/sci/ - Science & Math

Bump.

Hitler was an INTJ, btw.

Oh fuck. I'm an INTJ. Guess I should start a mass genocide now right?

INTP here, but I don't have to hunch over a printer to type.

INTJ here, fuck yeah unadulterated mass genocide and I don't even give a fuck about your human rights bitch, get out of my way.

Also my captcha was USSR^2 psychos. How... oddly fitting.

INTJ here

ESTJ here, true neutral

>implying personalities are static and do not shift based on environmental or biological factors.

ENTP represent!

>>1546908
FUCK YES I'M COLBERT

ISTP here. Recomended prefessions: Engineering. Oh well. Didn't expect to be gay

>>1546907
When did I imply that?

>>1546908
INTP, warren buffet > all the rest of those people.

INTJ. Like the majority of this board.

>ITSJ
>Judging
>1

Stop these threads. They are pointless and not even science related. Reported.

>>1546908
according to that website Clint Eastwood is also an ISTJ.

>Your Type is
INTJ

BETA AS FUCK

INFJ?

INTP here

72 questions? fuck you very much.

ISTP. Filthy craftsman peasant reporting in.

INTJ "So how's that 'normal' intelligence treating you"

It appears most of /sci/ is INTx.

INTP every fucking time I take these tests.

>>1546804
Not going to retake the test.

Still INFJ (usually the only one on /sci/).

Also, pic related to OP's pic and sage because not science and this is about the thousandth time we've had this thread.

INTJ, oh shi-

according to this >>1546908 INTP is the best. and im INTP.

The test seems similar to an autism test...

meh [/effort]

INTP
Einstein was INTP
I win

>>1546804

Out of the dozen or so of these I've taken, INTJ is the only result I've ever received.

ISTJ. Prepare to get organized, motherfuckers.

>>1547081
INTJ means you don't have a soul

>>1547091

I know.

ESTJ in here

i'm from a rare group :S

>>1546908
INTP is the best. billionaire and an intellectual bitches.

INTP fuckers!

>>1547094
>rare group
>ESTJs account for about 8–12% of the population
>Most famous individual who was ESTJ is George Bush
Lawl

wouldn't INFJ be the rarest since it's 1-3%?

INTP. We've always been overrepresented here.

Bump for more motivators

Another INTJ here... I feel like a living stereotype now

>>1547123
Really? That would explain why I'm the only one here.

INTJ here, also called 'the scientist' or 'the strategist'

to me intj's are incapable of being loved

>>1547147

It's all part of my plan.

>>1546804
if the other 2 people die, then yes. you are the only one here.

>>1547171
Oh, hey, I didn't notice that.
Cool. I'm not alone anymore, /sci/!

>>1547187

>>1547179
Don't kid yourself. You'll never be anything but alone in your entire life, and you never have been.

>>1546804
INTJ
Isaac Newton and Niels Bohr! Whoop!

>>1547147
INTP's are also incapable of being loved
The only difference is that our brains are like scrambled eggs

YOUR TYPE
I N T J
Strength of the preferences %
56 75 50 56

Ajaaaa

We INTJ's need our own board.

A safe haven from the storm of morons lurking about 4Chan.

...wait...

Which category do they put the people who find these tests insulting and the fact that they are taken seriously deeply depressing? Not being snarky, I want to know.

>>1547179
Figured I'd check it again, just in case.
It's still the same. It's always been that way.

(sage since I've already bumped this a few times)

INFJ

>>1547277
There's some of you in every category, although more the male-dominated ones than the female-dominated ones.

But they aren't, really. At the very least you have to recognize that they tend to group you with people who answered the questions in similar ways.

>>1546804
>>1546849
>>1546883
>>1546888
>>1546894
>>1546899
>>1546900
>>1546907
>>1546908
>>1546916
>>1546927
>>1546937
>>1546955
>>1546967
>>1546970

.....

>>1547313
>>1547297
>>1547314

>CUNT

fixed

>>1547314
"At the very least you have to recognize that they tend to group you with people who answered the questions in similar ways."
Yeah, seems to me that's the gist of what the test is. One major problem (of several) is that each question couples insurmountable ambiguity of the question with an incredibly unrealistic precision of the answer (YES/NO).

INTJ

>>1547352
Yeah personally I always get the same result whenever I take these tests
And it probably had to have some kind of validity in the first place in order to be accepted by psychologists
So I don't think of it as bullshit

>>1547352
It's just for fun, really. I'm betting most of us don't take the results seriously. If anything, just thinking about the questions posed will help you understand yourself. I think it's good to think about how you define yourself as a person. So, yeah, the test and types probably aren't scientific, but taking the test makes you think about who you are (and who you want to be).

So, I guess it's not so much the destination as it is the journey. You don't have to be bound by YES/NO when you're just thinking about it. It's all just fun.

INFJ here. Not sure what that means, really.

>>1547382
I don't mind the "just for fun" aspect any more than I mind zodiac signs; it simply bothers me that some people take these seriously (see: entire psychological profession, hiring firms, idiots)

INFJ here.

>>1547392
I agree. I don't put much stock into it but it's cool to do a Myers-Briggs with a group of friends or something so that everyone can compare and contrast.

>>1547382
Yeah never mind that this test was devloped by Carl Jung who is supposedly one of the greatest psychologists of our time

I used to be INFJ.

>>1547408
Oh? What are you now and what changed?

Why am I not surprised that all the INFJ are on sci

>>1547417
There are a lot more INTJ or INTP.

If we get one person whose 4-letter combination starts with an E, I'll be very surprised.

>>1547401
Complainer here. You're exactly who I'm talking about. "Greatest Psychologist" is either not a title that belongs to someone who develops arbitrary and deceptive labeling tests or Psychology is a giant joke. Psychology is not a real science, or at least it wasn't when science was Greek for real knowledge.

I'm INFJ, but I'm not a cunt.

>>1547437
you sound like a cunt

>>1547414
I read that this test isn't absolute for the rest of your life. You are "XXXX" at the moment, but maybe in another moment of your life you can change your personality.
I took the test again and got an ISTJ, although I still believe my personality is more likely an INFJ. But, the desire of being gente and helping others - an important characteristic of INFJ - disappeared, since I lost faith in most people around me.

ENTP here, seem to be one of a rarity on this board. Unsure whether this is a good or bad thing.