/sci/ - Science & Math

what is CAIT?
> t. genius

>>15695622
Sorry loser. If you're lucky you may end up as a labrat to some 125 IQ psychometrician.

>>15695622
nta, but it's an IQ test.
https://pdfhost.io/v/bzirL3Qfi_CAIT_Release_Document_v20_Copy_Copy

>>15695622
become a quant

take the 500k TC and 1m bonus for developing insane trading algorithms


tell them in the interview "proctor the wonderlic for me and ill prove im smart enough for this"

>>15695708
i got 133 full scale as an esl (im verbally retarded)

>>15695622
retail is always an option

>>15695622
maybe you can figure out how to go and fuck yourself :)

>>15695786
You sure do like using thought-terminating clichés.

>>15695622
100% over, at most you can use python.

>>15695757
>Wonderlic
Is this actually used irl though? I have never heard of it before. Found this. https://wonderlictestpractice.com/full-practice-test/
This seems a bit too easy & more knowledge based imo. Is it basically an IQ test as well, as claimed by some? I didn't know what it was before you said it, but it wouldn't make sense to me that Teachers are that high on the list for average scores on it. But I'll take it in a couple hours anyways and post results.

>>15695764
What were your scores for the subsections, PRI, Verbal, GAI and cognitive proficiency index etc. ?

>>15697021
your test is easy as shit LMAO
i shotgunned it and had 2 mins left

>>15697065
Yeah, I just took it and only got one wrong as well. Anything above a 40 is supposed to be 99th perecentile, but this was piss easy. I don't see how a test like this is a good measure of IQ.

>>15695653
"Comprehensive Adult Intelligence Test"
A full scale IQ test developed by EquusB, a psychometrician who hangs around r/cognitive testing. It is supposed to give an estimate of what you would get on WAIS but since it has general knowledge and vocabulary sections it is only fully accurate for native anglophones.

>>15695786
yes I do, got a problem faggot?

>>15697065
>>15697192
Wonderlic is more a test of processing speed than of other aspects IQ beyond a certain IQ level. But processing speed is correlated to IQ. You're better off taking the Digit span section off of CAIT, (https://wais-iv-digit-span-00667a.netlify.app/)) and that will give you a more accurate IQ based on processing speed than a random website.

>>15697026
ok I lied about being verbally retarded but I got 116 verbal, 122 cognitive and 141 on the visual shit which is a bit inflated since i refreshed the page halfway through the shapes test. And 132 GAI (fabulous)
The general knowledge test is definitely absolutely retarded, but I think the visual scales test is a pretty good indication of your mathematical abilities. I got 20 points on that.
so how did you do?

>>15697594
Mine was the opposite, really high verbal score. Verbal 151, Visual stuff 138, GAI 151, cognitive stuff 142 and FSIQ at the end was 154. I did take it while on amphetamines though (which I'm still on lol), so I'm sure that gave me a higher score. But also, for me personally, the main issue with the Visual stuff was the time limit. Did refreshing give you more time or what? Because I'm sure that would give a higher result.
>>15697475
My scaled score on that section was 20, idr the raw

>>15697908
daaamn imma gonna need some of that amphetamines dawg
> Did refreshing give you more time or what?
yeah it reset the time so i practically had an extra minute or two.
if you're really a NEET with that score you might wanna look into therapy and "gifted child syndrome".

>>15697908
This test is not good. I only did visual portion because I don't care about trivia knowledge in vocabulary, but I scored 156 and the visual stuff can 100% be trained. The visual weighting is merely syllogisms.

>>15697908
Take this if you can,
https://ravens-2-progressive-matrices-clinical-edition.netlify.app/
It's the leaked pro form of the full long form of the Ravens 2 matrices test. For reals. Time yourself, shouldn't go over 45 minutes. Post result if you can, I want to see for research purposes, but don't go over 45 mins. Here's pdf version if you want https://pdfhost.io/v/T7sXiiKxk_longformpdf.pdf

>>15698005
Lol no, not a NEET right now I'm in college now. But definitely had a rough NEET-lite patch in life before I got on amphetamines. But doing good now.
>>15698213
Sure, i'll try it tomorrow and post if the thread is still active then.
>>15698089
I don't think 156 on the Visual stuff is possible on CAIT, but I agree otherwise, it is def trainable. True that the weighting ones were quite easy.

>>15698213
>>15698259
Took the pdf one. 47 raw score. 147/154 IQ score

>>15695622
I hate that there are people like you who by pure luck get to be the intellectual nobility

>>15695622
Taking an IQ test and putting stock in the results proves that you're a retarded sheep who will never amount to anything.