[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 1.81 MB, 480x854, 1693711097066371.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15717653 No.15717653 [Reply] [Original]

Mathmatically speaking, how do I go about calculating the height of these two gentlemen?

>> No.15717661

>>15717653
Who cares? This line of thinking will lead you nowhere

>> No.15717668

>>15717653
Why would us glorious tall men waste our semen on a short woman? If you want tall kids, breed tall. Its like a Great Dane fucking a chihuahua.

>> No.15717716
File: 796 KB, 863x740, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15717716

>>15717653
using a photo from the whore's instagram of her holding an iphone pro max which is 6.7 inches and using a pajeet for scale we can determine that she is 9 iphones or 60.3 inches.

Scaling the pajeet to the gentleman gives 1.15 to 1.34 pajeet size or 5ft 8 and 6ft 8 respectively.

>> No.15717732

>>15717716
kek
>>15717668
i see it often. super tall men with short women

>> No.15717743

>>15717668
Same reason loli is popular.
Tight and bulging.

>> No.15717767

>>15717653
>tags: stomach deformation, stomach bulge, big penis, size difference, mmf, interracial, threesome

>> No.15717827

>>15717653
She's not even a 7.

>> No.15717970

>>15717668
Men are supposed to be tall. Women are supposed to be short. It's the way God intended, simple as.

>> No.15718078
File: 55 KB, 864x615, 1690939725718906 A11E9EE1-29E9-4132-95ED-CA175440CE3F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15718078

>>15717732
>>15717743
>>15717970
Wasting your tall semen on a short women are why so many of you are born as manlets. Short people should be beaten each day for their lack of height.

>> No.15718162

Ceiling height near duct average for stucture 6.1 - 6.2 ft. They're about 6ft

>> No.15718174

>>15718078
>Short people should be beaten each day for their lack of height.
I enjoy not having my arms twisted off by some raging hairy chimpoid creature

>> No.15718224
File: 369 KB, 600x375, 2b8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15718224

>>15718078
>that picture

>> No.15718278
File: 3.87 MB, 640x472, train-tunnel.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15718278

>>15717653

>> No.15718301

>>15717653
average door way height is 80 inches, that is 6.7 feet. They are about 7.5, a power forward

>> No.15718758

>>15718224
Explain

>> No.15718813

>>15717653
They're 5'5, she's just a midget

>> No.15718844
File: 37 KB, 621x414, 324234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15718844

>>15718078
>>15718224
It's nice to see that there are other men of culture around these parts.

>> No.15718868

>>15717653
I did a demonstration where I can tell someone's
height (roughly) just from a set distance away
and an object (marker, ruler, etc.). It went like this:

>measure every piece of the object beforehand
(ex. closed marker, marker cap, marker body, etc.)
>hold object at arm length from face; divide object length by distance from face
(differs for each person)
>stand a set distance away from the person being measured
(you can use the object to measure, if you want; use convenient numbers)
>use object at arm length to measure the person's height
(ex. they're one closed marker tall at some distance you picked)
>do this calculation: [math] h=d\cdot[{{o_1+o_2+...}\over {f}}] [/math]
(h=height; d=set distance; o_1, o_2...=length of object and parts, if needed; f=face distance)
>use the same units (ex. markers) in your calculation and convert to in. or cm. at the end

The result would be a little off, so add that delicious fudge
factor of 1-3 in. (or 2.5 to 7.6 cm) and get the final height.

>> No.15718905

>>15718758
I don't remember exactly but I believe that it was about research on it, and people on the left side of the distribution having trouble with hypotheticals, recursion and other things

>> No.15718914

>>15717970
There will only be small men and tall women in the near future

>> No.15718968

>>15717661
what do you mean?