/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15520369
>blog/editorial
Kill yourself.

>>15520371
The sad part is you faggots actually believe this faggotry. Would you like a serious link?

i managed to get my hands on a bunch of dark matter, not saying how i got it cause it might be a valuable secret. how much is this stuff worth? i bets some universities would pay a lot to study my stash of dark matter

He has an ubearably faggy face

This might shock you, but adding dark matter is, get this, a new model.

>>15521057
It's not predictive. Cope

dark matter is fucking retarded but your post is even more so

>>15521118
Yes it is, retard. And that wouldn't change the fact that dark matter was not a trivial thing to add, as if astrophysicists were like "phew, all we had to do is add a ridiculous amount of extra mass and we've saved our precious Jewish models! Muwhahahaha!" or whatever you dipshit schizos think.

>>15521402
Yes, that is literally what they did.

>>15522111
Checked and correct.

why are /x/ schizos obsessed with LE DARK MATTER. nigger it's minor work around until a better theory has been found / an experiment conceived that can prove/disprove it. It's not the epic gotcha you idiots dream of

>>15522203
>G-guys stop bullying the scientists for being lying hacks that push dis-info and materialistic nihilism! it's not fair that they're so inept that they can't earn a living by providing actual value to society!

>>15522227
shove a rod of dark matter in your ass

>meanwhile gigabrain youtubers:
https://youtu.be/PbmJkMhmrVI

>>15522257
>look at this troon talking about science raps for 40mins this proves dark matter!
the absolute state of you cucks it's C O M I C A L

>>15522253
no amount of insults will make dark matter real, scientist-kun.

>>15520369
>has never red an early cosmology model in his life
Glad you read about dark matter for the first time, there's a promising career for dark matter deniers, it just will never make them happy because they don't want to disagree with dark matter, they want to be the one who invented physics so they can be the Big Smart Boy. Settle into your place in mediocrity, buckle up, and if you're serious get ready for a career of people who have a lot of evidence to say otherwise saying you're wrong because you (probably, but not certainly) are wrong. I do genuinely encourage you go through the rigorous process of getting whatever counter theory you have formulated formalized.

[math]\eta_{{\mu}{\nu}}=\frac{8{\pi}{G}}{c^4{\Lambda}}T_{{\mu}{\nu}}[/math]

Implies space-time ( [math]\eta_{{\mu}{\nu}}[/math] ) has properties like energy and pressure, just like aether predicts. In the end Einstein's retarded theory of relativity led him exactly where he started, back to aether theory that is.

"Dark" Energy and "Dark" Matter = Aether
Aether exists.

>>15523079
Aether doesn't explain the invariance of the speed of light.

>>15523095
>invariance of the speed of light.

The invariance of light speed is a postulate of special relativity and thus can only be argued to be true in that theory, not in aether theory. Aether is the preferred reference frame. In dialects most recent video (only shown a day ago) he shows how relativity inherently must have a preferred frame of motion for acceleration. This is no issue for aether but is an issue for relativity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HduM03ZyyKI

>>15523112
There is no inconsistency. Absolute acceleration is a result of inertial reference frames.
You can measure acceleration without any outside reference but there does not exist an experiment capable of measuring speed without any external reference (absolute speed).

>>15523120
Well according to a person in an accelerating frame the inertial frame would be the accelerated one. This leads to 2 frames that do not agree on who is accelerating. The only way a preferred frame can occur is if something constant and everywhere can be measured relative to the accelerated frame. That would only be an aether.

>>15523134
Except they do agree because the person in an accelerating frame is not in an inertial frame and can independently measure its acceleration. There is no preferred frame.
Aether would make velocity objective but it isn't. Acceleration being objective is not a contradiction and does not require aether (and it's not like it's fully objective either because different frames of reference measure different acceleration of the same object due to relativistic effects).

>>15523145
How would we be able to measure if we where inertial or accelerating?

>>15523154
You can use an accelerometer.

>>15523154
Measuring equipment must be calibrated and choosing where and when is impossible. For example if we where accelerating up then calibrated it, then we stopped, we would think we experienced a force. This comes up in the video I linked at 6:25

>>15523169
I meant to reply to >>15523158

>>15523169
You can in fact calibrate it without knowing if you are in an inertial frame or not. Just measure acceleration in each axis in each direction using the same instrument. If you are being accelerated along a particular axis there will be a discrepancy between the two measured directions of the same axis.

imagine being low iq enough to believe in dark matter

>>15523797
half the population has IQ less than 100

>>15521014
you're just upset because even midwot normies on tiktok realize that dark matter is fake af

>>15520968
dark don't matter, so $0

>>15521014
who asked? go back to crystal cafe femcel

>>15521402
no, once you saw all your models are wrong, you came up with this "fit-anything" model called dark matter, the same way you invented one called "wave function collapse" you invent these pointless models as your last resort to be right to keep your taxpayer money funds

>>15523112
No way this dude was an Aetherchad all along.

>>15524492
those fit-anythings model stand in the way of learning anything, because you get your career canceled via the peer review process if you try to contradict the fit anything models and actually learn something. in astronomy and particle physics peer review applies not only to publication, but also to accessing the experimental equipment, so the peer review process is that much more potent when it comes to ruining careers and preventing investigation.
plus in the case of dark matter, if you question the einsteinian gravity theory you will also be accused of antisemitism

>>15525278
>plus in the case of dark matter, if you question the einsteinian gravity theory you will also be accused of antisemitism
same goes for calling into question any of the jewish particle physics theories
>oy vey, this goy thinks hes smarter than us
>SHUT IT DOWN

>>15520968
pics or fake and gay

>>15524145
>98% of the population has an IQ lower than 130

>>15520369
Great, come up with a better theory that fits the evidence.

And good luck because the evidence is literally not in your favor.

>>15526441
>i go to 4chan.org to defend NPR, a government propaganda agency, from criticism

>>15526441
the scientific method is about disproof, not "better theories"
if the best theory gets disproved then that just mean the best theory is "i don't know"
people who are unable to admit that there is something they don't know are mentally ill
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20366662

>>15527491
Is I think therefore I am guy mentally ill?

>>15527635
By this we are talking about Ha Zeus.

>>15527635
descartes was a genetic dead end, if you believe in evolution then you have to agree that he wasn't all too bright

>>15527640
Who?

>>15528255
the greek god with the lightning quick wit

>>15525278
>fit-anythings model
jewish pilpul straight out of the talmud. the talmud and a number of other jewish religious texts are filled with ideas about how to fool the goyims, most seem to involve overly complicated circular reasoning