics might not be accepted right away by the mathematical community, but that is not one of them.

>>15810754
>is so intelligent that he cannot even

>>15809857
Wrong. Knowledge can be used to acquire power, and nobody else needs to understand or even become aware it exists. It will be relevant by reason or by force.

>>15809857
>if the majority can't understand the language of the people making progress then the work is irrelevant
so then you limit yourself to what the masses can understand.

>>15809450
https://thehighergeometer.wordpress.com/2023/04/19/joshis-quest/

>>15809848
>ok what happens when no one else can understand your true theory? like for real?
These Redditors can't accept anything as science or proof if it can't be boiled down to few upvotable paragraphs. When in fact history is full of such paradigm shifts that were rejected or even ridiculed often beyond the authors death, until it was proven right sometime later on.