/sci/ - Science & Math

God

>>15495365
Some say it was a "vacuum fluctuation," though that should leave us asking why these don't happen anymore.
A few of us dare to ask if maybe the whole Inflationary Universe model is bullshit and always was.

>>15495368
God doesn’t exist.

>>15495365
'lambda', a mysterious, non-conscious, superdeterministic entity.

>>15495365
A big jizz

>>15495436
Neither does the Big Bang. But 14 billion years ago...who knows?

>>15495365
The big bang model is necessary due to a logical explosion at the origin point of math.

>>15495371
They do, 0, the value of the vacuum ie the empty set, is always constantly fluctuating between -0 and +0 by definition.

>>15495450
You sound like an idiot

>>15495460
You sound frustrated that your entire worldview is just the result of paradoxical semantics giving you infinitely explosive amounts of arbitrary information to consider.

>>15495365
Spontaneously synchronizing vacuum fluctuations as entropy approaches infinity, and therefore the probability of such synchronicity approaches 1.
>>15495371
>Some say it was a "vacuum fluctuation," though that should leave us asking why these don't happen anymore.
The mechanism is entropy. It certainly does happen, just not anywhere within our visible universe, at least if we infer that the cosmos is infinite as well. Whether it actually is or not doesn't really change the answer as to mechanism though.
>A few of us dare to ask if maybe the whole Inflationary Universe model is bullshit and always was.
Yet each additional discovery continues to affirm its accuracy. Sure, dare to ask, but any idiot can ask. It takes actual work to do something other than pat yourself on the back though, and nobody gives a shit about self congratulation.

>>15495518
>Yet each additional discovery continues to affirm its accuracy.

Complete and total gaslighting bullsht. A few years ago people like you were saying it takes billions of years just to make stars let alone fully formed galaxies. Not even ChatGPT has had time to update to JWSTs discoveries. Just STFU, stop LYING and stop being a RELIOUS ASS rather than a scientist.

>>15495530
>Claims bullshit
>Cites an irrelevant update to prior knowledge
I don't know if you are trolling, or don't understand anything about the relevant science so treat it as deceit due to being generally cynical. Either way your justification, the example, is a non sequitur.

>>15495365
The earth is flat and stationary with a dome. Bing Bang is a complete meme.

>>15495537
>Either way your justification, the example, is a non sequitur.

STFU. You people are lying scum and everyone knows it. It directly follows that 300M year old, mature galaxies break your bullsht fcking model. Your model is religion disguised as science design to appear to a religious worldview. You either know and accept that, you were nit yet aware of that, or you know and lie about it.

>>15495947
>STFU. You people are lying scum and everyone knows it. It directly follows that 300M year old, mature galaxies break your bullsht fcking model. Your model is religion disguised as science designed to appeal to a religious worldview. You either know and accept that, you were not yet aware of that, or you know and lie about it.

>>15495365
yo mama farting

>>15495947
>It directly follows that 300M year old, mature galaxies break your bullsht fcking model.
Based on what? What formula predicts galactic formation in the standard model and show me your calculations. Since you totally checked and verified your idea you can just copyand paste the latex right?

>>15495365
Research inconclusive, please wait until the end of the observable universe for confirmation

All black holes merging into one creating critical mass and becoming a singularity before exploding after -10^83 nanoseconds.

>>15495950
>Since you totally checked and verified your idea you can just copyand paste the latex right?

You act like we don't have a century long paper trail of your standard model galaxies formation predictions. Stfu fggot. I have better things to do with my time than talk to rtrded fcking crackpot crank schizo idiots who make false predictions. I'm going to go take a fat sht - would be better company than you.

>>15495950
>latex

Do your own calculations since you botch your galaxy formation predictions. You don't get to tell me to do sht fggt.

>>15495993
>doesn't know what latex is
build your own computer and wifi router before shitposting kid, it's past your bedtime

>>15495991
>You act like we don't have a century long paper trail of your standard model galaxies formation predictions
And you act like there isn't a very diverse array of assumptions underlying what numbers go into the model.

Therein lies the problem. You think the model hardcodes things it does not, and is therefore falsified because the hardcoded figures are wrong. So you don't know the first thing about anything and probably can't do math.

>>15495365
a Big Slut