/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15637533
Link? I’d be interested to read about this

>>15637533
/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15637539
https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/ooparts-found-coal-0010767
>>15637541
>evolutionist spergs out when challenged

>>15637533
hindism is real religion , we use it prayer

>>15637547
>an IT manager
>a psychologist
>an electronics engineer
>and a computer scientist

>article written by J.P. Robinson
>credentials : Contemporary Photography

>>15637749
Are you a professor of credentialism? If not, you're not allowed to post this.

>>15637749
>you need certain credentials to find man-made objects inside of coal

>>15637547
Seems pretty fake. That gold chain in particular is clearly modern.

>>15637815
Oh wait, I guess that's a stock photo. They don't appear to have of an actual photo of this alleged chain from the coal lump at all.

> ‘the idea of its having been recently dropped was at once made fallacious, for as the lump of coal broke, it separated almost in the middle, and the circular position of the chain placed the two ends near to each other; and as the lump separated, the middle of the chain became loosened while each end remained fastened to the coal.’
>anyway, we only started pictures after all proof was destroyed and it looked like an ordinary, temporary gold chain
>please pay us $33.50 for our cheapest membership package
>we're certainly not grifters

>>15637816
I think I farted

>>15637533
How do you know it's 300 million years old? It's entirely possible that these artifacts were found in peat which is commonly used for heating. Peat bogs all formed relatively recently, ~12000 years ago.

>>15637826
the article tells you where each piece of coal was found

>>15637831
No. The article tells you what they want you to believe. There's no way to know that this is real.

> This iron pot fell from the center, leaving the impression or mould of the pot in the piece of coal

Why is there only an image of the supposed iron pot? What happened to the piece of coal that it was embedded in? If they thought that the pot was strange enough to put into a museum, why didn't they also display the piece of coal that it came from? (hint. it doesn't exist)

any newer finds then from the 1950s with actual evidence of the finds being implanted in coal?

>>15637838
>nooooooo it's LE FAKE because um.... because le scientists said we came from le ooh ooh aah aahs!!!!!!!!!

>>15637858
post photographic or physical evidence of the objects being found inside a lump of coal not just some guy saying he did

>>15637858
>Noooo ITS LE REAL because some guy from 1912 said he found it in a lump of coal and they took a picture of the pot in 1948!!

>>15637541
emotionally triggered

>>15637533
its hindu temple bell people still use this temple at home

>>15637812
>you need certain credentials to find man-made objects inside of coal
An animal could find them, but to know that you did you certainly need some credentials. How do you even know that it's coal? There's a thousand things that look like it. Maybe we should bring a baker, a veterinarian, and a musician and ask them.

>>15639574
>How do you even know that it's coal?
cause it's in a coal mine. it would actually be even worse if it wasn't coal, cause then it means that human artifacts are being found inside of rocks that formed over a billion years ago

>>15637533
Thats easy, soience is all fake news

>>15640866
im doing a survey, what job do you have?

very organic not shill thread

>>15637838
I agree but you could say the same about any archeological finding.

>>15637867
Yeah you're right, the guy from 1912 should have pulled out his iPhone and take a picture.

Ring ring burr

R u real

>>15640975

people in this thread will say that micro organisms from a billion years ago made this hammer

>>15643480
micro organisms from a billion years ago made this hammer

>>15643480
It was the great race of yith niggerman save me

>>15643480
>Other observers have noted that the hammer is stylistically consistent with typical American tools manufactured in the region in the late 19th century. Its design is consistent with a miner's hammer. One possible explanation for the rock containing the artifact is that the highly soluble minerals in the ancient limestone may have formed a concretion around the object, via a common process (like that of a petrifying well) which often creates similar encrustations around fossils and other nuclei in a relatively short time.

>>15643701
um it was found in london, not america

>>15644013
london is in texas

>>15644015
looks like i switched timelines again

>>15637533
soience is all fake, theres no other explanation

>>15637533
Uh oh, turns out the great flood was real and only happened 10,000 years ago.

>>15644438
it that were the case the soience soigoys would just lie about it and call it a conspiracy theory

>>15646536
um.. they do

>>15643480
Macro organisms from 50 years ago (or sooner) took apart a hammer, chiseled a niche for it into a rock, and then stuffed it into the rock.

>>15637533
Cephalopod civilization(s) left these artifacts behind in the Paleozoic. Most of the evidence of their existence has since been subducted, eroded to dust, etc. However, most of their installations in deep space and the outer solar system are intact, though likely depowered. We'll probably be discovering these installations, if not the cephalopod beings themselves (or at least their AIs) in the coming decades.
It's anyone's guess whether or not they continue to occupy their space habitats or have evacuated to another system, died off, become digital beings, etc.
>t. geologist

>>15647506
Based schizo

>>15647506
>t. geologist
what kind of dogs do geologists fuck?

>>15647506
the vltimate nvclear trvth bvmb

>>15647858
Rockhounds?

>>15641597
Why not? they were doing it at real sites to document what happened.
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2016/jun/15/sands-of-time-ancient-egypt-excavated-in-pictures
>>15641583
Not ANY finding but certainly many.

>>15637533
Prove beyond a doubt that thing is 300 million years old
/thread

>>15637533
It's a bunch of stories. If the artifacts had been left in place for study it would be more believable than a few random people claiming they found these things embedded in coal.

We know people lie. We know people make up stories for fame and money. We don't know that a 300 million year old civilization existed. What does occam's razor tell you?

>>15649103
That 99% of humanity can tell if you got a piece of coal

>>15637533
These aren't well documented at all, a more likely explaination is the people who "found" them just lied

>>15643480
>limestone formation boggles the mind of some people

>>15647506
>Cephalopod civilization(s)
>he doesn't know about the edicaran spriggina imperium

>>15649193
Neato, finally someone had the decency to assume humans could just duplicate geological formations during the stone ages

>>15649184
why is that more likely? because your preconceived notions about soience demand it?

>>15649103
>We know people lie.
yeah

>>15649265
>metal bell
>during the stone ages
genius

>>15650174
This is not at all true. You can tell by bones alone how much meat was on them.

https://theconversation.com/how-do-you-weigh-a-dinosaur-there-are-two-ways-and-it-turns-out-theyre-both-right-144874

>>15650609
the amount of meat on the animal does not correlate with their appearance. both of those hippo versions can have the same weight

>>15637533
Geologists are the “authority” on how rocks are formed and they are wrong.

>>15651815
Ah yes, random image file from that noted geological authority, sitsshow.blogspot.com, that's what I call SCIENCE!

>>15650639
yeah but you have to move the meat somewhere.

>>15637533
Is quite simple. A civilization 300 millions years ago build lots of nice stuff. Only shit-tier chimps, worshiping a jew nailed to a stick, can be so stupid to believe they are the first ones.

>>15650609

>>15651825
Welcome to fringe science you need to overcome a dozen reality tests just to get published

>>15651825
>finding something
:|
>finding something, geologist
=O

>>15637533
Humans are ~6k years old. Surprise, the Bible is right.

>>15654598
Delusional

>>15654598
Verifiable

>>15637533
all the self identified science experts here can't answer this one simple question
maybe they need to spend less time fucking dogs and more time studying lololol

>>15651825
You’re trying too hard. I don’t know where I got the picture. I just know it’s retarded to think that name brand spark plugs existed a very long time ago. If people are finding random modern junk in ancient rock formations, they aren’t ancient. I was literally trying to be retarded. Don’t be mad that I’m not stupid enough to understand geology.

>>15637533
because they're lying. next question

>>15655928
>If people are finding random modern junk in ancient rock formations, they aren’t ancient.
the statement that killed geologists

>>15644015
haven't the texans suffered enough?

the earliest modern human skeleton was found in bulgaria, not in africa

humans evolved around the caspian sea and then spread out from there

the earlier human skeleton found in africa is 200k years older than the skeleton in bulgaria, despite africa generally being a better environment for fossilization, particularly in the desert areas. the skeletons dont exist because humans didnt live there at the time.

in the same age as the bulgarian skeleton, at the same strata, there are homo habilis, there are plenty of them. tons. but no humans

niggers are humans that went south and had sex with homo habilis

Coal is abiotic and infinite, just like oil and gas.
Planar technological civilisation always happens.
It always enables ludicrously easy living.
It always triggers extreme dysgenics.
Its collapse always reduces humans to less than 5-6 digits number.

It's a 50k years cycle, give or take 10k years.
Enjoy the ride, pretty sure the internet phase is the most fun, so much porn.

>>15656309
the vltimate mvther vf all thermvnvclear trvth bvmbs

>>15656272
Ok I know you are not out there with a shovel digging human remains but the basics of the basics the places people died differ and some people before our time may have excavated the older remains and do soup with it, cause humans lol

>>15656427
are you saying niggers eat dead corpses therefore there are no human remains in africa that have been fossilized?

I dont think this is valid. there are remains of anatomically modern humans that have evidence of having been eaten in china and europe

>>15656447
No I think humans bones called their attention and ended as decoration and eventual hyena food or similar

>>15656272
homo habilis has been discovered in NW Europe and SE asia and everywhere in between, the out of africa theory is blatantly fake and gay

>>15656777
the great flood put those skeletons there and buried them under the sediment

>>15656777
yes. but only niggers have homo habilis blood. so there's that

This looks very similar to this bell I saw on ebay not too long ago

>redpill me on how human artifacts have been found inside of 300 million year old coal chunks
It's called a scam, you are being scammed.

>>15657337
i agree. how do we teach the public that (((they))) are scamming us with this story that we are 2 million years old?

>>15656842
source?

>>15658332
snopes verified it using independent fact checkers

>>15656861
Sure as hell does, where was the ebay sell?

>>15637533
>300 million year old coal chunks
Fake as fuck, obviously.

I won't even bother mentioning radiometric dating methodologies for this, you're just fucking retarded.

>>15659410
redpill me on how long it takes for coal to form

>>15659214
>snopes

I know is fake now, next charckpot theory

>>15659414
300 years

>>15659693
I googled it and, either the United States Department of Energy is lying, or some random stranger on the internet is.

>>15659693
big if true

>>15659701
When you put it that way, it's a no-brainer.
Only a retard would believe a government, 300years it is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_mh3xQnMWQ

>>15637533
There is nothing to redpill. You just want to be part of a secret "in" community because you have nothing to contribute to humanity, so you substitute fantasy for reality and pretend everyone else is dumb.

>>15659754
You can make coal fron normal wood ,you know, it's still sedimentary rock, the same things that make easy to falsify also make it possible for it to be a geolocical discovery, going for the minimal amount of research, how fast can you make a scam to maybe something happened here, am not saying is the most absurd alternative either like 300 millions, but a reasonable amount of time that could link with similar discoveries of phoenician to roman origin

>>15637533
how is it possible that this olives have been found inside this mortadella if when the animal was alive it had no olives inside?

>>15661267
So your point is that this metal things were preserved there for some reason?

A mnamade preservation technique or smuggling

>>15661304
no, my point is that the researchers put these metal things there because they wanted to have a sensational article about it. if you can put olives inside mortadella, you can put those things inside coal
you're too gullible if you believe in stuff like this

>>15661330
You are to stupid if you don't think this happens all the time, so much it has became almost common sense to not believe in it, so basically this is how archaelogy dies, in places with sense like egypt anything you find is expected to be an artifact first then questioned

>>15659701
Who you gonna believe?

>>15661330
>if you can put olives inside mortadella, you can put those things inside coal
how would that be possible if no one was around to do it 300 million years ago?

>>15661536
when had the federal government ever told the truth about anything?

>>15637533
Thats easy, science is all fake af. Its just a bunch lies concocted to justify a political agenda

no scientist has dared to do any tests on it

>>15637533
There was this deep past geological process called "Digging"
>>15664971
Just do a CT scan on it, you are just a /pol/ variant of a deboonker

>>15666510
me cock dig unto ur mums vagian

>>15666555
Those are just the nigger dicks burying into your asshole

>>15664291
this

>>15666510
>Just do a CT scan on it, you are just a /pol/ variant of a deboonker
i don't have a scanner. however, i know that scientists do. they don't want to scan it despite the owner of the artifact giving free and open access to scan it

>>15664291
reminder that the (((scientists))) who are promting the lies all fuck dogs

>>15664971
DESU, it looks like a regular stone that got carefully drilled to be able to place that plug-like thing there. I don't see how could I get any kind of profit by analyzing it.

>>15664971
Yeah back then they had to charge their rocks by plugging them in.

>>15668164
the surface around the drill site would be obviously different under a microscope

>>15664971
It's a stone-age nokia charger. This is what we used to charge mobile phones before hunting mammoths.

>>15661267
OMG I FUCKING LOVE JWST PICS

>>15669193
lol

>>15668800
ancient civilizations knew electroplating, so it they definitely knew about electricity. the plug isn't wired though, it just has prongs on it

>>15637533
>found inside of 300 million year old coal chunks
Implies that they accurately can date shit. Which they cant.

Carbon/Radio Isotope dating is the most pseudoscientific shit ever.
Its off because the methodology is retarded.
C-14 has a halflife of 5730 years.
And they literally say, you can't acuarately measure anything hat is older than 25000 years old.
And after 50k years it is impossible to use C-14.
https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2013/07/10/how-do-geologists-use-carbon-dating-to-find-the-age-of-rocks/

So the next best thing is sedimentary layering.
Which is a rough guestimation.
Radio Isotope is very limited.
And then comes Sedimentary layers ...

It works only under the premise of linear progression of history and geology and slow incremental sedimentary layering.

Which must exclude:
> solar flares (which influence isotopes and radioactivity)
> asteroids (which influence isotopes and radioactivity)
> vulcanic outbreaks (which influence isotopes and radioactivity, and twist and turn sedimentary layers in a instant)
> floods (which twist and turn sedimentary layers in a instant)
> earthquakes (which twist and turn sedimentary layers in a instant)
> high civilisation weapons of mass desrction (Acient Alien Shizos: which thay allegedly used and killed them selves by accident)

Those things influence how to interpret the dating of material.
It is impossible to date anything.
Maybe Dinosaurs lived like 30k years ago.
During the last (alleged) 30k years
> science had a consens that multiple cataclysmic catastrophic events (of unknown cause) happened
> Meltwater pulse 1B ( 11,500 and 11,200 calendar years ago):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meltwater_pulse_1B
> Meltwater pulse 1A (13,500 and 14,700 calendar years ago)
> Meltwater pulse 1C (between about 20,000 to 7,000 years ago the sea level rose by a total of about 100 m)

We had in the more recent past a lot of "Catastrophic" events, which obfuscate the timeline of this realm.
we Cannot know.

>trees turn into coal

>>15661267
>>15669193
>>15669913
all these jwst pics are making me hungry

>>15637533
I know this is /sci/, but I like to imagine this stuff is real, and it's caused by 'bubbles' of exotic matter that temporarily changes the state of matter the sediment the objects are resting on when it passes through.

Anyway if this is real phenomena then these people need to be taking measurements and using scientific equightment on the areas in question, not just writing books or articles about it.

>>15672727
what do you mean? something that causes objects to fall through the ground?

>>15672727
That or coal formation is under 1k years, which makes sense since coal, like oil and gas, is abiotic and infinite.

>>15637547
>ads for Loli porn
Yeah, no thanks champ

>>15672773
I don't mean anything, I'm just making stuff up using my imagination.

>>15637858
Correct, the current scientific paradigm is more trustworth than ancientorigins.net and in the absence of evidence to the contrary you default to it.

Däniken is back in vengeance in this thread...
Get with the times bro, none of this old evidence of OOPArt matters because no one even cares about new OOPArts like dunn's son's measurements of the vase. Or even Dunn's measurements himself, proving 5-axis lathes on a massive scale combined with at least, AT LEAST, a mechanical solution to a multivariable analytic continuous calculous system to power the thing, which is absolutely insane.
We don't mind those things because what about it?

>>15673225
it only shows ads for things you search for

>>15671263
Look how rotten the bike is after just 10-20 years. How can the human artifact look so pristine after millions of years?

>>15675942
i don't know

>>15675942
the part of the bike inside the tree is pristine because it was protected from the elements

When will the jammies add the god damn math captcha.

>>15674073
is this a bot post?

>>15677668
Just hide the thread if it triggers you that badly. Either that or grow up and learn to control your emotions

>>15637533

>>15675946
GOOD MORNING SAAR

>>15671263
>s. niger stole my my bike
only true science experts will get this joke

>>15680829
updooted

>>15644015
Haven't londoners suffered enough?

>>15670635
Why does every insipid creationist use the same talking point about carbon dating? Any geologist will tell you we use longer-lived isotopes for rocks than archeologists do for their artifacts.
Which must exclude:
> solar flares (which influence isotopes and radioactivity)
> asteroids (which influence isotopes and radioactivity)
My favorite thing about radioactivity is how predictable it is. We can easily detect anomalies in the fine particulate that arrives from space (it's how we saw the dinosaurs)
> vulcanic [ESL DETECTED] outbreaks (which influence isotopes and radioactivity, and twist and turn sedimentary layers in a instant)
It's so easy to ID volcanic ash layers we use it as a chronometer, and they really don't "twist and turn sedimentary layers in an instant"
> floods (which twist and turn sedimentary layers in a instant)
Yep they're really easy to spot too. Sediment size is a simple characteristic that corresponds to changes in water flow predictably
> earthquakes (which twist and turn sedimentary layers in a instant)
Earthquake motion is confined to fault zones and doesn't twist or turn layers at all, the most confusing thing they do is break the decimeter-scale bedding around the fault zone
> high civilisation weapons of mass desrction (Acient Alien Shizos: which thay allegedly used and killed them selves by accident)
Retarded

>>15681000
>My favorite thing about radioactivity is how predictable it is
No it isn't the issue with it is firstly, that it is rarely used, beyond radio carbon dating.
The second is, that it is extremely inaccurate simply because it was never calibrated, and cannot be calibrated because of the simple reason: You need a verified true specimen of a thing that is verified of a certain age, and you need to know every single event that happened on earth to calculate and exclude it.
For example potassium-40, beryllium-10 isotope measurments reuqire the knowledge beforhand how much potassium-40 was originally in a specimen to measure how much is decayed.
It requires pure speculation and assumptions.
>We can easily detect anomalies in the fine particulate that arrives from space
Not retroactively for shit that is thousands of years old.
Its pure assumption and speculations and memes to get nerds engaged and keep funding rolling.

>ID volcanic ash
You cannot measure vulcanic "ash" if you do not know the composition and if the volcanic outbrake was a underwater and lead to a tsunami which leads to floods.
Also you are ignoring "mud vulcanos" which constantly "baffle" scientists.

>Sediment size is a simple characteristic that corresponds to changes in water flow predictably
no it doesn't, because it is impossible to know if mud and stone is placed by an flood and not regular water flow.
See for example the "baffling" of scientists and geologists about the "burried" ancient shit in "istanbul"/constantinople, which lead to the "Black Sea deluge hypothesis".

>Earthquake motion is confined to fault zones and doesn't twist or turn layers at all
Yes it does.
Soil liquifaction is backtrackable:
https://pnsn.org/outreach/earthquakehazards/liquifaction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_liquefaction

And it causes massive landslides:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwDIDpgEV2w
Massive changes in landscape can occur within 100s of years instad of gorillions.

>>15681229
trvthnvke

>>15637533
>Start with conclusion
>Disregard evidence that does not fit
>Cherry-pick or make up evidence for your conclusion
>get phd in schizology

>>15681493
enough about what scientists do for ooparts, i'm looking for some real answers

>>15681501
The real answer is that this is bullshit

>>15681505
>Start with conclusion

>>15649103
cringe and bluepilled, ywnbaw

>>15649103
>We know people make up stories for fame and money.
Scientists lie so they can get their name in the big replication crisis journals and to get research grants all the time, how come you give them the benefit of the doubt and nobody else? Confirmation bias?

>>15681516
lol

>>15674115
oh shit, we need to find that anon and SWAT him. I’ll leave the perfect bait—

Sirs, there is a 2000 year old vampire lolita at Fort Knox, please come up to the front gate with a gun and a sign that says I am pursuing a human with childlike features for sexual reasons so we know it’s you and not a creepy stranger.

>>15683988
>Scientists lie
That’s well known among researchers and even a sizeable minority of the population
Everyone who does research knows there’s so many places of weakness on ethics and logical approaches fudging data on purpose— retarded conclusions in the discussion section /abstract — meaningless sans control group studies, placebo research, publish poop or perish papers, inability to rerun experiments and get similar conclusions, incentives not to rerun established research— yes we know. It’s an unfortunate problem that no single individual can solve, the average people blindly trust research even more then their own two feet.

>>15650174
source on the middle image?

>>15655928
>You’re trying too hard
he said as he seethed out a mini essay

>>15656272
bulgariapes is this true?

>>15656777
tomato plants are found all over da globe obviously the out of america theory is fake and gay

>>15657387
who is 'they?

>>15670635
1A=1C

>>15672955
two more weeks

>>15674115
nonce cope

>>15684676
you know who

>>15684653
This is much better.

>>15647958
underrated post

i dunno why the fuck are there some trees that are older than the artifacts they've enveloped retard

>>15684676
(((scientists)))

>>15637533
They're not human artifacts. They're from angels or elves, depending on which way you go back in time.

>>15685686
stop dancing around the question

>>15686762
check out the board you're on

>>15688057
>stop dancing around the question
the super elites (above any public figure)

>>15656861
>>15659393
https://poshmark.com/listing/Antique-Hindu-Ganesha-Brass-Temple-Bell-Prayer-Bell-Religious-Ritual-Bell-6394eaa7d8dba73a69e9387b
Just used reverse image search

they found whole entire temples inside of solid rock

>>15689254
meds.

>>15689911
tartaria confirmed real.

>>15637533
Humans from the Pleiades came to earth hundreds of millions of years ago to colonize and settle this planet while dinosaurs were still roaming across the surface.

>>15637826
peat forms continuously, when it dries out it becomes coal, the who process can take less than 100 years

>>15692849
the same coal as found in coal mines?

>>15637533
We figure out time travel in a few years and its already happened in the past.

>>15693082
yes

>>15694360
interesting. why do scientists say that coal is 300 million years old then? perhaps their entire time scale is wrong, and they are pushing lies

>>15694695
scientists lie about everything, they're compulsive liars

>>15694695
HAGGIN, J. (1983). Argonne Scientists Make Artificial Coal. Chemical & Engineering News, 61(47), 42–43. doi:10.1021/cen-v061n047.p042

>>15673225
Fuck, gotta click that link now

>>15675946
They're not shitting in the streets.

They're just making smaller versions of their country's greatest wonder.

>>15696472
based architects

>>15695719
>1983
why was science so much more productive and powerful in the 20th century than it is now?

>>15697197
jews started clamping down on it as the world became more connected which allows information to spread faster

>>15697390
That must be part of the """"progress"""" they're always bragging about

>>15698307
They powers that be don't want progress, they want everything to stay as it is, with them on top.
They learned the lessons of the industrial revolution, which say the old aristocratic and royal powers replaced by industrialists and bankers. They don't want the same fate for themselves, so they've put a halt on scientific progress

>>15699937
trvthnvke

>>15696472
Are the Himalayas really composed entirely of accumulated fecal matter?

>>15637533
>Be me farmer
>I dig up coal from the ground to heat my house and lost my bell in my coal hopper
>Die
>2000 years later OP finds my bell next to coal and is amazed it's next to 300 million year coal

>>15700977
Also humans haven't been around for 2 million years. That's neither here nor there.

>>15700969
imagine the smell

>>15689911
imagine they can build that, but they can't figure out plumbing

>>15703144
>build
carve

>>15637812
You'd think that it would be someone from the coal industry finding things in coal, wouldn't you?

>>15637826
does peat sequester carbon and oxygen?

>>15703376
coal is all over the place, its only mined where its most economically convenient to do so.

>>15703376
go learn some history, all kinds of people were digging up coal for their personal uses. not everyone was a professional miner

>>15703255
They should carve some toilets

>>15675946
I wonder when the put the fence around it. Maybe years of everyone groping and dry humping is what kept it fresh. I wonder if the fence can have some sort of galvanic reaction through the soil.

>>15684639
science

>>15681229
>For example potassium-40, beryllium-10 isotope measurments reuqire the knowledge beforhand how much potassium-40 was originally in a specimen to measure how much is decayed.

you measure the activity 2 times, spaced by a reasonable time, boom, you have \Delta t and C_0. obviously it's not exact, but is at least a good order of magnitude approximation.

>>15703395
yes, thats why its a good fuel, it has plenty of stored solar energy to rerelease

is it that easy to make shit up? can i carve a hole in a random rock and put my gameboy in it and be famous?

>>15680393
>me ooga booga
>space daddy kicks your bio-daddy out of Eden
>force yourself into the agricultural age by force
>drop tool into every old pit
>gets absorbed by old material
It’s that simple.

>>15637533
I mean in terms of pure plausibility. If the item in question was house in a wooden structure, and there was a fire. The compacted charcoal could be compacted down over time into coal. So the coal in question could by induced by human activity.

>>15637812
>oi, are you practicing soience with a loicense, mate?

>>15684332
>watches loli porn
>goes on /sci
>open a random link to a random website
>there sees advertisement for loli porn
>in 2023, meaning the way ads work in 2023, meaning they literally have nothing to do with the website and are handled by 3rd party services, which personalize advertisements
>"has" to come back to that /sci thread and post "that website shows loli porn" as a reply to a link for some reason
>gets called out
>"has" to have an obviously defensive psychotic episode of obvious lies
>4chan

>>15647506
Weakest bait I have ever seen.

>>15708495
try it

>>15695719
good document, i wonder how much more expensive manufactured coal is than natural coal

>>15712888
depends on how fast you want it i suppose

>>15695719
>coal can be manufactured
i guess that means the coal supply is unlimited and can never run out

>>15714421
trees are unlimited, aren't they?

>>15637533
Sometimes they're fake. Sometimes they're much younger things that fell down a fissure and ended up in a layer of much older rocks; the rocks may settle and seal the fissure, giving the false impression that the rock formed around the alleged prehistoric artifact.

>ancient-origins.net
>evolutionist,
>limestones only form in like 300 million years
>no i cant be correct, in fact EVERYONE is an idiot except me!

>Pop Archaeology Site
>New Perspectives
>Expert in Artificial Intelligence

>>15703144
>>15705567
They invented toilets but lost the technology.

>>15715070
india's space program is going to be a hoot, they're going to be shitting in the airlocks and then purging them into space
>designated shitting orbit

>>15715623
If shit freezes in orbit does it become coal?