[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 144 KB, 523x1024, 2CB1F905-58BF-444A-A95A-BED60C0BB96D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15288545 No.15288545 [Reply] [Original]

Have the theory of electric universe ever been debunked or are the jews just screeching ”pseudoscience” hoping it will stick?

>> No.15288551

Professor Dave deboonked it

>> No.15288565

>>15288545
>theory
Hypothesis. Electric universe chuds have no mathematical model.

>> No.15288570

>>15288545
Wrong question. The real questions for any scientific theory are "does the evidence support it?" and "is it a valid scientific theory?" In the case of Electric Universe the answer is "no" for both.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structure-scientific-theories/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-underdetermination/
Any proposed "theory" no matter how scientific it appears or actually is must nonetheless distinguish itself by more than mere underdetermination. That is to say, it matters very little if one constructs even a perfect 1:1 equivalent theory if that theory has no distinguishing predictions and merely seeks to reframe everything already predicted up to that point.

That being said, to such extent as its proponents claim there've been such predictions? This is not true. Vague prophet-like statements, those with no rigor but handwaving, and retroactive claims of success, are not evidence. For that you can see >>15288551

>> No.15288588

>>15288545
The latter.

>> No.15288596
File: 141 KB, 381x383, apumanhattan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15288596

>>15288545
It's always the Jews anon

>> No.15288612
File: 95 KB, 822x653, 1664455358802589.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15288612

>>15288570
>Stanford
Yeah, I'm gunna need a legitimate source for these wild allegations.

>> No.15288620
File: 560 KB, 720x1480, 2023-03-21_03.01.28.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15288620

>>15288570
KNEW IT. I WANT THE FACULTY FIRED *RIGHT NOW*!

THIS ANTI-SCIENCE BULLSHIT HAS NO PLACE ON CAMPUS, THEIR HOME.

>> No.15288746

>>15288545
>da joos!
Psyop to try to associate EUT with antisemitic conspiracy.

>> No.15288766

>>15288612
That's a picture of Harvard, retard

>> No.15288778

>>15288746
>that guys who spells jews 'joos'

>> No.15288779

Langan-tier shit. Perfect for bodhi and other local pseuds.

>> No.15288781
File: 78 KB, 720x720, 2022-09-29_03.43.30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15288781

>>15288779
>other local pseuds
Explain this. EXPLAIN IT.

>> No.15288789

>>15288781
I'm pretty sure that JPEG means something to you, but you should know it doesn't mean anything to anyone else.

>> No.15288791

>>15288789
>posts a bunch a Physics phenomena and Mathematics
>BRAH SCHIOPHASIA MUCH?!

Youre a clown.

>> No.15288842

>>15288545
What electric universe? 95% of the matter in the universe doesn't even interact electrically

>> No.15288864

>>15288791
What?

>> No.15289071

>>15288842
everything is made of atoms as far as we know.
subatomic particles have electric charge

so you are by definition, wrong.

>> No.15289107

>>15289071
1-1=0

>> No.15289111

>>15288545
you can't create a rock that falls up by charging it up. gravity isn't electrical.

>> No.15289114

>>15288779
>riding bodhi's dick this hard
You sound like a scorned woman anon. Did he block you from sliding into his DMs?

>> No.15289152

>>15289071
>everything is made of atoms as far as we know
Nothing smaller than an atom is made of atoms. Some things larger than many atoms aren't made of atoms
>subatomic particles have electric charge
Neutron, gluon, neutrino, graviton, Z boson, Higgs, dark matter, any susy particle of the previously mentioned

>> No.15289162

>>15289152
>dark matter
Oh wow you are a literal retard. Ok then!

>> No.15289192

>>15289162
Ignores all the other verified particles that refute your point
OK faggot

>> No.15289202

>>15289071
Most of the matter in the universe is electrically neutral dark matter.

>> No.15289721

>>15288545
>>15288551
dave is an obvious kike and the first five seconds of his video is ad hominem

>> No.15289725

>>15288842
but it does

>> No.15289729
File: 65 KB, 720x720, 2021-02-02_21.59.07.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15289729

>>15288864
It means youre ingorant and know nothing of Physics or Mathematics.

Why are you on this board? Engineer?

>> No.15289744

>>15288620
Gametes are kinda always male or female, as that is the modus operandi of sexual reproduction. What is the problem here?

>> No.15289770

>>15288545
It's currently debunking mainstream astronomy as we speak. The James Webb telescope is proving them right and a bunch of articles are soft confirming it. I suspect a bunch of actual scientists were already on board and just waiting for something like this.

>> No.15289798

>>15289202
Dark matter and dark energy doesn’t exist. Some fags say it exists because it has to in order for Big Bang Theory to work.

>> No.15290545

>>15289798
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullet_Cluster

>> No.15290569

>>15288781
What is there to explain, symmetric hexagons and pentagons are good shapes for packing (with higher order shapes, the side-to-side overlap would have to suffer), while minimising the number of vertices and maximising the area. with squares, the overlap is good, the vertices are few, but a given area is better covered with hexagons than with squares.

Chemistry has many if these cycles (especially cyclohexyls and benzene rings) because:
- they lack torsional (angular and conformational/Pitzer) strain: cyclopropanes, cyclobutanes force unnatural angles for the C-C-C system, way less than the 109.5 degrees angle these bonds would like to have to accommodate carbon's optimal hybridisation exigencies
- they aren't large. 5-6 membered carbon rings is the little island of cyclic stability for these compounds. molecular orbital theory predicts that atomic orbitals within a molecule form all sorts of hybrid combinations. in this regard, the larger a molecule, the weaker these interactions, because the atomic orbitals are far away from each other. the molecule works as a functional entity, so cyclopentane and cyclohexane benefit from this proximity effect

>> No.15291723

>>15289152
>>15289107
subatomic particles having the capacity to be positive. negative, or neutral, by definition makes them relative to electromagnetic phenomena

behind the atomic structure, gravity, magnetism and electricity, one might posit that one or more of these is an intrinsic part of the atomic structure.
the strong and weak nuclear forces are directly related to one or more of the above as well.

>> No.15293608

>>15288545
Aether/Plasma Universe/Electric Universe is more realistic than the Higgs Field, if anything because it does not require a scientist's name.
Citation is the bane of humanity. Fuck Euler.

>> No.15293723

>>15290545
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-pinch

>> No.15293728

>>15291723
We already know that the weak nuclear force is electric, and we have strong evidence (heh) that the strong nuclear force is too.
https://structuredatom.org/

>> No.15293798

>>15293728
And the most recent theories suggest gravity is also electromagnetic in nature.

>> No.15293822

>>15289729
Those two images prove it exists. Saturn's pole extends down to it's core. That's not fluid dynamics going down a drain. That's how the planet is powered.
I once saw Neille Degrasse Tyson in person posing with a Jew girl I've known since I was a child. One day recently she seethed at me for no reason calling me an incel and that I need to be institutionalized. It all makes sense now.

>> No.15293823

>>15290569
>shapes for packing
The packing is inverted.

>Chemistry has many if these cycles
>Hyper specifics, ones that fit your inverted explanation

Anon, this is inside out...not outside in. This also doesnt explain why its not squares, and why it sometimes can be.
>molecular orbital theory
Structured Atom Model fits better and isnt dependent on molecules which forms higher-frequencies of shapes (the rest).

Molecules arent clouds. Molecules arent peoples perceptions. Yet theyre all combines and connected.

No mention of the atmospheric harmonics or fracton gravitational geometry.

>What is there to explain
Everything.

B^l

>> No.15293835

The universe is truly electric. Nikola Tesla knew this which is why he's been shunned from academia and history.

>> No.15293837
File: 39 KB, 500x625, 1522410335894.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15293837

>>15293822