[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 100 KB, 540x667, PRI_160480239.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15580281 No.15580281 [Reply] [Original]

If evolution made us look for partners who will give us healthy children then why am I attracted to women with no arms?

>> No.15580290

You don't want a handjob?

>> No.15580309

>>15580290
I've had this fetish many years before I knew what handjob or even sex is

>> No.15580341

>>15580281
Why would she not give you healthy children? Lacking arms is not hereditary, her mom had a stroke while carrying her.

>> No.15580343

>>15580281
it's the universe telling your linage to stop jacking off and fuck already. You don't deserve arms.

>> No.15580370
File: 270 KB, 615x561, Freud.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15580370

>>15580281
because sexuality presents itself in our species in a radically different way than others

I'm sorry but natural sciences can't explain cumjars

>> No.15580375

>>15580281
tfw no armless gf would be efforless to rape with love

>> No.15580415

>>15580281
eviloution wants us to mix genes randomly, if everyone only had sex with attractive people then it would select for attractiveness over disease resistance, environment tolerance, intelligence etc.
so people get psuedo-random fethises like feet and smells and shit to mix it up

>> No.15580418

>>15580281
Because you're mentally disturbed.

>> No.15580700

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway

femininity/cuteness is incompetency and dependency in some sense. this is a trait men find sexually attractive. you are attracted to an extreme instance of this trait, in that armless women are very dependent/helpless and cute (to you).

>> No.15580703

>>15580700
oh also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handicap_principle

>> No.15580723

>>15580703
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_babbler

Birds do virtue signaling too.

>> No.15581140

evolution doesn't 'want' anything. it's more like, if you are attracted to healthy women, your gene copies are more likely to show up in subsequent generations. if you're attracted to unhealthy women, you are less likely. there's no teleos behind it, it's completely blind.

>> No.15581166

>>15580281
This is like a guy with Down syndrome asking why he he has Down syndrome. You see what I’m getting at man?

>> No.15581198

>>15580281
Why do you need a woman with arms? What’s one useful thing women use them for?

>> No.15581200

>>15580281
Evolution wants you to have as many kids as you can. Impregnate every single woman. Doesnt matter what she brings to the table, every kid you have only has half of your DNA.
Having a kid is always cucked, the kid will always be a half you/half woman mutt.

>> No.15581388

>>15580281
>>15580281
source of pic?

>> No.15581408

>>15581388
https://www.pweng.net/member/english_article_junior.php?no=4794

>> No.15581425

>>15580281
Well, evolution doesn't guarantee that every specimen is functional. There are mutations. You, Sir, are the mutation that likes women without arms. It will have to be seen if that is a trait that leads to progeny. Whether it does or not, the species propagates with or without your specific case.

>> No.15581434

>>15580281
You think she'd be dependent on you

>> No.15582773

>>15581140
If evolution doesn't want anything, then what's the purpose of reproduction?

>> No.15582856
File: 47 KB, 492x449, tiresome2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15582856

>>15580281
>if evolution, why do people get sick

>> No.15582861

>>15580281
You played Katawa Shoujo too many times

>> No.15582864

>>15580281
>if evolution is real, then how come a genetic freak like me will die without progeny
hmm

>> No.15582868

>>15581140
>evolution doesn't 'want' anything
Every retard saying bullshit like that as if it's some clever gotcha should just be shot. You litreally couldn't make more of a midwit post than that. I mean, I guess eyes are not meant to see, and ears are not meant to hear, and legs are not meant to walk, because evolution does not intend anything. It has no purposes, no wants, and no goals. Guess what? That's fucking retarded, and only a reddit-tier brain dead pedant would spout such bullshit.

>> No.15582880

>>15582868
>Every xirtord saying bullshit like that as if it's some clever gotcha should just be vaporized. You litreally couldn't make more of a lobelet post than that. I mean, I guess our 2 foot long prehensile tongue is not meant to eat, and our sound feathers are not meant to hear, and tentacles are not meant to enable locomotion, because evolution does not intend anything. It has no purposes, no wants, and no goals. Guess what? That's fucking retarded, and only a zeddit-tier brain dead pedant would spout such bullshit.

>> No.15582887

>>15582773
If water doesn't want anything, then what's the purpose of rivers?

>> No.15582894

>>15581198
crochet, beading, gardening, hugs, knitting, weaving on a loom, holding/feeding babies
you know, typical women shit you retard

>> No.15582906

>>15582868
"feet are meant for walking, you midwit!" he said, under a picture of a female primate eating with her monkey paws.

>> No.15582950
File: 67 KB, 700x523, Anguidae.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15582950

>>15582906
To elaborate on this since I fear anon might be too stupid to follow, the woman in the picture (and many other limbless people) can survive without being fed spoonfed by somebody because our slightly prehensile feet happen to be sufficient to grasp things. If her being armless had a genetic cause, and this condition provokes a strong arousal in people like OP, then this woman will perhaps reproduce and give birth to a brood of armless people.
If the attractiveness was particularly powerful, almost irresistible, we might actually see armless humans becoming more and more common, and their feet would perhaps become more prehensile like monkey feet. In practice this is unlikely because having four limbs is extremely advantageous, and I doubt armless men are as attractive a partner, but let's assume the effect was just that strong while still allowing for survival.
Then countless millennia later, after 4-limbed people become forgotten creatures of myth or a transitional species fascinating paleontologists, we would find some anon would be furiously stomping "obviously feet are meant for grasping, idiot!" on his floor-keyboard.

>> No.15582954

>>15580281
It's called a fetish, foot fetish specifically. You're retarded and lower the gene pool, please get out of the pool

>> No.15583213

>>15582950
>feet are not meant for walking, eyes are not meant for seeing, and ears are not meant for hearing
Behold the midwit

>> No.15583223

>>15580281
>If evolution made us look for partners who will give us healthy children then why am I attracted to women with no arms?
Easier to rape? Hard to fight back.

>> No.15583320

>>15580281
intelligence and adaptability are extremely attractive

>> No.15585206

>>15580281
becuz u want to control her and she will still get pregnant and born ur children without arm

>> No.15585241

>>15580281
no slapping defense