/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15567876
Because everyone else fucked around and found out.

>>15567876
What makes you so sure that's the case?

>>15567876
long-term advantages of sapiens (not necessarily from genetics but circumstances such as population and distribution) along with the theory that anything that isn’t them was killed or outbred by them.

>>15567876
We are murderous psychopaths that breed like rabbits

>>15567876
It was the original globohomo.

>>15567876
so far

>>15567876
Because we define any living humans as being a part of homo sapiens

>>15567876
It's not a new species, it's just a neanderthal with a shrunk face. People must have done something that depleted metals from land. It doesn't only affect people, but animals as well.

>>15567999
le-d schizo has arrived

>>15567876
>Why are Homo sapiens the last surviving species of humans?
We're not.

>>15567893
well that's pretty clear. now, if you want to blame something...blame the environment. seems to favor sociopaths

>>15567999
The skull on the left is a cave bear, the two on the right are brown bears. They aren’t the same species and had different behaviour and anatomy

>>15568059

It's called, 'evolution.'

>>15568059
No, their DNA shows the same pattern of "admixture" like between sapiens and neanderthals.

>>15567876
>are Homo sapiens the last surviving species of humans
no

>>15568012
Imagine being so racist you skip right over physiognomy and just go with "lol they look the same". Mugabe makes that H. erectus look like he has microcephaly.

>>15568090
Yet another reminder that people had modern brain size since the late erectus/heidelbergensis. Their faces were bigger than ours. There was no increase in brain size in modern people.

>>15567879
>ywn wipe out a neanderthal cave with your caveman bros

>>15567876
What are you talking about
we are hybrids
There is Denisovan and Neanderthal DNA in large swaths of the populations descended from Asia and Europe, as well as unknown DNA in populations from Africa and Australia

>>15568277
>we are hybrids
>There is Denisovan and Neanderthal DNA in large swaths of the populations descended from Asia and Europe, as well as unknown DNA in populations from Africa and Australia
That seems more likely to be a misreading of speciation between branches of the hominid tree, doesn't it? What we share in common could be from our common ancestor.

>>15567876
Why does sapiens have gyno?

>>15568105
>Yet another reminder that people had modern brain size since the late erectus/heidelbergensis. Their faces were bigger than ours. There was no increase in brain size in modern people.

>>15567876
Niggers aren't sapiens tho

>>15568505
Niggers are THE sapiens everyone else is muttoids with neanderthal/abo admixture

>>15568519
Unironically this. Let's face it, fellow whitoids and Asians, we're Neanderthals.
https://www.livescience.com/15754-neanderthals-immunity-boost-humans.html
It's even in the name. Neandertal is a valley in Germany, not in Africa.

>>15568080
Cave bears lived at the same time as brown bears, they did not evolve into them
>>15568085
By this logic polar bears, brown bears and black bears must all be the same species then since brown bears occasionally interbreed with both. I guess you could even extend that to Komodo dragons being the same species as sand goannas despite Komodo dragons being 10 times the size since they’re known to have interbred in the past

>>15567876
spoiler answer to op question: because sapiens thrived in groups.

>>15568542
That's not what I mean. I mean the admixture is only apparent, it's just an artifact of the analysis, when the DNA from the subpopupations that didn't make it appears to be admixed into the DNA of the descendants pf those who did, just like Europeans seem to be admixed with Yakuts in this graph.
Apso similar to people there are no brown bears older than, or cave bears more recent than 26000

>>15568542
That's not what I mean. I mean the admixture is only apparent, it's just an artifact of the analysis, when the DNA from the subpopupations that didn't make it appears to be admixed into the DNA of the descendants of those who did, just like Europeans seem to be admixed with Yakuts in this graph.
Also similar to people there are no brown bears older than, or cave bears more recent than 26000 years.

>>15568277
Not really. The percentage of DNA from Neanderthals in the modern human is tiny. That’s not a hybrid.

>>15567876

>>15568771

>>15568771
>>15568775
The physical differences between Homo sapiens are not subspecies, they are a different biological category called clines. There is a much stronger case for recognizing Neanderthals, Denisovans, and Homo erectus as subspecies of Homo sapiens as opposed to separate species

>>15568771
>>15568775
These wolf and coyote comparisons are retarded. Canis as a whole is a mess. Whether or not the two are more genetically similar than two human races is irrelevant when you consider the physical and ecological differences, especially when you look at other species like some brown bear populations being closer related to polar bears than to other brown bear populations

>>15568086
Can someone Photoshop an Adidas headband on him?

>>15567876
human evolution is fake, the annunaki aliens created us around 400k years ago, they did so by mixing some of the ancient hominids dna who lived at the time with some of their own dna and that's where the homo sapiens came from

>>15567887
>theory that anything that isn’t them was killed or outbred by them
A mindless non answer. Of course one would be outbred if one went extinct