[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 5 KB, 290x174, eric.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15583154 No.15583154 [Reply] [Original]

>solves theory of everything

>> No.15583177

>jewish shills shilling jewish shills

>> No.15583178

>>15583154
to this day, nobody understands the meaning of geometric unity.

>> No.15583185

>>15583154
What is the difference between this guy and Tooker?

>> No.15583194

>>15583154
>solves theory of everything
>starts podcast
I love how jews have such a weakness for fame

>> No.15583195

>>15583185
The difference is that Tooker is right about some things.

>> No.15583206

>contentless post
>picture of a jew
why is this thread format so consistently popular?

>> No.15583249

So, what's "geometric unity"?
No, I'm not listening to some fucking podcast to find out.

>> No.15583306

>>15583249
don't bother asking, no one knows. not even the creator of the theory, apparently

>> No.15583308

>>15583249
Eric Weinstein thinks he's the only human being that knows what a tensor is so he pretends its a new paradigm shift for physics

>> No.15583432

>>15583154
his role is to be a smart annoying guy, but not to actually solve stuff. the idea is other people may be more motivated because he goes around being pushy and pedantic.

>> No.15583554
File: 521 KB, 1409x2048, kakuMichio.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15583554

who is better than him then?

>> No.15584327
File: 8 KB, 473x500, 1647381583946.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15584327

>>15583195

>> No.15584338

>>15583154
he couldn't solve his way out of a paper bag without asking for a donation
FAGGOT

>> No.15584341

>>15583308
>pretends
Add a motive and any action can be a murder.

>> No.15584358

>>15583178
wrong, there was a guy who took the time to read his gibberish and eviscerated that "paper", and Eric had a funny meltdown.
He's a decent self-promoter tho, if you get 1000s of people to admire how "brilliant" you are without any concrete achievements it's not you who's the retard.

>> No.15584361

>>15584358
>a guy
The guy with a 3 hour rebuttle to Erics 1 hour presentation?

>> No.15584369

>>15584361
https://timothynguyen.org/geometric-unity/
this guy

>> No.15584371
File: 99 KB, 904x562, 1689725946938644.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15584371

>>15584369
>timothynguyen
Yep.
>eviscerated
lmfao

>> No.15584386

>>15584371
he did, but you're probably among the retards that got taken in by a snakeoil salesman and now are too embarrassed to admit it

>> No.15584394

>>15584386
>he did
If he did he would have made a shorter "one move checkmate" video but he didnt, he made a hundred checks. Thats a clear sign he is grasping for pressure points, not "eviscerating" the crux of the theory.

You should spend more time researching Physics and less time "feeling out the conviction of the Physicist", youre no Empath, youre a normie joining a team sport.

>> No.15584403

>>15584394
>If he did he would have made a shorter "one move checkmate" video but he didnt, he made a hundred checks. Thats a clear sign he is grasping for pressure points, not "eviscerating" the crux of the theory.
there is a paper, retard. Who cares about some video? The paper is a mere 10 pages and completely destroys Weinsteins drivel.

>> No.15584415

>>15584403
https://youtu.be/8CLxLBMGxLE

Behold...your leader, in a paper bag called The Matrix and unable to get out.

>> No.15584429
File: 282 KB, 1480x720, Screenshot_20230724-135844_YouTube.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15584429

>>15584415
Sorry, this is like some sort of "smart people variety hour show", he isnt some hyper-savant polymath. Hes a whizz-bang with a name to get known.

Youre coatchasing the coatchasers get your own Theory and compare it to others, not listen to two men debate who is right.

>> No.15584430

>>15584341
Is that you Eric?
You have the same level of communication (lotta words with no meaning)

>> No.15584438

>>15584430
>You have the same level of communication
Youre not a linguist, youre illiterate and are "saying words".

PRETENDING to know motives poisons the scientific discussion with internaized moral deviency which brainwashes you into believing before knowing. You literally cannot hear facts anynore because you've added a hypothetical crime to the equation to which you believe youre the one to right the wrong, science has left this equation and now its a witch hunt.

YOU ARE NOT SMART, YOURE IN A CULT, DUMBASS.

>> No.15584443

>>15584438
>anynore
nice try mister master linguist, looks like I win this one

>> No.15584455

>>15584443
Exactly. I compare Eric's theory to my theory, not "I read in Physics 101 its this way, so I will do it that way and it doesnt work in Eric's theory so I win."

Thats using old metrics for new measure and proves the core of the (ANY)new theory is beyond that person, an inability to abstract (ANY) new measures.
>Only knows what is known, will NEVER discover something new, only check new with old and old always wins, so no more new (ANY)thing.

>> No.15584523
File: 54 KB, 752x752, jonathan-gorard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15584523

Im in a class today with Boy Wonder 0.5. The Sith apprentice to Wolfram.

He is getting feisty with the lecturer, lots of moxy...thats *very* dark side behavior.

>> No.15584637

>>15583154
>spews drivel about seeing patterns in abstract math
>can't create anything tangible based on the outcome
>solved
Yup, I was on the phone with god earlier. He said the math checks out.

>> No.15584651

>>15584523
it's so fucking funny how he looks like the quintessential giganerd and that's literally what he is.

but on a darker note i am highly disappointed in team wolfram because they fucked up their once promising theory. there is small hope that they may correct their course

>> No.15584659

>>15584651
>fucked up their once promising theory
What part of it specifically? I havnt tracked his at all, I thought it was very computer based which isnt my field of study so I mostly skipped it.

>> No.15584667

>>15583154
Jewish grifter.

>> No.15584675

>>15584651
seems like they were just promising super fast results that obviously couldn't really happen

>> No.15584685

>>15584675
What about with new hardware? I was going to talk to Wolfram about conputer architecture but this makes that a moot subject to bring up.

Cant talk people into making electric cars the day after the internal combustion engine was invented...will have to wait for the day humans are ready.

>> No.15584686

>>15584685
https://www.cerebras.net/press-release/department-of-energy-and-cerebras-systems-partner-to-accelerate-science-with-supercompute-scale-artificial-intelligence/

Oops.

>> No.15584692

>>15584651
>once promising theory
the cellular automaton view of reality isn't all that new and suggested itself to the first people working on CA, like Neumann etc., but there are fundamental problems with squeezing QM into that paradigm, it's deeper than just finding the right automaton rule.

>> No.15584694

>>15584685
>electric cars the day after the internal combustion engine was invented
electric cars were invented first

>> No.15584704

>>15584694
It was to illustrate an economics point, but ok...Working for new designs that are not market driven is a waste of time.

BetaMax all over again...a less useful tool because cheap and now was simply too much to turn away from...but when the current design no longer performs the balance will tip.

>> No.15584709

>>15584659
when they introduced the 'all possible rules' idea

>> No.15584713

>>15584692
CA are closer to reality than QM is. QM is wrong.

>> No.15584791

>>15584685
I'm not much into that but my impression is that while hardware advancements are nice, we still have a long way to go on the algorithmic side. Certain areas of AI are exploding now partly because of data center availability and performance. But it's much more because of the toolkits that got built up over decades, since it's about finding the right combinations of statistical methods to compress infinite possibilities into something workable. I believe it's a similar problem with Wolfram Physics, where discrete fundamental principles must scale infinitely and so layers of abstraction are needed to simulate higher level phenomena, only nobody can say precisely what structures allow that to happen.

>> No.15584931

>>15583185
hemisphere awareness