[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 194 KB, 840x1050, elon-musk-shares-breathtaking-image-of-the-deimos-ocean-spaceport-162282_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201131 No.15201131 [Reply] [Original]

Sea Launch Edition

Previous: >>15198322

>> No.15201136
File: 21 KB, 680x355, boeing_wing_ttbw_truss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201136

WE ARE BUILDING IT AND IT'S COST PLUS

>> No.15201137

https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1625292261830414337
>Gwynne Shotwell told reporters last week that SpaceX sold the rigs; "they were not the right platform." Still interested in sea-based launch platforms, but the company wants to start flying Starship first and understand it before proceeding.
IT'S OVER

>> No.15201140
File: 48 KB, 151x178, origines.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201140

>>15201137
Absolute Bloregano energy

>> No.15201141
File: 802 KB, 804x1794, Trimaran.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201141

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfmzVZOToBM
This is cool, a Rafale-launched "Trimaran" orbital rocket!

>> No.15201143
File: 3.15 MB, 4096x2732, scraplyn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201143

>>15201140
is it too late to buy Jacklyn and launch from it?

>> No.15201147
File: 277 KB, 1020x712, Trimaran2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201147

>>15201141
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/attachments/cnes_guest_lecture_surrey_9thseptember2008-pdf.679805/

Full details here, require secretprojects account

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/316186751565824001/1074802468803850350/CNES_Guest_Lecture_Surrey_9thSeptember2008.pdf

here for downloading it quickly (too heavy for /sci/)

>> No.15201148

sea launching is dumb anyways, the costs of getting to and from the platform are enormous compared to what the goal $ is for SS

>> No.15201149

H3 Launch streams

JAXA stream
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEEwsYYzyME [Embed]

NVS streams
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DBuzrLM7yw [Embed] (south side)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tshpc5v47Y [Embed] (north side)

For the Vtuber fags:
https://www.youtube.com/live/DtXGDfp3Jx4

>> No.15201151
File: 93 KB, 1156x1034, E59xx5DWUAA0avh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201151

Delta IV ads

>> No.15201156

>>15201151
>delta iii
>low risk

>> No.15201157
File: 328 KB, 1473x2047, E59zmjiWQAIV_6G.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201157

>>15201151

>> No.15201158

>>15201137
wtf, this is actually important and serious

>> No.15201160
File: 255 KB, 1327x1850, E592FZJWEAUfDKu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201160

>>15201157

>> No.15201163

>>15201137
so...how are they going to recover superheavy and starship...? the first launch is no more than months away.

>> No.15201164
File: 130 KB, 1234x1087, E59yR3YWUAE-ATQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201164

>>15201160

>> No.15201167
File: 60 KB, 1023x798, 6_13_308_img1604A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201167

Original Boeing EELV Staging

>> No.15201168
File: 821 KB, 1529x1241, D5AE25D8-E420-40A4-A829-CCDDCB225CBA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201168

FUCK NIMBYS

https://spacenews.com/noise-complaints-help-bring-down-launch-startup-spaceryde/

>> No.15201171

>>15201137
its actually over
without rigs they will never be allowed to launch and land as often as they want

>> No.15201172
File: 1.41 MB, 1242x1221, comfy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201172

>>15201158
It's not. They have done pretty much nothing with those platforms for months. You really don't need that extra performance of sea launch, close to the equator, because Starship is volume, not mass-constrained.
Also, with multiple launch sites on land, they won't need offshore ones. Today you have Starbase that is almost finished, LC-39A under construction and LC-49A with a few Starship towers in plans. Meanwhile, a sea platform is more difficult to use and wastes a lot of time sailing between the shore and the launch destination.

>> No.15201176

>>15201172
Tankers are definitely mass-constrained

>> No.15201178

>>15201172
this isnt sea launch. the platforms would stay in the same spot and be a spaceport island.

>> No.15201180
File: 1.12 MB, 320x262, jerry-laugh.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201180

>>15201168
>canadian
lmao

>> No.15201182

>>15201172
If all of what you've just written is true, then why SpaceX even bothered with the oil rigs in the first place?? doesn't make sense

>> No.15201185

>>15201168
I didn't even know Canada had a Bloostar clone. Sucks to seem them die

>> No.15201186

>china is expected to have 80 launches this year
>60 government, 20 commercial
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>> No.15201189

>>15201182
It seemed like a good idea at the time and they probably snapped up some platforms that were being sold off at a bargain.

>> No.15201192

>>15201172
how else are you going to launch more than 5 times a year
even at the cape you can only launch so many times a year

does spacex need to get an air craft carrier

>> No.15201194

>>15201182
Those numbers are not set in stone. Falcon 9 had a license for up to 6 launches per year. Moreover, 5 launches from Starbase and 24 from LC-39A will be more than enough for a few years.

>> No.15201195

>>15201192
air launched starship

>> No.15201197

>>15201194
meant for >>15201192

>> No.15201200

>>15201186
This is why China is so desperate to get a reusable launch vehicle flying. Their payload production the last couple of years has been absurd.

>> No.15201205

Speaking of oil rigs, I found some time ago this PDF made by the FAA about the final environmental assessment for Sea Launch, you know that space company that used Zenit rockets and launched them from ocean platforms.
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/final_ea_sea_launch.pdf
Turns out you still have to go through a lengthy environmental review even if launching from international waters. So, it would seem that as of right now there's no place on Earth for SpaceX to freely launch as much and as frequent as they truly want.

>> No.15201209

>>15201205
From the draft version, page 17
>Because it proposes to launch in international waters, outside the territory of the United States or any foreign country, SLLP must obtain an FAA license to launch.

>> No.15201212

>>15201209
fucking fascists

>> No.15201214

Is there any limit to the amount of fusion that can happen in a thermonuclear device compared to the amount of fission? I'm assuming orion drives would want more fusion happening, and most current estimates say ~6000 isp which isn't great for interstellarshit

>> No.15201216

>>15201137
Either the best decision or the worst decision

>> No.15201218

>>15201163
Superheavy will attempt RTLS. Starship will land in the ocean.

>> No.15201219

>>15201186
>60 government, 20 government

>> No.15201221

>>15201218
rtls on the first flight? sounds like a recipe for massive pad destruction, they should just launch it expendable and send up a big bag of water as payload

>> No.15201224

>>15201172
Not to mention, you cant quickly recyclea sea launch platform. the logistics would be a fucking nightmare. instead, buildmany coastal launch sites, and Starship can RTLS to any of them from any of them

>> No.15201228
File: 18 KB, 670x440, B-a6rj8CQAAvL6Z (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201228

might be one of the sexiest starships designed

>> No.15201229

>>15201224
Over a kilometer long, interstellar flybys only, and fully expendable. It looks pretty but it's hot garbage.

>> No.15201230

>>15201224
>buildmany coastal launch sites
where?

>> No.15201233

>>15201194
>Moreover, 5 launches from Starbase and 24 from LC-39A will be more than enough for a few years.
they could use all of those launches in a week

>> No.15201234
File: 663 KB, 1195x668, 02.33.54.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201234

>>15201176
Well, that's true, but in the long term, they will make up the minority of launches. The simpler solution is to simply stretch the ship.
If you look at Starlink launcher, you can clearly see that it's not using the whole volume of the payload bay because V2 is too wide to fit inside the nosecone.

>> No.15201238

>>15201229
yeah, but all non-sailing starship designs might as well be fantasy so it's really choosing out of a big trash heap at this point.

>> No.15201242

>>15201168
yeah maybe RUD your "rocket test stand" at 7pm saturday night every week instead of 3am monday morning

>> No.15201256
File: 263 KB, 1500x1125, lawn darts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201256

>>15201228

>> No.15201262

>>15201234
They could probably get another four or five stuffed in there vertically.

>> No.15201269
File: 73 KB, 1024x576, world_ship_002-2-1024x576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201269

>> No.15201295

>>15201158
Maintaining those shits was too expensive and they won't be needed for a while. When they need a rig they can buy one from rig-mart

>> No.15201312

>>15201137
>>15201140
Welp. I guess it’s good news that they haven’t really touched them and didn’t sink millions into upgrading them further, honestly

>> No.15201317

>>15201312
lol

>> No.15201318
File: 307 KB, 1170x1095, F72524CC-8DAA-41D7-9BB8-24E786CA4BFA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201318

>>15201151
>low risk
KEK

>> No.15201320

imagine running a fuel depot in the kuiper belt and stocking shitty sandwiches and nachos

>> No.15201323

>>15201137
Biggest problem with oil rigs being converted into sea launch platforms is getting the necessary MethalOx at the run rate needed to truly take advantage of SS/SH capabilities. It's probably better to literally just create a mini island out at sea 1/2 kilometer or 1km out from land, and then run a pipe.

>> No.15201326

>>15201230
all over the world, starting with close US allies (Japan)

>> No.15201328

>>15201137
>SpaceX: decides to buy oil rigs, will convert them into launch platforms
>sfg: Good idea, oil rigs are cheap, better to launch from international waters, musk = god, etc
>SpaceX: on second thought, let's scrap it all, back to square one
>sfg: oil rigs were a stupid idea, expensive and difficult to work with, only continental launch sites make sense, etc etc
come on, anons

>> No.15201330

>>15201230
Indonesia!

>> No.15201332

>>15201328
If the rigs were 90% done a la beff jezos’ carnival cruise ship it would have been dumb

>> No.15201335
File: 941 KB, 1749x1092, 3FBC691F-B305-437B-9C8A-3D8F97A1B160.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201335

>> No.15201337

>>15201317
I was being serious hahah. I know they started clearing the decks a while ago but they put it on hold. It’s not like they had towers and a full tank farm

>> No.15201339

>>15201328
> RIGGED

>> No.15201344

>>15201328
I've always argued the scalability of oil rigs was dubious. i dont think they want to build fuckhuge mechazillas at sea just yet, if ever

>> No.15201347
File: 100 KB, 795x986, c1m9d7ci5hn21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201347

>>15201318
It had it's teething issues, but I'm confident they could have been fixed if McDonnell Douglas and Boeing had stayed in their own lanes. After the buyout Boeing owned both the Delta III and the Zenit-3SL through Sea Launch, and the Zenit was a more attractive rocket that they'd already invested a billion dollars into getting operational. The Delta III still had a dozen launches booked when it was canned so it's not like no one wanted to fly on it.

>> No.15201353

>>15201347
Oldspace really was a fuck, man

>> No.15201366

>>15201131
guys, GUYS. HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEWS? THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT UFOS!!!

>>15201141
russians have warplanes that had service ceiling of more than 60k ft. the russians could be selling that as a small rocket launch service.. why the fuck aren't they doing just that?

>> No.15201374

>>15201366
>russians have warplanes that had service ceiling of more than 60k ft. the russians could be selling that as a small rocket launch service.. why the fuck aren't they doing just that?
They sell space on their actual rockets. Why bother?

>> No.15201376

>>15201366
One, it wasn't designed by the Soviet Union. Two, no one is buying their launch services anymore. If their space sector was any more isolated they'd all be Chinese.

>> No.15201383

>>15201366
The Russians has mig-31 air launched rocket projects in the 2000s...
In the end it’s not worth it, they already have cheap and quick launch capability and would rather spend the money on hypersonic missiles

>> No.15201387

>>15201214
In an Orion design, Isp isn't about the speed od the fission products, it's about how fast they can fire a lump of tungsten (or something else) at the pusher plate. Designs that directly exhaust fusion fuels can have Isp over 30,000s.

>> No.15201391

>>15201366
UFOS arent real

>> No.15201393

>>15201374
cuz their rockets launch big sats, not microsats?

>>15201376
>it wasn't designed by the Soviet Union.
do you mean the concept of launching microsats from warplanes?


>Two, no one is buying their launch services anymore
sad IMO. but, isn't that because of costs more than anything else? I guess launching from already existant warplanes would be way cheaper than almost any competitor... I have no idea though.

>> No.15201395

>>15201200
It’s amazing that Chinese space sector is finally getting on pace after 25 years+ of buildup and investment.

Also scary to think that without spacex America would have been hopelessly behind.

>> No.15201400

>>15201395
LM5 and LM2F are the only rockets worth their weight putting meaningful things into orbit, and both of those barely ever launch. Everything else barely carries it’s own lifting power into LEO. It just so happens that they have like 10 different types of rockets and they launch them often. There’s a huge disparity between number of launches and actual tonnage to LEO

>> No.15201401

LEO is old hat. it's all about MEO now

>> No.15201402

>>15201383
>The Russians has mig-31 air launched rocket projects in the 2000s...
oh, did they? then the talk is useless

>would rather spend the money on hypersonic missiles
I mean, those are completely different things, and income from one could be spent on the other, so why not?

>> No.15201406

>>15201391
>UFOS arent real
They literally are lol

>> No.15201407

>>15201366
Dnepr, Proton, and Angara ended up becoming way too expensive for commercial flights. Soyuz was the only one which actually had a market, and that was already being eaten into by Falcon 9

>> No.15201408

>>15201395
They've got a lot of government encouraged investment from commercial groups and education institutions, which helps things. I think their payload numbers are also being goosed a bit by the fact that their domestic space-rated electronics are trash, or at least they were seven-ish years ago. If a lot of the spy sats they're putting up have Soviet 70s lifespans it would help to explain their launch cadence.

>> No.15201412

Will passing the Karman Line cure my depression
Probably not

>> No.15201414

>>15201406
Prove it

>> No.15201417

>>15201414
>See an object in the sky
>Fail to identify it
Voila. It's an unidentified flying object.

>> No.15201424

>>15201168
>Rocket company in Canada
>Tests their engines in Southern Ontario
Man they're retarded, it's not like we don't have space for this.
Anyways their rocket seemed pretty bad, Reaction Dynamics and MLS are still looking good so I'm still hopeful we get a space launch industry going soon

>> No.15201425
File: 48 KB, 599x427, 43496DCF-5478-4482-9789-A6C5B6BA8E3E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201425

>>15201402
>oh, did they?
Yeah, ishim mainly, needed a pretty extensive redesign of the mig-31, didn’t happen but I think some of the work was reused on ASAT projects

>> No.15201427
File: 83 KB, 1005x687, 203EDFF3-83CB-4477-B15F-DC60A539CE0D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201427

Hermes was going to be comfy for 3

>> No.15201433

>>15201425
Ishim was a pretty interesting case since it was expected that between the high speed, high altitude separation, the lesser drag and gravity losses and the vacuum optimised launcher it was going to shave off 2km/s of delta v Effectively on the launcher.

>> No.15201435
File: 977 KB, 1170x1692, 12AD71B8-06ED-42D7-9CBE-E86FE6BD7FEA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201435

>>15201427

>> No.15201436

>>15201424
isn't MLS using hohol smallsat launchers? The only thing they're building is the launch complex

>> No.15201437
File: 1023 KB, 1170x808, A7B16208-6C71-4003-BADA-CC3349C7E2F7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201437

>>15201435

>> No.15201439

>>15201427
Remind me again why they cancelled Hermes

>> No.15201441

>>15201435
For an orbital Laboratory it’s shit
For a crew transfer vehicle to the iss/freedom for 3 it’s luxurious

>> No.15201445
File: 2.07 MB, 1280x720, 1659665814970.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201445

>> No.15201446

>>15201439
Too fat; too expensive

>> No.15201447

>>15201439
It became an expensive oversized spacecraft without a mission.

>> No.15201449

>>15201412
I’ve thought of this too. What happens after I pass the Karman line? I spend my whole life working towards that goal, but what happens next? Idk

>> No.15201451
File: 62 KB, 1412x708, 12FEAA95-C0A4-401C-8224-A69855A67907.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201451

If you could go back in time, how would you unJUST ESA?

>> No.15201453
File: 26 KB, 400x238, 993B02D2-E7F5-49F4-93AD-80E7D5404E32.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201453

>>15201451
Esa station from the 80’s

>> No.15201454

>>15201451
Declare bankruptcy and cease operations

>> No.15201456
File: 41 KB, 400x224, CC7E7491-17A8-4B2C-8898-930178F4389E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201456

>>15201453
Kino. It’s too bad Hermes ended up becoming too massive

>> No.15201460
File: 15 KB, 574x407, 7407B536-3F61-4148-BB38-3413522CAAEA.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201460

>>15201456

>> No.15201461

>>15201436
They're still officially partnered with Yuzhmash but the manufacturers are in Kharkiv and Dnipro so I would be very suprised if that ever came to fruition.
Their only other partner is Reaction Dynamics, a Quebec rocket company, and they're planning their first demo flight this year
https://www.maritimelaunch.com/news/all-canadian-space-launch-solution-plans-inaugural-flight-2023

>> No.15201463
File: 42 KB, 500x404, 25594-c100aa2130a46e40d766b5f48c069d02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201463

>>15201439
It would have helped a lot if they could have picked a single design and stuck with it.

>>15201451
That's hard. All of their major problems are rooted in international gridlock and an overabundance of bureaucracy, and you can't just delete those things without completely imploding the organization.

>> No.15201464

>>15201461(me)
Just checked, their test site is 40min from here. Maybe I should go watch

>> No.15201465

>>15201461
>check job postings
>they have an opening that fits me almost perfectly (don't have "french (preferred)")
wonder if I should apply... it's kind of hard to get excited over small rockets now a days t b h

>> No.15201480
File: 272 KB, 1440x1325, 0abfff79aab38237dd201ddf45d0b81f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201480

>>15201137

Mars is never happening.

>> No.15201485

>>15201451
No Hermes in the 80s, focus on some recoverable unmanned capsule that can be launched in Ariane 4 that could eventually evolve into something manned , get as much work done on it before the mid 90s budget cuts

Keep the geocomsat development Europe wide instead of the whole 80s split with Olympus and SES,

avoid Lockheed commercialising the proton, get there first, don’t bring Soyuz to Kourou


Earlier and Closer cooperation with the Japanese

DO NOT TRUST THE RUSSIANS WITH ANYTHING RELATED TO MARS

Don’t develop Vulcain, keep using the Ariane 4 base, develop an indigenous Kerolox or Methalox engine with Russian/Nip help in the 90s and use it as base for Ariane 5, never do any big SRB, stick to PAP sized srb if necessary,

Make Galileo ASAP, do not listen to the American with their international earth observing collaboration in the 90s, don’t make Envisat and make smaller sats instead

Hard mode: let small european companied play with decommissioned french ICBM from the 90s onward to put the basis for private launcher entrepreneurship

>> No.15201486
File: 451 KB, 1170x795, E75A7D32-D5F2-4C3D-985C-163199F31F95.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201486

More boeing! airliner problems, unless these are both really pilot error. This is scary lol
https://twitter.com/flightradar24/status/1625106547649966081

>> No.15201491

>>15201463
1988 and 89 would be one hell of a uhhhhhh ride. Nomsayin? Nudge nudge??

>> No.15201496

>>15201491
1979 is "we have shuttle at home"

>> No.15201498
File: 209 KB, 900x1200, 7748E314-5C6E-4565-B41E-9FD4FAE65962.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201498

>>15201496

>> No.15201500
File: 482 KB, 1096x1471, BF07F5BE-40C7-456F-A3D7-C84F6827301C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201500

>>15201463
1984 Hermès+Ariane 5, just after A5’s architecture was selected

>> No.15201503

>>15201412
>>15201449
In a certain way, wanting to go to space is in the same level as wanting to get a new game. Of course it will be fun, but it's not something that will make your suddenly happy with your life.
I guess professional astronauts feel more satisfied with it since it is their careers and they dedicated so much of their lives to it, but I don't think it is more than just a fun ride to rich people going in a New Shepard ride.
I don't think my depression can be cured unless I completely change my life style in unreachable ways, or I stuff myself with pills I can't pay for.

>> No.15201506
File: 136 KB, 499x800, F077C687-443D-4CDB-A75B-AA03E32EAE46.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201506

>>15201500

>> No.15201514

>>15201136
Fuck this gay shit, bring back the sonic cruiser. I want to see propfans flying at mach .98

>> No.15201524
File: 76 KB, 890x600, 1987 12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201524

>>15201506
One big design issue was that after Challenger everyone suddenly decided that a next-gen shuttle needed to be able to eject the entire cockpit in the event of an emergency. Hermes was not immune to this madness.

After a few years they abandoned that as impractical and decided to go with ejection seats instead, despite NASA openly admitting those were even worse.

>> No.15201527
File: 61 KB, 1040x720, F74D7964-32AB-498E-B8FF-DBE94EC0D380.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201527

>>15201506
>>15201500
>>15201463
Why did they keep making Hermes bigger? NASA’s HL-20 spaceplane was “only” 13 tons and it could carry 6 crew to LEO.

>> No.15201537

>>15201524
Cockpit ejection is what high altitude military aircraft use. It was the right choice. They just pussied out because it was difficult.

>> No.15201538

>>15201527
Hermès was supposed to be a mini-shuttle, robotic arm included, capable of supporting standalone month-long missions. It wasn’t just supposed to be a crew transfer/access vehicle

>> No.15201542

>>15201328
It made a lot more sense when starship wasn’t planned to have a fuckhuge mechazilla stage 0

>> No.15201552
File: 16 KB, 300x350, n1f1965.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201552

>> No.15201553

>ASS2ASS
DEAD
>SeaLaunch
DEAD
>by extension, E2E
DEAD
>Static fire
BARELY PASSED
>Vibe check?
Two weeks

>> No.15201555

>>15201552
right looks like it has a TWR of 1.0000001

>> No.15201557

>>15201555
The Astra special would be hilarious from a rocket that big.

>> No.15201558

>>15201553
It's gonna work. the geopolitical consequences might get spicy. china knows they can't compete if starship works.

>> No.15201566

>>15201557
Kek at that point it would be an intra launch site ballistic missile

>> No.15201567

>>15201137
>but the company wants to start flying Starship first and understand it before proceeding.
so, two more years until they buy rigs again?

>> No.15201568
File: 362 KB, 740x1220, 43089961-3D89-4B4E-B517-27D3E32CB63A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201568

>>15201552
It’s hydrogen

The N1F (2nd from left) replaced the NK-15 engines with the more reliable NK-33s. It would fly in 1974 to support lunar landings by the mid to late 70’s.

By the late 70’s, the upper stages of the N1F would be replaced by hydrogen/oxygen ones. This new rocket would be the N1M.

The final evolution would happen in the 80’s, and see the upper stages be replaced by hydrogen/NUCLEAR stages to support mars missions

>> No.15201571

>>15201555
The horribly named "N-IFV-II-III" had hydrogen fueled second and third stages, so it wouldn't have weighed nearly as much as it looked like it would. If the very hypothetical numbers Astronautix has are accurate it could have pulled 16m/s2 of acceleration at liftoff, which is actually a bit more than the Falcon 9.

>> No.15201573

>>15201192
>does spacex need to get an air craft carrier
it would be so fucking cool if they took over a Nimitz-class ship that's due for retirement

>> No.15201575

Hmm, maybe a hydrogen fluorine super heavy launch vehicle

>> No.15201604
File: 75 KB, 676x716, 8D059EAD-D471-4260-B999-86718CB34E5A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201604

>N11GR

>> No.15201611

>>15201604
A shame it didn't go to the moon, but at least one of them will get there during an Artemis mission.

>> No.15201617

>>15201611
kek

>> No.15201639

Los Dos reporting that SpaceX employees and NASA personnel had a meeting about passing the T-30 day mark to Starship OFT1. Static fire was good and everyone is excited.

>> No.15201648

>>15201137
Probably realized that no matter where they go, even in international waters, the FAA and ITAR will cuck them. Might as well try and force it through in Boca Chica by bribing local faggots. Fuel operations with pipelines and shit would be expensive too, cheaper than USA cocksucker red tape but it seems that it will be unavoidable to pay the zog pitso so oh well. Shame to see it go bye bye but probably not a bad move overall.

>> No.15201658

>>15201648
>with an oil rig, you can go anywhere you want

>> No.15201660

>>15201172
You're fucking retarded, it's was never about any kind of logistical issue, it was about trying to bypass Jewish beauracrats and gay ass laws which now they realize they cannot do so they just take the L and work within the faggot system as best they can.

>> No.15201662
File: 44 KB, 676x716, 1676350651906335.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201662

>>15201604

>> No.15201671

>>15201192
>does spacex need to get an air craft carrier
Actually a great idea, but it's probably really expensive to maintain and would take a decade of paperwork to clear

>> No.15201681

>>15201639
2 2 weeks WE GAAAAN

>> No.15201692
File: 60 KB, 400x588, apollocsm_wings01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201692

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xox-yQADUTM&t=248s
holy kek

>> No.15201696

>>15201681
Los Dos also reporting that DreamChaser flight 1 is being pushed into 2024 lol

>> No.15201702
File: 2.36 MB, 750x750, N1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201702

Alright well it's midnight and I can't finish this so take what I have instead

>> No.15201708

>>15201696
sadge

>> No.15201709

Checked Next Spaceflight now, H3-22 got delayed to 2/16, fucking shit.

>> No.15201728
File: 128 KB, 1700x1133, 524DE749-A69C-48AC-9DDD-7592BF1345D0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201728

>>15201709
>Delta IV-sized hydrogen rocket costs less than a Falcon 9 (a bit less capable though)
Still can’t believe it. H3 is badass

>> No.15201729

>>15201708
Budget Clueless -> Aware

>> No.15201735

More info from Los Dos
>Antares looking for a bigger upper stage
>Starship OFT2 planned to be a month after OFT1 (suuuuuuuuuure)
>Kuiper launch 1 won’t be ready until December 2023
>Vulcan will have no payload until 2024 after Peregrine this year
>New Shepard (NS-23) failed because the engine nozzle was damaged during reentry on the previous flight

>> No.15201740
File: 133 KB, 2501x1250, 0EB57727-1CBC-4509-86C9-F0C975086D60.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201740

Really puts stuff into perspective lol

>> No.15201743

>>15201740
Lack of ambition vs ambition.

>> No.15201745

>>15201740
>not solvent
>SOLVENT

>> No.15201748

>>15201417
That's not what a UFO is

>> No.15201752

>>15201748
It quite literally is

>> No.15201754

>>15201748
UFO = Unidentified Flying Object. It doesn't mean "flying saucer," or "aliens," or any other thing like that.

>> No.15201756

>>15201748
No, that is indeed the dictionary definition. Please fuck off back to /x/ if you think everything not identified is automatically Ayyyy's.

>> No.15201757

>>15201752
>>15201754
UFOs have never been determined to be manmade so the logical extension is that they are extraterrestrial

>> No.15201759
File: 53 KB, 470x608, finger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201759

>>15201757
Eat shit

>> No.15201764

>>15201740
>Ariane 6: built to compete with Falcon 9
>H-3: built to compete with Falcon 9
>Vulcan: built to compete with Falcon 9
Did ESA, Japan, and ULA all hire the same cost-benefit analysis team when they were doing next generation launch vehicle design studies? They're practically bloody identical and they're all trying to beat the same rocket.

>> No.15201765

>>15201764
Not just Falcon 9, but specifically Falcon 9 1.0

>> No.15201768

>>15201757
That's a tautology. If we confirm it's manmade we can identify it.

>> No.15201771

>>15201757
If it was extraterrestrial it would be identified as extraterrestrial. ergo it would not be unidentified anymore.

>> No.15201776

A spaceplane is a UFO

>> No.15201785

>>15201776
all space planes are manmade

>> No.15201788

>>15201149
delayed by two days due to bad weather

>> No.15201814
File: 865 KB, 1125x1623, 0241F7FC-AF62-4A82-9FC8-AD9BA4DB338F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201814

This is actually a really fun infographic. Look for your favourite rockets in here.
>Black Arrow
>Scout
>Atlas II
>Starship

>> No.15201852
File: 3.32 MB, 1254x1678, Screen Shot 2023-02-13 at 10.00.57 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201852

>>15201814
Damn right

>> No.15201902
File: 52 KB, 637x410, ithacus1 carrier.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201902

>>15201192
>does spacex need to get an air craft carrier
Ithacus chads rise up

>> No.15201907
File: 280 KB, 1136x568, cmb bog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15201907

>>15201269
> no access to the axis
> pointless windows in the roof
awful

>> No.15201937

>>15201765
>Falcon 9 1.0
ouf

>> No.15201939

>>15201937
>>15201765
1.1 really, but yeah, they are not positioned to compete with reusable Falcon 9, let alone an operational Starship.

>> No.15201942

>>15201764
Convergent evolution. Falcon 9 is the ideal rocket body.

>> No.15201943

>>15201942
Starship will be the crab of rockets

>> No.15201982

>>15201568
I can understand why they kept LOx in spherical tanks
but why go with kerosene spherical tanks?

>> No.15201988

>>15201982
Because they didn't know how to build sufficiently large capsular propellant tanks on a weight budget.

>> No.15202016

>>15201907
The cables are access tubes.

>> No.15202128
File: 63 KB, 747x565, Burnside Clapp zubrin black horse 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202128

> Spacex e2e fantasy is dead
Sounds like it's Black Horse o'clock to me

>> No.15202153

>>15202128
why?
all you need for an e2e to work is another launch complex on the destination
or you don't mind doing a one way trip

>> No.15202174

>>15201982
Kerolox is stored in the balls.

>> No.15202179

https://mainenginecutoff.com/podcast/239

Great discussions with Lori Garver

>> No.15202202

>>15201764
>they're all trying to beat the same rocket
The same REUSABLE rocket. It's like they think if they don't look at it too hard it will go away.

>> No.15202206
File: 385 KB, 1015x576, 1550873357502.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202206

>>15201852
>no New Glenn

>> No.15202221
File: 218 KB, 1290x701, A1404088-7AFF-4BDE-9CAD-4A05EBDEBEAA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202221

H3 LAUNCH IN ONE HOUR

https://www.space.com/japan-h3-rocket-debut-launch-webcast

Didn’t know this was happening today

>> No.15202223

>>15202221
Anon... it’s been delayed to the 17th

>> No.15202224

>>15202221
>live in 2 days

>> No.15202225

>>15202223
it's over

>> No.15202226

>>15202179
/ourhorse/

>> No.15202230

>>15201439
Baseduz was cheaper

>> No.15202267

>>15202230
Crewed Hermes was actually basically dead by the time the ussr fell, the German budget cut due to reunification already delayed it into the 10+ years event horizon. By 1992 plans had already fallen back to an unmanned Hermes

The real shame is that we didn’t push for a truly co-develop Hermes derived vehicle For NASA’s crew access vehicle/lifeboat program in the 90s and instead had to wait for the x-38 and get cucked when they cancelled it

>> No.15202275
File: 48 KB, 680x500, 1569443299156.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202275

>>15202223
>>15202225
お仕舞いだ

>> No.15202278

>>15201137
spacex turned into oldspace
it's over

>> No.15202306

>>15201137
the rigs were a joke idea anyways, starship is way too fucking big for the cheap used rigs they wanted to buy

>> No.15202330 [DELETED] 
File: 258 KB, 502x668, 2023-02-14T14.11.06.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202330

pleiades cluster

>> No.15202333
File: 2.80 MB, 2155x2873, IMG_5981.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202333

pleiades cluster

>> No.15202344

>>15201702
tfw no flame

>> No.15202361

>>15202333
I wanna go there

>> No.15202378

They should use expendable starships as wet workshops
>>15202361
iktf

>> No.15202393

European parliament accepted to fund Iris2, the european megaconstellaton for €3.1 Billion.

>tfw Ariane 6 will be the most succesful ariane ever despite being dogshit just because it'll launch Kuiper and Iris2

>> No.15202402

>>15202393
Newspace is the best thing that ever happened to oldspace

>> No.15202416
File: 1.05 MB, 1102x725, Screenshot from 2023-02-14 17-25-41.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202416

Why did they build this thing right in the middle of a wildlife area?

>> No.15202420

>>15202416
Because it was originally just a falcon 9 cosmodrome, and it had clearance for that

>> No.15202421

>>15202416
because capitalost billionaire pig white colonial

>> No.15202432

>>15202416
>wildlife area
Have you ever looked at Cape Canaveral?
Having a reason to keep filthy Urfers out of a wildlife area is a good thing.

>> No.15202445

>>15202416
And even then beach is the biggest problem.

>> No.15202455

>>15202416
they thought they were special and the rules wouldn't apply to them

>> No.15202472

>>15202416
Probably so the noise has less effect on people and any accidents have less effect on people. Nature doesn’t matter.

>> No.15202497

I heard somewhere that fusion reactors can now make net energy. Is this true?

>> No.15202505

>>15202497
no

>> No.15202523

>>15202497
No

>> No.15202527

>2024: Chang'e-6 sample-return
>2025: Tianwen-2 NEA sample-return/comet
>2026: Chang'e-7 orbiter & south pole landing
>2028: Tianwen-3 Mars sample-return
>2030: Chang'e-8 south polar ISRU tests
>2030: Tianwen-4 Jupiter/Uranus
china is pumping those probes out

>> No.15202530

>>15202416
Would you rather they build it in the middle of a city?

>> No.15202531

>>15202530
I strongly advocate for the destruction of all cities so sure.

>> No.15202547

>>15202527
unironically the best use case for sls was to launch large outer system probes

>> No.15202559

>>15202527
China is strong and overtaking America fastly

>> No.15202566

>>15202527
>2028: Tianwen-3 Mars sample-return
if China actually pulls this off, they gigamog the NASA-ESA "architecture"

>> No.15202577
File: 98 KB, 616x789, 1676394570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202577

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1625536488422404097

400 ton of useful mass to orbit per quarter this year from SpaceX.

Last quarter, it was 142 ton

>> No.15202583

>>15202577
1.2M tons to orbit this year
WE ARE GAAN

>> No.15202596

>>15202577
>Starlink
>useful mass

>> No.15202599

>>15202577
>useful mass
What is not useful mass

>> No.15202606

>>15202583
1.6M

>> No.15202614

>>15202599
Meatbags and their sustenance.

>> No.15202615

>>15202596
cope
>>15202599
spent stages

>> No.15202617

>>15202599
Expendable rocket bodies

>> No.15202630

>>15201814
not that accurate though. Black Arrow and V-2 were only 13m and 14m tall compared to Electron at 18m. Makes me wonder about the rest.

>> No.15202638

>>15202599
Wings

>> No.15202645

>commercial space stations
>moon base on the horizon
>mars colony ships in an advanced state
despite this there's still alot of people who think space colonization will never happen. why cant they see the writing on the wall?

>> No.15202648

>>15202645
starship hasn't launched yet and there are no other launch vehicles that change anything....
spacex is just doing 100 launches a year for their LEO constellation, currently running on a massive loss

>> No.15202653

>>15202648
All Falcon 9 operations are profitable. Including Starlink.

>> No.15202661

>>15202648
Considering their customer numbers Falcon 9 runs at a profit, Starlink is probably only mildly in the red, and the Starship project is relatively cheap compared to other moon shot (heh) developments in big companies. I don't think they are in financial trouble, if they were they could just sell more Inspiration 4 style missions to rich fags who want to go.

>> No.15202681

>>15202661
>running a significant profit on Launches
Lol
Lmao

>> No.15202686

>>15202681
When you have a bunch of fat pursed governments throwing their pork fat satellites on your rockets yeah

>> No.15202714

>>15202645
>commercial space stations
>mars colony ships in an advanced state
nothingburgers until proven otherwise

moon base however seems likely with NASA actually backing it with bipartisan support, but a MIR in lunar orbit and a cuckshed on the ground is barely any progress

>> No.15202722
File: 100 KB, 960x550, 1676392851843541.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202722

>>15202530
as long as they dump expendable stages on it

>> No.15202724

>>15202344
Yeah I had flames animated but the transparency completely fucked up and it was too late at night to deal with it

>> No.15202726

>>15202559
just two more years left to go

>> No.15202735
File: 820 KB, 1600x1200, 1676286695857005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202735

>>15202645
I am just looking forward to the coping seethe it will cause in subversives and feeble minded demoralized when the starship landers plant their flags right next to one of the old apollo landing sites completely discrediting their fake moon landing cult.

>> No.15202740

>>15202722
Expendable boosters taking it to the next level

>> No.15202755
File: 81 KB, 812x610, apollo 10 crew snoopy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202755

>>15202735
All landings will be at the south pole, hundreds of miles from any Apollo sites

>> No.15202767

The first guy that wrote "$10 quintillion asteroid" should be shot. simple as.

>> No.15202769

>>15202645
there's still a lot of people who poop their pants. why the fuck should i care?

>> No.15202772

>>15202648
*currently running cash flow positive

>> No.15202779

>>15202681
F9 marginal cost is peanuts. SpaceX is the only one making real money flying customer payloads, the profit margin is huge

>> No.15202787

https://youtu.be/A4xQWpBB4ZY
it's time: chingchonghour

>> No.15202792

>>15202645
95% of people are retarded and cannot extrapolate. They see that we aren't currently able to colonize Mars and they conclude that it'll always be impossible.
Same thing with AI or EVs or any developing technology

>> No.15202793

>>15202772
>cash flow positive
In the same way that fusion is now net energy positive.

>> No.15202800

>>15202793
It means they are on their way of being profitable. Not yet recouped all their Starlink investment. Gwynne doesn't have a history of lying so I believe her.

>> No.15202811

Mars (derogatory)

>> No.15202822

>>15202416
>I’ve never been to the Texas coast, the post

>> No.15202827

>>15202822
Hasn't been on my top travel destinations list

>> No.15202841

>>15202827
Literally the entire Texas coast is inhabited or has some sort of state or national park. They also have islands just off the coast usually that are also inhabited but which probably would not at all suit a launch facility. Boca Chica was easily the best location imo, all the complaints are extremely exaggerated. There were less than 30 residents and despite the whining the beach was not heavily used.
All the craw about fucking wildlife is even more ridiculous, that area is genuinely pretty fucking empty. North of it is much more significant protected land and immediately south of the border you have the exact same sort of biome untrammelled for miles and miles and miles. It is a nothingburger and anon is a faggot for being yet another retard swallowing contrarian opinions to pretend to know anything about the area

>> No.15202844

>>15201425
>mig-31
from google:
>The MiG-31 Foxhound has made several world records. It reached an absolute maximum altitude of 37,650 meters in 1977, and set a time-to-height record of 35,000 meters in 4 minutes, 11.78 seconds, both of which were set by the famous MiG test pilot Alexander Fedotov.
holy fuck...

>> No.15202856
File: 51 KB, 900x600, 2014CurbYourEnthusiasm_080413.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202856

Starship is going to keep the Raptor's throttled down until it has successfully cleared the tower, right?

It doesn't need anywhere near its max thrust to get off the pad, and if they are still concerned over the cement exploding under the engines, then throttling down to the point where you give yourself a safe margin to clear the tower and then throttle rapidly up to 100% actually might how they do it, right?

>> No.15202857

>>15202844
The MiG-31 is an upgraded version of the MiG-25. It can reach Mach 3 with copious afterburner use and a willingness to treat its after flight maintenance like SSME rebuilds. The 25 is what scared the US enough to build the F-14 and F-15 to counter it.

>> No.15202862

>>15202857
Yeah, I was gonna say. The Foxbat and Foxhound could do some wild stuff, so long as you were willing to accept that you basically just killed the airframe's capacity to ever get off the ground again without a complete rebuild, and could stomach replacing the engines entirely since they were usually just slag.

>> No.15202863

>>15202787
Astronomers seething

>> No.15202864

>>15202856
that would waste fuel. don't ask me how I know: I have an intuitive sense for it.

>> No.15202876

>>15202857
>The 25 is what scared the US enough to build the F-14 and F-15 to counter it.
Until they got to investigate the aircraft on their own.

>> No.15202884
File: 24 KB, 608x443, Fairchild-Republic AFTI lifting body.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202884

>>15202876
If they'd found out it was nbd what would the USAF have built instead?

>> No.15202892

>>15202864
I mean, barely any. I doubt they'll leave margins that tight.

>> No.15202935

>>15201757
The literal definition of a logical fallacy

>> No.15202945

>>15202884
By the time they got a close enough look the decision had already been made. This was just trying to analyze the plane by shape. Large wings, twin tails, HUGE engines and radar. We didn't realize a lot of it was due to Soviet incompetence or titanium shortages.

>> No.15202947

https://twitter.com/whoisheartbreak/status/1625579690902822912

>> No.15202956
File: 59 KB, 643x506, Rockwell c5 air launch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202956

>>15202945
>By the time they got a close enough look the decision had already been made.
Yeah but what if they found out it was kinda crappy way before they did, before the F-14/15 got greenlit. Just upgrade the Phantoms?

>> No.15202957
File: 507 KB, 1920x1080, Fo86HM9WYAwcpqR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202957

>>15202947

>> No.15202962
File: 672 KB, 2048x1437, valentines day.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202962

Raptor Valentines day

>> No.15202966

>>15202947
why is she still single?

>> No.15202970

>>15202956
Probably. There were some experimental Super Phantom designs with upgraded turbofans, better electronics, wing slats, etc. that were competitive with early F-15 performance.

>> No.15202973

>>15202966
There is no time for relationships or children if you work for SpaceX.

>> No.15202980

A single J-2 is more powerful than four RL-10s.

Let that sink in.

>> No.15202981

>>15202333
Saw the pleiades through a telescope for the first time on a perfectly clear and dark night in the desert, and it was the single most beautiful thing I've ever seen in my life

>> No.15202986
File: 54 KB, 1080x1080, FB_IMG_1676405712946.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15202986

Happy Valentines from down under

>> No.15202991

>>15202986
they dont even do anything relevant

>> No.15202999

>>15202991
I know :(

>> No.15203013

You now remember the excitement you had the first time you saw a metal flap arrive at starbase. The first time a hexagon tile was bolted to a nose cone. The first time a nosecone was actually mated to a water tower segment.
These are but distant memories now

>> No.15203017

>>15202973
Not quite true. Elon has a family. So doe Shotwell. But you know, the sacrifices are immense for both of them.

>> No.15203025

>>15203017
Shotwell already had her children when he started at SpaceX. Elon is a man. He can just dump the spunk and let the nannies take care of the rest.

>> No.15203031

>>15203025
SpaceX runs Astra school for all their employees. Thats their daycare/nanny for their kids.

>> No.15203036

>>15203031
Someone should knock up Jessie then.

>> No.15203040

>>15203031
>Ad Astra
https://www.youtube.com/@astranovaschool

>> No.15203049

>>15203040
Looking through some of the videos, the conundrums are all designed to make kids think critically. Forcing kids to go into various camps, debate with each other, find out flaws, and strength of each sides, etc.

Seems clever and simple.

>> No.15203057

>>15203013
it didnt happen in fact it never happened

>> No.15203064

https://web.archive.org/web/20100307012940/http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_politics/2010/03/shuttle-flights-would-continue-under-new-proposal.html

>> No.15203095

>>15201486
>https://twitter.com/flightradar24/status/1625106547649966081
if it is boeing I ain't going!
I'm gonna start taking that phrase seriously now... only airbus for me in the future.

>> No.15203107

>>15202016
>loadbearing elevators

>> No.15203111

>NASA administrator Michael D. Griffin argued in a 2007 paper that the Saturn program, if continued, could have provided six crewed launches per year – two of them to the Moon – at the same cost as the Shuttle program, with an additional ability to loft infrastructure for further missions:

>If we had done all this, we would be on Mars today, not writing about it as a subject for "the next 50 years." We would have decades of experience operating long-duration space systems in Earth orbit, and similar decades of experience in exploring and learning to utilize the Moon.[41]

>> No.15203127

>>15203111
it was never about budget. it was about destroying america

>> No.15203132

>>15203095
avherald says the qatar airlines incident was a human error
https://www.avherald.com/h?comment=504d75c7&opt=0

I was looking for aditional info on avherald and just found this:
https://www.avherald.com/h?article=50526a09&opt=0

>> No.15203136

>>15203127
It was about the government being a retard cheapskate and the launch companies being corrupt, plus retarded anti space movements saying "muh pennies for the poor"

>> No.15203142
File: 1.10 MB, 3000x2000, elon_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203142

>>15202206
>the bald guy
Elon, I...

>> No.15203164
File: 927 KB, 988x898, Screenshot 2023-02-14 at 16-06-42 Brendan Byrne on Twitter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203164

And... liftoff!

>> No.15203170

>>15203164
muh boomer radio ppl

>> No.15203175

>>15203164
F

>> No.15203176

>>15203164
Is he also the ULA guy???

>> No.15203184

>>15203164
Aging is the worst disease and it must be eradicated at all costs

>> No.15203187

>>15203184
>Aging is the worst disease
what about being an Earther?

>> No.15203192

>>15203187
terminal

>> No.15203202

>>15203187
They’re the same thing

>> No.15203221
File: 118 KB, 1200x800, 2019-07-10T194149Z_1_LYNXNPEF691NA_RTROPTP_4_SPACE-EXPLORATION-VIRGIN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203221

https://investors.virginorbit.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/68/virgin-orbit-update-on-uk-mission-anomaly

>The data is indicating that from the beginning of the second stage first burn, a fuel filter within the fuel feedline had been dislodged from its normal position.

>Additional data shows that the fuel pump that is downstream of the filter operated at a degraded efficiency level, resulting in the Newton 4 engine being starved for fuel. Performing in this anomalous manner resulted in the engine operating at a significantly higher than rated engine temperature.

>Components downstream and in the vicinity of the abnormally hot engine eventually malfunctioned, causing the second stage thrust to terminate prematurely

There’s some nice cope in there too if anyone’s interested in that

>> No.15203230
File: 1.88 MB, 1049x829, 9AFA487B-B6A0-444A-847C-9E93942CB82E.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203230

>>15203187
Being an earther doesn't turn what me and everyone I have ever loved into pic-related for the second half of their lives. Fuck that shit I'd rather become a bloathead or darkwraith, at least they get to look cool in the end

>> No.15203232

>>15203221
I do believe space is unironically hard, and some people are just good at making it look easy. But, you can’t be in the game this long and still have falcon 1-tier tomfoolery like this

>> No.15203238

>>15203230
my brain read this as ‘good cock in the end’ and the photo made me even more confused

>> No.15203248

>>15201137
sea landings are cringe anyway since we never get a good view of them anyway

>> No.15203252

>>15203248
A majority of falcon 9 missions beg to differ

>> No.15203276
File: 13 KB, 416x410, tom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203276

Alhamdulillah NSF has converted

>> No.15203283

>>15203136
>retarded anti space movements saying "muh pennies for the poor"
This is the destroying America part.
The people funding those retards know exactly what they are doing.

>> No.15203288

>>15203107
it works for trees

>> No.15203294

>>15203276
he looks like a bum

>> No.15203309
File: 173 KB, 789x976, sls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203309

https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1625618818641829892

>> No.15203322

>>15203276
fuck i need to trim my beard, dont want to look pakistani

>> No.15203324
File: 781 KB, 680x451, Fo9p3VPWAAMWbNQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203324

B8 HPU heading for B7

>> No.15203327

>>15203324
H-P-huh???

>> No.15203336

>>15203309
that AI still has some way to go

>> No.15203338

>>15203327
Hydraulic Power Unit. It provides hydraulic pressure for the thrust vector control arms on the center 13 engines.

>> No.15203354

>>15203324
SN15?

>> No.15203359

>>15203354
Probably out of 16 units that were built before they switched over to electric actuators.

>> No.15203373

https://www.twitter.com/ArianeGroup/status/1625574812125913105

> Jim, who is an aeronautical engineer with ArianeGroup, has a secret project: to build his own rocket and be the first amateur to make a space flight. The French film "L'Astronaute" will be released tomorrow. Who among you would like to see it?

LMAO

>> No.15203390
File: 266 KB, 2048x1218, 587E3208-750A-47E9-A9E4-1843B10F2FDA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203390

>Starlink is cash flow positive
Does this mean they’re turning a profit with it?

>> No.15203398

>>15203390
Not yet iirc. Still paying off the initial investment

>> No.15203412

hypothetically, could an evolutionary algorithm be used to do classification (which is usually done by neural networks)

>> No.15203417
File: 2.80 MB, 720x720, SoyusLaunchFromSpace56.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203417

forgot WEBM

>> No.15203422

>>15203412
No but it can be used to rape u

>> No.15203426
File: 410 KB, 1226x2048, 160B4BBC-7520-4DCA-B11B-841BA183698A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203426

Ariane 5’s JAV (Jupe AVant, Forward Skirt)

>> No.15203431

>>15203338
Weren't they moving to electric motors for those? Or was that something else

>> No.15203434

>>15203426
Are there any close up photos of the new A6 SRBs?

>> No.15203440

>>15203412
Yes but it would be worse. Also wrong thread

>> No.15203447

>>15203431
They are, starting with Booster 9

>> No.15203448

>>15203426
>JAV starring a French girl
uh oh

>> No.15203455

>>15202577
>Rocket Lab 168kg
>Firefly 32kg
vs
>LandSpace 2800kg
>ExPace 1000kg
>Chinarocket 747kg
>Galactic Energy 210kg
American small launch is shitting their pants

>> No.15203457

>>15203455
Falcon 9 devoured the small launch market

>> No.15203460
File: 600 KB, 2043x2048, FDIE8IGVEAEbSHD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203460

>>15203440
in practice how would you get an evolutionary algorithm to do that?

>> No.15203461
File: 354 KB, 1448x2048, 811F2B6D-9804-4D81-ACC4-13A9F96B84C1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203461

>>15203434
Sure
They’re called P120C (Powder 120 Common) and more specifically for A6 ESR (Equipped solid rocket)

>> No.15203462
File: 53 KB, 600x944, DmGtYBn25GDHFdc4Gui8CS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203462

>>15203373
kek, this movie was already made

>> No.15203465

>>15203390
no, but it means they are losing less and less capital on it

>> No.15203466
File: 127 KB, 720x960, 0A386CE9-E8E2-4067-96A2-9B073EE6F52B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203466

>>15203461
375tons thrust at ignition each, very quickly rising to ~450 tons after

>> No.15203467
File: 442 KB, 1366x2048, C104F984-2C0F-404A-9D41-6A4B72D52C20.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203467

>>15203466
140 tons of fuel (despite the 120 in the name), largest single segment SRB

>> No.15203469

>>15203373
That's a fun premise.
Amateur manned will never happen but how long until amateur orbital rockets?
Maybe 3D printed with solid fuel

>> No.15203470
File: 675 KB, 1449x2048, 5D86EB81-6DCD-4406-9FF0-D963E1E46EE5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203470

>>15203467
This is from the combined test, 3 are models, 1 is a real one but unfuelled

>> No.15203472

Is engine anon still alive?

>> No.15203473

>>15203457
true, but it will have no impact on chinese-made payloads. there will be a bifurcation of launch economies, which is kinda nice since no one else seems to be competing with SpaceX. if china eventually builds a F9 or Starship equivalent, then SpaceX doesnt need to do 100% of the work colonizing Mars. ideally there are more players, but RL and Blue Origin seem to be the only ones with a modicum of interest in trying (and barely at that)

>> No.15203476
File: 43 KB, 545x574, B4CAF24A-4647-481D-A5D4-ED4EFB5ECD99.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203476

>>15203470
What could have been…

>> No.15203477

>>15203472
No, he died in the engine explosion.

>> No.15203478

>>15203469
cant wait till i can 3d print a nuclear missile in my garage hnnnggg

>> No.15203483

>>15203477
god bless him and his family

>> No.15203484

>>15203460
You don't, it's just about the worst possible algorithm for classification
https://ai.stackexchange.com/questions/2908/is-it-possible-to-classify-data-using-a-genetic-algorithm

>> No.15203487

>>15203478
I'm pretty sure you can't 3d print nuclear fuel

>> No.15203488

>>15203373
Why doesnt Boeing fund any propaganda movies about SLS?

>> No.15203491

>>15203487
Relativity is working on that

>> No.15203492

>>15203487
I'm pretty sure metal ceramic fuel elements have always been extruded.

>> No.15203496

>>15203491
are they?

>> No.15203498

>>15203484
>There are a few options. One is to not use the GA as a direct classifier, but instead use a GA to learn the parameters of another classification model like a neural network. The basic idea of a GA is that it (very roughly speaking) forms a black-box method for searching an arbitrary space for solutions that minimize or maximize some function.
would it be possible thought to write a GA that searches the space of possible computer programs, and selects those that happen to be good at classifying? (No prior knowledge of NNs)

>> No.15203499
File: 245 KB, 1772x1253, B8C77BA7-C12E-4026-AA18-CB8D1502859F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203499

>>15203470
The huge composite casing are made by Avio near Rome, the nozzles are made near Bordeaux, the composite cone (CoCo) are made in Madrid, the attachment between Kongsberg Norway and Lausanne, Switzerland, the skirt in Augsburg. It’s assembled and filled with fuel at Kourou. Kourou can support ~40 P120C production per year between A6 and Vega

>> No.15203500
File: 428 KB, 1810x2560, 2C9DA6C9-D340-44C7-9E8B-20D0140542C6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203500

How do we increase Vega’s flight rate?

>> No.15203501

>>15203469
It won't ever be a thing I don't think, but if you were determined you could say fuck the FAA and all the goverbmebt faggots and get yourself to orbit. Mercury rocket was what, like 80 foot long? I saw one at KSC and it didnt seem so big to me. Solid rockets are pretty simple, If you had a bit of rural land, machining skills, money and determination you could DIY a rocket and launch yourself to orbit 100%. Re-entry with amateur systems would be way more difficult but would be a very fucking cool funeral if you had enough of life.

>> No.15203503

>>15203500
I love the diameter variations of this rocket

>> No.15203506

>>15203498
Why do you want to do this in the first place?

>> No.15203507
File: 64 KB, 762x598, Salvage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203507

>>15203373
>to build his own rocket and be the first amateur to make a space flight
Too late frogs, Andy Griffith beat you to it

>> No.15203510

>>15203506
just curious. I think I'd be interesting if GAs could do the same thing as NNs

>> No.15203511

>>15203461
>>15203467
Wow they unironically look cheaper than A5s

>> No.15203512

>>15203500
I think the main bottleneck right now is the P120C production rate. I heard that's capped at 25 units per year. Completing the Vega-E should help too since you can ditch the Zefiro-9 and AVUM stages for a single methane stage, which should be easier to mass produce.

>> No.15203514

>>15203476
>main rocket body is 3 different widths at different points
I love wider at the top rockets but 3 is too many.

>> No.15203547

>spend most of my life indoors
>feel lethargic, tired of life
>everything feels so fake, like existence is a temporary illusion
life in the colonies is going to be rough if you cant touch grass

>> No.15203549

>>15203547
>life in the colonies
Life in space colonies will literally be LIVE IN THE POD and EAT THE BUGS like the /x/chizos and /pol/tards like to bitch about, but they refuse to accept it.

>> No.15203552
File: 2.14 MB, 1456x1920, B0224888-B964-4EB7-A3F2-0F552DFD2AC9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203552

>>15203514
Only one rocket family has mastered the look, everything else looks goofy

>> No.15203559

>>15203547
I feel you, bro. Sometimes spaceflight seems to be like one of the only things that makes this life meaningful or real at all. Maybe once you are up there it's going to feel different. Otherwise, why even bothering.

>> No.15203575

Lock your doors tonight, anons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbuiPJQjnjU

>> No.15203588

I had a dream Starship OFT1 cleared the pad but failed at Max Q

>> No.15203589

>>15203547
You have no purpose (colonists will have a grand sense of purpose and a lifelong goal), you eat goyslop (colonists will not eat this because processed trash food is not efficient, they will be eating salads, veges crustaceans and fish fresh af), you barely exercise (colonists will likely have to exercise hard and often or face severe medical issues).

etc

>> No.15203593

>>15203547
You just seem like a loser. Change your life or kill yourself. Or at least stop whining where I have to see it

>> No.15203600
File: 2.19 MB, 2880x3840, 632C7C64-3A19-497B-8B49-065FE0671B1B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203600

>Daily Starship threads on /k/
Lmao

>> No.15203609

>>15203600
It’s just one fag spamming, there’s also a fag spamming anti musk garbage every couple days

>> No.15203629
File: 53 KB, 567x611, 1643128230594.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203629

>>15203600
>space transportation general on /n/

>> No.15203631
File: 57 KB, 644x800, 1067297eead5bdb13f0a5195d4193e5d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203631

>Kymeta

>> No.15203635

>>15203600
just wait a few decades
>2050
>thread on /k/ about space force
>anons complaining about riding in a rusty old starship and how boring lunar tours are

>> No.15203639

>>15203600
Gross, hopefully those faggots stay there.

>> No.15203643

>>15203639
Who do you think is making them?
lol

>> No.15203644
File: 96 KB, 678x538, nig einstein n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203644

>>15203600
> /k/atamites
lowest form of life on 4channel

>> No.15203648

>>15203644
Russian shills are much lower

>> No.15203660

>>15203648
At least the Russian shill is doing something for his country unlike fat incel neckbeards larping about killing the government with 20,000 dollars of shit he only knows how to use from an online pdf.

>> No.15203662

>>15203644
/k/ is genuinely one of the only intelligent boards since it involves people who are familiar with weapons, most boards require no real practical knowledge for discussion. It’s not that intelligent but the bar isn’t high on 4chan. /Sfg/ used to be smarter for the same reason but has dumbed down a lot. Stupidest boards are /his/, /pol/, /int/, /r9k/, /v/. /sci/ and /x/ are the most schizo. /lit/, /tv/, /co/ and /a/ are the most insufferable, though.

>> No.15203663

>>15203660
>for his government
Yeah, like a good goy

>> No.15203665

>>15203660
>>15203644
You can’t even into memearrows stop acting like you aren’t a newfag.

>> No.15203667

>>15203600
/k/ is worse than /pol/

>> No.15203669

>>15203663
Let me know when you manage to kill your government by larping online with your shiny gun fat boy.

>> No.15203672 [DELETED] 

>>15203662
I bet you also believe the Ukraine is winning.

>> No.15203673

>>15203644
/k/ is actually a great board for current events desu

>>15203667
Is it though? /pol/ is like the /sci/ catalog but a million times worse. At least /k/ doesn’t have retarded schizos and Trump general # 1 million

>> No.15203674

>>15203673
>/k/ is actually a great board for current events desu

You're fucked in the head, it's 95% glowniggers doing agitprop. Admittedly it was pretty OK before Ukraine but it's quite literally unusable now.

>> No.15203676

>>15203672
The fact that you’re obsessed with this and with >>15203669 proves pretty thoroughly that you’re a newfag tbqh. Honestly the armatard era of /k/ was worse but I kind of miss the castration fetish mod, he really knew his stuff

>> No.15203678

>>15203635
For real, commercial space travel will probably be shit unless it is first class.
As in, the first several times humans have traveled in airplanes were probably an wonderful experience in some way, but when commercial air travel came up it became an unpleasant experience for most people.

>> No.15203680

>>15203676
Go back

>> No.15203681

>>15203674
this
>>15203676
lmao even

>> No.15203683

>>15203680
He who smelt it.

>> No.15203686

>>15203662
lmao

>> No.15203688

>>15203644
/co/oomers might be the lowest, and by that I mean the most disgusting subset of /co/ trash that constantly posts waifu threads, and posts fetish pics of characters during the Sunday night Fox AD threads.

>> No.15203690

>>15203678
I'm not so sure, at least not until it becomes extremely mainstream. Let's say it costs $1000 to give someone legroom, entertainment, wifi, good food, etc. That's 10 times the price of a budget airline ticket but would be a small fraction of the price of any seat on Starship, even under the most optimistic scenarios.

>> No.15203693

>>15203688
That's the best part of /co/ you retard

>> No.15203694 [DELETED] 
File: 202 KB, 828x1337, A5144F29-EA64-4BF6-B72E-5F5836504A78.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203694

We China now

>> No.15203701

>>15203678
airline travel was for wealthier people until the 80s or 90s or something.

>> No.15203703 [DELETED] 

>>15203694
Spaceflight?

>> No.15203722
File: 82 KB, 970x1024, 1616683309801.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203722

>>15203549
What is lost in comfort is gained in purpose.

>> No.15203735

>>15203694
The worst that my part of I-10 ever got was a HCl tanker truck flipped over on a ramp with a tight curve. The concrete was a LOT cleaner when it was over.

>> No.15203751

>>15202416
Why is Vandenberg right next to a marine reserve on the beautiful mid-California coast

>> No.15203753
File: 3.13 MB, 1499x1128, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203753

>>15203751
forgot the image

>> No.15203756
File: 96 KB, 1745x633, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203756

>>15203629
maybe it'll liven up the board a little bit

>> No.15203757

>>15203751
The base was there first. The reserve is an excuse to sink """fishing boats""" that get close.

>> No.15203760

>>15203722
Speaking of which, can't wait for cartel rockets smuggling drugs to orbit, like they do now with submarines.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR18qhnGEpM

>> No.15203772

>>15203760
Fuck cartels

>> No.15203774 [DELETED] 

>>15203694
Based.

>> No.15203793 [DELETED] 
File: 259 KB, 743x1483, mark-hero.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203793

>>15203694
My senator will fix this. Thank you Mark Kelly

>> No.15203799 [DELETED] 

>>15203674
found armatard. Zigger steppe trash was always despised there, seeing them get btfo just enflamed the joy of misery

>> No.15203805 [DELETED] 
File: 2.62 MB, 1280x7671, 1675715537921712.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203805

>>15203672
they are doing pretty alright

>> No.15203806 [DELETED] 

>>15203672
We'll give them nukes if they need them.

>> No.15203808 [DELETED] 

>>15203672
It’s more than just Ukraine winning. Russia has lost a minimum of 30,000 men over the course of a year. America’s # 1 enemy has lost 4X as many men in one year that America lost in 20 years of GWOT

>> No.15203814 [DELETED] 
File: 899 KB, 1859x1235, ukraine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203814

>>15203805
you sure showed me

>> No.15203816 [DELETED] 

>/sfg/ - Ukraine Happening General

>> No.15203818 [DELETED] 

>>15203816
Russian internet shittery never sleeps.

>> No.15203819 [DELETED] 

>>15203808
Yeah, but having an unlimited stockpile of trash infantry to drown their opponents with has always been Russia's thing. All the foreign guns in the world doesn't mean much when you're trying to hand them off to some conscripted twelve year olds.

>> No.15203820
File: 1.88 MB, 1170x1434, D95126C8-F704-4525-93F9-0813F452546E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203820

Bismallah I will put this thread back on the rails

>> No.15203821

>>15203674
>vatnik bitch seething
post discarded

>> No.15203823
File: 900 KB, 1152x720, 1E091C8A-EAB5-46C5-9923-439590D2F7F4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203823

I downloaded the FreeIVA mod for KSP which lets you walk around your ship in IVA mode. Holy shit this is so fun

>> No.15203824 [DELETED] 

>>15203808
How many men has america lost due to trannyism, estrogenation and brownification? Probably a hell of a lot more than 30k.

>> No.15203825
File: 110 KB, 824x651, 7FB40429-62CD-426B-B89A-A7B3175EE6B5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203825

>>15203820
Without a steady diet of launches /sfg/ will always devolve into geopolitics or circular arguments about meme spacetech.

>> No.15203827
File: 867 KB, 1152x720, 10174E29-8A85-4807-B6A1-B9EBF5E896E0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203827

>>15203823
We are going. I’m hoping to have a self sustaining base of 20 or so Kerbals eventually. It’s gonna take a lot of work to get there - life support mods really are a grind

>> No.15203828 [DELETED] 

>>15203814
In 2 weeks, Russia will take over Kiev

>> No.15203831

>>15203823
>playing ksp this close to ksp2 releasing

>> No.15203832
File: 160 KB, 1024x768, FD5B3A05-6B8E-437D-8A79-BE65B7F9584A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203832

>>15203824
How many has Russia?

>> No.15203833

>>15203831
KSP + KSRSS + Realism mods is fine. Anyways, I’m on a max laptop lol KSP2 support ain’t coming
>KSRSS?
RSS but at 1/4 scale, or KSP scaled up 2.5X. Stock parts and balances to IRL scale now. A lot of fun, and easy on your PC. It’s like RSS but not as grindy

>> No.15203834

>>15203824
Not as many men Russia has lost due to alcoholism lmao

>> No.15203835

Are stainless steel balloon tanks lighter than carbon fiber?

>> No.15203837

>>15203835
For a given strength at cryo temperatures yes.

>> No.15203844

musk had BDS

>> No.15203846

>>15203844
Big Dick Starship

>> No.15203847
File: 20 KB, 260x400, ED9DA688-8774-4703-B180-C47179C0E1E3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203847

I don’t like Neutron

>> No.15203850

>>15203833
make sure to get principia so you can do sick fucking orbits
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3PCCJZzVvg

>> No.15203851

>>15203844
Booster Detachment System

>> No.15203857

>>15203851
Booster Derangement Syndrome

>> No.15203859
File: 118 KB, 1200x1020, 20230126_070544.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203859

>>15203847
she's like a fat electron and i'm here for it

>> No.15203861

Jeff foust is Back
https://youtu.be/XNgp_pVpJVY

>> No.15203865

>>15203857
Benis Detachment Syndrome

>> No.15203866

>>15202599
heatshields

>> No.15203871

>>15203844
Booster Downrange Success

>> No.15203873

>>15203589
>they will be eating salads, veges crustaceans and fish fresh af)
Yeah I'm sure they're going to be shipping fresh fish and salad to Mars

>> No.15203878

>>15203873
Grow fish

>> No.15203885

>>15203878
Realistically it'll just be nutrient bars and stuff, maybe canned food on a good day. Although having an underground lake with fish in it on Mars seems pretty cool

>> No.15203891

>>15203885
We already ran the numbers, they’ll raise tilapia

>> No.15203894
File: 245 KB, 702x336, EAC5B125-FBB1-4902-B504-C67310E8D4BA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203894

I just want to pass the Karman line one day, bros.

>> No.15203895

>>15203873
>>15203885
No one is shipping food to Mars, you grow and direct eat it there, many fish have beneficial uses in hydroponic setups, we've been through this many times you fucking newfaggot redditor.

>> No.15203909
File: 279 KB, 2048x1366, EbxlwbgX0AAGYwI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203909

Where can I find information about Falcon 9/heavy's upper stage variant for long duration coasts? I know they can be identified by their gray band of insulation paint, but i've heard somewhere that there's more differences than just that.
I'm trying to track down the specific source that said that there was more equipment onboard that kept the RP-1 thermally stable, it was some autistic "Gunters Space Page" tier website, but iv'e had no luck in finding it.
I looked through the Falcon user guides for it too, but theres no mention of it anywhere. Any articles that mention it are just that... mentions.

>> No.15203912
File: 32 KB, 900x506, 2F446460-580D-42DC-8CC9-36720E3C497A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203912

I know it was just suborbital and only reached 80 kilometers, but the Richard Branson spaceflight was incredibly kino

>> No.15203913

>>15203894
If your goal does not include at least a full orbit, then I must say your ambition is lacking. Also, what steps are you taking to make this a reality? Are you in physical shape to launch ect.

>> No.15203915

>>15203909
IICR there’s extra helium in them too. Because there’s 3 burns usually, instead of 1 or 2.

>> No.15203918

>>15203895
Wow rude

>> No.15203920

>>15203913
I’m in Uni hoping to go to med school in 2-3 years. It’s hard; I work full time so I’m gonna take a gap year or 2 or even 3 to work on my volunteering. GPA is 3.99, so if I keep this up I’m almost certain I’ll get into medschool somewhere
I’m also an aspiring bodybuilder who competed in powerlifting until recently lol. Ironically I think powerlifting was pretty fucking detrimental to my health as I could no longer walk up stairs without feeling dizzy haha

How about you Anon

>> No.15203926

>Falcon 9’s first landing was over 7 years ago
What the fuck

>> No.15203940

>>15203885
>Realistically it'll just be nutrient bars and stuff

No, it won't. Maybe the first NASA faggots but no real effort is going to be bringing food rather than growing it in situ.

>> No.15203941
File: 81 KB, 550x309, 3FAD90A6-A348-4406-9863-53A1623B8796.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203941

>>15203926
>starhopper was 13 years ago

>> No.15203943

>>15203941
I wonder where spaceflight will be by 2032 desu. 2010 to 2023 was insane enough.

>> No.15203944

>>15203943
Mars.

>> No.15203946

>>15203944
The only hard part seems like it’ll be ISRU propellant. Habitation, re entry, refueling, flight rate, etc. Will all be solved by HLS

>> No.15203964
File: 79 KB, 702x218, 68050DBE-EBFA-43B0-B0BA-A6121D4B78E5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203964

I have failed my diet 3 days in a row goddamnit. I’m not even trying o lose a lot of weight, just 16 pounds by June

>> No.15203966

>>15203964
Just eat less

>> No.15203969

>>15203966
It was my girlfriend’s birthday on Sunday, and then Valentine’s Day today. It’s hard, mate

>> No.15203981
File: 88 KB, 1200x675, s-l1600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15203981

>>15203946
If only there was somebody who was working on this years ago
He could have made a fully functional prototype by now.
And then, when NASA declined going to Mars, he could, I don't know, start a company developing power-to-gas technology for Earth applications.
If only there was somebody like that...

>> No.15203984

>>15203981
>Builds a 94% efficient ISRU demo in his garage with some friends
The true king of /sfg/

>> No.15203991

Oh hey the professor from cool worlds was on discovery tv pop sci show.
Good for him.

>> No.15204003

>>15203964
>spaceflight?
Anyway, literally all you need to do is to just skip a meal and do some pushups.
I've lost 5kg in less than a month - it's that easy.
You know what doesn't help? Sitting on ass, filling out excel tables, thinking about food.

>> No.15204018

>>15204003
>I've lost 5kg in less than a month

Good stuff but thats too fast, you're going to end up with nasty flappy skin if you don't take it slower.

>> No.15204022

>>15203991
Well he is a very good narrator.

>> No.15204032

>>15204022
I know. And it was tiresome when they went to michio kaku every single time.

>> No.15204079

>>15203964
I've never been very large (I've been told I look anorexic) and the thing that seems to keep me that way is doing a few pushups everyday and not eating snacks. If you don't have snacks you can't just eat whenever you feel like it, you have to set aside a non-trivial amount of time to prepare food.

>> No.15204142
File: 122 KB, 1024x683, 1659445868257822.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204142

does anyone have the go/no go gifs that anons used to post here?

>> No.15204145
File: 591 KB, 320x240, giphy.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204145

>>15204142
This?

>> No.15204147
File: 41 KB, 600x599, f9_pls_launch.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204147

>>15204142
idk wat u mean

>> No.15204150
File: 11 KB, 28x30, catimag28x30.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204150

>>15204145
thanks anon, I will trade you this

>> No.15204151
File: 1.82 MB, 2707x2182, longshipislong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204151

laumch

>> No.15204154
File: 475 KB, 332x292, launch cat.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204154

>>15204142
the collage

>> No.15204189
File: 69 KB, 1082x1305, atmospheric layers 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204189

> I just wanna pass the Karman line bros ;_;
You'd just be an ascended mesocuck lol

>> No.15204196

>>15203676
>the castration fetish mod
QRD?

>> No.15204201

>>15204003
I run up the stairs 90% of the time

>> No.15204212

>>15204189
>you'll forever be trapped as a grounddweller
sugar coat me bro

>> No.15204215
File: 1.50 MB, 780x1039, honey.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204215

>>15204212
okay

>> No.15204221
File: 625 KB, 1600x1067, 26504730220_4740fe540b_h.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204221

>>15204215
enjoying some hexagons

>> No.15204224

>>15204221
What exactly has JWST achieved?

>> No.15204225
File: 785 KB, 2500x1406, EDU_GoldCoatedMirror_16x9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204225

>>15204224
I anticipated someone asking this

>> No.15204233
File: 398 KB, 1300x1104, 2201-02_delta_ii.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204233

>>15201151
bring back blue delta...blue vulcan

>> No.15204236

>>15204233
This is a child.

>> No.15204242

>>15204236
she got a cute wittl toof :) :D

>> No.15204255

>>15204236
on a suicide mission

>> No.15204256
File: 388 KB, 1365x2048, sls_rocket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204256

>> No.15204257
File: 88 KB, 800x450, ElonSellingTeslaSharesByBloomberg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204257

>> No.15204277

>>15204257
>selling on tops before bubble crash
smart? it was interesting seeing FT and other publications talk about twitter crashing while amazon and other FAGMANs were coming down at the same pace if not faster, SeX being private must help a lot keeping their interests straight

>> No.15204287
File: 36 KB, 736x521, 1676462781.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204287

>>15204257
>>15204277
Yeah the feds crushed all the stocks by forcing every investor to sell and move to high interest guaranteed federal reserve bonds. Tesla also put their earnings into fed bonds because of those free high interest bonds

>> No.15204298

>>15204224
Btfoed big bang

>> No.15204304
File: 189 KB, 1094x728, Star trails earth orbit from the International Space Station.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204304

>>15204224
its destroying red dwarf habitability stupes even as we speak, its worth every penny for that alone

>> No.15204311

>>15204298
How?

>> No.15204324

>>15204304
>still no official news of Trappists

>> No.15204332
File: 68 KB, 599x595, heaven's gate away team nike.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204332

>>15204324
they don't want suicides

>> No.15204341
File: 48 KB, 709x584, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204341

>>15204257
>the worlds most valuable car company went from #1 to.... slightly lower #1

>> No.15204353

>>15204311
There's fully formed galaxy as far as it can see

>> No.15204355

>>15204341
There's so much catalyst for Tesla on the horizon too. Cybertruck, FSD, the new charging infrastructure build out, gen4 platform, etc. Like this year alone. People oversold because of stupidity and fear.

>> No.15204362

>>15204355
the real catalyst is governments around the world incentivizing green energy. This is why Tesla is so valuable despite losing money and not making many cars. They lead an industry that's bound to get much much bigger

>> No.15204364
File: 48 KB, 704x723, 9.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204364

>>15204353
huh

>> No.15204365

>>15204364
Now google if men can get pregnant

>> No.15204367

>>15204365
KEK

>> No.15204368
File: 1.11 MB, 2000x3000, 51307939629_4515d7c8ea_3k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204368

When Webb went online I expected an avalanche if new discoveries. Instead what we got is a slow trickle.

>> No.15204369

>>15204365
Can you provide a credible source then?

>> No.15204370

>>15204362
>despite losing money and not making many cars
You're like 4 years out of date with that data lol. Tesla makes more profit per car, more profit overall as a company than Toyota last quarter.

>> No.15204372

>>15204365
>Mammalian males, including humans, do not possess a uterus to gestate offspring.
based google

>> No.15204373

>>15204368
It’s performing as good as everyone hoped, maybe even better. It’s just the nature of academia that makes it go slow. In some ways this is a good thing. In many ways this is a bad thing; inshallah I hate academia

>> No.15204374

>>15204369
I read it on /sci/

>> No.15204375

>>15204370
I admit I'm a bit out of day. But have they started producing a considerable amount of cars?

>> No.15204377

>>15203920
I am an Aerospace Engineer, graduated from university and been in industry for 5 years. I am a long distance runner, and the university I went to was located over a mile above sea level, so it was like high altitude training. I have studied Russian, though it is debatable how relevant that is these days. I am also working on my pilot's license.

Even with my background I know how competitive the astronaut game is, and I know I haven't gone all in. I know a T.A. I had got his Aerospace Engineering degree and then went on to med school all to increase his chances for selection.
Also with national astronaut products you have to navigate the politics of it, they may just not want your demographic, and then you are fucked.

Hopefully we are just in time for the expansion of commercial space, and will be ready to grab opportunities when they come.

But if your goal is space you will still need to make it happen.

>> No.15204380
File: 133 KB, 1599x689, 1676467240.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204380

>>15204375
1.3M last year. Stated to be 1.8-2M this year.

Tesla is the 6th largest car company in the world by earnings right now, and 11th largest by revenue. And by profit, they're #1 I believe too. Along with profit margin per car.

https://companiesmarketcap.com/automakers/most-profitable-automakers/

>> No.15204381

>>15204298
nothing a little fine tuning cant fix. i fucking hate modern physics

>> No.15204382
File: 85 KB, 1264x567, 1676467643.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204382

>>15204380
https://www.carscoops.com/2022/11/tesla-was-more-profitable-than-toyota-last-quarter-earning-8-times-more-per-vehicle/

Even though Toyota sells ~10x more car, Tesla's overall profit is higher than Toyota. Thats with a ~1M car during the summer. Now that we're closing to ~2M car this year, Tesla will be an absolute monster

>> No.15204384
File: 412 KB, 3000x2000, 51283604438_4a959e3705_3kTRANSPORTER2LANDING.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204384

>>15204380
so you're saying Elon Musk runs two revolutionary highly successful companies? And people still think he's a scam?

>> No.15204386
File: 32 KB, 485x269, Musk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204386

>>15204287
Yeah, why can't they just keep the interest rates flat 0. Who cares about inflation and the plebs, let the mega rich have their stocks pumped by free money.

>> No.15204390

>>15204386
>gov funds covid research
>covid gets released by lab due to "accident"
>government shuts down supply chains
>prices shoot up
>gov gaslights "companies" as a "problem"
>gov tries to kill companies with extreme volatility
>gov claims they're trying to save people and inflation
>gov tells people "rich man bad"
>gov prints money

>> No.15204399
File: 90 KB, 1024x768, thunderfoot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204399

>>15204384
I'm smarter than Elon fucking Musk

>> No.15204415
File: 1.10 MB, 3456x4608, SPOILER_IMG_20230214_174745579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204415

How was your Valentine's day, eseffgee?

>> No.15204419

>>15204384
People are naturally more attracted to negative news than positive ones. Mainly because we're hard wired as a species by evolution to pay more attention to negative/threats. Its how our news media exploits this and runs 24/7 negative media campaign to keep your eyeball glued to the media.

>> No.15204420

>>15204415
Lonely, another time in a row.

>> No.15204422
File: 56 KB, 886x1103, chinesium.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204422

https://twitter.com/AJ_FI/status/1625835371719188480
wtf is this

>> No.15204425
File: 74 KB, 891x1153, FpAgOWhXgAEUvI-.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204425

>>15204422
bonus full scale falcon heavy clone

>> No.15204426

>>15204422
scam

>> No.15204431

>>15204422
ME CHINESE
ME NAME MY SPACE COMPANY STAR SPACE
ME NAME ROCKET FLY SPACE

>> No.15204474

>>15204390
Yes, printing money is bad. It caused all these unproductive startups that can raise money for eternity even if they have no positive cash flow. That includes Twitter. Maybe Elon can prune it enough to make it sustainable, doubt he can ever recoup his investment.

>> No.15204478
File: 49 KB, 1024x565, Copenhagen-Suborbitals-Spica.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204478

>>15203469
>>15203501
how do you guys not know about copenhagen suborbitals?

>> No.15204479

>>15204474
Twitter is an investment into the future. Aside from the financial aspects through cost cutting+expansion of feature sets and subscribers, you also have the payout through control over social voice/change. No more ultra woke shit on twitter = good for future of humanity

>> No.15204482

>>15204478
They move slower than fucking oldspace on fattest cost plus contract known to man though.

>> No.15204485

>>15204384
Spacex isn't a scam. Tesla isn't a scam. FSD is a scam. People put down real money to get that "revolutionary" feature, and now some of those cars are near midlife with barely anything close to level 5 autonomy.

>> No.15204487

>>15204485
I also remember people saying that Semi is a scam.

>> No.15204488

>>15204485
FSD is fuckin cool and the ultimate normie filter

>> No.15204489

>>15204482
Yeah but its like 10 guys in a warehouse with no funding, what do you expect, they've all got day jobs so its probably less total time invested than one full time employee.

>> No.15204490

>>15204422
It's goofy looking but it's not that bad an idea. SpaceX is going to have a lot of work to do and a lot of issues to overcome before crew launch and land on Starship. Meanwhile, the Falcon 9 booster has the best reliability of any rocket ever flow and is already crew-rated. Designing a reusable second stage that's intended only for crew launch would be a good way to expand your capability to get large numbers of people into space and back quickly.

I'm not sure how well a Chinese knockoff would be able to deliver on any of that, but it's not a bad idea.

>> No.15204492

what class of rocket comes after super heavy lift?

>> No.15204493

>>15204492
NTR

>> No.15204494

>>15204492
Heavy Lift 64

>> No.15204495

>>15204492
Mega heavy lift

>> No.15204505

>>15204492
Nothing, just like you don't need to airlift more than ~200 tons, you don't need to orbit more than that amount in a single launch.

>> No.15204511

>>15204505
>I don’t care if you’re working construction; you don’t need that pickup truck. Just drive a camry bro

>> No.15204512

>>15204492
next comes reclassification
just like you had pre-dreadnaught battleships and then dreadnaughts, you will have pre-starship launch vehicles and starship class, followed by superstarships

>> No.15204527

If those !balloons were ayys then why haven't we seen any evidence of aliens out in space?

>> No.15204531

>>15204527
They were not extraterrestrial it’s as simple as that

>> No.15204538

>>15204492
Super Duper Pooper Scooper Gurren Lagann Carl Sagan Ship

>> No.15204540
File: 116 KB, 933x828, 1633196193490.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204540

>>15204221

>> No.15204573
File: 45 KB, 512x343, billy witchdoctor dotcom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204573

>>15204492
Ultra mega lift?

>> No.15204629

Huh today I learned the soviets actually sent soyuz around the Moon

>> No.15204637

>>15204492
Light shuttle

>> No.15204645
File: 314 KB, 447x447, 90BBDB20-F008-4C28-95F0-C1FBB3B0B28F.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204645

>Kerbalism and Methane/Hydrogen ISRU not working
>Have to switch to an easier/less realistic life support mod
Mfw

>> No.15204651

>>15204629
Unlike landing landing on the moon, the Soviet actually had a shot at sending a man around the moon before the Americans

>> No.15204655

>>15204651
From my limited research I just did right now in a fit of autism, it seemed like korolev thought soyuz was too heavy to be launched on an UR-500. Well he ended up dying and the new head of OKB-1, Vasily Mishin, thought soyuz could indeed go around the moon—if they stripped it down a ton. Thus they created the Zond spacecraft. It kept blowing up on Protons. Some of them actually made it around the Moon though, with most fucking up the landing sequence and pulling something like 20 Gs or failing to deploy parachutes (they took away reserve shoots to save mass lol)
Zond 7 was the only mission deemed “survivable” after going around the moon and returning

>> No.15204657

>>15204492
single stage two orbit

>> No.15204700

>>15204645
My KAS broke and now every design is a final design, even if all I needed to do to fix a problem is add a docking port or solar panel.

>> No.15204705

Instead of parachutes, could we just have the capsule be inside a big Zorb?

>> No.15204716
File: 48 KB, 500x373, DC6212E8-60F2-44A1-9866-127C0C5F6CC5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204716

>>15204705

>> No.15204721

>>15204716
Say what you want but JPL does absolutely amazing stuff sometimes

>> No.15204725

>>15204716
nice, but I heard this wouldn't be survivable for astronauts.

>> No.15204736

>>15204721
https://youtu.be/pDdWbrwsFTM
Soviets did it first believe it or not. Go to 3:10 this shit is hilarious and based

>> No.15204750

>>15204725
Really? What gave that away?

>> No.15204755

>>15204415
no hardbacks, no erections, no launches, no massive explosions: it sucked

>> No.15204763

>>15204750
I'm sure if you made the bubbles a bit bigger they would be okay.

>> No.15204765

Beyond kino
https://twitter.com/11k25_energia/status/1625920031279153159

>> No.15204776

>>15204765
This guy was 50% of the reason why I made a twitter account

>> No.15204795

slow days

>> No.15204811

https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a3dc2a
WhiteKnightTwo is airborne for the first time in over a year

>> No.15204816

>>15204811
Well congratulations, you got yourself airborne. Now what's the next step of your master plan?

>> No.15204819

downselect soon? nasa is feeling the urge to prune some of the contenders for the commercial leo station.
https://spacenews.com/nasa-updates-plans-for-use-of-commercial-space-stations/

>> No.15204829

>>15204816
More test flights followed by more mandatory maintenance followed by more test flights followed by waiting around for the Delta-class spacecraft to be complete so they can replace the current spaceship model.

Then more test flights.

>> No.15204847

its over. biden won, elon bent the knee.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/02/tesla-finally-agrees-to-open-its-charging-network-to-all-evs-in-us/

>> No.15204850

>>15204819
Ehhh it’s about time.

>> No.15204854

>>15204847
why don't people just charge at home

>> No.15204855

>>15204847
He’s been talking about doing this for a while. I don’t know if it’s out of the pure goodness of his heart though, I’m sure there are other financial/political implications but I’m not smart enough to ponder what it could be

>> No.15204858

>>15204854
Lots of places offer free charging

>> No.15204874
File: 91 KB, 422x719, DBA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204874

>>15204425
Jesus Christ ANOTHER ONE???

>> No.15204889
File: 60 KB, 525x600, 97CAE689-AA8D-4394-A92B-6F39CFD38238.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204889

>>15204847
Don’t Worry. No charge for them

>> No.15204895

>>15204847
Standardisation is good

>> No.15204911

>>15204847
Not really. Biden just agreed to fund Tesla in exchange for CCS adapters.

CCS1 large/bulky but Biden wont budge on it. So Tesla will just have their "Magic Dock" which adds CCS compatability to some of their chargers. While getting some of that billions to expand their supercharging stations.

It would be nice if NACS was adopted since its smaller, sleeker, lighter, requires less materials to make, costs less, but who cares if Biden wants to make the competitor use bulkier and worse off connectors. We'll have 2 competing connectors.

>> No.15204919

>>15204911
I don’t give af about electric vehicles for now, but I do wonder when the next ‘huge breakthrough’ for battery tech will come. This has far-reaching implications especially for space flight. I really hope we live to see some crazy ass development in energy storage in our lifetimes

>> No.15204929

>>15204858
They wont be free for long

>> No.15204933

>can move vehicles on earth with electricity
>cant do the same in space
electric propulsion when?

>> No.15204934

>>15204919
No such thing

>> No.15204943

>>15204919
Aren't lithium-sulfur rbatteries elatively interesting for aerospace? They degrade quickly thought cycle but that's less of a problem for many space applications.

>> No.15204947
File: 84 KB, 643x847, U-boat hammocks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204947

>>15204933
How do you think starlinks move? Elon makes a wish and it happens?

>> No.15204949

>>15204919
Next breakthrough is long lasting + fast charging + solid state, which is decade + away. Each part are separate functions. Solid state right now has terrible charge cycle, similar level of charge speed as lithium ion, it needs lot of work.

But its not necessary because lithium ion already charges 10-70% in 15 mins. LFP already does that and they have ~4000+ charge cycles. When used in space, you can use it on space stations/mars/moon and have them last 100+ years.

>> No.15204957

>>15204933
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion_thruster

>> No.15204962

>>15204957
>>15204947
that's expulsion of gases through a rocket. it's just fuel. electric cars, boats, planes, etc. dont need to use fuels.

>> No.15204973
File: 16 KB, 441x331, solar wind electric sail 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204973

>>15204962
electric solar wind sails then you homomonkey

>> No.15204981

>>15204973
this is why laser sails are the future

>> No.15204985
File: 51 KB, 602x379, main-qimg-4c05e3ae370ac6bf00b263af1daf635f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204985

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/ludhiana/centre-isro-starts-process-for-launching-space-tourism-479890

I did not expect this. India is going to send paying tourists to orbit before Blue Origin.

>> No.15204987

>>15204973
That relies upon the sun's exhaust particles. >>15204933
Chemical energy in batteries is converted into mechanical energy via electric motors. Mechanicsl energy moves the wheels which when contact with the medium like road (or water in electric boats), allow the vehicle to move forward. So friction play a role here. Friction is electromagnetic charges between two opposing forces. In space, there's no "opposite" force to push against, thus electric motor by themselves cant generate force needed to propel space fracts, which is why we throw mass particles in form of chemical rockets to create that negating force.

>> No.15204993
File: 513 KB, 1170x2159, 7B90619D-FA8C-4AD2-899B-887C48F42363.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204993

>>15204985
Good morning!

>> No.15204995

>>15204987
we just havent invented the tech to push against space fluctuations yet

>> No.15204998
File: 97 KB, 1066x793, Ariane 3 rocket 1st launch 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15204998

stage it

>> No.15205017
File: 34 KB, 640x640, xlarge_Mike_McCulloch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15205017

>>15204995
o rly

>> No.15205020

Staging

>>15205019
>>15205019

>> No.15205021

>>15205017
He’s too busy licking russian boots to do anything

>> No.15205027

>>15204492
>150 tonnes
>"super heavy"

Can't wait until this boomer nomenclature goes away and 150t because a small launcher.

>> No.15205055

>>15204492
spin launch

>> No.15205093

>>15204847
Everything besides superchargers was already open

>> No.15205120

>>15204889
Made me lol out loud

>> No.15205124

>>15204311
>>15204369
No, he can't. The Big Bang wasn't disproved, but Lambda-CDM is looking shaky because galaxy formation shouldn't happen as early as these high redshift galaxies are indicating, so something is wrong with the models.

>> No.15205194

>>15205124
Maybe the universe is just older than thought

>> No.15205201

>>15205194
Probably not, but who knows? The right solution is probably the one that explains all current observations with the fewest new parameters and assumptions.