/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15684762
Why is Mr. Mungo covering his genital area? Maybe that's part of the secret they're hiding?

They're just being cunts whenever they get the chance, makes them feel bigger

>>15684762
First, because they are retarded troglodytes and probably think it will kill them or something. They resent whites too.
Second, because our current knowledge suggests that current Abbos were not the first people to settle Australia and since the country's shitlib media apparatus is mostly based on crying over Abbos, you can imagine that if we tested the remains and confirmed the theory, they can't represent them as the true ancestral peepo anymore.
This is not the only modern case of government covering up anthropological research for political correction, by the way. I recall similar problems in Canada.

>>15684762
See:
https://stoneageherbalist.substack.com/p/the-problems-of-australias-deep-past

>>15685122
There are 'conspiracy theories' that the same is true of New Zealand. You can find a few blogs that talk about this.

>>15684766
Wouldn’t you cover your junk when you die?

>>15685122
It's complete hearsay on my part but apparently there are parts of the Grand Canyon completely barred from entry due to similar "cultural" reasons.

>>15686666
...it's because it's really hard to fish tourist corpses out of a canyon and large enough a terrain feature that you can easily get lost in it. it's wider than you think.

also if the goal was to force a narrative they'd just destroy the evidence, it's not hard.

Was just reading about this, couple interesting links:

http://www.canovan.com/HumanOrigin/kow/kowswamp.htm

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Robust-Pleistocene-Australian-crania-From-top-to-bottom-Cohuna-Kow-Swamp-5-and-WLH_fig1_26725106

Looks like abos are a soup of archaic homo sapiens, denisova, and late Javan erectus.

>>15685122
>In 2016, a paper published by Tim Heupink and colleagues finally returned a proper genetic rebuke. Using different and more modern methods, they concluded that Adcock and his team had contaminated the samples, and that the genetic grouping to which Lake Mungo 3 belonged was consistent with Out of Africa. They also identified a novel haplogroup, S2, which was proof of deep Aboriginal separation once they arrived in Australia. They found no differences between the gracile and robust bodies, supporting the older idea that Aboriginal phenotypic difference was indigenous to the continent.

>>15686982
>Based on this genetic analysis of one (1) individual, all aboriginals are pure unalloyed HSS with no archaic admixture.

>>15687199

>>15687206

>>15687207

>>15687210

>>15687211

>>15687214
Bonus Khoisan woman that totally doesn't have Homo Naledi admixture.

>>15687218
booba

>>15687199
>no archaic admixture
>despite essentially every human group having archaic admixture
It was in 2016, surely they didn’t just forget about Denisovans right?

>>15687375
They were able to trace PART of Mungo 3's ancestry to an African group, but I'm pretty sure abos have a bit more than the canonical 5% Denisova admixture, and probably a lot of late erectus as well.

>>15685122
lol