/sci/ - Science & Math

Suk my Bea nao.

So sulfur is important for getting it to work, but do we have any idea why?

>>15632591
Nice facebook meme, overfriend.

>>15632584
Need to update a couple of sections

>Simulation and theory
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01723

>Replication attempts
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01516 (video: https://targum.video/v/2023/8/1/e2ad3b8e86961ccfdcf411d2d4d18d3f/?l=en))

^ the video is from the lower links, just connecting the two

>>15632594
According to Iris and Andrew right? We don't have any confirmation from the kimchi squad that sulfur is important and they still have the best samples.

>>15632603
Apparently it's apparent even in their work?

overbros take this fat L
it's our dub

>>15632612
>You Density-Functional Theory?
what did she mean by this

>>15632627
>t. dyslexic

Zygmunt M. Galasiewicz (Auth.) - Superconductivity and Quantum Fluids-Pergamon Press (1970)
Read this book from Libgen or this
N. N. Bogoluibov - A New Method in the Theory of Superconductivity

original authors already trying to stall to next year
obvious scam

>Needing a general
lol
lmao even

Needle update

>>15632651
Explain. Did anything happen so far?

>>15632584
Would this make the magnetic separation of Uranium using a calutron more discrete? Asking for some Iranian friends.

>>15632655
Explanation of last video >>15629178

Confirms ferromagnetism or diamagnetism is an unlikely explanation for levitation. Watch the sample as the magnet is nudged and rotated.
If it was diamagnetism, the sample would slip and slide away from the field center, not be pinned in place. It also wouldn't be locked on one axis and rotate with the magnet.

>https://youtu.be/8JlZdyq8b6Y?t=126
This shows how difficult it is for a diamagnetic material to "balance" on a magnetic field. The only way to levitate a diamagnet is by creating a "divot" in the field, with either an array of magnets or a ring.

>https://youtu.be/RS7gyZJg5nc?t=2457
The sample touching the magnet on one side could be explained by the sample being impure or unbalanced, and the whole piece being too heavy for the superconducting material to levitate, like what is shown in this video.

The tiny part of the sample touching the magnet is not sufficient to explain how rigidly the sample appears to be locked in the same position in the magnetic field.
We still don't have confirmation of bulk room temperature superconductivity, but the sample is levitating at room temperature in a way that can only be explained by either islands of superconductivity, or an unprecedented new kind of superdiamagnetism that also self aligns itself with the magnetic field.

Additionally, the American engineer on Twitter successfully completed his replication attempt. He demonstrated his sample reacting strongly diamagnetically to a magnet, and the sample appeared to stay in place and rotate with the magnet placed underneath the sample holder, which is consistent with superconducting and removes the variable of friction.

>TLDR
Needle is heavily leaning towards back.

Would a gun made of LK-99 be invisible to metal detectors?

>>15632584
this shit is fake. they make quartz a requirement. breaking the quartz container means their shit gets contaminated with tiny pieces of quartz, which is diamagnetic.

American video attempt.
Updates and clarification posted on his Twitter.
https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1687405505604734978/

>>15632692
Why does it look like the bottom is stuck in place?

>>15632690
by far the dumbest group of overbros are the people who think all the replicators are in on a big hoax. Like you people are legitimately retarded and make me (a sane overbro) look bad. In fact im beginning to think you are a false flag hopechud.

The fucking varda space people and the chinese university did not randomly decide to commit a hoax for 0 upside just to validate some korean dudes. You literally have autism if you think this.

>>15632685
As life changing as this might be, I'll choose to remain calm until I see more proof. Thank you, however. Looking forward to more testing.

>>15632698
it's ferromagnetic and this whole thread is a waste of time

>>15632699
explain this: why do they only get tiny pieces of "LK-99" barely floating?

>>15632690
>flecks of quartz provoke a diamagnetic reaction stronger than ever seen previously

Well good goddammit this is going to blow open the industry

>>15632706
they're all following the same one shitty guide on how to make it

>>15632690
One of the most strongly diamagnetic materials, pyrolytic carbon, comes nowhere near LK-99.
Even if it was proven to have no (room temperature) superconducting, it would be the most outrageously powerful diamagnetic material known to man.
But that wouldn't explain the material's self aligning behavior.

>>15632706
the fuck if I know, what I do know is that the chinks and this space jew have no reason to give false support for random koreans they have no relation to

Okay, now what happens if you put it in between two magnets?

>>15632706
Because the base metal is literally lead, any imperfections causes a massive amount of dead weight holding down the good bits

>>15632723
Ketchup gas.

>>15632706
if
>>15632492
is really the lk99 sample someone should ask the Andrew Mcalip guy about it

what happens if AN UNSUPERVISED CHILD eats it
why is there no regulatino

>>15632744
they get turned into a retard

>>15632685
It's still resting on an edge and not floating.

Bad news guys, Andrew says his rock is cringe.
>https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01516

>>15632744
they start floating on the ionosphere
https://youtube.com/N44EPM4Mw0o

answer this >>15632715

>>15632762
>I really don't know
Please

>>15632762
Thunderfag BTFO, the rock is metal

>>15632699
(((They))) are seething and has every reason to bury this. They can't van the paper authors now or it will look obvious. So they will force them to not send out samples and then say they're going to work on another material instead and then debunk it.

>>15632767
I think it's the position of the field? If you just drop a magnet, it'll sometimes get pushed away from a superconductor.
It has to get a little ways inside the magnetic field to get locked, so that may be why you get weird behavior like that.
The sudden jump heating and cooling is neat and would point to superconductivity, but you need very precise control over a sample the size of a large grain of sand.

>>15632761
sex with rin

>>15632769
Didn't the Koreans say LK-99 turns into a metal at high temperatures?
Or am I imagining that.

>>15632776
they're asians, they probably crushed it into dust and snorted to check if it makes their dicks bigger, just in case

>>15632744
https://youtu.be/HmnlSsZ1rdg

It's real, but it's going to take at least a year to refine the process, and make good amounts. In the meantime i recommend everyone design their own supercodnuctor gadget

>>15632612
>this is what backcels are
thanks for revealing yourselves, ill make sure to fud the shit out of this now. its over

>over 1 week in
>nothing even remotely close to actual replication
Just kill this stupid general. Waste of space and time.

>>15632744
They become supermagneto

>>15632584
Why THE FUCK is it taking so long for western academia to prove/disprove this? How incompetent are we? Why do I have to rely on videos that only exist on twatter and chinktube?
>it takes time bro
Then fucking announce that you are working on it. The silence about this shit is worrying.

>>15632820
Argonne already said they're working on it

>>15632820
they are probably on vacation

>>15632820
Academics are not used to playing therapist with the public. No one involved in this field expected this degree of attention 2 weeks ago. They are going to go through things at the usual pace with the usual discretion and you just need to find a new hobby. Maybe try rock climbing.

>>15632685
Damn so we're back????
WE BACK

>>15632762
Jesus Christ Andrew, they're minerals.

>>15632825
>Government lab
Ok expect it to take about 8 months for a tentative review and 3 years for confirmation because of all their monkey diversity scientists and bureaucracy.

>>15632698
>>15632685
>>15632584
It's a 1 Dimensional superconductor and only exhibits magnetic field rejection when the magnetic flux is perpendicular to superconductor Pathways this explains why no matter how strong the diamagnetic effect is it won't lift its tail from the ground, it will lift itself upright until the ever increasing magnetic flux permeability caused by aligning it's superconductor Pathways results in enough dead weight it can no longer lift itself, resulting in a slant.

>>15632686
Its ceramic dude

>>15632820
i think many of them just work on it in silence in some way.

You'd be surprised though how many of them probably think that it's "beneath" them to even look at it, just because it challenges so much.

>>15632820
you've never worked in a lab before

>>15632817
>Deaf, blind, stupid
>But not mute
Shut up, bitch.

>>15632808
Oh if it works ill be love to start designing
But we need some fucking parameters if the material to do so. Not videos of half floating rocks

>>15632885
well sucks to be you then I guess
>continues working on his floating rock/dicksucking machine

>>15632895
>continues to work on his/shis/schiz's 22nd century neo-dilator

>>15632845
So you're saying it really is a Type Sneed superconductor?

>>15632718
No way to explain it for a gook. It is obviously a new kind of superdiamagnetic material.

over status?

>>15632988
Its over.

>>15632988
It's over for over.

is it actually over? the hype is gone already

these guys will have results shortly

https://twitter.com/CondMatfyz/status/1687578006980632576

Is it over or are we back
im already preparing the metric fuckton of threads mocking the loser, but i need to know which side will "win*

>>15633017
Sample behavior replicated multiple times is incompatible with any explanation other than superconductivity.

>>15632612
>localizer scum

>>15633024
>Where is your peer-reviewed study?

>>15632762
>It has some of the same responses as the paper, but the appearance makes me think it's less based.
LK-99 confirmed cringe.

here is another livestream of a team cooking it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVkVBvo8_GM

>>15632820
Things are moving pretty fast, actually.

even if it's not a superconductor, it's a pretty weird material

That said, the current results you can barely call that. This all still could be margin of error. Maybe a common pitfall with the process itself

Give me a scientific reason why I shouldn't shove a large sample of LK99 up my asshole?....

>>15633042
This level of crowdsourced science is kind of unprecedented. It's nice to see a bunch of garage scientists giving this a go.

>>15633029
it was an april fools joke, and it was funny

Please at least BE SOMETHING even if not superconductor I don't want to wagecuck for the rest of my life and the world is getting worse and worse... We haven't had a scientific breakthrough in a century please god give something

>>15633074
You might have to get an MRI sometime
Don't know how that would work, though. Would you be stuck inside, or repelled before getting in? And if so, what if it just repels the LK? And which way would it fly out? And would you be liable for any damage?

>>15633074
lead poisoning isn't real plumbum bum syndrome is a myth it can't hurt you

>>15633086
>I don't want to wagecuck for the rest of my life
You will be no matter what tech is invented. Capitalism will ensure that.

>>15633031
This but unironically

>>15633029
the proper translation is called 'Typhoon Girls' if you're curious
you know where to look

>>15632584
requesting current back/over status

>Leave for a day
>It's getting better

>>15633046
this is a way to rational opinion, you do not belong here

>>15633086
>We haven't had a scientific breakthrough in a century
it'll never stop feeling insane to me how zoomers are so convinced that we live in an era of scientific and technological stagnation
where does this come from? Were you actually born yesterday?

>>15633107
Nothing ever happens in this gay earth

>>15633107
Back, but on hold till the ovens have cooled.

Institut für Sonderanwendungen did it. Lk-99 Room temp Superconductor has been replicated, perfected and confirmed.
Best

>>15633107
Check
>>15632651
>>15632657

>>15633107
the team with the livestream on youtube will be pulling out their tubes soon

>>15633121
The fake one?
Was a pretty good joke. I was gullible enough to do a google search

>>15633114
They think it's because the effects aren't as noticeable as they were back when horseshit cleaner was a government job and negroes weren't allowed to have utilities.

They're spoiled, which is fine, sort of, I guess. They're too enamored by their handheld supercomputers to really comprehend that their supercomputers are handheld.

>>15633107
Check
>>15632651
>>15632685

>>15633127
>the team with the livestream on youtube
There's one on yt? I only saw the one on twitch.
Got a link?

>>15633129
https://twitter.com/instsondaw/status/1687433935012139008

>>15633133
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVkVBvo8_GM

>>15633136
That's the one. Still pretty sure it's a joke.

>>15633141
Thanks

>>15633144
https://twitter.com/i/status/1687466403232710656

>>15632855
>tfw have a vacuum oven in the lab at work
>it's sole purpose in life is to keep the dessicant dry for the Karl Fischer

>>15632808
What about someone do the plasma vapor deposition of this material onto the inside surface of a circular glass tube to make a single turn planar conductor so that we can induce some current into it and study its magnetic field.

>>15632845
OK, so does this mean that we can make a super long chain of LK99 sticks (from what I understand it can't be made into a normal wire) from a solar field in the Sahara desert to Europe and then another chain back, that will make an usable electric current, with minimal/no energy loss?

As in, it super-conducts electricity but only in one way???

>>15633154
I'll do the logo

>>15633158
I'll do your mom.

>>15633003
overtroons can use those to dilate

>>15633165
that teams results will be the best yet, since they are experts with probes lol

https://twitter.com/CondMatfyz/status/1687561399310995456

Is the material at least... special? Or could it be a complete scam?

>>15633182
if it's not a superconductor, it exhibits a level of magnetic interactions far, far beyond what can be explained by our current models. Literally nothing else we know of compares.

>>15633182
The material is legitimately fuckin' weird, bro.

>>15633182
If nothing else is ever observed and LK-99 only behaves as we've seen it up to now, it's an unprecedented new type of high temperature superconductor, that is also an impossibly strong diamagnet even above it's critical temperature.

>>15633187
And those fucking gooks have been sitting on this shit for over two decades

>>15633156
The material is harder to work with than traditional copper wires, but you can make somewhat flexible cables by depositing it on a metal tape.

>>15633182
ITSOVERfags will say it's a nothingburger but I have to admit even if it's not a RTSC it still possesses extremely strange qualities.

Materials science deserves more investment and respect in general, so either way I hope this opens some doors for the field regardless of outcome.

>>15633196
this is to say nothing of doping a more elastic, conductive material with the ceramic particles to vastly reduce the resistivity and heat propagation.

Also
>silicon wafers are a ceramic
that's the main application I bet. low TDP circuits.

wonder if you could deposit it in layers easily.

>>15633196
How much silver do these need? I imagine that could be a bottleneck for large scale adoption if LK99 cables filled a similar construction.

>>15633205
I have no doubt TSCM will have R&D looking into this within a month. If this shit can be PCB'd, as another anon put it, Moore's Law is back in business.

Can we please discuss how a superconductor would benefit the fast food industry? So we can all relate… would the price of a happy meal be affected by this? What about my soda? Asking for a fren

>>15633209
the one bottleneck will be phosphorus. the price of food will go up if this rock is real.

>>15633216
it would make it exponentially easier for me to get my dick in a box of mcnuggies, energy wise, scientifically.

>>15632651
where can i look at the needle real time??

>>15633216
yes restaurants will have lower electricity costs. levitating gizmos are a bonus.
the ice cream machine won't break anymore.

>>15633216
The ice cream machine will NEVER break.

>>15633209
https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000090970/23021470
>A 1-5 μm layer of silver is sputtered on top of the REBCO layer for chemical protection. Additionally, the silver layer stabilizes the conductor by providing an alternative path for the current at weak spots in the superconductor.
>Additionally, the quench can be prevented from starting by improving the stability of the superconducting wire. The resistivity of superconductors in the normal state is rather high. For this reason, most practical superconductors are stabilized with a highly conductive metal such as copper, silver or aluminium. The stabilization provides an alternative path for the current if a normal zone develops, reducing Joule heating. The stabilization also helps to remove heat from the normal zone by thermal conduction.
It looks like the silver is there as a heat buffer and current fallback conductor, it's a fairly thin layer, and it might not need to be silver.

Werebackbros...I think we're back.

>>15633228
I’m shaking…

>>15633209
it's a niche application for those conductors.
the silver is chosen as a material based on the YBCO's properties. Given that YBCO still needs liquid nitrogen as a superconductor it's probably due to silver's elastic/fracture characteristics at 77K that is the main reason.

Yttrium is probably comparable in abundance to Silver and it's certainly less sought after in comparison but theres much less of it in that diagram.

>>15633220
Well that's good timing.

Backsisters...
Not like this...

>>15633236
>r*ddit

>>15633149
>tfw have a fridge with 0.1°C resolution at work
>people keep putting sodas and burgers in it when there's no samples

>>15633236
its so over back-sisters

>>15633236
>video that can only be explained by superconducting
>Sorry, but no.
it's over

>>15633236
Wow, why I'm so glad I'm on /sci/ so I can read reddit posts.

>>15633234
now that is some luck. Morocco controls most of the worlds phosphate supply by far.

>>15633196
>>15633205
Oh, cool, haven't thought about making it thin enough until it's bendable, since I was still thinking in copper wire terms, which need a certain thickness to be viable.

But back to the first question: is a such a tape, made with LK99, able to send a one way electric current across the globe, with no power loss?
Or what does it mean, that it is a "1D superconductor"?

>>15633236
>16 hours ago

>>15633236
I'm not even sure people with videos know what the fuck they are doing when testing for meissner. I though the superconductor should got under Tc with the magnet in its vicinity. if you just take a chunk of RTSC and put it near a magnet it won't lock in place, it would show diamagnetism

Still a useless ceramic

Can anyone please access paint and sketch what a superconductor battery would look like? Would you make a loop and just have the charge spin inside? I need to know pls

>>15633236
>same tired oversissy talking points
>but reddit!
A tiny point touching a smooth magnet isn't going to have that much friction.

>>15633266
>t.seething overcuck

>>15633236

>>15633261
for zero power loss you'd need a single crystal extending the entire distance.
not going to happen any time soon. monocrystaline stuff is expensive as fuck and difficult to do.

best you can hope for at the moment is that the resistance of a common cable made of copper/aluminium/steel doped with LK-99 and reduce the powerloss a certain amount. Orient the crystal lattices correctly and you'll get orders of magnitude levels of drop in resistivity. You won't get zero though.

>>15633264 me
heat that bitch to 200C or something put it on a magnet and let it cool. then check for meissner.

>>15633273
thats some big cope right there

>>15633272

Here you go, we're in troll physics land now with this thing.

why do our oversisters keep making claims of it being over "because its over." Their arguments are more circular than the cross section of my meaty cock.

>>15633261
I could be wrong but my understanding is that LK-99's superconductivity could be dependent on a "tube-like" internal structure, which would allow superconductivity easily along the tubes, but not as easily across the entire material.
>credentials: none

>>15633287
remove the troll face and you have a literal superconductor patent diagram on par with most of the shit ever submitted.
and it would work lmao

>>15633285
How much money have you lost today?

>>15633290
>Their arguments are more circular than the cross section of my meaty cock
proof?

>>15633287
Yeah that’s what I thought. Thank you kind gentleman

>It's getting better every minute at this point
I think I've overdosed on whitepills

>>15633234
why the fuck Norway has so much good shit?

>>15633287
>>15633272
>>15633299
From a previous thread
>Experiments have been done with a current continuing in a superconducting coil lasting for years with no voltage applied, and the same experiments have shown that the current should last for 100k years.
lmao

>>15633141
ETA on when this will stop baking? I’ve been watching for a while but can’t read Korean

>>15633310
National University of Taiwan Laboratory LK-99 alchemy is live, unpacking + measurement at 16:30 on Saturday

>>15633287
I love that troll physics is real now.

>>15633293
That’s what I’m doing. Don’t you fucking dare steal my idea patent pending. Now you told everyone. Great. Thanks. I already am in the process of parenting it so im one step ahead of you all.

>>15633298
yeah here you go

>>15633317
Why is it onion shaped? Are you an ogre?

>>15633317
ayyyy

>>15633314
>still 5:05 to go

Damn

>>15633241
I am jealous. Our sample fridge is a 30 year old maytag that I am fairly certain someone found on the side of the road. It is right next to a gas chromatography machine that costs as much as a house.

>>15633310
it will be done at 16:00 Taiwan time then they'll cool it for an hour I think.

>>15633236
>movement in accordance to an applied
What is an applied

Yea it’s the best thing in my pocket for the day

>>15632744
>he doesn't want a hover child

We have been working at this one but now it’s not done with all of us

I wish people figured out sooner you needed Cu2S to make LK99 good BEFORE they starting making the fucking samples

We're back itsoverbros

>>15633303
Careful with those anon. Last time i did that, the Russian coup was cancelled
Still back, though

>>15633352
its actually over for us overbros... Its over...

>>15633343
>>15632744
>>15632845
>Tragic: Child accidentally eats 1 dimensional superconductor, which can only hover them on one axis

>>15633360
KEK

>>15633360
>James, 9 , swallowed a pound of LK-99 he found in his mother's bedside drawer
>against all odds
>he grew up to be a famous conductor

>>15633264 me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5f17VLp9Co

It’s not over here yet lol but I’m sorry I’m just not getting it. Are we beck?

>Claimed superconductor LK-99 is an online sensation — but replication efforts fall short
Nature is so salty it's unreal.

See you nerds next week.
Maybe we'll have an answer then (probably not)

>>15633291
Yeah, that makes more sense, than what I have imagined.
Thanks for the explanation, anon.

>>15633282
Bummer, a global electrical grid would have been neat.

So what would be the applications for this thing?
Microchips?
Home quantum computers?
Cheap and advanced MRI?
Fusion?
Robo cat girl gf?

Just woke up. Are we back or is it over?

>>15633380
See
>>15633228

>>15633380
Yes to all above, see first link in the OP.

>>15633374
>Nature is so salty it's unreal.
They rejected this paper last year right?

INTERVIEW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w
INTERVIEW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w
INTERVIEW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w

>one of the ingredients... is used in meth

>>15633032

100% confirmed over

If this structure works to make a 1D super conductor couldn't we use the same principle to make similar SCs using different geometry of atoms? Like what about a buckyball like structure that has a bunch of tubes going in various directions.

I'm not a chemist though

>>15633385
Trust the needle.

>>15633385
>Are we back or is it over?
We are so back

>>15633391
You heard him. Everyone pack your stuff. Was nice till it lasted but we have to face the truth know… it’s over.

>>15633390
JESSIE

>>15633394
>If this structure works to make a 1D super conductor couldn't we use the same principle to make similar SCs using different geometry of atoms? Like what about a buckyball like structure that has a bunch of tubes going in various directions.
C60 bucky balls ... are balls.... not tubes.
and if you think of drinking straws like the tubes, throwing a bunch into a box doesn't really help

but what the oversissies don't understand is that regardless of confirmation, some weird shit is going on here and that means new applications and new things to look for.

it's not over until its over.

>>15633409
Maybe you haven’t read
>>15633391
It’s been confirmed 100% over. There is no coming back from this. Sorry bud. Let’s all get together and pray for forgiveness, as the Bible says… One shall not play with the rocks.

Holy schizophrenia, get a fucking life dude

>>15633409
Ok I am trying to describe a shape I have no idea what id call it and used a buckyball as a reference, as you can tell topology is not my expertise area either. Imagine a similar shape where each facet has a "tube" that connects with eachother in the center. Wouldn't this make it much easier to make super conductive pathways?

>>15633409
This.
Imagine if the Korean cloning guy couldn't confirm his human cloning experiment was successful, but when a third party researcher came to inspect the sample it started talking to him telepathically.
That's how much this material is shaking up material science.

>>15633394
Honestly the main thing about this is how mixing some seemingly mundane chemicals can actually produce materials whose structure have unforeseen properties, we'd have to reevaluate how we do research.

>>15633389
yes, and now they published an article with that title I quoted (and which 4channel.org won't let me link to because "muh spam")

>murrican labs literally dont care
I'm thinking... it's jover.

>>15633390
I thought varda were jeets.

anyone who wants to get a quick PhD, be the first cook it and put it in a microwave oven....

>>15633445
Didn't Argonne say they were investigating it?
They're one of those "I wouldn't worry about it" important labs, so we might not hear from them again in a while.

>>15633432

>>15633445
but multiple American labs are working on it anon :(

>>15633453
We don't live in flatland, so just layer 1D planes on top of each other rotated one after the other, making a bulk 2D superconductor.
Material science is literally so easy.

>>15633460
But wouldn't using a 3D structure like that be much easier to produce a perfect super conductive pathway (assuming the theory is right).

>>15633453
>>15633469
Guys.. give it to me straight.
Is shitfuck23 over?

why does this whole thing, from discovery to reproduction, seem so low tech and slapdash?

>>15633477
The alchemist influence of throwing shit together to see what sticks.

>>15633234
>6/29/23
The universe is just fucking with us.

>>15633390
>one of the ingredients... is used in meth
Thousands of people die from dihydrogen monoxide every year, yet tests reveal it is rampant in our tap-water! Why does our government allow this??

>>15633287
>troll physicist was just an applied quantum physicist this whole time
lmao
Also just think of the fucks figuring this shit out in the 20s and 30s learning how far we've taken it.

>>15633477
That’s just how things work sometimes anon. The whole story of the paper came to got leaked was wild too

This stuff isn't too crazy to attempt at home. I need to do this stuff in my garage; I can see the hands of the controllers out working to stop this highly disruptive technology. A single anon in his garage can find the right combination, the right tricks for manufacture, and thwart the jailors and change the fate of mankind. I probably am not that anon, but I might be.
What's the best approach for dealing with the phosphorus bottleneck?

>>15633236
You have to go back.

okay /sci/, how can LK99 synthesis be improved?
from the nerd forums:
>If I were to guess, the current protocol most likely needs to be heavily tuned to get reliable results. The original mixture may have an excess or shortage of copper, or other compounds just near the right concentration, and simply tuning this might allow for a more successful procedure.
Also heat treatment indeed, just like iron and you may be able to lock in a less energetically favoured phase.
However, I personally think the supposed ion exchange step in this method isn't very reliable. If the theory is correct, and lead needs to be exchanged for copper and placed in a higher energy position, then it might make sense to try other methods for ion exchange.
I unfortunately don't have access to my lab, but I would go via a colloidal route, create the lead-lanarkite phase first, ion-exchange these particles in solution, and then sinter them together and perform the heat treatment.
In this way, it is much more controlled what phase and material you are creating, instead of creating a mixture.

oh yeah the chinese made another batch.
https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/claims-of-room-temperature-and-ambient-pressure-superconductor.1106083/post-94399418
tl;dr they're trying to find out which rocks float right now

>>15633499
Buy it from Sigma Balls or eBay and come up with a quick way to explain what you're doing to a cop while you show them your nice and clean little lab if one shows up.
Or just make it yourself.

>>15633504
Clean you damn hammers.

>>15633504
First time I'll say it but you gotta dig into more nutso chemist message boards or even try to pick the brains of soviet trannies on twitteX and get some outside views until you can come up with a guess on to what is the mechanism that's actually creating the ideal properties.
Gotta do some big dick internet collab-i-tude. I like big dicks.

>>15633131
>>15633114
technological stagnation since 1970 has been pretty well documented. compare someone in 1923 to someone in 1873: massive changes in every aspect of life - running water, electricity, radios, cars, a bunch of shit i'm forgetting. and then again from 1923 to 1973: home refrigerators, TVs, dishwashers, laundry machines, microwaves. From 1973 to 2023: bigger TVs, chinese basketweaving forums.

>>15633517
>From 1973 to 2023: bigger TVs, chinese basketweaving forums.
yeah definitely feels like im basically living in 1973 right now.
literally can't tell the difference

It's possible for us to be both back and over at the same time. Maybe LK99 is trying to tell us the meaning of our world, balance and harmony

>>15633517
just impressively retarded

>>15633488
When will we be able to fly with oil?

>>15633521
>It's possible for us to be both back and over
the eternal somersault

>>15633525
>Flag
Wrong image perhaps?

>>15633520
i had a clock like that when i was a kid

there is no difference besides phones/internet really
o yeah everything is built shitty and terrible and its all wrapped in 100 layers of plastic

>>15633534
>there is no difference besides phones/internet really
ah so no difference apart from everything being totally different.
got it.

>>15633517
>b-but muh personal computers, infinitive amount of information at home and waifu generator

>>15633504
I want them to test the solubility of LK99 and see if they can recrystallize it to purify it.

>>15633517
You forgot: everyone's more autistic and retarded

>>15633550
I want someone to try sintering it.

>>15633550
>lead
>phosphate
>copper
>sulfide
exactly none of these give me high hopes of decent solubility

>>15633536
The day to day life of most people is unchanged besides their ability to communicate. improvements have been made but those are rarely to the benefit of the end user and many things are just objectively worse.

compare that to someone born in 1900, how the world had changed by 1950

not even remotely comparable

>>15633562
shut the fuck up

https://github.com/pgerhardt/DongaChairArticle/blob/main/english.md

>>15633517
From the graph I'd say the stagnation started in the 2000s

>>15633527
ei viddu saadana make :DDD

>>15633564
How is he wrong?

>>15633562
you're a moron with so little understanding of the world around you that what looks like a tiny increment
>it's just one phone bro lmao
is basically magic to you and you can't comprehend the leaps in everything from software, to nanotech, to battery / chemical tech, to screen tech, to radio tech, materials tech and manufacturing tech required to build such a device.

no wonder you're citing the brainlet social studies and journalists at the Financial Times instead of something useful.
mongoloid

>>15633579
all of those things are irrelevant and in principle have no impact on anyone's life

>>15633562
Do you actually remember living in the 20th century though? Because I do.
One major difference was that information was much harder to come by. Even the stupid old newspaper was regarded as an important resource worth reading. Scientific papers meant going to the university library in the capital city of your state and spending ages making photocopies for 10c a page.

>>15633589
its probably some retarded ipad generation zoomer

>>15633587
I bet you can't even imagine what it's like to have a question and accept that it will go unanswered unless you go to a library and research it
have you ever been lost in your life?
can you imagine walking around town and looking at posters on windows to know if a job is available?
when's the last time you memorized a phone number?
it's just crazy to me. You're so fucking stupid and myopic. I sincerely hope you're not truly representative of your generation in taking it all for granted.

>>15633477
Because nothing has fundamentally changed since 1900. We're still low tech and slapdash. That's late-capitalist stagnation for you,.

>>15633575
it's certainly become more apparent since then. that wasn't the best graph to use because the smoothing obscures things, but i'm too lazy to go find a better one. basically the period from 1995-2000 matched 1960s-level productivity growth, and that's the only window the US has had since 1970 where you can say that.
as to why that happened i dunno, but my favorite explanation is that's around the time when energy prices stopped declining.

>>15633571
Donga Science, September 1993, pp. 106-107.

"I would like to point out that the existing BCS theory, which interprets superconductivity, is incorrect."

In the late 1980s, the world's scientific community was seized with a fever for superconductivity. Following the computer revolution, scientists overwhelmingly endorsed "superconductivity" as a scientific revolution that would culminate the 20th century. This was because the development of superconductors could address the pressing issue of energy, a challenge faced by humanity.

Superconductivity is a phenomenon where current flows without resistance. Most materials exhibit superconductivity when their temperature is brought close to absolute zero (-273°C). The challenge, however, is not achieving such low temperatures but developing a material that can induce superconductivity at relatively higher temperatures.

In 1911, Onnes of the Netherlands discovered superconductivity in mercury (at absolute temperature 4K), but for 75 years afterward, the critical temperature (the temperature at which superconductivity occurs) remained at 19K.

In this context, a groundbreaking discovery was made in 1986 at IBM's Zurich Research Laboratory by Bednorz and Müller. They created a lanthanum-barium-copper oxide compound that induced superconductivity near 30K. Afterward, the critical temperature rapidly increased for 3-4 years. By the end of '86, it reached 40K, and by early '87, yttrium-based oxides were reported to have been discovered by Dr. Chu of the University of Houston, reaching 90K.

Limitations of BCS Theory In January '88, Japan announced a superconductor surpassing 100K, and around the same time, at the World Superconductivity Conference, a titanium-based oxide showing superconductivity at 125K was revealed.

>>15633618
Domestic universities and research institutes also reported the discovery of superconductors where electrical resistance disappears around 100K. However, suddenly, this fever cooled in the 1990s. Why?

Professor Chair Tong-seek of the Chemistry Department at Korea University argues that this was because a proper understanding of superconductivity had not been established. We met with Professor Chair, who is leading the research on next-generation superconductors, to breathe new life into the stagnant field of superconductivity research.

"I heard that you're finalizing a book on new superconductivity research at the end of September. What's the difference between existing superconductivity research and your newly completed research?"

"Before discussing the differences, I'd like to explain why existing superconductivity research has hit a wall. As you may know, the basic theory that explains superconductivity is BCS theory. Specifically, Cooper's theory that electrons must pair to induce superconductivity has dominated researchers, and I would like to point out that this is incorrect."

"Didn't Cooper win a Nobel Prize in '72 for this theory?"

"Yes, he did. But if electrons pair, the magnetic susceptibility should be zero. However, in the situation that induces superconductivity, it is not zero. Also, electrons do not actually pair in real space. They only have the same momentum and energy values in momentum space."

50 years after the emergence of BCS theory, a theory that more broadly explained superconductivity appeared in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. However, after BCS won the Nobel Prize in 1972, other theories lost momentum. Professor Chair explains that the Cold War atmosphere may have distorted the direction of scholarship.

>>15633550
What would a single crystal of LK-99 look like? I don't think it would be the brown metal/rock that we've seen so far from the Korean lab.

what's going to happen to ITER if this pans out? Immediately abandoned?

>>15633621

"What are the features of your new superconductivity theory?"

"Superconductivity requires low entropy. However, even when you lower the temperature, electrons do not easily reduce entropy. The way is in the location and momentum, and the movement. We should standardize the form, and the most ideal thing is to make a uniform movement, like dividing an army. In other words, it means that it must be confined in a narrow space and only vibrated in place. This concept is 'collective oscillation'. At first, I thought I was the one who first established the concept of collective vibration, but when I looked back at the literature these days, I found that it had already been used by Galasiewicz in Poland." (Translators Note: Likely “Zygmunt M. Galasiewicz Professor of Physics, Wrocław, Poland author of Superconductivity and Quantum Fluids. 1970)

Professor Chair was looking for Poland's Galasiewicz and his former Soviet mentor N. Bogoliubov (Translators note: likely Nikolay Bogolyubov, Soviet Physicist), who in 1970 led to the same conclusion as himself.

So is Professor Chair's theory a mere rediscovery?

"No, it's not. The next step is even more important, not the end of collective vibrations. When an electron is oscillating collectively, it moves one step at a time when electrons flow in from outside, but this time it is tunneling as a wave, not as a particle. In other words, the electron takes on the nature of a wave when the temperature is low, its position is limited, and its mass is very small. The BCS theory saw the movement of electrons as particles, but I see it as a wave. It's a kind of quantum mechanical perspective."

>>15633627
Adding to this, Professor Chair's theory understands the flow of electrons in superconductivity not as a gaseous flow but as a liquid flow. Common sense would say that liquids have greater viscosity than gases, so it's easy to have a gaseous perspective when superconductivity occurs, but under identical conditions (same pressure, same temperature, same density), liquids are less viscous, he argues. In summary, the explanation is that when the flow of electrons is perceived as a liquid wave phenomenon, the resistance becomes zero.

Professor Chair explained that anyone specializing in quantum statistical mechanics or fluid theory would have come to the same conclusion if they participated in superconductivity research. In fact, at a symposium held in Los Alamos in 1989, masters of theoretical physics gathered and called electrons inside superconductors liquid. In Korea, too, people like Dr. Jo Soon-tak are supporting the liquid theory.

So, as a result of theoretical errors, you're saying that today's superconductor research has hit a wall?

"That's right. But there seems to be a slight misunderstanding. Superconductor researchers know well that the BCS theory cannot explain high-temperature superconductivity. Therefore, many scholars are studying high-temperature superconductors, regardless of BCS. But with high-temperature superconductor development pouring in here and there, there is a problem that the United States and Japan are selecting only those that satisfy one framework. This is what I explained earlier as the framework barrier. For example, the Meissner effect (a phenomenon where superconductors exhibit diamagnetism when magnetized) is listed in the framework as a requirement for a superconductor, but I think it is hindering superconductor research."

>>15633517
I mean, I'll take the bait or debate you as though you're being honest here

So let's break it down by 50 year stretches, arbitrarily starting today. I'll think of random shit and try to attribute them to eras.

>1973-2023
>Internet; Taiwan SemiConductor Co and all their innovations; ISS; robust, mass-produced and cheap microelectronics in general; Higgs Boson; supercollider advancement in general; JWST; gravity wave evidence;

I'm gonna exclude Einstein here cuz he straddles

>1923-1973
>atom bomb and nuclear power; the advancement of the automobile; helicopters; rocketry in general, the space race and Apollo; digital/binary computing, information transfer; petrochem, especially fuel and plastics; the aircraft carrier

>1873-1923
>radio; radioactivity; old quantum theory; most foundational advanced science was actually in this timeframe; automobiles; the battleship; the airplane

>1823-1873
>widespread locomotive;steam power advancements in general; telegraph and fax; cotton gin; Bessemer process

We haven't had a major materials science breakthrough in a while, but in exchange we've been making what we do have incredibly small, cheap, and now everything can communicate with everything else and distance is a non-factor. You could talk to a person on every continent on Earth and one in space all at the same time, and the worst delay you'd suffer is a few seconds lag. The sheer volume of information that can be accessed and reviewed at any time by anyone is so far beyond what's ever been accomplished that it's taken completely for granted by anyone who's grown up with that profound level of connection to data and information.

Anyway. TLDR it's all confirmation bias, and also your source is fucked because not every advancement can be neatly correlated to an inflation-adjusted backwards-peering GDP that includes financial manipulation in an era where money is worth money because 'trust the fed bro"

>>15633630
“Take only what you need.”

When the reporter met him for the third time, he finally gave a simple example to explain his theory. He continued, "If it's the most ideal superconductor, it should have a high critical temperature, high critical current, and large critical magnetic field. But reality isn't so. Ultimately, we only need to increase the parts that can be increased according to the need. If you want to use a superconductor in a transmission line, it's enough to have a high critical current and high critical temperature.

There's no need to increase the critical magnetic field. When using a superconductor in a supercomputer, only a very small current flows, so there is no need to worry about the critical current."

His theory is that if a superconductor is developed to suit its purpose, the development of superconductors can grow rapidly.

Currently, Professor Chair is preparing patents for about ten superconductors that match his theory. Many of these were discovered by others but were discarded because they did not fit the so-called quasi-framework.

According to the new superconductor theory, many previously ignored superconductors will be revitalized. If the development of superconductors so far was similar to an alchemist accidentally creating precious gems, now we can almost perfectly prove experimentally what phenomena occur when certain materials are treated in a certain way. We can also explain why it was ignored because it wasn't reproducible. In other words, diagnoses and prescriptions have become certain according to need."

>>15633390
LOOK AT THE TOP OF HIS HEAD

Damn nature really is seething

>>15633642

>>15633642
what you don't remember levitating a frog on a handheld disc magnet in 3rd grade?
pffft

>>15633642
forgot the oxford comma too

>>15633642
>viral evidence
What's that, /sci/?

>>15633642
nature can suck a cross section of my big fat cock.
>>15633321
>onion
You are what you eat. Its ogre.

>>15633642
>everything that isn't super-light graphene requires fuckhueg magnets to move diamagnetically
>LK99 sample becomes fully erect with just a common Nd magnet
The cope is real. Academia is a joke.

>>15633642
This kind of behavior is why I will for ever and always hate normal fags

>>15633642
someone make and post LK99 virgin/chad memes

>completely pure samples give negative results
>samples showing Cu2S contamination confirmed in all working samples
What if the impurities… were the purities?

>>15633642
>the levitating frog in an ultra powerful 25-35 torr electro magnet
ah yes, that's very comparable to all the videos

>>15633623
There will be a rush to measure all the physical properties of lk99 since it would give lots of grad students easy PhD's.

Nature can't accept it

>>15633508
Show the cop your floaty rocks I bet they will let you go :)

>>15633571
Interesting stuff, thanks

>>15633642
westoids seething happens more often than you'd think.

>>15633642
>LK99 can't be a superconductor because frogs also float when you put them in a magnet so powerful it can rip iron based tattoo pigment out of someone's fucking arm

lmao

>>15633658
Just 16 Teslas according Nobel Prize of Graphene.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_(unit)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E

>>15633634
>decide to take a moment to think on a response
>post right in the middle of some copypasted git repo

>>15633642
>We get maglev train tech and Nature outs themselves to the world as seething no-hoverboard cucks in the same week

>>15633642
You should have accepted our paper.

I really hope this pans out just to humiliate Nature for rejecting the paper

>>15633690
I still haven't read your post but I lol

>>15633700
what do you mean?

>>15633714
Nature published a RTSC paper that turned out to be fake a few years ago, so when these Koreans came to Nature to get their RTSC paper published, Nature rejected it.

>>15633697
High trust face. I think we're here to stay.

>>15632726
Underrated

>>15633626
they'll likely continue with their plans; it'll just make future fusion projects easier and cheaper

>>15633721
YOU'RE DAMN RIGHT WE ARE

>>15633681
Naw this is just britbongs, notice Science and Elsevier staying fucking silent.

>>15633088
you would float in the center of the mri tube and start spinning at extremely high speed

Nature going full TED-X was the worst thing to happen to their marque.

>>15633634
i mean some of the disagreement may be over what counts as a technological advancement. if someone discovers a higgs boson that's great and all, but i'm just meaning stuff that makes a difference in normal people's lives.

i like gps, i like wikipedia, i like playing weeb music in my car, i like being able to read old newspapers without going to a library and trying to find the right microfilm in a giant drawer. but i'm claiming that's a fairly narrow scope in which meaningful innovations have occurred when compared to the 1870-1970 period, which gave us better food and much cheaper food, cheaper and much better transportation, MUCH better sanitation and medicine, etc. etc., while still making huge strides in communication and information systems. computing and the internet are just the only sectors where advances lately have kept pace with how rapidly EVERYTHING was innovating pre-1970.

>ISS
if you're on /sfg/ at all then i know you know better than to claim there wasn't a massive stagnation in spaceflight after 1970. we went from suborbital to the moon in 12 years, and then we proceeded to do jack shit in the way of meaningful advancements for the next 45 years until elon landed a booster.

>also your source is fucked because not every advancement can be neatly correlated to an inflation-adjusted backwards-peering GDP that includes financial manipulation in an era where money is worth money because 'trust the fed bro"
that's true to some degree, but i'd point out that if you think that financial manipulation causes the gdp to be overstated then that means the stagnation has been even more severe in recent years because the gdp has become more and more fake. regardless, i still prefer it to anecdotal evidence.

>>15633693
hoverboards are cool but when hoverbikes?

>>15633636
thanks for that anon, that's an interesting read...

>>15633601
I've experienced all of these things retard, i only got a smart phone like 4 years ago

imagine having roads filled with horse shit
imagine living with no long distance communication at all, only hand-delivered messages
imagine not having antibiotics or any medicine at all really

the convenience of the internet and phones are nice but when i was a kid we had these things called

encyclopedias
maps
job listings
address books

you're the stupid and myopic millennial that can't remember what the world was like when you were a kid
it was better btw

I heard the Twitter niggers are doing a space in 10 mins

>>15633697
Do we have pic of the rouge author? And other authors also? I need them to build my altar

hypothetically speaking for a friend, what would happen if I impregnated an anime representation of LK99?

science related replies only please.

>>15633682
>when you put them in a magnet so powerful it can rip iron based tattoo pigment out of someone's fucking arm
w-what happened to the frog?

>https://twitter.com/0xfoobar/status/1687611748017111040
Another Twitter user documenting their replication process. If this one works too, it'll be really good news for true hobbyist replication potential.

>>15633773
you would get lead poisoning

>>15633759
seriously, shut the fuck up

>>15633660

>>15633758
More like hovertrains. You need magnets in the ground to make superconductors float.

>>15633798
then we'll have something like skateparks with magnetized floors for hoverboards

>>15633773
idk what might happen, but you may have no choice.
I've heard that anime representations of LK99 have an enormous sexual apatite

>>15633804
>I've heard that anime representations of LK99 have an enormous sexual apatite
w-where can i find one?

It's 100% over for over fags.

We did it chuds.
We won.

Magic science is now possible.

>>15633803
LK99 is a 1D superconductor. It's not capable of making roads or skateparks, only rails.

>>15633817
Source?

>>15633819
What is a road if not a wide rail?

>>15633778
they were fine as far as I know

>>15632808
Already working on my hover bike designs

>>15633820
https://twitter.com/instsondaw/status/1687458668814479360

>>15633817
>>15633820
>>15633825
It's a false flag by overcels.

>>15633828
it's obviously not a piece of lk99 too

Why have all recreations been so fucking small you need a magnifying glass to see?

Can they not make a bigger batch?

>>15633804
i thought that was clever anon

>>15633828
>the claimed method of making it by crushing it into powder and smashing together the most responsive bits was the exact same as what one anon suggested a few days ago
There is no way it isn't someone from here taking the piss.

>>15633845
nobody really knows

>>15633828
This fake as hell stock website links to
>Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung
>(Institute for Natural Language Processing)
>https://twitter.com/Uni_Stuttgart/
Which has not tweeted about LK-99 at all.

>>15633845
>>15633849
It's a 1D superconductor. What's the chances you get a large enough piece that all of the strains of it align?

>>15633819
that would be pretty rad

>>15633853
The website is just listing every google result for their name, and has suspicious Korean text everywhere.
I don't think whoever is managing the website can read English, otherwise they wouldn't be including this part.

>>15633817
It’s floating.
What’s your rebuttal oversissies?

>>15633234
Thank you for reminding me to invest in Norway

>>15633817
I see the string

If LK-99 is the real deal can we expect magnetic suspensions for skateboards?

A whole day of no real news... Has it ever been more over than now?

>>15633779

This is one of the biggest gains from this event even if nothing else comes of it.
Hobbyists replicating things by the dozens and collaborating online is the closest thing to a real science this world has seen in a while.
Real academia can eat a dick.
And most importantly hobbyists getting results and those results being seen, will challenge the people who have previously held monopoly on the official narrative.
Thank fuck for Chinks making all kinds of equipment cheap and available for everyone.

>>15633562
You have to be at least 18 to post here

/v/ here.
so, is it real, or a nothingburger? i just want cheap graphics cards

>>15633911
Scoffers want it to be nothing. What it is is novel enough that it's not clear what exactly we're looking at.

>>15633819
>Its not capable of making skateparks, only enabling sick tricks at skateparks
I can accept this.

>>15633911
It will unironically do nothing for gamerfags. No not even Josephson Junctions. This is all about macro scale changes. The big picture.

>>15633911
At this point we know that LK-99 behaves in a way that up till now could only be the result of superconductivity.
It's either superconductive at room temperature, or it's a diamagnetic material about three orders of magnitude stronger than the previous strongest, and follows the magnetic field in a strange way.
Keep in mind that at this point we have strong evidence that a sample was superconductive below room temperature.

>>15633911

It's either a real superconductor or an absolutely stupidly powerful magnet with weird ass effects.
Either way it's a big discovery.

>>15633925
Is this your cope? Either its a superconductor or its a novelty for 5 seconds with no useful application otherwise.

>>15633933

Sure, we can go with that.

>>15633919
LK-99 by itself might not, but just reading some of what the guy who came up with it thinks >>15633636 this is the first of many. If the concept works, I don't see why his idea of specialized superconductors couldn't be a thing.

>He continued, "If it's the most ideal superconductor, it should have a high critical temperature, high critical current, and large critical magnetic field.
>But reality isn't so. Ultimately, we only need to increase the parts that can be increased according to the need.
>If you want to use a superconductor in a transmission line, it's enough to have a high critical current and high critical temperature.
>There's no need to increase the critical magnetic field.
>When using a superconductor in a supercomputer, only a very small current flows, so there is no need to worry about the critical current."

>>15633234
>real life is just civ v with better graphics

Still a ceramic...

>>15633941
You have to think about in the context of who you're replying to. It's a gamerfag, he only knows self-serving and immediacy. LK99's properties isn't useful for much anything at all, it is significant for being RTAPS at all, which will, as you say, lead the way for more that use this unique flat gap quantum well phenomenon. But this takes decades and tens if not hundreds of billions to engineering around the problems, not to mention even finding other material compositions in the first place. Making NEET gamerfags happy is probably on the absolute bottom of the list for superconducting efforts.

>>15633821
You can turn on a straight road. Rails enforce linearity.

>>15633950
So are LN2 temperature superconductors. That doesn't make them useless.

>0 news today
its jover

>>15633651
A lot of style guides popular in the US say it should be omitted for inane reasons.

>>15633969
We should ask the white guy to make more experiments

>>15633697
>white man phenos
We are so fucking back.

>>15633969
That space battles nerd forum list has all failed replications on the chart. I think it's over for real now...

>>15633989
Spacebattles is literally a fanfic site.

>>15633994
They themselves were wondering how the fuck they were the only guys doing a half-decent job of collating information and replication attempts.

>>15633856
>we're in the Ratchet and Clank grindrail timeline
God is good.

Just got home. Over or back?

>>15634008
Overbros are back!

>>15633978
https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1687678998321766400
>Consistently of the tubes has been 2/3. We had a burn through on one tube. They tend to crack during the cooling process. The ones on the right were cooled over 4 hours.

>>15633994
Does that change anything? The list is still flooded with failures and retries and one where it still needs cryogenic temps, which even then could be a false positive when there are like 10 failures.

>>15633951
I mean sure gaymers and all, but with the rise of AI and it obviously being pushed on the public at this point dont see why there wouldn't be a desire to improve the current standards of computing with SC compared to say, wiring whole cities with it to save some money/ putting fucking magnets in the sidewalks/roads (LOL like the US government could ever organize that). I dont see us just up and switching to quantum computing at home EVEN IF we have the RTSCs to do it. I think it would be a much more obvious goal to improve the current binary computing (and AI) by designing something with RTSCs specifically for it. Infact I think this is one of the first things we will see should there be a suitable RTSC (for computing) as it destroys Moores law. It would require a small amount of material compared to creating reactors/generators which I think is the most important part. It seems like the yield is still pretty low thought that is subject to change, so something that would need a small amount comparatively (just a CPU/GPU die) would be pretty desirable. We will have to wait and see, but I am pretty hopeful. This should hopefully be enough to get the SC researchers to rethink how they look at things, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1o88seNB-w&t seems to think so anyways.

>>15633994
still more trustworthy than (((wikipedia)))

>>15633989
we already have videos demonstrating room temperature flux pinning, plus theory papers and widely varied replication results basically confirming there's something to this
just dunno the details yet

>>15633642
> SIIIIIIIIIIIIIRS YOU FORGOT ABOUT US WHAT ABOUT US DON'T LEAVE US ALONE SIIIIIIIIIRS

>>15634061
>Publicly blacklisted from hoverboard, barred from +1Thz component stores
This is the future he chose, doubtxisters

>>15634061
as far as i can remember, the dumb roasties thought the bomber was cute and demanded he was forgiven and released

>>15634061
nigger /pol/ found the bombers, reddit thought it was some other retard and ruined his life. this bozo doesnt know what weaponized autism is capable of

Just woke up. What’s the status? Need needle update asap

>>15634349
we've never been backer

>>15634349
We never even left.

>>15634349
It has only begun.

https://www.youtube.com/live/zVkVBvo8_GM?feature=share
Here's a chink livestream of a sample that's also going to be tested, will be brought out at 1:30AM PST.

>>15634385
Guess I'm staying up, this better not be a troll stream.

link to the 1:30 PST stream
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iESVlSxPuv8

>>15634528
retard.

>>15634533
I don't understand what they're saying.

>>15634705
open in a separate window so you can see chat, some people are translating the gist of it
their sample is cooling right now

>please translate to english !!! taiwan no.1
the negotiator

>>15634731

what is the overstatus?

>>15634759
>tfw i have been standing for 3 hours now

>>15633562
Fucking retarded zoomer. You should all be put down like a lame horse.

>>15633605
>air conditioning
>computers
>airplane travel
>jet engines
>space flight
>nuclear power/bombs
>instantaneous wireless communication
>near infinite information at your fingertips
>widely available electricity
>indoor toilets
Jesus, you are fucking dumb

> 400 ohms at 90K
It's over

>>15635352
To be expected from LK-66

NEW THREAD

>>15635356
>>15635356
>>15635356
>>15635356

Just saw this on /pol/ of all places. Are we back?
https://twitter.com/Andercot/status/1687740396691185664

>>15633482
someone was bored looking at the fail compilation that is the 21st century and put us on 'recruit'