[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 244 KB, 2749x1128, global cooling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15451039 No.15451039 [Reply] [Original]

Why is the climate getting colder?

>> No.15451050

>>15451039
it is literally the opposite: https://xkcd.com/1732/

>> No.15451066 [DELETED] 

>>15451039
>>>/pol/

>> No.15452124
File: 11 KB, 500x221, Temperature_Interglacials.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15452124

>>15451039
We're due for another ice age any time now

>> No.15452457
File: 21 KB, 474x355, E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15452457

>>15451039
>Why is the climate getting colder?
Because the rich 1% are trying to reduce greenhouse gases that keep us warm, so they can cause a global population decline.

>> No.15452526

>>15451039
the bottoms of the cold periods also seem to be on a descending trend

>> No.15452572 [DELETED] 

>>15452457
The rich get richer the more people there are. Always the flaw with the Agenda21 conspiracy theories. If anything the rich are desperately looking for a way to increase the population while still employing as many people as possible, and importing poor breeders from abroad as fast as they can to mitigate the population falling and the top heavy age demographics which are economic poison..

>> No.15452826

>>15452572
>top heavy age demographics which are economic poison..
are you sure about that?
all of the world's wealthiest countries have those age demographics.
none of the poor countries have those age demographics.
can you explain why those demographics are bad economically?
or are you just repeating a falsehood you heard on tv?

>> No.15453035

>>15451039
cosmic rays, solar activity, and the earth's orbit around the sun

>> No.15453059

>>15451066
Kek. It's true Climate Change is more politics than science.

>> No.15453067

>>15451050
Different timescales in the two graphs. Also it is 'Climate Change' not Global Warming now so it doesn't matter if the temperature goes up or down, it is still wrong.

>> No.15454024

>>15451050
>xkcd.com
this is the dude who thought the r9k algorithm would necessarily produce improved content
he is a moron

>> No.15454210

>>15451039
Where's the Y-axis?

>> No.15454636

>>15452124
the final 5k or so years of that graph also shows a clear trend towards colder temperatures.

>> No.15454639

>>15453067
this
the graph is at a base incorrect to the viewer

>> No.15454908

>>15453067
>so it doesn't matter if the temperature goes up or down, it is still wrong.
but graphs like >>15452124 show temperature on earth can and does change radically without any human activity involved, so "human made climate change" is still an unproven theory, not a "scientific fact" as many politicians and climate activists want people to believe.
and looking at the slope on some of those >>15451039 bumps, even the current rate of temperature change is nothing unprecedented.
There is no definite proof that the currently observed change in average global temperature is in any way caused or even just related to human activity.

>> No.15454967

>>15454908
>even the current rate of temperature change
the current rate of change is zero, climate has been rock steady since at least 50 years ago

>> No.15455114

>>15454024
and yet 4chan still keeps it around

>> No.15455186

>>15455114
moot deleted it, should've kept it that way.

>> No.15456047

>>15451039
Because the global warming narrative is a big lie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie

>> No.15456577

>>15455186
steesatsu made 4chon.net in order to preserve /r9k/ after moot deleted it the first time. /new/ was deleted at the same time and /new/gger chads moved in on 4chon and easily took it over with their superior posting and memesmithing. both boards were eventually brought back, /r9k/ continues to flounder, /pol/ made itself into the world's most famous and important imageboard in all of history.
steesatsu can be reminded of this on uboachan if anyone want to bother to take the time to laugh at him

>> No.15457221

>>15451039
We're due for another ice age soon, its not anything to worry about, ice ages are only a little bit colder than what we've got now. 5ºC or so

>> No.15458449
File: 198 KB, 2702x2054, IMG_3699.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15458449

>>15454908
>>15451039
I wonder who’s paying for the endless climate science denial threads here

>> No.15458473

>>15451039
because your thermometer is upside down

>> No.15458474

>>15458449
A physicist already debunked this nonsense on /sci/ weeks ago.

>> No.15458477
File: 38 KB, 751x484, IMG_0475.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15458477

>>15451039
>Graph with no axes and no data
Great

>> No.15458492

>>15451039
anthopy or something

>> No.15458493
File: 411 KB, 1284x1057, IMG_0663.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15458493

>>15458474
I recall he was thoroughly btfo though. The greenhouse effect is a measured and observed phenomenon and property of CO2. Your ignorance on the subject doesn’t mean it’s not real

>> No.15458495

>>15458493
Your memory is spotty if you recall something that doesn't exist. You may have dementia.

>> No.15458512

>>15458495
Must be caused by climate change

>> No.15458523

>>15458512
I've heard that the climate has become so chaotic since mid-2021 that it caused a massive spike in heart attacks and strokes. If only we hadn't passed that mid-2021 climate tipping point!

>> No.15458530
File: 660 KB, 1685x1895, IMG_3697.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15458530

>>15458495
>no arguments
>supposed physicist doesn’t even know about satellite measurements
Lmao

>> No.15458531

>>15458530
You don't even know about photosynthesis transforming energy into chemical bonds. You're a joke.

>> No.15458563

>>15458531
It should be trivial for you to produce spectral data of outgoing radiation showing that photosynthesis somehow negates the greenhouse effect in the atmosphere then

>> No.15458575

>>15458563
Spectral data already shows it. You erroneously believe that the missing emissions are somehow trapped to heat the planet, whereas in reality the discrepancy is because it's been locked away in plant sugars.

>> No.15458593

>>15458449
Nobody pays them, the /pol/tards do it for free, they're delinquent basement dwelling denizens, they do it for free because they believe they're waging a war against "leftists". It's a few obsessed teenagers with too much time on their hands

>> No.15458599

>>15458575
>observed increased energy coming from the atmosphere measured from the surface pointing to the clear sky in direct response to CO2 concentration is somehow due to photosynthesis
Lol
No matter how hard you cry the greenhouse effect is an intrinsic property of CO2

>> No.15458603

>>15458599
In 20 years when the climate is still rock-steady the same as it has been for the last 50, will you feel ashamed?

>> No.15458608
File: 451 KB, 1284x936, IMG_5525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15458608

>>15458603
>as it has been for the last 50
Blatantly lying agains?

>> No.15458613

>>15458608
I guess the answer to my question is "yes." If you weren't ashamed, you wouldn't need to defend your lies with spam.

>> No.15458619

>>15458613
>no arguments or refutations to the postres data
Lol

>> No.15458620

>>15458619
Why would I argue with fake data? Mann was already forced to admit the hockey stick was created through fraud in court.

>> No.15458629

>>15458620
>instrumental data
>related to Mann’s reconstruction which has been proven right multiple times by independent teams
Your ignorance about the most basic of concepts about climate is hilarious

>> No.15458631

I don't mind the earth getting warmer. It will kill many of the pests I don't like.

>> No.15458633

>>15458629
Copying a known fraud's results only proves they were bad actors.

>> No.15458641

>>15458633
>proven wrong after claiming that the temperature hasn’t changed for 50 years
>no arguments yet
Good stuff from the deniers

>> No.15458642

>>15458641
How can fraud prove a correct statement wrong? Lies aren't valid arguments.

>> No.15458645

>>15458608
sources: 4 government agencies and the inventor of the hockey stick graph
>graph starts at the end of the little ice age