[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 2.08 MB, 1524x5912, ScienceSummary_2023_April_EN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon May 29 17:33:47 2023 No.15470712 [Reply] [Original]

Any good overviews where studies are continously integrated other than Wikipedia articles and conventional static reviews?

What are some major trial results to be released this year to add to the "2023 in science" Wikipedia article? The first NASA UFO study and Galileo Project results are due this year, are there more studies as big as these or something else you are waiting for?

You are now aware that Wikipedia is severely missing editors for science-related articles as well as people who upload science-related CCBY images. However, the bigger issue may be that most articles get very little pageviews even when they're about topics concerning determinants of near-term civilizational collapse. I'm out of ideas what could be about these three issues.

How do you keep track of scientific & science policy developments? Which field of research is getting neglected most besides policy studies and the science-policy interface (PSI)?

Why doesn't /sci/ debate recent actual studies/results or metascience topics?

>>

Anonymous Mon May 29 17:38:34 2023 No.15470721

>>15470712
>Why doesn't /sci/ debate recent actual studies/results or metascience topics?
Because academia is paywalled behind $200k degrees, $40 papers, and million dollar facilities we could never dream of entering or building for ourselves.
That, plus trying to discuss any niche topic would immediately dox ourselves

>>

Anonymous Mon May 29 17:53:26 2023 No.15470764
File: 98 KB, 1152x566, nwac285fig3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15470721
>academia is paywalled behind $200k degrees, $40 papers, and million dollar facilities we could never dream of entering or building for ourselves.
That's already a great topic.

One thing that recently happened in this area is an entire editorial board of a journal quitting due to high fees and setting up their own journal accompanied with an open letter. Featured this open letter here (it's the latest one at the top):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open_letters_by_academics
This is a new article I recently created.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 29 20:16:19 2023 No.15470980 >>15470712 >Which field of research is getting neglected most besides policy studies and the science-policy interface (PSI)? Human biodiversity.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 29 20:24:23 2023 No.15470993 >>15470980 >researchers demonstrate an AI scientist that can create models of natural phenomenon from knowledge axioms and empirical data close enough :^)

>>

Anonymous Mon May 29 20:46:50 2023 No.15471031
File: 60 KB, 639x390, 1683933810783570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>15470712
all is replication crisis garbage, most of it is highly political and intentionally fraudulent, such as all the global warming fakery.
stop posting this garbage here, go where you belong >>>/pol/ and take your propaganda with you

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 07:39:07 2023 No.15471906 File: 312 KB, 1500x838, 41467_2023_37728_Fig1_HTML.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15470993 Currently it only works for physical-mathematical formulae, but maybe it could be expanded to other areas as well.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 14:58:00 2023 No.15472435 File: 294 KB, 1755x869, 41467_2023_37236_Fig2_HTML.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15471031 >global warming fakery discarded.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 16:05:39 2023 No.15472515 >>15470712 The answer is that sometimes we do, but the discussion inevitably gets derailed by schizos, deniers, shills and company, so it's easier to just shitpost all day.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 16:24:49 2023 No.15472542 >>15472515 >we do Wow the spokesman for Science! is in da thread. Sheeeit!

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 16:29:13 2023 No.15472549 >>15472542 More meaningless schizobabble

>>

Anonymous Tue May 30 20:18:57 2023 No.15472987 [DELETED]

[DELETED]

>>15470712
Grug brain not want think. Want pleasure.

>>15470721
sci-hub.st
libgen.rs

>>15471031
>The >>>/pol/ guys trying to tell actual scientists to go to >>>/pol/
I laughed.

>>15472542
I do too. So yes, it's plural. Now everyone else fuck off back to >>>/pol/

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 22:42:44 2023 No.15473199 File: 454 KB, 1422x799, cover2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >researchers demonstrate an AI scientist that can create models of natural phenomena from knowledge axioms and experimental data I used the statistics to create the statistics

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 22:44:52 2023 No.15473200 >>15473199 Replication crisis scientists are soon to be out of work. Computers can now create fraudulent data without anyone being involved.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 22:46:40 2023 No.15473204 >>15473200 You don't even know what you're talking about.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 30 22:49:55 2023 No.15473208 >>15473204 It's ok anon, I hear learning to code is pretty easy.

>>	Anonymous Wed May 31 06:52:23 2023 No.15473725 >>15470712 What's the sauce of picrel?

>>	Anonymous Wed May 31 10:46:27 2023 No.15473903 File: 1.12 MB, 2091x1017, journal.pbio.3002052.g001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>15473725 I made it. Forgot to add a post title. The sources can be found at: https://mailchi.mp/4345cd0237c2/orapfn1bn4

>>	Anonymous Wed May 31 21:38:56 2023 No.15474764 >>15473903 Link the Wikipedia article if you post such threads again

>>	Anonymous Thu Jun 1 02:13:32 2023 No.15475085 bump